Search

OBJECTIVE. In settings with limited assessment tools, we sought to determine whether early clinical signs and symptoms and blood oxygen saturation would predict amoxicillin treatment failure in children with severe pneumonia (as defined by the World Health Organization). METHODS. Data were from a previously reported, multinational trial of orally administered amoxicillin versus injectable penicillin for the treatment of World Health Organization-defined severe pneumonia in children 3 to 59 months of age. We assessed all 857 participants assigned randomly to the experimental amoxicillin arm. Six multivariate logistic regression models were created and evaluated for their ability to predict failure after 48 hours of therapy. Regression models included vital signs, symptoms, and laboratory data collected at baseline and after 12 or 24 hours of observation. Oxygen saturation data were included in 3 models. RESULTS. Clinical treatment failure occurred for 18% of children. Younger age, increased initial respiratory rate, and baseline hypoxia predicted treatment failure in all models. Data available after 24 hours improved the ability to predict failure compared with data available at baseline or 12 hours. The inclusion of oximetry data improved the predictive ability at baseline, 12 hours, and 24 hours. The ability to predict failure after 12 hours of observation with oximetry data was similar to the predictive ability after 24 hours without pulse oximetry data. CONCLUSIONS. Assessment of clinical parameters at presentation and after 24 hours improved the ability to predict clinical failure of oral amoxicillin therapy, compared with assessment at presentation alone or at presentation and after only 12 hours, for children with World Health Organization-defined severe pneumonia. KEY WORDS. amoxicillin, pneumonia, hospitalization, oximetry, child. PEDIATRICS 2006;118:e1822-e1830. URL: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2005-2673, Linda Y. Fu, MD, MSc, Robin Ruthazer, MPH, Ira Wilson, MD, MSc, Archana Patel, MD, DNB, MSCE, LeAnne M. Fox, MD, MPH, Tran Anh Tuan, MD, MSc, Prakash Jeena, MBChB, [...]

OBJECTIVE: New emphasis on and requirements for demonstrating health care quality have increased the need for evidence-based methods to disseminate practice guidelines. With regard to impact on pediatric immunization coverage, we aimed to compare a financial incentive program (pay-for-performance [P4P]] and a virtual quality improvement technical support (QITS) learning collaborative. METHODS: This single-blinded (to outcomes assessor], cluster-randomized trial was conducted among unaffiliated pediatric practices across the United States from June 2013 to June 2014. Practices received either the P4P or QITS intervention. All practices received a Vaccinator Toolkit. P4P practices participated in a tiered financial incentives program for immunization coverage improvement. QITS practices participated in a virtual learning collaborative. Primary outcome was percentage of all needed vaccines received (PANVR]. We also assessed immunization up-to-date (UTD) status. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 3,147 patient records from 32 practices. Practices in the study arms reported similar QI activities (~6 to 7 activities). We found no difference in PANVR between P4P and QITS (mean ± SE, 90.7% ± 1.1% vs 86.1% ± 1.3%, P = 0.46]. Likewise, there was no difference in odds of being UTD between study arms (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.52, P = .93]. In within-group analysis, patients in both arms experienced nonsignificant increases in PANVR. Similarly, the change in adjusted odds of UTD over time was modest and nonsignificant for P4P but reached significance in the QITS arm (adjusted odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.60, P = .O3). CONCLUSIONS: Participation in either a financial incentives program or a virtual learning collaborative led to self-reported improvements in immunization practices but minimal change in objectively measured immunization coverage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Addressing parental/caregivers' coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy is critical to improving vaccine uptake in children. Common concerns have been previously reported through online surveys, but qualitative data from KII and focus groups may add much-needed context. Our objective was to examine factors impacting pediatric COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in Black, Spanish-speaking, and rural white parents/caregivers to inform the content design of a mobile application to improve pediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake., Methods: Parents/caregivers of children aged 2 to 17 years from groups disproportionately affected by COVID-19-related vaccine hesitancy (rural-dwelling persons of any race/ethnicity, urban Black persons, and Spanish-speaking persons) were included on the basis of their self-reported vaccine hesitancy and stratified by race/ethnicity. Those expressing vaccine acceptance or refusal participated in KII, and those expressing hesitancy in focus groups. Deidentified transcripts underwent discourse analysis and thematic analysis, both individually and as a collection. Themes were revised until coders reached consensus., Results: Overall, 36 participants completed the study: 4 vaccine acceptors and 4 refusers via KIIs, and the remaining 28 participated in focus groups. Participants from all focus groups expressed that they would listen to their doctor for information about COVID-19 vaccines. Infertility was a common concern, along with general concerns about vaccines. Vaccine decision-making was informed by the amount of information available to parents/caregivers, including scientific research; possible positive and negative long-term effects; and potential impacts of vaccination on preexisting medical conditions., Conclusions: Parents/caregivers report numerous addressable vaccine concerns. Our results will inform specific, targeted interventions for improving COVID-19 vaccine confidence., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Objective: Immunization quality improvement (QI) interventions are rarely tested as multicomponent interventions within the context of a theoretical framework proven to improve outcomes. Our goal was to study a comprehensive QI program to increase immunization rates for underserved children that relied on recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Task Force on Community Preventive Services and the framework of the Chronic Care Model., Methods: QI activities occurred from September 2007 to May 2008 at 6 health centers serving a low-income, minority population in Washington, DC. Interventions included family reminders, education, expanding immunization access, reminders and feedback for providers, and coordination of activities with community stakeholders. We determined project effectiveness in improving the 4:3:1:3:3:1:3 vaccination series (4 diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines, 3 poliovirus vaccines, 1 measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, 3 Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines, 3 hepatitis B vaccines, 1 varicella vaccine, and three 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines) compliance., Results: We found a 16% increase in immunization rates overall and a 14% increase in on-time immunization by 24 months of age. Improvement was achieved at all 6 health centers and maintained beyond 18 months., Conclusion: We were able to implement a comprehensive immunization QI program that was sustainable over time.