Search

Endocrine treatment regimens for breast cancer that target the estrogen receptor-α (ERα) are effective, but acquired resistance remains a limiting drawback. One mechanism of acquired resistance that has been hypothesized is functional substitution of the orphan receptor estrogen-related receptor-α (ERRα) for ERα. To examine this hypothesis, we analyzed ERRα and ERα in recurrent tamoxifen-resistant breast tumors and conducted a genome-wide target gene profiling analysis of MCF-7 breast cancer cell populations that were sensitive or resistant to tamoxifen treatment. This analysis uncovered a global redirection in the target genes controlled by ERα, ERRα, and their coactivator AIB1, defining a novel set of target genes in tamoxifen-resistant cells. Beyond differences in the ERα and ERRα target gene repertoires, both factors were engaged in similar pathobiologic processes relevant to acquired resistance. Functional analyses confirmed a requirement for ERRα in tamoxifen- and fulvestrant-resistant MCF-7 cells, with pharmacologic inhibition of ERRα sufficient to partly restore sensitivity to antiestrogens. In clinical specimens (n = 1041), increased expression of ERRα was associated with enhanced proliferation and aggressive disease parameters, including increased levels of p53 in ERα-positive cases. In addition, increased ERRα expression was linked to reduced overall survival in independent tamoxifen-treated patient cohorts. Taken together, our results suggest that ERα and ERRα cooperate to promote endocrine resistance, and they provide a rationale for the exploration of ERRα as a candidate drug target to treat endocrine-resistant breast cancer., (©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Drugs that target the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) and/or insulin receptor (IR) are currently under investigation for a variety of malignancies including breast cancer. Although we have previously reported that IGF-IR expression in primary breast tumors is common, the activation status of this receptor has not been examined in relation to survival. Phosphorylated IGF-IR/IR (P-IGF-IR/IR) and its downstream signaling partner phospho-S6 (P-S6) were evaluated immunohistochemically in tumor tissue microarrays representing 438 cases of invasive breast cancer. P-IGF-IR/IR (n = 114; P = 0.046) and total levels of IR (n = 122; P = 0.009) were indicative of poor survival, whereas total IGF-IR (n = 112; P = 0.304) was not. P-IGF-IR/IR and P-S6 were coordinately expressed in primary breast tumors (likelihood ratio, 11.57; P = 6.70 x 10(-4)). Importantly, P-IGF-IR/IR was detected in all breast cancer subtypes (luminal, 48.1%; triple negative, 41.9%; and HER2, 64.3%). In vitro, the IGF-IR/IR inhibitor BMS-536924 decreased phospho-RSK and P-S6, and significantly suppressed the growth of breast cancer cell lines MCF-7, SUM149, and AU565 representing the luminal, triple negative, and HER2 subtypes, respectively, in monolayer and soft agar. BMS-536924 also inhibited growth in tamoxifen resistant MCF-7 Tam-R cells while having little effect on immortalized normal breast epithelial cells. Thus, we can determine which patients have the activated receptor and provide evidence that P-IGF-IR/IR is a prognostic factor for breast cancer. Beyond this, P-IGF-IR/IR could be a predictive marker for response to IGF-IR and/or IR-targeted therapies, as these inhibitors may be of benefit in all breast cancer subtypes including those with acquired resistance to tamoxifen.

Antiestrogen resistance is a major clinical problem in the treatment of breast cancer. Altered growth factor signaling with estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha is associated with the development of resistance. Gene expression profiling was used to identify mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase 3 (MKP3) whose expression was correlated with response to the antiestrogen tamoxifen in both patients and in vitro-derived cell line models. Overexpression of MKP3 rendered ER-alpha-positive breast cancer cells resistant to the growth-inhibitory effects of tamoxifen and enhanced tamoxifen agonist activity in endometrial cells. MKP3 overexpression was associated with lower levels of activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation in the presence of estrogen but that estrogen deprivation and tamoxifen treatment decreased MKP3 phosphatase activity, leading to an up-regulation of pERK1/2 MAPK, phosphorylated Ser(118)-ER-alpha, and cyclin D1. The MAPK/ERK kinase inhibitor PD98059 blocked tamoxifen-resistant growth. Accumulation of reactive oxygen species was observed with tamoxifen treatment of MKP3-overexpressing cells, and antioxidant treatment increased MKP3 phosphatase activity, thereby blocking resistance. Furthermore, PD98059 increased the levels of phosphorylated c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK) in tamoxifen-treated MKP3-overexpressing cells, suggesting an interaction between MKP3 levels, activation of ERK1/2 MAPK, and JNK signaling in human breast cancer cells. MKP3 represents a novel mechanism of resistance, which may be a potential biomarker for the use of ERK1/2 and/or JNK inhibitors in combination with tamoxifen treatment.

An increasing body of evidence demonstrates that growth factor networks are highly interactive with estrogen receptor signaling in the control of breast cancer growth. As such, tumor responses to antiestrogens are likely to be a composite of the estrogen receptor and growth factor-inhibitory activity of these agents, with alterations/aberrations in growth factor signaling providing a mechanism for the development of antiestrogen resistance. In this light, the current article focuses on illustrating the relationship between growth factor signaling and antiestrogen failure in our in-house tumor models of breast cancer and describing how we are now beginning to successfully target growth factor activity to improve the effects of antiestrogen drugs and to block aggressive disease progression.

The factors controlling epithelial proliferation in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are unclear. Antiestrogens are effective in the prevention of the majority of estrogen receptor-positive, but not estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancers, which suggests that other factor(s) are promoting proliferation in ER-negative DCIS. Mutated or overexpressed tyrosine kinases are frequently associated with tumor development. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that is involved with mitogenesis and is expressed in ER-negative DCIS. We hypothesized that EGFR is central in driving proliferation in ER-negative/EGFR-positive DCIS. The purpose of this study was to establish whether the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), ZD1839 (Iressa), can reduce epithelial proliferation and increase apoptosis in EGFR-positive DCIS. Breast tissue from 16 women undergoing surgery for DCIS were implanted into 16-32 immunosuppressed mice/experiment (8 xenografts/mouse). Treatment commenced 2 weeks after implantation and consisted of once daily oral gavage with ZD1839 at doses ranging from 10 to 200 mg/kg for 14-28 days; appropriate controls were present. Xenografts were removed on days 14, 21, 28, and 42 after implantation and then assessed for proliferation (LI) by Ki67 immunostaining and apoptosis index (AI) by morphology. All Ps reported are two-sided. Overall, a 56% reduction in epithelial proliferation was seen with Iressa in EGFR-positive DCIS. EGFR-TK inhibition compared with vehicle controls resulted in a fall in Geometric Mean Labeling Index (LI) after 14 days (day 28) of treatment both in ER-negative/EGFR-positive DCIS [6.5% interquartile range (IQR, 3.8-11.1) versus 13.9% (IQR, 12.0-16.3%); F(1,3) = 103; P = 0.002] and ER-positive/EGFR-positive DCIS [4.6% (IQR, 3.9-5.2%) versus 11.7% (IQR, 9.2-15.5); F(1,2) = 32.3; P = 0.03]. EGFR-TK inhibition had similar effects on the "at risk" normal breast epithelium adjacent to DCIS in the treated epithelium LI day 28 [ZD1839 2.2% (IQR, 1.7-3.3%) compared with control 3.8% (IQR, 2.4-5.4%); F(1,14) = 29.2; P = 0.00009] and in addition increased epithelial apoptotic index at day 21 [ZD1839 0.38 (0.23-0.83) compared with control 0.19 (0.1-0.25); F(1,6) = 12.2; P = 0.013]. The effect on epithelial proliferation was still significant after 28 days of treatment [for both DCIS (F1,29) = 24; P = 0.039 and normal breast F(1,6) = 47.3; P = 0.0005]. EGFR-TK inhibition with ZD1839 offers a novel approach to the treatment of EGFR-positive DCIS, regardless of ER status, and provides a potential new chemopreventative approach in patients at high risk of breast cancer.

In patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease or ER+ hormone-resistant disease, the dominant influence on tumor cell growth is growth factors, e.g., epidermal growth factor (EGF), heregulins, and insulin-like growth factors acting through specific receptor tyrosine kinases at the cell surface. This superfamily of ligand-activated growth factor receptors triggers cascades of biochemical signals that influence tumor cell motility, invasiveness, angiogenesis, and survival, as well as proliferation. In breast tumors, expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and/or erbB2 is associated with poor prognosis; the therapeutic utility of blocking these receptors has been established using trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal antibody that blocks erbB2 signaling. An alternative therapeutic approach is offered by small molecule inhibitors of EGFR-TK, exemplified by ZD1839 (Iressa), a potent and selective EGFR-TK inhibitor. Resistance to tamoxifen is associated with up-regulation of the EGFR-TK pathway and mitogen-activated protein kinase activity is substantially increased in tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 cells. ZD1839 treatment of tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 cells blocks mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. Furthermore, treatment of wild-type MCF-7 cells with tamoxifen and ZD1839 prevents development of tamoxifen resistance. These data support the potential clinical utility of ZD1839 in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer and suggest the possibility of preventing resistance by the early use of combination ZD1839 with antiestrogenic agents such as tamoxifen or ICI 182,780.

7Alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)-nonyl]estra-1,3,5, (10)-triene-3,17beta-diol (ICI 182,780; Faslodex) is a novel steroidal antiestrogen. This partially blind, randomized, multicenter study compared the effects of single doses of long-acting ICI 182,780 with tamoxifen or placebo on estrogen receptor (ERalpha) and progesterone receptor (PgR) content, Ki67 proliferation-associated antigen labeling index (Ki67LI), and the apoptotic index in the primary breast tumors of postmenopausal women. Previously untreated patients (stages T(1)-T(3); ER-positive or -unknown) were randomized and received a single i.m. dose of ICI 182,780 50 mg (n = 39), ICI 182,780 125 mg (n = 38), or ICI 182,780 250 mg (n = 44) or oral tamoxifen 20 mg daily (n = 36) or matching tamoxifen placebo (n = 43) for 14-21 days before tumor resection surgery with curative intent. The ER and PgR H-scores, together with the Ki67LI were determined immunohistochemically in the matched pretreatment biopsy and the posttreatment surgical specimens. The apoptotic index was determined by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling on the same samples. The effects of treatment on each of these parameters were compared using analysis of covariance. ICI 182,780 produced dose-dependent reductions in ER and PgR H-scores and in the Ki67LI. The reductions in ER expression were statistically significant at all doses of ICI 182,780 compared with placebo (ICI 182,780 50 mg, P = 0.026; 125 mg, P = 0.006; 250 mg, P = 0.0001), and for ICI 182,780 250 mg compared with tamoxifen (P = 0.024). For PgR H-score, there were statistically significant reductions after treatment with ICI 182,780 125 mg (P = 0.003) and 250 mg (P = 0.0002) compared with placebo. In contrast, tamoxifen produced a significant increase in the PgR H-score relative to placebo, and consequently, all doses of ICI 182,780 produced PgR values that were significantly lower than those in the tamoxifen-treated group. All doses of ICI 182,780 significantly reduced Ki67LI values compared with placebo (ICI 182,780 50 mg, P = 0.046; 125 mg, P = 0.001; 250 mg, P = 0.0002), but there were no significant differences between any doses of ICI 182,780 and tamoxifen. ICI 182,780 did not alter the apoptotic index when compared with either placebo or tamoxifen. Short-term exposure to ICI 182,780 reduces the ERalpha in breast tumor cells in a dose-dependent manner by down-regulating ER protein concentration. The reductions in tumor PgR content by ICI 182,780 demonstrate that ICI 182,780, unlike tamoxifen, is devoid of estrogen-agonist activity. Reductions in tumor cell proliferative activity (as indicated by Ki67LI) show that ICI 182,780 is likely to have antitumor activity in the clinical setting.

The expression of the activated mitogen-activated kinases/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) ERK1 and ERK2 was characterized in 101 humanhead and neck squamous carcinoma specimens. Activated ERK1/2were detected at different levels in the majority of these tumors, as assayed by immunostaining with an antibody specific for the dually phosphorylated and activated ERK1 and ERK2. ERK1/2 activation levels were higher in tumors with advanced regional lymph node metastasis (P = 0.048) and in relapsed tumors (P = 0.021). The expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (P = 0.037), transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha; P < 0.001), and HER2 (P = 0.066; positive trend) correlated with activation of ERK1/2. In a multivariate analysis, both TGF-alpha (P < 0.0001) and HER2 (P = 0.045) were independently correlated with ERK1/2 activation. In turn, activation of ERK1/2 was associated with a higher Ki-67 proliferative index (P = 0.002). In EGF receptor-dependent model cells (A431 and DiFi), a specific EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ("Iressa"; ZD1839) and a chimeric anti-EGF receptor antibody ("Cetuximab"; C225) inhibited ERK 1/2 activation at concentrations that inhibited autocrine cell proliferation. In patients on treatment with C225, the activation of ERK1/2 in skin, an EGF receptor-dependent tissue, was lower compared with control skin. Parallel changes were seen in keratinocyte Ki67 proliferation indexes in skin from C225-treated patients. Taken together, these studies provide support for a role of activation of ERK1/2 in head and neck squamous carcinoma and a correlation with EGF receptor/TGF-alpha expression. The inhibition of ERK1/2 activation in vitro and in vivo by compounds targeting the EGF receptor points to the interest of ERK1/2 as potential surrogate markers of EGF-receptor signaling in clinical therapeutic studies.

Frequent deletions or mutations of the INK4 gene, which encodes the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor p16INK4a, have been documented in various human cancers, but little is known about the role of this tumor suppressor gene in primary breast cancer. We examined p16INK4a mRNA expression and its relationship with cyclin D1 and estrogen receptor (ER) expression in 314 primary breast cancers using Northern blots probed with a p16 exon 1alpha-specific cDNA. Tumor samples overexpressing p16INK4a were predominantly ER negative with low levels of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 and ER mRNA levels in the high p16INK4a expressers were significantly lower than those in the remainder of the population (P = 0.0001). Furthermore, the mean p16INK4a mRNA level in the ER-negative tumors was significantly higher than that in the ER-positive group (P = 0.0001). Because the INK4 gene is frequently inactivated by de novo methylation, we investigated the frequency of INK4a exon 1alpha methylation in a subset of 120 primary breast cancers using methylation-specific PCR; 24 of these were methylated. These findings indicate that high expression of p16INK4a and reduced expression due to de novo INK4a methylation are frequent events in primary breast cancer. In a subset of 217 patients for whom detailed clinical data were available, high p16INK4a mRNA expression was associated with high tumor grade (P = 0.006), > or = 4 axillary lymph node involvement (P = 0.004), ER negativity (P = 0.0001), and increased risk of relapse (P = 0.006). The significant negative correlation between p16INK4a and ER gene expression raises issues regarding their functional interrelationships and whether high p16INK4a expression may be associated with a lack of hormone responsiveness in breast cancer.

Cyclin D1 is a key cell cycle regulatory protein with demonstrated oncogenic activity in a variety of malignancies. Cyclin D1 mRNA and protein are overexpressed in approximately 50% of primary breast carcinomas; however, the pathophysiological consequences of increased expression remain unclear. To investigate the functional sequelae of cyclin D1 mRNA overexpression, we analyzed clinical outcome in relation to the cyclin D1 mRNA level in 253 primary breast cancer patients (median follow-up, 75 months) with particular reference to estrogen receptor (ER) status and endocrine response. Overall, with the exception of the relationship between cyclin D1 mRNA expression and the ER, cyclin D1 mRNA was not associated with other clinicopathological features such as age, menopausal status, axillary lymph node status, vascular invasion, tumor size, type, and grade. However, in patients with ER-positive tumors (n = 182), high levels of cyclin D1 mRNA were associated with increased risk of relapse (P = 0.0016), local recurrence (P = 0.025), metastasis (P = 0.019), and death (P = 0.025). In contrast, there were no clinical correlations with cyclin D1 expression in ER-negative disease (n = 71). In 33 patients who received endocrine therapy for their primary or recurrent breast cancers, there was an apparent association between a high cyclin D1 mRNA level and a shorter response duration within the ER-positive subgroup (P = 0.04). Our findings indicate that overexpression of cyclin D1 mRNA correlates with a worse prognosis within the ER-positive breast cancer phenotype and may be a contributing factor to the development of endocrine resistance in ER-positive disease.

We describe the development and use of a sensitive reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) procedure to detect novel estrogen-regulated gene expression in small clinical breast cancer samples, in which such study would be extremely difficult by any other molecular or immunocytochemical means. Assay optimization for pLIV1, estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors, and pS2 gene products was carried out on 50 primary breast cancers for which comparative Northern analysis and immunocytochemical data were available. Using 27 amplification cycles and a 0.5 microM primer concentration, varying expressions of the gene products were recorded simultaneously with a constant densitometric signal for a coamplified endogenous control gene (alpha-actin). Good concordances were subsequently observed between pLIV1 status generated by RT-PCR and both Northern analysis (P = 0.002) and ER status by immunocytochemistry (P = 0.0244). Agreement was also noted between ER (P = 0.002), progesterone receptor (P = 0.0005), and pS2 (P = 0. 0023) RT-PCR and immunocytochemical methodologies. The RT-PCR assays were then applied to 10 needle core trucut biopsies in which similar relationships were obtained. Our results justify the future use of this RT-PCR methodology to examine new estrogen-regulated genes in small breast cancer samples, and it is envisaged that this technology will prove invaluable in many future breast cancer studies.

The CCND1 gene, encoding the cell cycle regulatory protein cyclin D1, maps to chromosome 11q13, a locus that is amplified in about 13% of breast cancers. Because several studies have indicated a relationship between 11q13 amplification and markers of phenotype including estrogen receptor (ER) status, we tested the relationship between CCND1 and ER gene expression in 364 primary breast cancers using Northern blot analysis. Seventy-three % of samples were positive for ER mRNA, and cyclin D1 mRNA levels in the ER-positive group were significantly higher than those in the ER-negative group (P = 0.0001). When the samples were divided into quartiles of cyclin D1 expression, 58% of samples were ER positive in the lowest quartile and 87% in the highest quartile. The tumors expressing the highest levels of cyclin D1 (7%) were all ER positive. Furthermore, ER mRNA levels in the half with lower cyclin D1 mRNA were significantly less than in the half with higher cyclin D1 levels (P = 0.0001). Using simple regression analysis, there was a significant positive correlation between cyclin D1 and ER mRNA levels in the total population (P = 0.0001). This study demonstrates that cyclin D1 mRNA and ER mRNA are positively correlated in primary breast cancer, but the functional relationship between these genes remains to be elucidated.

The expression of transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) has been evaluated in 51 breast cancers of known responsiveness to endocrine therapy using immunohistochemistry. High levels of TGF-alpha were observed in 65% of tumors and showed no relationship with tumor estrogen receptor or epidermal growth factor receptor status or Ki67 immunostaining. TGF-alpha levels did, however, relate to the endocrine sensitivity of the disease, with unresponsive tumors frequently showing high levels of TGF-alpha immunoreactivity. This relationship was observed in estrogen receptor-positive disease and was independent of the epidermal growth factor receptor status of the tumor. No quantitative association between TGF-alpha and Ki67 immunostaining was observed in any of the subcategories of tumors. These data infer a role for TGF-alpha in the development of endocrine insensitivity in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer by mechanisms which appear independent of tumor growth fraction, as determined by Ki67 immunostaining.

We have conducted a clinical trial of a novel pure antiestrogen, 7 alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)nonyl]estra-1,3,5,(1 0)-triene-3,17 beta-diol (ICI 182780), to assess its tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and short term biological effects in women with primary breast cancer. Fifty-six patients were randomized to either a control group (n = 19), in which they received no preoperative treatment, or a treatment group (n = 37), in which they received daily i.m. injections of ICI 182780 at doses of 6 mg (n = 21) or 18 mg (n = 16) for 7 days prior to primary breast surgery. Serum drug concentrations, gonadotropin levels, and sex hormone-binding globulin levels were measured during the study period by radioimmunoassay. Expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors, the estrogen-induced protein pS2, and the cell proliferation-related antigen Ki67 was determined immunocytochemically in pre- and poststudy tumor samples. Treatment with ICI 182780 caused no serious drug-related adverse events and had no effect on serum gonadotropin or sex hormone-binding globulin levels. Minor adverse events occurred in 5 patients receiving the 6-mg dose and 3 patients receiving the 18-mg dose. The serum concentration of ICI 182780 was dose dependent but showed variation between individuals. There was evidence of an approximately 3-fold drug accumulation over the short treatment period but steady state levels were not reached by the end of the 7 days. In patients with ER-positive tumors, treatment with ICI 182780 was associated with significant reductions in the tumor expression of ER (median ER index, 0.72 before versus 0.02 after treatment; P < 0.001), progesterone receptor (median progesterone receptor index, 0.50 before versus 0.01 after treatment; P < 0.05), and Ki67 (median Ki67 labeling index, 3.2 before versus 1.1 after treatment; P < 0.05). Treatment with ICI 182780 also resulted in a significant reduction in pS2 expression (P < 0.05) but this appeared unrelated to tumor ER status. In conclusion, ICI 182780 was well tolerated after short term administration and produced demonstrable antiestrogenic effects in human breast tumors in vivo, without showing evidence of agonist activity. These properties identify ICI 182780 as a candidate agent with which to evaluate whether a pure estrogen antagonist offers any additional benefit in the treatment of human breast cancer over conventional nonsteroidal antiestrogens, typified by tamoxifen, which exhibit variable degrees of agonist activity.

Retinoic acid inhibits proliferation and steroid receptor gene expression in human breast cancer cell lines. Retinoic acid receptors (RAR)alpha, -beta, and -gamma are expressed in these cells and the expression of RAR alpha is significantly greater in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cells. This study was undertaken to determine whether the same relationship between RAR alpha and ER gene expression was present in human breast cancers and to explore the possibility that the higher level of RAR alpha in ER-positive cells was due to estrogen regulation of RAR alpha gene expression. RAR alpha and ER mRNA expression were determined by Northern blot analysis in 116 primary breast tumors; 94 (81%) tumors were ER-positive and of these 87 (93%) were also RAR alpha-positive. The coexpression of ER and RAR alpha was statistically significant (P = 0.0052 by chi 2 contingency analysis). There was also a positive correlation (by linear regression analysis) between the levels of expression of ER and RAR alpha mRNA (r2 = 0.251, P = 0.0001), which confirmed the relationship previously documented in breast cancer cell lines and suggested that RAR alpha expression may be modulated in breast cancer in vivo by estrogens acting via the ER. The ability of estradiol to regulate RAR alpha gene expression was examined in vitro using T-47D cells which had been rendered sensitive to estrogen by repeated passage in steroid-depleted medium. Estradiol increased RAR alpha gene expression, but not that of RAR beta or RAR gamma, in a concentration-dependent manner, with the effect being maximal at 10(-10) M and less marked at higher concentrations. The effect was rapid, being detectable 1 h after and maximal 6 h after treatment with 10(-10) M estradiol. Co-treatment of cells with estradiol and antiestrogens (tamoxifen or ICI 164384, 4 x 10(-7) M for 6 h) inhibited the estradiol induction of RAR alpha gene expression, demonstrating that the effect was ER mediated. The estradiol sensitivity of the effect was underscored by the demonstration that addition of untreated serum to cells growing under steroid-depleted conditions was sufficient to induce maximal RAR alpha gene expression. This effect was totally abolished by addition of ICI 164384. In summary, the demonstration that estradiol increased RAR alpha mRNA levels in breast cancer cells supports the hypothesis that the correlation between RAR alpha and ER gene expression in breast tumors and breast cancer cell lines is due to estradiol augmentation of RAR alpha gene expression.

Frozen sections of breast tumor tissue have been stained using an immunoperoxidase [estrogen receptor (ER)-immunocytochemistry] kit incorporating a monoclonal antiserum [H222] to visualize nuclear human ERs. Quantitation of specific staining has been performed by manual procedures using optical microscopy and by a computer-assisted image analysis system (CAS 100). Initial investigations with a test panel of ER-immunocytochemistry-positive tumors revealed a good qualitative agreement between CAS and manual assessments. Reduced variance was, however, observed between quantified ER-immunocytochemistry results from four experienced investigators using the CAS analysis. An extended study confirmed the relationships between CAS and manual methods of assessment. These findings were evident when studies were scored either by assessment of the percentage of positively stained cells (n = 92; r = 0.919; P less than 0.01) or by H-score calculations (n = 92; r = 0.913; P less than 0.01). A good correlation was also found between CAS quantification and the results of an ER enzyme immunoassay of 48 primary breast cancer specimens (r = 0.715; P less than 0.05). In 49 cases it was possible to relate CAS-defined ER status and levels to the subsequent response of patients to endocrine therapy. ER was assessed on specimens obtained prior to commencement of treatments for recurrent breast cancer. Presuming the presence of ER to be a prerequisite for successful therapy, very good correlations between response and both status and levels of positivity were recorded. None of 16 patients with CAS-ER-negative tumors responded to treatment, while 16 of 33 (48.4%) CAS-ER-positive patients achieved an objective response according to International Union Against Cancer criteria. A relationship between response and the degree of CAS-ER positivity was obtained when the CAS score divisions of 0, 1-100, and greater than 100 (response rates, 0, 41, and 64%, respectively) were used. These data demonstrate that automated image analysis offers a reliable, reproducible procedure for quantifying ER in immunocytochemically stained sections. It has potential advantages over manual procedures, providing less opportunity for subjective influences in scoring sections. Future advances in software design should further reduce elements of subjectivity and increase both the speed and reliability of results. We anticipate image analysis becoming a valuable tool in investigations concerning, for example, the influence of heterogeneity of steroid receptor distribution on the rate of recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy and in the clinical course of the disease.

An immunocytochemical assay using a monoclonal antibody to estrogen receptor was applied to frozen sections of 43 prostatic tumors. In addition, in 16 tumors the results of the immunocytochemical assay were compared with those obtained using an enzyme immunoassay for estrogen receptor, a tritiated ligand binding assay, and a histochemical procedure using fluorescein-labeled estradiol conjugates. Specimens from 14 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and 29 patients with prostatic carcinoma were analyzed in assays in which human breast carcinoma specimens of high, medium, low, or negative estrogen receptor content acted as controls. The intensity of nuclear staining and the percentage of stained cells in the breast sample controls correlated well with estrogen receptor content as determined by both the enzyme immunoassay and the tritiated ligand binding assay. None of the fixed, frozen sections from the 43 prostatic tumors exhibited nuclear staining of either the benign or the malignant epithelial cells or of the stromal components. Negative results were also obtained with the tritiated ligand binding assay. The majority of prostatic samples were negative when using the enzyme immunoassay but four specimens had a mean value of 6.2 fmol/mg protein which is just above the sensitivity of the assay. Using fluorescein-labeled estradiol conjugates both cytoplasmic and nuclear binding was observed in the prostatic samples which did not correlate with the results obtained by the other three procedures.

An estrogen receptor enzyme immunoassay kit (ER-EIA) has been evaluated in 70 human breast carcinomas against a routine cytoplasmic [3H]estradiol binding assay (ERU). A linear correlation between the ER-EIA and the ERU was observed for binding values up to 400 fmol/mg of cytosol protein. Above this value, the ERU underestimates the concentration of receptor. The ERU gave a lower number of estrogen receptor-positive tumors (50 of 70) than did the ER-EIA assay (59 of 70). In the ERU-negative ER-EIA-positive tumors, receptor values as determined by the ER-EIA assay all fell below 50 fmol/mg of protein (mean, 19.9 +/- 4.2 fmol/mg of protein). Application of an exchange procedure which estimates the total steroid binding capacity of the cytosol gave positive results in 7 of 9 ERU-negative ER-EIA-positive tumors (mean, 16.9 +/- 2.95 fmol/mg of protein). Subdivision of the binding data according to the menopausal status of the patient indicates low receptor values in premenopausal women by each assay. A correlation between the ER-EIA assay and the histological grade of tumors was observed; Grade I well-differentiated tumors were all positive, while Grade II and III tumors were 86% and 75% positive, respectively. No correlation between the ER-EIA assay and tumor lymph node stage or tumor size was observed.

An immunocytochemical assay for the measurement of estrogen receptor (ER-ICA; Abbott Diagnostics) has been evaluated in 163 human breast carcinomas. Specific binding was observed in the nuclei of 111 of 163 (68%) tumors. An excellent correlation was observed between the ER-ICA and the estrogen receptor enzyme immunoassay. A significant relationship was observed between ER-ICA status and percentage of ER-ICA negative cells, histological grade of malignancy, and mitotic activity of the tumors. A significant correlation was also observed between ER-ICA status and age at mastectomy with 50% of patients with ER-ICA positive breast tumors presenting with their disease over 60 years of age. No association was observed with either tumor size or patient nodal status. Examination of the proportion of negative cells within tumors revealed a trend for the acquisition of poor prognostic features to be associated with an increase in the negative cell population. Data on the recurrence free interval of these patients showed a significant recurrence free advantage in ER-ICA positive patients, particularly those whose tumors contained low numbers of negative cells.

A new enzyme immunoassay (Abbott ER-EIA Monoclonal) for the determination of estrogen receptor in cytosols from breast tumor specimens has been developed by Abbott Laboratories. To establish the correlation of the results from this new technique with currently existing steroid binding methods, a multicenter study was conducted in eight European laboratories. All participants followed the same protocol consisting of a familiarization phase, a proficiency evaluation, and a comparison of existing steroid binding methods with the new immunoassay using panel samples and clinical specimens. ER-EIA was compared with the multipoint dextran coated charcoal assay in six laboratories, four of which followed the EORTC protocol; of the remaining two laboratories, one used a single saturating dose assay, the other an isoelectric focusing assay. The results show no significant difference between reducing agents when used in the ER-EIA. Reproducibility for the immunoassay (interassay coefficient of variation, 6%, interlaboratory coefficient of variation, 11-19%) was somewhat better than that for the steroid binding methods (interlaboratory coefficient of variation, 12-32%). The correlation between the methods was dependent on the origin of the lyophilized specimens. In breast tumor samples, an excellent correlation, (not statistically different from 1) was found between the ER-EIA and the steroid binding method in six laboratories. One laboratory showed a slope of 1.1 for the correlation line; the laboratory using isoelectric focusing showed a slope of 1.9. The mean value determined by the enzyme immunoassay in premenopausal women was 74 fmol/mg cytosol protein, and in postmenopausal women it was 187 fmol/mg cytosol protein with no significant difference in the slope of the correlation line. Results suggest the usefulness of the new standardized enzyme immunoassay for routine use in the clinical laboratory.