Search

Background Rituximab plus bendamustine (R-B) has been demonstrated to improve outcomes and reduce toxicity compared with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in follicular lymphoma (FL). Nevertheless, in clinical practice, many centers still prefer R-CHOP to R-B in patients with FL grade 3A (FL3A). Therefore, we retrospectively assessed patients with FL3A treated with either R-CHOP or R-B in five European cancer centers and compared their outcomes. Materials and Methods We retrospectively assessed 132 patients affected by FL grade 3A treated with either R-B or R-CHOP in the first line and evaluated outcome and toxicity according to the type of treatment. This study included 101 patients who were a subgroup of a previously published cohort. Results R-B was less toxic and achieved a similar percentage of complete remissions compared with R-CHOP (97% vs. 96%, p = .3). During follow-up, 10 (16%) patients relapsed after R-B and 29 (41%) after R-CHOP (p = .001), leading to a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 15 versus 11.7 years, respectively (p = .03). Furthermore, R-B overcame the negative prognostic impact of BCL2 expression (15 vs. 4.8 years; p = .001). However, median overall survival was similar between both groups (not reached for both; p = .8). Conclusion R-B as a first-line treatment of FL3A is better tolerated than R-CHOP and seems to induce more profound responses, leading to a significantly lower relapse rate and prolonged PFS. Therefore, R-B is a valid treatment option for FL grade 3A. Implications for Practice Rituximab plus bendamustine (R-B) has shown to be less toxic and more effective than rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in follicular lymphoma grade 3A. Although both regimens can induce a complete remission in >95% of patients, relapses occur more frequently after R-CHOP than R-B, leading to a significantly longer progression-free survival in the latter. R-B is also able to overcome the impact of negative prognosticators, such as BCL2 expression. However, because of the indolent course of this disease and efficient salvage treatments, overall survival was similar in both treatment groups. Therefore, R-B is a valid treatment option in this patient setting.

Despite the advent of new treatment strategies, many patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse or die of the disease. Prospective clinical trials have demonstrated that lenalidomide is an effective and safe treatment option, especially for non-germinal center B-cell (non-GCB) DLBCL. However, routine clinical data are lacking, which is why we provide the results of the so-far largest relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL real-life analysis.We retrospectively assessed 123 R/R DLBCL patients who received either 15 or 25 mg/day of lenalidomide from January 2006 to January 2015.During a median follow-up period of 4.5 years, complete remission was achieved in 32% and a partial remission in 33% non-GCB patients compared with 0% and 3% in the GCB group (p.001 and .001, respectively), with median response durations of 15 and 5 months, respectively (p.001). Lenalidomide at 25 mg was superior to 15 mg in terms of response (complete remission 21% and partial remission 23% vs. 0% and 8%; p = .007 and .05) and median response duration (10 vs. 4 months; p = .03). Toxicity was limited and reversible. Median progression-free survival differed between non-GCB and GCB patients (37 vs. 30 months; p.001) and between the two dosages (24 vs. 34 months; p = .002). However, overall survival was similar between the subgroups (38-42 months).We provide evidence that lenalidomide is a valid treatment option for R/R DLBCL, with limited and reversible toxicity, and is more efficient in non-GCB DLBCL and at higher doses.Despite the advent of new treatment strategies, many patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse or die of the disease; hence, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. This study confirms that lenalidomide is a valid and well-tolerated treatment option for relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL. Superior outcomes were observed in non-germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL, probably because of inhibition of the nuclear factor-κB pathway. Similarly, high drug doses resulted in greater clinical benefits. Overall, lenalidomide is a suitable therapeutic option for R/R DLBCL, especially in non-GCB DLBCL, and 25 mg/day dosing should be preferred.