Search

• Hippocampal TNFα has no impact on memory encoding or formation. • Hippocampal TNFα blocks the retrieval of contextual fear and spatial memories. • Hippocampal TNFα blocks the reconsolidation of contextual fear and spatial memories. • TNFα blocks hippocampal c-fos induction activated by memory retrieval. • TNFα facilitates the retrieval-induced erasure of hippocampus-dependent memory. Neural inflammation is associated with cognitive decline, especially learning and memory. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) is a major cytokine generated during neuroinflammation. Previous studies indicated that TNFα impairs hippocampus-dependent memory including contextual fear and spatial memories. However, it is unknown which memory processes are impaired by TNFα. Here, we show that TNFα blocked the retrieval and reconsolidation of contextual fear and spatial memories. Micro-infusion of TNFα into the dorsal hippocampus at 6–18 h before retrieval impaired the retrieval of contextual fear memory, although micro-infusion before contextual fear conditioning had no effect on memory formation. Interestingly, hippocampal TNFα micro-infusion before memory retrieval decreased freezing responses, even at 24 h after retrieval, suggesting that TNFα impairs the reconsolidation of contextual fear memory. Similarly, hippocampal TNFα micro-infusion impaired the retrieval and reconsolidation of spatial memory in the Morris water maze. Consistent with these observations, hippocampal TNFα micro-infusion before retrieval blocked the induction of c-fos expression in the hippocampus, which is a marker of neural activation, in response to the retrieval of contextual fear memory. Collectively, our findings indicate that TNFα negatively regulates the retrieval and reconsolidation of hippocampus-dependent memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The reminder of a previously-learned memory can render that memory vulnerable to disruption or change in expression. Such memory alterations have been viewed as supportive of the framework of memory reconsolidation. However, alternative interpretations and inconsistencies in the replication of fundamental findings have raised questions particularly in the domain of human declarative memory. Here we present a series of related experiments, all of which involve the learning of a declarative memory, followed 1–2 days later by memory reminder. Post-reminder learning of interfering material did result in modulation of subsequent recall at test, but the precise manifestation of that interference effect differed across experiments. With post-reminder performance of a visuospatial task, a quantitative impairment in test recall performance was observed within a visual list-learning paradigm, but not in a foreign vocabulary learning paradigm. These results support the existence of reminder-induced memory processes that can lead to the alteration of subsequent memory performance by interfering tasks. However, it remains unclear whether these effects are reflective of modulation or impairment of the putative memory reconsolidation process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although priming mental representations of attachment security reduces arousal, research has not examined the effect of attachment on the retrieval of emotionally arousing memories. This study investigated the effect of priming attachment security on the retrieval of emotional memories. Seventy-five participants viewed negative and neutral images, and two days later received either an attachment prime or a control prime immediately prior to free recall of the images. Two days later, participants reported how frequently they experienced intrusions of the negative images. The attachment group had less distress, and reported fewer subsequent intrusions than the control group. Attachment style moderated these effects such that individuals with an avoidant attachment style were not impacted by the attachment prime. These findings suggest that priming attachment security decreases distress during memory reactivation, and this may reduce subsequent intrusive memories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, it has become clear that retrieval (i.e., reactivation) of consolidated memories may return these memories into a labile state before they are restored into long-term memory (‘reconsolidation’). Using behavioral manipulations, reactivated memories can be disrupted via the mechanism of novel learning. In the present study, we investigated whether changing a strong memory during reconsolidation depends on the strength of novel learning. To test this, participants ( N = 144) in six groups acquired a relatively strong memory on Day 1 by viewing and recalling a series of pictures three times. On Day 8, these pictures were reactivated in three groups, and they were not reactivated in the other three groups. Then, participants viewed and recalled new pictures once (weak new learning) or three times (strong new learning), or they did not learn any new pictures. On Day 9, participants performed a recognition test in which their memory for Day 1 pictures was assessed. Two main results are noted. First, the groups that reactivated pictures from Day 1 and received weak or strong new learning did not differ in memory performance. Second, these two groups consistently performed similar to groups that controlled for new learning without reactivation. Because these results contradict what was expected based on the reconsolidation hypothesis, we discuss possible explanations and implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is currently well established that the synthesis of new proteins (mRNA translation) is required for long-lasting synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Translation in the brain is regulated primarily at the initiation stage by general as well as by gene-specific mechanisms. Stored memories can become sensitive to interference upon reactivation, through a process termed reconsolidation, which depends on protein synthesis. Here, I examine the role of translation control mechanisms, focusing particularly on the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), in reconsolidation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Behavioral neuroscience has greatly informed how we understand the formation, persistence, and plasticity of memory. Research has demonstrated that memory reactivation can induce a labile period, during which previously consolidated memories are sensitive to change, and in need of restabilization. This process is known as reconsolidation. Such findings have advanced not only our basic understanding of memory processes, but also hint at the prospect of harnessing these insights for the development of a new generation of treatments for disorders of emotional memory. However, even in simple experimental models, the conditions for inducing memory reconsolidation are complex: memory labilization appears to result from the interplay of learning history, reactivation, and also individual differences, posing difficulties for the translation of basic experimental research into effective clinical interventions. In this paper, we review a selection of influential animal and human research on memory reconsolidation to illustrate key insights these studies afford. We then consider how these findings can inform the development of new treatment approaches, with a particular focus on the transition of memory from reactivation, to reconsolidation, to new memory formation, as well as highlighting possible limitations of experimental models. If the challenges of translational research can be overcome, and if reconsolidation-based procedures become a viable treatment option, then they would be one of the first mental health treatments to be directly derived from basic neuroscience research. This would surely be a triumph for the scientific study of mind and brain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long-term memories can undergo destabilization/restabilization processes, collectively called reconsolidation. However, the parameters that trigger memory reconsolidation are poorly understood and are a matter of intense investigation. Particularly, memory retrieval is widely held as requisite to initiate reconsolidation. This assumption makes sense since only relevant cues will induce reconsolidation of a specific memory. However, recent studies show that pharmacological inhibition of retrieval does not avoid memory from undergoing reconsolidation, indicating that memory reconsolidation occurs through a process that can be dissociated from retrieval. We propose that retrieval is not a unitary process but has two dissociable components; one leading to the expression of memory and the other to reconsolidation, referred herein as executer and integrator respectively. The executer would lead to the behavioral expression of the memory. This component would be the one disrupted on the studies that show reconsolidation independence from retrieval. The integrator would deal with reconsolidation. This component of retrieval would lead to long-term memory destabilization when specific conditions are met. We think that an important number of reports are consistent with the hypothesis that reconsolidation is only initiated when updating information is acquired. We suggest that the integrator would initiate reconsolidation to integrate updating information into long-term memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The reconsolidation process is the mechanism by which strength and/or content of consolidated memories are updated. Prediction error (PE) is the difference between the prediction made and current events. It is proposed as a necessary condition to trigger the reconsolidation process. Here we analyzed deeply the role of the PE in the associative memory reconsolidation in the crab Neohelice granulata . An incongruence between the learned temporal relationship between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli (CS-US) was enough to trigger the reconsolidation process. Moreover, after a partial reinforced training, a PE of 50% opened the possibility to labilize the consolidated memory with a reminder which included or not the US. Further, during an extinction training a small PE in the first interval between CSs was enough to trigger reconsolidation. Overall, we highlighted the relation between training history and different reactivation possibilities to recruit the process responsible of memory updating. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Persistence is an attribute of long-term memories (LTM) that has recently caught researcher’s attention in search for mechanisms triggered by experience that assure memory perdurability. Up-to-date, scarce evidence of relationship between reconsolidation and persistence has been described. Here, we characterized hippocampal ERK participation in LTM reconsolidation and persistence using an inhibitory avoidance task (IA) at different time points. Intra-dorsal-hippocampal (dHIP) administration of an ERK inhibitor (PD098059, PD, 1.0 μg/hippocampus) 3 h after retrieval did not affect reconsolidation of a strong IA, when tested 24 h apart. However, the same manipulation impaired performance when animals were tested at 7 d, regardless of the training’s strength; and being specific to memory reactivation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing that persistence might be triggered after memory reactivation involving an ERK/MAPK-dependent process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) has a pivotal role in different cognitive functions such as learning and memory. Recent evidence confirm the involvement of the hippocampal CB1 receptors in the modulation of both memory extinction and reconsolidation processes in different brain areas, but few studies focused on the infralimbic cortex, another important cognitive area. Here, we infused the cannabinoid agonist CP55,940 either into the infralimbic cortex (IL) or the CA1 area of the dorsal hippocampus (HPC) of adult male Wistar rats immediately after a short (3 min) reactivation session, known to labilize a previously consolidated memory trace in order to allow its reconsolidation with some modification. In both structures, the treatment was able to disrupt reconsolidation in a relatively long lasting way, reducing the freezing response. To our notice, this is the first demonstration of ECS involvement in reconsolidation in the Infralimbic Cortex. Despite poorly discriminative between CB1 and CB2 receptors, CP55,940 is a potent agent, and these results suggest that a similar CB1-dependent circuitry is at work both in HPC and in the IL during memory reconsolidation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The immune system is an important modulator of learning, memory and neural plasticity. Interleukin 1β (IL-1β), a pro-inflammatory cytokine, significantly affects several cognitive processes. Previous studies by our group have demonstrated that intrahippocampal administration of IL-1β impairs reconsolidation of contextual fear memory. This effect was reversed by the melanocortin alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH). The mechanisms underlying the effect of IL-1β on memory reconsolidation have not yet been established. Therefore, we examined the effect of IL-1β on glutamate release, ERK phosphorylation and the activation of the transcription factor zinc finger- 268 (zif268) during reconsolidation. Our results demonstrated that IL-1β induced a significant decrease of glutamate release after reactivation of the fear memory and this effect was related to calcium concentration in hippocampal synaptosomes. IL-1β also reduced ERK phosphorylation and zif268 expression in the hippocampus. Central administration of α-MSH prevented the decrease in glutamate release, ERK phosphorylation and zif268 expression induced by IL-1β. Our results establish possible mechanisms involved in the detrimental effect of IL-1β on memory reconsolidation and also indicate that α-MSH may exert a beneficial modulatory role in preventing IL-1β effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Retrieval enhances long-term retention. However, reactivation of a memory also renders it susceptible to modifications as shown by studies on memory reconsolidation. The present study explored whether retrieval diminishes or enhances subsequent retroactive interference (RI) and intrusions. Participants learned a list of objects. Two days later, they were either asked to recall the objects, given a subtle reminder, or were not reminded of the first learning session. Then, participants learned a second list of objects or performed a distractor task. After another two days, retention of List 1 was tested. Although retrieval enhanced List 1 memory, learning a second list impaired memory in all conditions. This shows that testing did not protect memory from RI. While a subtle reminder before List 2 learning caused List 2 items to later intrude into List 1 recall, very few such intrusions were observed in the testing and the no reminder conditions. The findings are discussed in reference to the reconsolidation account and the testing effect literature, and implications for educational practice are outlined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] Learning interference leads to memory impairment. [•] Intra-hippocampal administration of choline modulates memory reconsolidation. [•] Choline reverses learning interference by enhancing memory reconsolidation. [•] Learning interference cause memory expression deficit, but not storage impairment. [•] Reconsolidation could modify the ability of a memory for being expressed later. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Highlights: [•] Animals were trained in hippocampal-dependent trace fear conditioning. [•] Arc expression was quantified in the ventral hippocampus after testing 24h later. [•] Memory recall enhances Arc expression and is blocked by pre-training administration of APV. [•] Administration of Arc antisense ODNs prior to testing does not impair expression of trace fear conditioning. [•] Administration of Arc antisense ODNs prior to testing blocks recall-induced Arc expression and memory reconsolidation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Highlights: [•] Spermidine improved memory reconsolidation. [•] Arcaine impaired memory reconsolidation. [•] Spermidine and arcaine are specific for reconsolidation of conditioned fear. [•] Involvement of NMDA receptor in the effect of polyamines on reconsolidation. [•] Effect of arcaine on reconsolidation was not caused by state dependence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: It is widely known that pre-training systemic administration of the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (SCP) (0.5mg/kg, i.p.) leads to anterograde memory impairment in retention tests. The administration of the α7-nicotinic receptor agonist choline (Ch) in the dorsal hippocampus (0.8μg/hippocampus) immediately after memory reactivation allowed recovery from scopolamine-induced memory impairment. This effect of Ch was time-dependent, and retention performance was not affected in drug-treated mice that were not subjected to memory reactivation, suggesting that the performance effects are not due to non-specific effects of the drug. The effects of Ch also depended on the age of the reactivated memory. Altogether, our results suggest that Ch exerts its effects by modulating memory reconsolidation, and that the memory impairment induced by low doses of SCP is a memory expression failure and not a storage deficit. Therefore, reconsolidation, among other functions, might serve to change memory expression in later tests. Summarizing, our results open new avenues about the behavioral significance and the physiological functions of memory reconsolidation, providing new strategies for recovering memories from some types of amnesia. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Two hypotheses were tested in this study. First, blockade of neural activity by lidocaine immediately following the retrieval of a memory may impair the reconsolidation and subsequent expression of that memory. Second, a non-retrieved memory would not be affected by this lidocaine treatment. Since the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) is involved in emotion-related memory, an intra-BLA lidocaine infusion was used immediately after the retrieval of two emotion-related memories, the step-through passive avoidance response (PA) and cocaine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP). Intra-BLA lidocaine infusion immediately after cocaine-induced CPP retrieval diminished CPP magnitude in retests. However, intra-BLA lidocaine infusion alone did not affect cocaine-induced CPP performance. Intra-BLA lidocaine infusion immediately after PA retrieval decreased PA performance in retests. Omission of PA retrieval procedure, intra-BLA lidocaine infusion did not affect subsequent PA performance. Surprisingly, intra-BLA lidocaine infusion immediately following the retrieval of PA or cocaine-induced CPP diminished both PA and cocaine-induced CPP performance in the retests. Finally, Fos-staining results revealed that a number of BLA neurons were activated by the retrieval of both cocaine-induced CPP and PA. We conclude that inactivation of neural activity in BLA immediately following retrieval of a fear or cocaine-conditioned memory can impair subsequent expression of both memories. More importantly, retrieval of a memory does not seem to be an absolute condition for rapidly changing the memory. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are involved in memory formation. The Ca2+ signal derived from stimulation of IP3 receptors (IP3Rs) via mGluRs, initiates protein synthesis that is required for memory consolidation and reconsolidation. However it has been suggested that different mechanisms are triggered by mGluR1/5 activation in these two processes. It is also not clear whether the transient amnesia observed after blockade of group I mGluRs after a reminder, results from disturbance of memory reconsolidation or temporal impairment of recall. The aim of this study was to examine more closely the role of mGluR1 in memory consolidation and reconsolidation and to detect differences in the participation of mGluR1 and mGluR5 in memory retrieval after initial training and after the remainder of the task. Our results demonstrate, that in chicks performing a one-trial passive avoidance task, antagonists of mGluR1, mGluR5 and IP3R significantly disturb memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Inhibition of mGluR5 and IP3R also impairs memory recall, whereas mGluR1 do not seem to participate in this process. The presented data suggest that activation of mGluR1 and mGluR5 is necessary for the correct course of memory consolidation and reconsolidation, whereas mGluR5 are additionally involved in retrieval processes dependent on Ca2+ release from IP3 activated intracellular stores. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The retrieval of consolidated fear memory causes it to be labile or deconsolidated, and the deconsolidated fear memory is reconsolidated over time in a protein synthesis-dependent manner. We have recently developed an ex vivo model where during fear memory deconsolidation and reconsolidation the synaptic state can be monitored at thalamic input synapses onto the lateral amygdala (T-LA synapses), a storage site for auditory fear memory. In this ex vivo model, the deconsolidation and reconsolidation processes of auditory fear memory in the intact brain were prevented following brain slicing; therefore, we could monitor the synaptic state for memory deconsolidation and reconsolidation at the time of brain slicing. However, why the synaptic reconsolidation process stopped after brain slicing in the ex vivo model is not known. One possibility is that brain slicing severs neuromodulatory innervations, which are required for memory reconsolidation, from other brain regions (e.g., noradrenergic innervation). In the present study, we supplemented amygdala slices with exogenous norepinephrine as a substitute for the severed noradrenergic innervations. DHPG (a group I metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist)-induced depotentiation (mGluRI-depotentiation), a marker for consolidated synapses, was observed following norepinephrine application to slices prepared immediately after tone presentation (fear memory retrieval) to rats that had been pre-conditioned to a tone paired with a shock. These results suggest that noradrenergic activation initiates synaptic reconsolidation. In contrast, mGluRI-depotentiation was absent following norepinephrine application to slices that were prepared immediately after the tone presentation (no fear memory retrieval) to rats when a tone and a shock were unpaired, ruling out the possibility that noradrenergic activation somehow facilitates a subsequent synaptic depression induced by DHPG irrespective of synaptic reconsolidation. Furthermore, the restored mGluRI-depotentiation following application of exogenous norepinephrine was dependent on de novo protein synthesis, as is memory reconsolidation. Thus, our findings suggest that T-LA synapses from acute slice preparations can undergo a reconsolidation process, thereby providing an optimal preparation to study a fear memory reconsolidation process in vitro. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Stress enhances memory consolidation, in particular for emotional material. When reactivated, consolidated memories return to a fragile state again and thus require another period of stabilization, called reconsolidation. Rodent studies suggest that memory reconsolidation is impaired by stress. Here we examined in healthy humans the effect of stress on the reconsolidation of autobiographical memories. Participants recalled positive, negative and neutral episodes from their recent past and were afterwards exposed to a stressor (socially evaluated cold pressor test) or a non-arousing control condition. Additional groups of participants were exposed to the stressor without prior memory reactivation or were neither stressed nor asked to recall episodes from their past. Stress after memory reactivation impaired the memory for the neutral episodes 1week later whereas the subsequent memory for the emotional episodes was not affected by stress after reactivation. Reactivation per se or stress without prior memory reactivation had no effect on memory performance. These findings suggest that the effect of stress on memory reconsolidation is opposite to the stress effect on memory consolidation supporting the view that consolidation and reconsolidation are distinct processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The dynamic re-arrangement of actin filaments is an essential process in the plasticity of synaptic connections during memory formation. In this study, we determined in mice effects of actin filament arrest in the basolateral complex of the amygdala (BLA) at different time points after memory acquisition and re-activation, using the fungal cytotoxin phalloidin. Our data show a selective disruption of auditory cued but not contextual fear memory, when phalloidin was injected 6h after conditioning. In contrast, no effect was observed when phalloidin was applied after 24h, ruling out an interference with the retrieval or expression of conditioned fear. A comparable result was obtained after memory re-activation, hence suggesting similar actin-dependent mechanisms to be active during consolidation and reconsolidation of auditory fear memory. Biochemical analysis showed that phalloidin-mediated filament arrest leads to a transient increase of highly cross-linked actin filaments in the BLA, evident 2h after injection. Together, these observations indicate that dynamic re-arrangements of actin filaments in the BLA during a late phase of fear memory consolidation and reconsolidation are critical for fear memory storage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Memory persistence is a dynamic process involving the reconsolidation of memories after their reactivation. Reconsolidation impairments have been demonstrated for many types of memories in rats, and signaling at N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors appears often to be a critical pharmacological mechanism. Here we investigated the reconsolidation of appetitive pavlovian memories reinforced by natural rewards. In male Lister Hooded rats, systemic administration of the NMDA receptor antagonist (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-SH-dibenzo{a,d}cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate (MK-801, 0.1mg/kg i.p.) either before or immediately following a brief memory reactivation session abolished the subsequent acquisition of a new instrumental response with sucrose conditioned reinforcement. However, only when injected prior to memory reactivation was MK-801 effective in disrupting the maintenance of a previously-acquired instrumental response with conditioned reinforcement. These results demonstrate that NMDA receptor-mediated signaling is required for appetitive pavlovian memory reconsolidation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Despite the fact that extensive evidence supports the view that phases of de novo protein synthesis are necessary for memory formation and maintenance, doubts are still raised. Skeptics generally argue that amnesia and the disruption of long-term synaptic plasticity are caused by “non-specific effects” of the reagents or approaches used to disrupt protein synthesis. This paper attempts to clarify some of these issues by reviewing, discussing and providing results addressing some of the major critiques that argue against the idea that de novo protein synthesis is necessary for the stabilization of long-term memory. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Learning in a contextual fear conditioning task involves forming a context representation and associating it with a shock. The dorsal hippocampus (DH) is implicated in representing the context, but whether it also has a role in associating the context and shock is unclear. To address this issue, male Wistar rats were trained on the task by a two-phase training paradigm, in which rats learned the context representation on day 1 and then reactivated it to associate with the shock on day 2; conditioned freezing was tested on day 3. Lidocaine was infused into the DH at various times in each of the two training sessions. Results showed that intra-DH infusion of lidocaine shortly before or after the context training session on day 1 impaired conditioned freezing, attesting to the DH involvement in context representation. Intra-DH infusion of lidocaine shortly before or after the shock training session on day 2 also impaired conditioned freezing. This deficit was reproduced by infusing lidocaine or APV (α-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid) into the DH after activation of the context memory but before shock administration. The deficit was not due to drug-induced state-dependency, decreased shock sensitivity or reconsolidation failure of the contextual memory. These results suggest that in contextual fear conditioning integrity of the DH is required for memory processing of not only context representation but also context–shock association. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Recent studies have shown that consolidated fear memories, when reactivated, return to a labile state that requires a new protein synthesis for reconsolidation. Post-retrieval infusion of an inhibitor of protein synthesis blocks memory reconsolidation processes. In a previous research, the role of MAPKs in memory consolidation has been shown in emotional tasks, such as passive and active avoidance. In particular, mice knockout for ERK1 had a better performance in comparison to wild type mice in both passive and active avoidance tasks. In the present study, in order to investigate the involvement of MAPKs in memory reconsolidation processes we administered immediately after retrieval, different doses of SL327 (an inhibitor of MEK, a kinase that activates both ERK1 and ERK2) both in C57BL/6 (C57) mice and ERK1 mutant mice tested in a fear conditioning task. Systemic administration of SL327 dose-dependently reduced the memory reconsolidation of fear memories in C57 mice. Moreover, SL327 administration impaired memory reconsolidation also in ERK1 mutant mice. Altogether, these results clearly indicate a central role for ERK2 protein in memory reconsolidation processes in mice. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Over the years, experimental and clinical evidence has given support to the idea that acetylcholine (Ach) plays an essential role in mnemonic phenomena. On the other hand, the Hippocampus is already known to have a key role in learning and memory. What is yet unclear is how the Ach receptors may contribute to this brain region role during memory retrieval. The Ach receptors are divided into two broad subtypes: the ionotropic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and the metabotropic muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Back in 2010, we demonstrated for the first time the critical role of hippocampal α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in memory reconsolidation process of an inhibitory avoidance response in mice. In the present work, we further investigate the possible implication of hippocampal muscarinic Ach receptors (mAchRs) in this process using a pharmacological approach. By specifically administrating agonists and antagonists of the different mAchRs subtypes in the hippocampus, we found that M1 and M2 but not M3 subtype may be involved in memory reconsolidation processes in mice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]