Search

Aim There is limited knowledge in the field of glandular vulvar malignancies. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence and survival of women with glandular vulvar malignancies. Methods We searched PALGA, a nation-wide database registering all histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands, for all cases of glandular vulvar malignancies between 2000 and 2015. Additional data were retrieved via the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Incidence rates were calculated per 1,000,000 women per year. Five-year net survival rates were calculated. Results We identified 197 patients with a glandular vulvar malignancy. Of these patients 55% had a primary malignancy while 45% had secondary malignancies: expansion of another tumour in 17% and metastases or recurrences of another malignancy in 28%. There is a great variety of different diagnoses of primary vulvar malignancies: 11 different types were identified. We found an overall incidence rate of glandular vulvar malignancies of 0.9–2.5 per 1,000,000 women per year. Five-year net survival for patients with a primary malignancy was 68.5%. Most of the secondary vulvar malignancies originated from (ano-)rectal malignancies. Conclusion Glandular vulvar malignancies are extremely rare and primary tumours are slightly more common. Overall survival of patients with primary glandular vulvar malignancies is comparable to patients with a vulvar squamous cell carcinoma, with five-year survival around 70%. The great variety in diagnoses combined with the low incidence should lead to routine pathologic revision and treatment in specialised gynaecologic oncology centres. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To assess the compliance of HSIL patients to the national Dutch routine follow-up protocol in the first 2 years after LLETZ and to determine if based on the status of excision margins, follow-up intervals could be modified. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed in patients, referred because of an abnormal Pap smear between 1996 and 2004 and treated for HSIL with LLETZ. The Dutch national routine follow-up protocol orders a Pap smear after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Follow-up results were completed by using PALGA, the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands. To assess compliance to the follow-up protocol, adequate follow-up was defined as three cervical smears taken after 6 (+/−3), 12 (+/−3) and 24 (+/−3) months, respectively. Results: Compliance to the first 2 years follow-up protocol declined from 86.2% to 64.8% to 51.2% for first, second and third follow-up cervical smears, respectively. Patients with involved excision margins had a three times higher overall risk of developing a subsequent HSIL after LLETZ as compared to patients with free excision margins (HR: 3.2, 95% CI=1.3–7.9, p =0.01). Risk for diagnosing HSIL during the first 12 months of follow-up for patients with free excision margins was only 1%. Conclusions: Compliance to the Dutch national routine follow-up protocol in HSIL patients after LLETZ is only moderate. For HSIL patients with free excision margins after LLETZ the first cytological follow-up interval can safely be increased to 12 months. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]