Search

Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have new indications for treatment in gynecologic malignancies. These targeted drugs have both unique and overlapping toxicities, which require careful attention and management. New combination therapies with immune-oncology agents have demonstrated promise in endometrial cancer. This review examines common adverse events associated with TKIs and provides readers with an evidence-based review on current uses and strategies for the management of these medications. A comprehensive review of the medical literature on TKI use in gynecologic cancer was undertaken by a committee approach. Details of each drug, its molecular target, and relevant data on both clinical efficacy and side effects were compiled and organized for clinical use. Information on drug-related secondary effects and management strategies for specific toxicities, including dose reduction and concomitant medications, were gathered. TKIs can potentially offer improved response rates and durable responses for a group of patients who were previously without an effective standard second-line therapy. The combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab represents a more targeted approach to the drivers of endometrial cancer; however, there remains significant drug-related toxicity, and thus dose reduction and dose delay are frequently required. Toxicity management requires frequent check-ins and management strategies to help patients find the highest tolerable dose. TKIs are expensive and patient financial toxicity is as critical a measure of a drug's utility as any drug side effect. Many of these drugs have patient assistance programs, which should be fully utilized to minimize cost. Future studies are needed to expand the role of TKIs into new molecularly driven groups. Attention to cost, durability of response, and long-term toxicity management is needed to ensure all eligible patients have access to treatment. • Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are increasingly used as single agents or combined with immunotherapy in gynecologic cancers. • Recognition and appropriate management of their unique toxicities is crucial. • Special considerations for use of TKIs in gynecologic malignancies are reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine whether Black race is associated with treatment and survival among women with low-risk endometrial cancer. Black and White women with Stage IA grade 1–2 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma diagnosed from 2010 to 2016 in the SEER 18 dataset were identified (n = 23,431), and clinical and socioeconomic attributes obtained. Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and relative survival (RS) were calculated using SEER*Stat 8.3.9. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine predictors of overall survival (OS) and CSS. There was a significantly higher proportion of Black women who did not have surgery compared to White women (3% vs 1%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Residing in the South, being insured with Medicaid, and residing in a county with low median income were also associated with non-receipt of surgery. Black women remained less likely to undergo hysterectomy on multivariable analysis (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32–0.60). Non-receipt of hysterectomy was predictive of decreased CSS (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.09–0.21) and OS (HR 0.18, 95% 0.14–0.23) on adjusted analysis. Black race was also an independent predictor of increased cancer-specific death (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.50–2.86) as well as death from any cause (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.44–2.09) on adjusted analysis. Black women with low-risk endometrial cancer were less likely to undergo hysterectomy and experienced decreased survival relative to White women. Further investigation is warranted to better understand the socioeconomic, geographic, and biologic factors that influence this disparity. • Black race, low socioeconomic status, and residing in the South were associated with non-receipt of cancer-directed surgery. • Five-year cancer-specific and relative survival were lower for Black women compared to White women. • Black race and receipt of hysterectomy were independent predictors of decreased cancer-specific and overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Endometrial cancer due to loss of mismatch repair proteins may be caused by epigenetic or genetic factors. Complete profiling is not routinely performed in clinical practice. We sought to explore outcomes of women with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) due to epigenetic MLH-1 promoter hypermethylation (MMRd-MLH). We hypothesize that MMRd-MLH correlates with worse clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer. Methods: Under an IRB protocol, we retrospectively identified patients with endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma undergoing hysterectomy at our institution from 2016-2020. These patients underwent routine immunohistochemical testing for MMRd, with subsequent genetic testing or methylation studies for loss of MMR proteins. We examined patient data in three cohorts: MMR proficient (MMRp), MMRd-MLH, and MMRd deficiency due to germline mutation (MMRd-G). We excluded patients who did not undergo MMR testing and those who were MMR deficient due to other causes. We examined clinical data via univariate and multivariate tests and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Results: We identified 327 patients who met the criteria for review. The majority (243, 74%) were MMRp, 74 (23%) were MMRd-MLH, and ten (3%) were MMRd-G. On univariate analysis, we observed no differences in the history of post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy, family history of cancer, personal history of hypertension or diabetes mellitus, or body mass index. We found that when compared to the other two groups, MMRd-MLH patients were more like to have grade 2-3 tumors (p < 0.01) and LVSI (p < 0.001). We identified statistically significant associations between age at surgery (60, 67, and 60 years, respectively) and depth of invasion (0.41cm, 0.67cm, and 0.18cm). We did not observe significant differences in the stage. We identified that MMRd-MLH was associated with pathologic high-intermediate risk factors leading to increased adjuvant therapy in stage I disease (p=0.04). We observed a 4.1% recurrence rate in MMRp compared to 8.1% in the MMRd-MLH group compared to no recurrences in MMRd-G (p = NS). When comparing MMRp and MMRd-MLH in Kaplan-Meier analyses, we observed a statistical difference in disease-free survival favoring those who were MMRp (p = 0.02). Median survival was not reached. There were no significant differences in overall survival between MMRp and MMRd-MLH. We did not identify independent prognostic factors for recurrence when controlling for age, stage, grade, or MMR status. [Display omitted] Conclusions: MMRd-MLH is associated with LVSI, higher grade, deeper tumor invasion, and a significantly higher rate of adjuvant therapy. We observed patients with MMRd-MLH were more likely to recur despite adjuvant therapy. MMRd-MLH may represent a poor prognostic factor and a target for further adjuvant therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Surveillance follow-up for women with vaginal and vulvar cancer, extrapolated by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), includes a physical exam every 3-6 months during the first two years, followed by every 6-12 months for three to five years after treatment. For VAIN, general recommendations for follow-up suggest a physical exam every six months for the first two years and yearly after. For VIN, physical exams every six months for the first five years are recommended. Little is known regarding rates of retention for follow-up in these rare cancers and dysplasia. We sought to explore post-treatment retention for patients with vaginal and vulvar cancer and dysplasia at our institution. Methods: After IRB approval, we retrospectively identified patients treated for vaginal and/or vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia or carcinoma between 2011-2016. Baseline demographic, pathologic, treatment, surveillance, and recurrence data were collected. We examined the continuous and total retention of post-treatment surveillance visits for patients diagnosed with cancer VIN, VAIN, or concomitant VIN and VAIN. Continuous retention was defined as sequential visits no longer than one year apart. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: We identified 40 patients who met the criteria for review. The median age of treatment was 60 years old. Most patients were White (75%), followed by Asian (10%), Black (5%), other (8%), and American Indian (3%). The most common diagnoses were VIN III (25%), VAIN III (22%), and squamous cell carcinoma (22%). Most were treated with wide local excision (42.5%), followed by radical surgery (30%), and laser surgery (15%). The median times for total and continuous post-treatment retention were 27.5 and 21 months, respectively. The median number of visits and pap smears in the first post-treatment year were 2 and 1, respectively. The median number of visits and pap smears in the second post-treatment year were 1 and 1, respectively. Only 29% of patients continued with surveillance in the third post-treatment year. Recurrence was noted in ten patients (25%) with a median time of recurrence of 29 months with a range of 1-69 months. The most common primary diagnoses associated with recurrence were VIN III (40%), VAIN III (20%), VIN II (20%), and squamous cell carcinoma (20%). Conclusions: This is the first baseline assessment of post-treatment surveillance retention for VAIN, VIN, or vulvovaginal carcinoma. We observed that our population generally adheres to NCCN surveillance guidelines during the first year; however, the adherence drops in the following years with a median continuous retention rate of less than two years. Further work is needed to enhance post-treatment surveillance and identify barriers to follow-up for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]