Search

Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figure Legends, Supplementary Table

Kaplan-Meier estimated progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population

Major molecular response by 12 months, by Sokal risk group. bid, twice daily; MMR, major molecular response (defined as BCR-ABL1 transcript level {less than or equal to}0.1% [MR3.0]); qd, daily.

Purpose: Radotinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in Korea for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in patients newly diagnosed or with insufficient response to other TKIs. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radotinib as first-line therapy for CML-CP.Experimental Design: This multinational, open-label study assigned patients (1:1:1) to one of two twice-daily radotinib doses, or imatinib daily. The primary endpoint was major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months.Results: Two hundred forty-one patients were randomized to receive radotinib 300 mg (n = 79) or 400 mg twice-daily (n = 81), or imatinib 400 mg daily (n = 81). MMR rates by 12 months were higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg (52%) or radotinib 400 mg twice-daily (46%) versus imatinib (30%; P = 0.0044 and P = 0.0342, respectively). Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates by 12 months were higher for radotinib 300 mg (91%) versus imatinib (77%; P = 0.0120). Early molecular response at 3 months occurred in 86% and 87% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg and radotinib 400 mg, respectively, and 71% of those receiving imatinib. By 12 months, no patients had progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis. Most adverse events were manageable with dose reduction.Conclusions: Radotinib demonstrated superiority over imatinib in CCyR and MMR in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01511289. Clin Cancer Res; 23(23); 7180–8. ©2017 AACR.

Achievement of MMR by 12 months according to 3-month EMR (< 10% of BCR-ABL1IS). (c) Radotinib 300 mg bid (n = 79 patients with evaluable molecular data at 3 months).

Achievement of MMR by 12 months according to 3-month EMR (< 10% of BCR-ABL1IS).EMR at 3 months.

Purpose: Radotinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in Korea for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in patients newly diagnosed or with insufficient response to other TKIs. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radotinib as first-line therapy for CML-CP. Experimental Design: This multinational, open-label study assigned patients (1:1:1) to one of two twice-daily radotinib doses, or imatinib daily. The primary endpoint was major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. Results: Two hundred forty-one patients were randomized to receive radotinib 300 mg (n = 79) or 400 mg twice-daily (n = 81), or imatinib 400 mg daily (n = 81). MMR rates by 12 months were higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg (52%) or radotinib 400 mg twice-daily (46%) versus imatinib (30%; P = 0.0044 and P = 0.0342, respectively). Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates by 12 months were higher for radotinib 300 mg (91%) versus imatinib (77%; P = 0.0120). Early molecular response at 3 months occurred in 86% and 87% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg and radotinib 400 mg, respectively, and 71% of those receiving imatinib. By 12 months, no patients had progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis. Most adverse events were manageable with dose reduction. Conclusions: Radotinib demonstrated superiority over imatinib in CCyR and MMR in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01511289. Clin Cancer Res; 23(23); 7180–8. ©2017 AACR.

Background: The rationale for developing an alternative paclitaxel formulation concerns Cremophor EL-related side effects, and a novel paclitaxel delivery system might augment its therapeutic efficacy. Genexol-PM is a novel polymeric micelle formulated paclitaxel free of Cremophor. The polymeric micelle formulation is composed of hundreds of low molecular weight, non-toxic, and biodegradable amphiphilic diblock copolymers which include monomethoxy poly (ethylene glycol)-block-poly (D,L-lactide). This multicenter phase III study was designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of efficacy of Genexol-PM compared to conventional CrEL-based paclitaxel. Methods: In this phase III study, 213 patients were enrolled onto the study and randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment group according to prior recurrent or metastatic breast cancer chemotherapy. The study evaluated the objective response rate for the primary objective, and others including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), time to tumor progression (TTP), duration of overall response and adverse events. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either Genexol-PM or standard paclitaxel. Genexol-PM or standard paclitaxel was administered on the first day of every 3 weeks. Measurable disease was assessed by imaging using the RECIST 1.0 criteria. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) was higher by the administration of the study drug (39.05% v 24.30% in ITT, 56.92% v 39.29% in PP). One-sided 95% upper confidence limit was -4.36%, which is lower than the non-inferiority threshold (7%), indicating that the study group is not inferior to the control group. OS, PFS, TTP and duration of overall response were analyzed in the ITT population. The analysis of OS showed no significant difference (p=0.5878) (859 days, 95% CI : 732.00∼1,025.00 v 726 days, 95% CI : 553.00∼ -). Median PFS periods were 232 days (95% CI: 164.00∼274.00) vs. 191 days (95% CI: 159.00∼237.00). Median TTPs were 233 days (95% CI: 165.00∼286.00) vs. 191 days (95% CI: 159.00∼241.00) between the groups. Difference in PFSs and TTPs between the groups were not statistically significant. (p=0.2407, 0.2076, respectively) Genexol-PM was not significantly different from the comparator in terms of safety. Conclusion: Genexol-PM demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and comparable safety profile compared with standard paclitaxel in this patient population. Of note, Genexol-PM permits the delivery of a higher paclitaxel dose without additional toxicity achieved with CrEL-based formulation. In the absence of CrEL, no filter or special tubing is required that conventional PVC infusion sets can be used. Citation Format: Jung Sil Ro, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Sung Bae Kim, Keun Seok Lee, Joo Seop Chung, Jae Hoo Park, Soo Hyeon Lee, Tae You Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Eun Kyung Cho, Yang Soo Kim, Hong Suk Song, Jae Hong Seo, Hun Mo Ryoo, Sun Ah Lee, So Young Yoon, Chul Soo Kim, Yong Tai Kim, Hwa Jung Sung, Si Young Kim, Yong Jin Lee. A open-label, randomized, parallel, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Genexol®-PM compared to Genexol®(conventional paclitaxel with cremorphor EL) in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-04.

Background: The L-Expanded Access Program (LEAP) was designed to provide access to L/C for HER2+ patients (pts) who previously received anthracycline, taxane, and trastuzumab. In earlier registration trial, CNS metastases occurred in fewer women receiving L/C therapy compared with C alone. Although L therapy has shown efficacy in brain metastasis (BM), it has not been well elucidated in relationship with the outcomes of systemic disease. Patients and methods : Enrollment in LEAP lasted between Jan. 2007 and Apr. 2008 at 6 centers in Korea. Exploratory analysis on clinical outcomes of brain metastasis was performed. Results: Total 187 pts enrolled in LEAP. The median treatment duration of all pts was 19.0 weeks (range, 1.4 — 146.9). The median progression free survival and overall survival (OS) of all pts were 20.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]= 18.6-24.0) and 60.0 (95% CI= 50.3-72.7) weeks, respectively. All patients received prior trastuzumab therapy, and 48.7% received prior capecitabine. Among 58 enrolled pts who had BM diagnosed before start L/C therapy, 55 pts were included for the analysis excluding 3 pts (1-consent withdrawal and 2- Conclusion: Overall survival of patients with brain metastasis who received lapatinib plus capecitabine was prolonged specifically in responders of both brain and extracranial disease. Patients with hormone receptor positive tumors had longer survival compared with those of hormone receptor negative disease. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-04.