Search

Charles Breder, a pioneering researcher of blind Mexican cavefish was the first to note extreme variation in the facial skeleton of this intriguing subterranean-dwelling organism. Using a system of polar coordinate plots, he identified substantial dysmorphic changes affecting bones of the orbital skeleton. A complication of his landmark publication from 1944 was an error in the number of orbital bones depicted for this species. Intriguingly, however, he proposed an unknown "organizing force" likely influences final bone position and associated dysmorphia. At the time this was merely hypothetical. Roughly eight decades since its publication, however, insights into sensory influences on facial bone development may explain dysmorphia and variation in bone numbers for Astyanax cavefish. A morphological association between mechano-sensory neuromasts of the lateral line and dermal bones of the facial skeleton had been appreciated in the classical literature, but the polarity of this interaction has long remained unclear. Here, we propose that sensory-skeletal integration between sensory neuromasts and bones explain the incomplete numbers of bones, and dysmorphic features such as fusion between neighboring elements. We propose that in closely-related surface fish (and most teleost fish) this developmental coupling enables the sensory and skeletal systems to become integrated into a functional unit over the course of life history. In this opinion article, we discuss the relevance of this (poorly understood) phenomenon as a potential evolutionary source of variation in the facial bone structures of taxa across deep geologic time. We provide three potential explanations for the error in Breder's drawings, that may be explained by natural developmental variation documented in other related species. Moreover, we argue that the natural variation in this "evolutionary" model system is useful for explaining diverse cranial features by uniting aberrations occurring during embryogenesis with long-term adult dysmorphia. [Display omitted] • Charles Breder represented Astyanax as having too few orbital bones. • Breder proposed an "unknown organizing force" governed development of these bones. • This "force" is likely the osteogenic capacity of sensory neuromasts. • Sensory neuromasts likely induce bone to prefigure their functional role. • Variations on sensory-skeletal integration explain aberrations in cavefish. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Developmental patterning is a complex biological phenomenon, involving integrated cellular and molecular signaling across diverse tissues. In Astyanax cavefish, the lateral line sensory system is dramatically expanded in a region of the cranium marked by significant bone abnormalities. This system provides the opportunity to understand how facial bone patterning can become altered through sensory system changes. Here we investigate a classic postulation that mechanosensory receptor neuromasts seed intramembranous facial bones in aquatic vertebrates. Using an in vivo staining procedure across individual life history, we observed infraorbital canal neuromasts serving as sites of ossification for suborbital bones. The manner in which cavefish departed from the stereotypical and symmetrical canal neuromast patterns of closely-related surface-dwelling fish were associated with specific changes to the suborbital bone complex. For instance, bony fusion, rarely observed in surface fish, was associated with shorter distances between canal neuromasts in cavefish, suggesting that closer canal neuromasts result in bony fusions. Additionally, cavefish lacking the sixth suborbital bone (SO6) uniformly lacked the associated (sixth) canal neuromast. This study suggests that patterning of canal neuromasts may impact spatial position of suborbital bones across development. The absence of an eye and subsequent orbital collapse in cavefish appears to influence positional information normally inherent to the infraorbital canal. These alterations result in coordinated changes to adult neuromast and bone structures. This work highlights complex interactions between visual, sensory and bony tissues during development that explain certain abnormal craniofacial features in cavefish. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]