Search

Acellular dermal matrices (ADM) were used to cover the implant to reduce implant rotations and to improve esthetic results. Current retrospective data on complication rates are heterogeneous. Prospective data are rare. Primary objective was to evaluate the explantation rate. 11 German sites, with experience in breast reconstruction using ADM, have been selected for participation in this study. Patients were enrolled according to predefined in- and exclusion criteria into two cohorts: group A - primary reconstruction and group B - secondary reconstruction after capsular contracture. After documentation of baseline characteristics and surgical parameters, endpoints such as rate of seroma, red breast syndrome, infection and explantation were assed at 1 day, 7 days, 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. In addition, patient- and surgeon-satisfaction were recorded. Data of 83 patients were analyzed (A: 50, B: 33). In 29 patients Epiflex was used bilaterally, so that it was used 112-times in total. The average age of the patient was 45.1 years (A: 41.5; B: 50.3), the average BMI was 22.2 (A: 22.3; B: 22.1). In total, 17.0 % seromas (A: 19.4 %; B: 12.5 %), 10.7 % red breast syndrome (A: 9.7 %; B: 12.5 %), 4.5 % infections (A: 6.9 %; B: 0 %) and 5.4 % explantations (A: 6.9 %; B: 2.5 %) were observed. During the average observation period of 8 month, the satisfaction of the patients and surgeons was high at all measured time points. On a scale from (1 - very satisfied to 6 - not satisfied) the satisfaction of patients and surgeons was 2.3 (A: 2.3; B:1.9) and 2.0 (A: 2.2; B: 1.8) respectively. Our data show, that both patients and surgeons are generally satisfied with the outcome of breast reconstruction using ADM. Complication rates were adequate and commonly lower in secondary reconstructions. Citation Format: Blohmer J-U, Ankel C, Faridi A, Krause-Bergmann B, Neumann C, Schnuppe K, Beier L, Mau C, Strittmatter H-J, Gerber-Schäfer C, Bauer L, Paepke S. First results of the NOGGO-AWOGyn observational study: Skin and nipple sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction with an implant and Epiflex® [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-13.

Background Over 90% of male breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) have hormone receptor (HR) positive disease. Until today tamoxifen is considered to be the standard of care in male BC pts. Due to the low incidence of male BC, there is a lack of data regarding efficacy and safety. Therapeutic strategies are extrapolated from the standard of care of female BC. However, no prospectively randomized study in male BC pts has been conducted so far. The Male-GBG54 study is the first prospective, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of different endocrine treatment options in male BC patients. Patients and Methods In the phase II Male-GBG54 trial (NCT01638247), pts were randomized to receive either tamoxifen 20 mg/day per os (p.o.) or tamoxifen 20mg/day p.o. + GnRHa subcutaneous (s.c.) q3m or exemestane 25 mg/day p.o. + GnRHa s.c. for 6 months as (neo)adjuvant or metastatic therapy. Further treatment was conducted as per local guidelines. Primary objective was the suppression of oestradiol in the three treatment arms after 3 months of therapy. Secondary objectives comprised oestradiol suppression after six months, compliance and safety of the three therapies, the level of different steroidal hormones (testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, SHBG, FSH, LH) and osteocalcin in the three arms. Quality of Life was assessed using the Aging Male Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile function and International Prostate Symptom Score. Tissue and blood was collected for translational research. Male BC pts with a Karnofsky Index ≥60%, normal blood lipids, and no history or evidence of prostate cancer were eligible. 14 pts per group were needed for the F-test to have 80% power to detect a difference in mean oestradiol decrease between the three therapeutic groups at the 5% significance level. The final sample size was calculated as 48 patients, as a non-parametric test (Kruskal-Wallis) was chosen in case the oestradiol levels are not normally distributed within the study population. Results Between October 2012 and May 2017, 55 pts were randomized within 24 centers in Germany. 52 pts were included in the adjuvant and 2 pts in the metastatic setting of whom 48 pts were fully evaluable and comprised the analysis set. The median age was 62 years (range 37-83 years). The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 3 treatment groups. Karnofsky Index ranged from 60%-100%, 36.4% had received prior chemotherapy and 12.7% had HER2-positive BC. The majority had a pT2 (52%), pN0 (58.0%) BC. 3 serious adverse events were reported, none was related to the study treatment. Conclusion This is the first prospective randomized trial worldwide evaluating the impact of three different endocrine treatments in male breast cancer. The therapy was well tolerated without safety signals. At the meeting, final results of the primary and secondary endpoints will be present. Citation Format: Reinisch M, Seiler S, Hauzenberger T, Schmatloch S, Strittmatter HJ, Zahm DM, Thode C, Jackisch C, Furlanetto J, Strik D, Stickeler E, Marmé F, Janni W, Schmidt M, Kamischke A, Rudlowski C, Nekljudova V, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S. Male-GBG54: A prospective, randomised multi-centre phase II study evaluating endocrine treatment with either tamoxifen +/- gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) or an aromatase inhibitor + GnRHa in male breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-10.