Search

Purpose:BRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer represents a significant clinical problem, with combination approaches being developed clinically with oral BRAF inhibitors combined with EGFR-targeting antibodies. While compelling preclinical data have highlighted the effectiveness of combination therapy with vemurafenib and small-molecule EGFR inhibitors, gefitinib or erlotinib, in colorectal cancer, this therapeutic strategy has not been investigated in clinical studies.Patients and Methods:We conducted a phase Ib/II dose-escalation/expansion trial investigating the safety/efficacy of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and EGFR inhibitor erlotinib.Results:Thirty-two patients with BRAF V600E positive metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and 7 patients with other cancers were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in escalation, with vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily with erlotinib 150 mg daily selected as the recommended phase II dose. Among 31 evaluable patients with mCRC and 7 with other cancers, overall response rates were 32% [10/31, 16% (5/31) confirmed] and 43% (3/7), respectively, with clinical benefit rates of 65% and 100%. Early ctDNA dynamics were predictive of treatment efficacy, and serial ctDNA monitoring revealed distinct patterns of convergent genomic evolution associated with acquired treatment resistance, with frequent emergence of MAPK pathway alterations, including polyclonal KRAS, NRAS, and MAP2K1 mutations, and MET amplification.Conclusions:The Erlotinib and Vemurafenib In Combination Trial study demonstrated a safe and novel combination of two oral inhibitors targeting BRAF and EGFR. The dynamic assessment of serial ctDNA was a useful measure of underlying genomic changes in response to this combination and in understanding potential mechanisms of resistance.

Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary Table 3

Supplementary figure 3 shows combining trametinib with different classes of HDAC inhibitors in COLO 201 cells

The EGFR/RAS/MEK/ERK signaling pathway (ERK/MAPK) is hyperactivated in most colorectal cancers. A current limitation of inhibitors of this pathway is that they primarily induce cytostatic effects in colorectal cancer cells. Nevertheless, these drugs do induce expression of proapoptotic factors, suggesting they may prime colorectal cancer cells to undergo apoptosis. As histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) induce expression of multiple proapoptotic proteins, we examined whether they could synergize with ERK/MAPK inhibitors to trigger colorectal cancer cell apoptosis. Combined MEK/ERK and HDAC inhibition synergistically induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer cell lines and patient-derived tumor organoids in vitro, and attenuated Apc-initiated adenoma formation in vivo. Mechanistically, combined MAPK/HDAC inhibition enhanced expression of the BH3-only proapoptotic proteins BIM and BMF, and their knockdown significantly attenuated MAPK/HDAC inhibitor–induced apoptosis. Importantly, we demonstrate that the paradigm of combined MAPK/HDAC inhibitor treatment to induce apoptosis can be tailored to specific MAPK genotypes in colorectal cancers, by combining an HDAC inhibitor with either an EGFR, KRASG12C or BRAFV600 inhibitor in KRAS/BRAFWT; KRASG12C, BRAFV600E colorectal cancer cell lines, respectively. These findings identify a series of ERK/MAPK genotype-tailored treatment strategies that can readily undergo clinical testing for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Supplementary Figure 4

Supplementary figure 2 shows the effect of trametinib plus panobinostat on colony formation in HCT 116 cells

Supplementary figure 4 shows phosphorylated ERK staining in an adenoma from a ACDX2 mouse

Supplementary Figure 6

Supplementary Figure 7

Supplementary figure 5 shows mouse weight during treatment in two of the mouse studies

Supplementary Figure 5

Supplementary Figure 1

Supplementary Figure 3

Supplementary Table 2

Supplementary table 1

Supplementary Figure 1 shows the synergistic effect of trametinib plus panobinostat in CRC cell lines and PDTO's

Supplementary Figure 2

Supplementary material

Purpose: To compare napabucasin (generator of reactive oxygen species) plus paclitaxel with paclitaxel only in patients with second-line advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: In the double-blind, phase III BRIGHTER study (NCT02178956), patients were randomized (1:1) to napabucasin (480 mg orally twice daily) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 3 of 4 weeks) or placebo plus paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results: Overall, 714 patients were randomized (napabucasin plus paclitaxel, n = 357; placebo plus paclitaxel, n = 357). 72.1% were male, 74.6% had gastric adenocarcinoma, and 46.2% had peritoneal metastases. The study was unblinded following an interim analysis at 380 deaths. The final efficacy analysis was performed on 565 deaths (median follow-up, 6.8 months). No significant differences were observed between napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel for OS (6.93 vs. 7.36 months), PFS (3.55 vs. 3.68 months), ORR (16% vs. 18%), or DCR (55% vs. 58%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 69.5% and 59.7% of patients administered napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel, respectively, with grade ≥3 diarrhea reported in 16.2% and 1.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Adding napabucasin to paclitaxel did not improve survival in patients with pretreated advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Consistent with previous reports, the safety profile of napabucasin was driven by manageable gastrointestinal events; grade ≥3 diarrhea occurred at a higher frequency with napabucasin plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel.

Supplementary Fig 2. Change in overall (A) and specific (B) plasma antibody titres against tumour antigens from baseline (D0) to 6 weeks of treatment (6W), n=8 patients.

Supplementary Table 1 Sequencing Primers used for FcGR 2a ( H/R,rs1801274) and FcGR3a (F/V;rs396991) polymorphisms genotyping

PDF file - 22K, Supplemental Fig. S3. Effect of cytoplasmic MET immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining on objective response rate in patients treated with panitumumab (pmab) plus rilotumumab (AMG 102) versus pmab plus placebo.

PDF file - 37K, Supplemental Fig. S4. The effect of baseline IGF and IGF-related protein expression on overall survival.

PDF file - 76K, Supplemental Fig. S1. (A) Randomized phase Ib/II trial of panitumumab plus rilotumumab (AMG 102) or ganitumab (AMG 479). (B) CONSORT diagram for part 2. *Panitumumab 6 mg/kg; rilotumumab 10 mg/kg with dose de-escalation to 5 mg/kg as necessary. �Panitumumab 6 mg/kg; rilotumumab 10 mg/kg; ganitumab 12 mg/kg. �Rilotumumab 10 mg/kg; ganitumab 12 mg/kg.

Supplementary Fig 3. Hierarchical clustering of plasma antibody profiles after 6 weeks of study treatment, using the Spearman rank correlation method with average linkage. Patient ID (0n) at the 6-week time point (best tumour response, PFS).

Supplementary tables 1-3

Supplementary Table from Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Paclitaxel ± Napabucasin in Pretreated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

PDF file - 38K, Supplemental Fig. S5. The effect of baseline IGF and IGF-related protein expression on objective response rate.

PDF file - 38K, Supplemental Fig. S2. Best percent change of the sum of longest diameters of target lesions from baseline to post-baseline. (A) Panitumumab plus rilotumumab.(B) Panitumumab plus ganitumab. (C) Panitumumab alone.

Purpose: Panitumumab, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb), has demonstrated efficacy in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Rilotumumab and ganitumab are investigational, fully human mAbs against hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/scatter factor and IGF1R, respectively. Here we evaluate combining rilotumumab or ganitumab with panitumumab in previously treated patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC.Experimental Design: Part 1 was a phase Ib dose-finding study of panitumumab plus rilotumumab. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Part 2 was a randomized phase II trial of panitumumab in combination with rilotumumab, ganitumab, or placebo. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. Archival tissue specimens were collected for exploratory correlative work.Results: In part 1, no DLTs were reported. A recommended phase II dose of 10 mg/kg rilotumumab was selected. In part 2, for the panitumumab plus rilotumumab (n = 48), panitumumab plus ganitumab (n = 46), and panitumumab plus placebo arms (n = 48), the ORRs were 31%, 22%, and 21%, respectively. The median PFS was 5.2, 5.3, and 3.7 months and median OS 13.8, 10.6, and 11.6 months, respectively. Adverse events were tolerable. Exploratory biomarker analyses, including MET and IGF-related protein expression, failed to indicate conclusive predictive evidence on efficacy endpoints.Conclusions: Panitumumab plus rilotumumab met the prespecified criterion for improvement in ORR whereas ganitumab did not. This is the first study to suggest a benefit for combining an HGF inhibitor (rilotumumab) with panitumumab in previously treated patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC. Clin Cancer Res; 20(16); 4240–50. ©2014 AACR.

Supplementary Data from Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Paclitaxel ± Napabucasin in Pretreated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Supplementary Legend

Purpose: Two germline Fc-γ receptor (FCGR) polymorphisms, rs1801274 [FCGR2A;His(H)131Arg(R)] and rs396991 [FCGR3A;Phe(F)158Val(V)] produce altered proteins through amino acid substitutions; both are reported to be associated with cetuximab-related outcomes. We performed a validation of these polymorphisms in NCIC CTG CO.17, a randomized trial of cetuximab monotherapy in refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer expressing EGFR.Experimental Design: DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was genotyped. In addition to log-rank tests, Cox proportional hazard models assessed their relationships with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), adjusting for clinically important prognostic factors, along with a polymorphism–treatment arm interaction term.Results: Somatic KRAS status was wild-type for exon 2 in 153 (52%) of 293 patients, from whom tumor DNA was available. For FCGR2A H/H, a genotype–treatment interaction for KRAS wild-type patients was observed for OS (P = 0.03). In KRAS wild-type patients carrying FCGR2A H/H, cetuximab (vs. no cetuximab) improved survival substantially, with adjusted HRs (aHR) of 0.36 (OS) and 0.19 (PFS) and absolute benefits of 5.5 months (OS; P = 0.003) and 3.7 months (PFS; P = 0.02). In contrast, patients carrying FCGR2A R alleles (H/R or R/R) had aHRs of only 0.78 (OS; 2.8-month benefit) and 0.53 (PFS; 1.6-month benefit). No relationships were found for rs396991 (FCGR3A).Conclusions: In the CO.17 trial, cetuximab worked best for patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal cancers carrying FCGR2A H/H genotypes. Significantly lower benefits were observed in patients carrying germline FCGR2A R alleles. Clin Cancer Res; 22(10); 2435–44. ©2016 AACR.

Supplementary Fig 1. (A) PFS in plasma VEGF-C subgroups, (B) OS in plasma Ang-2 subgroups.

Supplementary Figure from Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of Paclitaxel ± Napabucasin in Pretreated Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Purpose:To compare napabucasin (generator of reactive oxygen species) plus paclitaxel with paclitaxel only in patients with second-line advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.Patients and Methods:In the double-blind, phase III BRIGHTER study (NCT02178956), patients were randomized (1:1) to napabucasin (480 mg orally twice daily) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 3 of 4 weeks) or placebo plus paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.Results:Overall, 714 patients were randomized (napabucasin plus paclitaxel, n = 357; placebo plus paclitaxel, n = 357). 72.1% were male, 74.6% had gastric adenocarcinoma, and 46.2% had peritoneal metastases. The study was unblinded following an interim analysis at 380 deaths. The final efficacy analysis was performed on 565 deaths (median follow-up, 6.8 months). No significant differences were observed between napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel for OS (6.93 vs. 7.36 months), PFS (3.55 vs. 3.68 months), ORR (16% vs. 18%), or DCR (55% vs. 58%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 69.5% and 59.7% of patients administered napabucasin plus paclitaxel and placebo plus paclitaxel, respectively, with grade ≥3 diarrhea reported in 16.2% and 1.4%, respectively.Conclusions:Adding napabucasin to paclitaxel did not improve survival in patients with pretreated advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Consistent with previous reports, the safety profile of napabucasin was driven by manageable gastrointestinal events; grade ≥3 diarrhea occurred at a higher frequency with napabucasin plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel.

PDF file - 86K

Amplification or overexpression of the FGFR family of receptor tyrosine kinases occurs in a significant proportion of gastric cancers. Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic and oncogenic kinases, including FGFR, which showed activity in the randomized phase II INTEGRATE clinical trial in advanced gastric cancer. There are currently no biomarkers that predict response to this agent, and whether regorafenib is preferentially active in FGFR-driven cancers is unknown. Through screening 25 gastric cancer cell lines, we identified five cell lines that were exquisitely sensitive to regorafenib, four of which harbored amplification or overexpression of FGFR family members. These four cell lines were also sensitive to the FGFR-specific inhibitors, BGJ398, erdafitinib, and TAS-120. Regorafenib inhibited FGFR-driven MAPK signaling in these cell lines, and knockdown studies confirmed their dependence on specific FGFRs for proliferation. In the INTEGRATE trial cohort, amplification or overexpression of FGFRs 1–4 was detected in 8%–19% of cases, however, this was not associated with improved progression-free survival and no objective responses were observed in these cases. Further preclinical analyses revealed FGFR-driven gastric cancer cell lines rapidly reactivate MAPK/ERK signaling in response to FGFR inhibition, which may underlie the limited clinical response to regorafenib. Importantly, combination treatment with an FGFR and MEK inhibitor delayed MAPK/ERK reactivation and synergistically inhibited proliferation of FGFR-driven gastric cancer cell lines. These findings suggest that upfront combinatorial inhibition of FGFR and MEK may represent a more effective treatment strategy for FGFR-driven gastric cancers.

The EGFR/RAS/MEK/ERK signaling pathway (ERK/MAPK) is hyper-activated in most colorectal cancers (CRCs). A current limitation of inhibitors of this pathway is that they primarily induce cytostatic effects in CRC cells. Nevertheless, these drugs do induce expression of pro-apoptotic factors, suggesting they may prime CRC cells to undergo apoptosis. As histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) induce expression of multiple pro-apoptotic proteins, we examined whether they could synergize with ERK/MAPK inhibitors to trigger CRC cell apoptosis. Combined MEK/ERK and HDAC inhibition synergistically induced apoptosis in CRC cell lines and patient-derived tumor organoids in vitro,and attenuated Apc-initiated adenoma formation in vivo. Mechanistically, combined MAPK/HDAC inhibition enhanced expression of the BH3-only pro-apoptotic proteins BIM and BMF, and their knockdown significantly attenuated MAPK/HDAC inhibitor-induced apoptosis. Importantly, we demonstrate that the paradigm of combined MAPK/HDAC inhibitor treatment to induce apoptosis can be tailored to specific MAPK genotypes in CRCs, by combining a HDAC inhibitor with either an EGFR, KRASG12C or BRAFV600 inhibitor in KRAS/BRAFWT ; KRASG12C , BRAFV600E CRC cell lines respectively. These findings identify a series of ERK/MAPK genotype tailored treatment strategies that can readily undergo clinical testing for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Citation Format: Laura J. Jenkins, Ian Y. Luk, Walter D. Fairlie, Erinna F. Lee, Michelle Palmieri, Kael L. Schoffer, Tao Tan, Irvin Ng, Natalia Vukelic, Sharon Tran, Janson Tse, Rebecca Nightingale, Zakia Alam, Fiona Chionh, George Iatropoulos, Matthias Ernst, Shoukat Afshar-Sterle, Jayesh Desai, Peter Gibbs, Oliver M. Sieber, Amardeep S. Dhillon, Niall C. Tebbutt, John M. Mariadason. Genotype-tailored ERK/MAPK pathway and HDAC inhibition rewires the apoptotic rheostat to trigger colorectal cancer cell death [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Colorectal Cancer; 2022 Oct 1-4; Portland, OR. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(23 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B014.

Purpose: Inhibition of mTOR in addition to EGFR may overcome resistance to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase Ib/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of irinotecan, panitumumab, and everolimus. Patients and Methods: Patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type (WT) mCRC following failure of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy received i.v. irinotecan and panitumumab every 2 weeks, and everolimus orally throughout a 14-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the phase II study was response rate (RR). Secondary survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and results were analyzed as intention to treat. A preplanned exploratory biomarker analysis was performed. Results: Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Dose level 1 (irinotecan 200 mg/m2, panitumumab 6 mg/kg, and everolimus 5 mg alternate day) was declared the MTD with no dose-limiting toxicities in six patients. Forty patients were treated at dose level 1: median age, 60 years (37–76); 65% male; 45% and 52.5%, respectively, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group values of 0/1. Median dose intensity was 85%. Grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (23%), mucositis (18%), rash (13%), fatigue (8%), dehydration (5%), neutropenia (20%), febrile neutropenia (8%), hypomagnesemia (20%), and hypokalemia (8%). Grade 4 toxicities were hypomagnesemia (5%) and neutropenia (3%). RR was 48%, and stable disease was 43%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 10.8 months. Twenty-five patients were RAS/RAF WT and had an RR of 60%, median PFS of 6.4 months, and OS of 11.8 months. Conclusions: The toxicity of the panitumumab, irinotecan, and everolimus regimen is as expected and manageable. The RR of 60% in all RAS/RAF WT supports further study of this combination. Clin Cancer Res; 24(16); 3838–44. ©2018 AACR.

Purpose: Cetuximab improves survival in patients with K-ras wild-type advanced colorectal cancer. We examined the predictive and prognostic significance of additional biomarkers in this setting, in particular BRAF, PIK3CA, and PTEN. Experimental Design: Available colorectal tumor samples were analyzed from the CO.17 study. BRAF mutations were identified in tumor-derived DNA by direct sequencing and PIK3CA mutations were identified using a high-resolution melting screen with confirmation by sequencing. PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on tissue microarrays. For each biomarker, prognostic and predictive effects were examined using a Cox model with tests for treatment–biomarker interaction. Results: A total of 572 patients with pretreated colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive cetuximab or best supportive care (BSC). Of 401 patients assessed for BRAF status, 13 (3.2%) had mutations. Of 407 patients assessed for PIK3CA status, 61 (15%) had mutations. Of 205 patients assessed for PTEN, 148 (72%) were negative for IHC expression. None of BRAF, PIK3CA, or PTEN was prognostic for overall or progression-free survival in the BSC arm. None was predictive of benefit from cetuximab, either in the whole study population or the K-ras wild-type subset. In the K-ras wild-type subgroup, the overall survival adjusted HR according to BRAF mutation status was 1.39 (interaction P = 0.69), PIK3CA mutation status HR = 0.79 (interaction P = 0.63), and PTEN expression HR = 0.75 (interaction P = 0.61). Conclusions: In chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer, neither PIK3CA mutation status nor PTEN expression were prognostic, nor were they predictive of benefit from cetuximab. Evaluation of predictive significance of BRAF mutations requires a larger sample size. Clin Cancer Res; 20(3); 744–53. ©2013 AACR.

Activated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS1 tyrosine kinases, through gene fusions, have been found in lung adenocarcinomas and are highly sensitive to selective kinase inhibitors. This study aimed at identifying the presence of these rearrangements in human colorectal adenocarcinoma specimens using a 4-target, 4-color break-apart FISH assay to simultaneously determine the genomic status of ALK and ROS1. Among the clinical colorectal cancer specimens analyzed, rearrangement-positive cases for both ALK and ROS1 were observed. The fusion partner for ALK was identified as EML4 and the fusion partner for one of the ROS1-positive cases was SLC34A2, the partner for the other ROS1-positive case remains to be identified. A small fraction of specimens presented duplicated or clustered copies of native ALK and ROS1. In addition, rearrangements were detected in samples that also harbored KRAS and BRAF mutations in two of the three cases. Interestingly, the ALK-positive specimen displayed marked intratumoral heterogeneity and rearrangement was also identified in regions of high-grade dysplasia. Despite the additional oncogenic events and tumor heterogeneity observed, elucidation of the first cases of ROS1 rearrangements and confirmation of ALK rearrangements support further evaluation of these genomic fusions as potential therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer. Implications: ROS1 and ALK fusions occur in colorectal cancer and may have substantial impact in therapy selection. Mol Cancer Res; 12(1); 111–8. ©2013 AACR.

Introduction: Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and a leading cause of cancer death. Advanced OesophagoGastric cancer (AOGC) has a poor prognosis despite treatment. The P2 INTEGRATE multinational 2:1 (active:placebo) randomized trial demonstrated the activity, on progression-free survival (PFS), of the oral multikinase inhibitor regorafenib (REG) in patients (pts) with refractory AOGC (Pavlakis et al JCO 2016), leading to the P3 INTEGRATE II trial (NCT02773524) currently underway. Here, we sought to identify prognostic protein biomarkers in a discovery analysis of a patient subset from INTEGRATE I. Methods: The discovery analysis set comprised of 40 INTEGRATE I patients (12 placebo; 28 REG) selected using stratified random sampling based on quartiles of observed PFS within each arm of allocation, half from 1st quartile (worst PFS outcome) and half from 4th quartile (best PFS outcome). We profiled the plasma proteome of INTEGRATE pts using data-independent acquisition of liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (SWATH-MS acquisition). Plasma collected at baseline (10µl) was analyzed with TripleTOF 6600 System (SCIEX, MA, USA). Data was searched against an “extended” spectral library generated using SwathXtendsoftware (Wu et al MCP 2016). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the prognostic value of log2 protein expression level adjusted for treatment allocation. Results: 437 proteins were identified across all 40 pt samples (>99% peptide confidence). A subset of 27 proteins were identified as candidates for possible further investigation using the verification analysis set on the basis of having p-values Conclusions: This is the first time that SWATH has been used to analyse AOGC pt samples, an otherwise challenging biofluid (undepleted plasma) for profiling. These proteins could represent a novel prognostic signature for PFS in AOGC patients, pending validation in the larger verification data set. This work highlights the potential value of incorporating proteomics into risk assessments guiding treatment strategies for patients. Citation Format: Sarah A. Hayes, Andrew Martin, Sonia Yip, Viive M. Howell, Katrin M. Sjoquist, Eric Tsobanis, Yoon-Koo Kang, Yung-Jue Bang, Thierry Alcindor, Christopher J. O'Callaghan, Niall C. Tebbutt, John Simes, David Goldstein, Nick Pavlakis. SWATH-MS profiling identifies prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) In INTEGRATE - A randomized phase II double-blind placebo-controlled study of regorafenib in refractory advanced oesophagogastric cancer (AOGC) - A study by the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4531.

Activating mutations in BRAF (BRAFV600E) occur in ~10% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and drive tumorigenesis through constitutive activation of MAPK signaling. In metastatic CRC, BRAF mutations are associated with poorer prognosis and resistance to conventional therapies, necessitating an urgent need to develop new treatments for these patients. BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib and dabrafenib have significant clinical activity in BRAF-mutant melanoma, however BRAF-mutant CRCs are largely refractory to these agents, due at least in part to feedback-relief mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling or alternate signaling pathway activation. Strategies to enhance the activity of BRAF inhibitors in BRAF-mutant CRC are therefore needed. Consistent with clinical observations, treatment of a panel of BRAF-mutant melanoma and CRC cell lines with vemurafenib resulted in significantly increased apoptosis in melanoma cell lines compared to CRC cell lines, where effects were largely cytostatic. To determine the mechanisms for this differential response we interrogated vemurafenib-induced gene expression changes in the two tumor types, focusing on altered expression of components of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Vemurafenib induced a more pronounced increase in expression of the pro-apoptotic genes BIM, BMF and PUMA and suppression of pro-survival gene MCL1 in melanoma cells compared to CRC cells. These findings suggested that the extent to which expression of pro and anti-apoptotic genes are altered by vemurafenib in CRC cells may be insufficient to reach the threshold required for apoptosis initiation. We therefore postulated that BH3-mimetics may synergize with vemurafenib to induce apoptosis in BRAF-mutant CRC cells. Analysis of quantitative proteomic data of BRAF-mutant CRC cell lines revealed significantly higher basal expression of the pro-survival proteins Bcl-xL and MCL1 compared to BCL2 and BCLW, suggesting CRC cells may be particularly dependent on Bcl-xL and MCL1 for survival. Indeed, combination treatment of BRAF-mutant CRC cells with the Bcl-xL inhibitor A-1331852 significantly enhanced apoptosis in the majority of BRAF-mutant CRC lines. Comparatively, combination treatment of vemurafenib with the MCL1 inhibitor S63845 induced a modest increase in apoptosis, while combination treatment with the BCL2 inhibitor ABT-199 had no effect on apoptosis, consistent with the low levels of BCL2 expression in these lines. Finally, we investigated the effect of combination treatment of vemurafenib with inhibitors of both Bcl-xL and MCL1. The triple combination further enhanced apoptosis in 3/5 cell lines, suggesting these cell lines are likely dependent on both Bcl-xL and MCL1 for survival. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that combining BRAF-inhibitors with Bcl-xL and/or MCL1 inhibitors may represent a novel strategy for treating BRAF-mutant CRC. Citation Format: Laura J. Jenkins, Fiona Chionh, Ian Y. Luk, Erinna F. Lee, Amardeep S. Dhillon, Niall Tebbutt, Walter D. Fairlie, John M. Mariadason. BRAF inhibitors synergize with BH3 mimetics to induce apoptosis in BRAF mutant colorectal cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2492.

Purpose: We report a first-in-man trial of a humanized antibody (hu3S193) against the Ley antigen. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced Ley-positive cancers received four infusions of hu3S193 at weekly intervals, with four dose levels (5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/m2). The first infusion of hu3S193 was trace labeled with Indium-111, and biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, tumor uptake, and immune response were evaluated in all patients. Results: A total of 15 patients (7 male/8 female; age range, 42-76 years; 6 breast, 8 colorectal cancer, and 1 non–small-cell lung cancer) were entered into the study. Transient grade 1 to 2 nausea and vomiting was observed following infusion of hu3S193 at the 40mg/m2 dose level only. There was one episode of dose-limiting toxicity with self-limiting Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 elevated alkaline phosphatase observed in one patient with extensive liver metastases. The biodistribution of 111In-hu3S193 showed no evidence of any consistent normal tissue uptake, and 111In-hu3S193 uptake was observed in cutaneous, lymph node, and hepatic metastases. Hu3S193 displayed a long serum half-life (T1/2β = 189.63 ± 62.17 h). Clinical responses consisted of 4 patients with stable disease and 11 patients with progressive disease, although one patient experienced a 89% decrease in a lymph node mass, and one patient experienced inflammatory symptoms in cutaneous metastases, suggestive of a biological effect of hu3S193. No immune responses (human anti-human antibody) to hu3S193 were observed. Conclusion: Hu3S193 is well tolerated and selectively targets tumors, and the long half-life and biological function in vivo of this antibody makes it an attractive potential therapy for patients with Ley-expressing cancers.

Purpose: Humanized monoclonal antibody A33 (huA33) targets the A33 antigen which is expressed on 95% of colorectal cancers. A previous study has shown excellent tumor-targeting of iodine-131 labeled huA33 (131I-huA33). Therefore, we did a phase I dose escalation trial of 131I-huA33 radioimmunotherapy. Experimental Designs: Fifteen patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma each received two i.v. doses of 131I-huA33. The first was an outpatient trace-labeled “scout” dose for biodistribution assessment, followed by a second “therapy” dose. Three patients were treated at 20, 30, and 40 mCi/m2 dose levels, and six patients at 50 mCi/m2 to define the maximum tolerated dose. Results: Hematologic toxicity was 131I dose-dependent, with one episode of grade 4 neutropenia and two episodes of grade 3 thrombocytopenia observed at 50 mCi/m2. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 40 mCi/m2. There were no acute infusion-related adverse events, and gastrointestinal toxicity was not observed despite uptake of 131I-huA33 in bowel. Seven patients developed pruritus or rash, which was not related to 131I dose. There was excellent tumor-targeting of 131I-huA33 shown in all patients. The serum T1/2β of 131I-huA33 was (mean ± SD) 135.2 ± 46.9 hours. The mean absorbed tumor dose was 6.49 ± 2.47 Gy/GBq. Four patients developed human anti-human antibodies. At restaging, 4 patients had stable disease, whereas 11 patients had progressive disease. Conclusion: Radioimmunotherapy using 131I-huA33 shows promise in targeting colorectal tumors, and is deliverable at a maximum tolerated dose of 40 mCi/m2. Further studies of 131I-huA33 in combination with chemotherapy are planned.

Activation of the small GTPase RHOA has strong oncogenic effects in many tumor types, although its role in colorectal cancer remains unclear. We show that RHOA inactivation contributes to colorectal cancer progression/metastasis, largely through the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. RhoA inactivation in the murine intestine accelerates the tumorigenic process and in human colon cancer cells leads to the redistribution of β-catenin from the membrane to the nucleus and enhanced Wnt/β-catenin signaling, resulting in increased proliferation, invasion and de-differentiation. In mice, RHOA inactivation contributes to colon cancer metastasis and reduced RHOA levels were observed at metastatic sites compared to primary human colon tumors. Therefore, we have identified a new mechanism of activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and characterized the role of RHOA as a novel gene with tumor suppressor activity in colorectal cancer. These results constitute a shift from the current paradigm and demonstrate that RHO GTPases can suppress tumor progression and metastasis. Citation Format: Paulo Rodrigues, Irati Macaya, Sarah Bazzocco, Elena Andretta, Rocco Mazzolini, Higinio Dopeso, Silvia Mateo-Lozano, Josipa Bilic, Fernando Cartón-García, Rocio Nieto, Lucia Suárez-López, Elsa Afonso, Stefania Landolfi, Javier Hernandez-Losa, Kazuto Kobayashi, Santiago Ramón y Cajal, Josep Tabernero, Niall C. Tebbutt, John M. Mariadason, Simo Schwartz Jr, Diego Arango. RHOA inactivation enhances Wnt signaling and promotes colorectal cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2058. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2058

Background: Delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4) is a ligand that activates the Notch pathway which is important for cancer stem cell (CSC) survival. DEM is a humanized IgG2 anti-DLL4 antibody that has been shown to inhibit tumor growth and decrease CSC frequency in minimally passaged human xenograft models. In addition, inhibition of DLL4 has also been shown in preclinical studies to cause dysfunctional sprouting of new vessels resulting in an antiangiogenic effect. DEM also showed synergistic activity when combined with GEM in human pancreatic tumor-derived xenograft models. Material and Methods: Patients with first line stage III or IV pancreatic cancer received DEM (2.5 every 2 or 4 wks or 5 mg/kg every 4 wks) and GEM 1000 mg/m2 7 of the 1st 8 wks and then 3 of every 4 wks until disease progression. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of DEM. Other objectives included: safety, efficacy, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetic, and biomarkers of Notch signaling and CSCs. Results: Twenty four patients were enrolled; 8 pts received 2.5 mg/kg every 2 wks, 8 received 2.5 mg/kg every 4 wks and 8 received 5 mg/kg every 4 wks of DEM. The median age was 65.5 yrs. Three (12.5%) and 21 (87.5%) patients had stage III and IV disease, respectively. Seven, 16 and 1 patients were ECOG performance status 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Related adverse events (all grades) in ≥10% of patients included: fatigue (29%), hypertension (29%), vomiting (29%), nausea (25%), thrombocytopenia (21%), decreased appetite (21%), increased B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (13%), anemia (13%), peripheral edema (13%), pulmonary hypertension (13%), dizziness (13%) and rash (13%). The hypertension was successfully managed with oral anti-hypertensives. Increased BNP values appear to be an early indicator of the cardiac effects of DEM and mildly elevated values are being used to initiate cardioprotective therapy with an ACE inhibitor or carvedilol. One patient who received 5 mg/kg developed reversible pulmonary hypertension and heart failure on study day 143. As a result, the duration of DEM will be limited to 70 days in subsequent cohorts and paclitaxel protein-bound particles will also be added to the regimen. Four of 16 (25%) evaluable patients had a RECIST partial response and 7 had stable disease. The median progression free survival for the 5 mg/kg cohort was 5.9 months. The pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity samples are being analyzed and these data will be presented. Conclusion: DEM plus GEM was generally well tolerated with fatigue, hypertension and vomiting being the most common drug related adverse events. The duration of demcizumab therapy is being limited to 70 days in subsequent cohorts due to cardiopulmonary toxicity which was observed following more prolonged administration. Encouraging early clinical activity has been observed. Subsequent cohorts will include paclitaxel protein-bound particles. Enrollment is ongoing and updated results will be presented. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):B78. Citation Format: Antonio Cubillo, Michael Jameson, Enrique Grande, Francis Parnis, Peter Grimison, Prasad Cooray, Mark Jeffery, Robert Stagg, Jakob Dupont, Niall Tebbutt. A Phase Ib study of demcizumab (DEM, anti-DLL4) with gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with first line locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B78.

Background: Death receptor 5 (DR5) is a member of the TNFR superfamily that initiates the extrinsic apoptotic pathway by activating caspases. CS-1008 is a humanised, monoclonal IgG1 agonistic antibody to human DR5 created by CDR grafting of the murine antibody TRA-8. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of CS-1008 dose on biodistribution, quantitative tumor uptake and anti-tumor response in patients with mCRC. Methods: Pts with mCRC who had received at least 1 course of chemotherapy (CT) were treated with weekly IV CS-1008 infusions in 5 non-sequential cohorts (Co). Different loading doses were used on days 1 and 8 (Co 1: 0.2 and 6 mg/kg; Co 2: 1 and 6 mg/kg; Co 3: 2 and 6 mg/kg; Co 4: 4 and 4mg/kg; Co 5: 6 and 2 mg/kg), followed by a weekly CS-1008 dose of 2 mg/kg. Cycle 1 encompassed 7 wks of therapy (D1 and D36 doses trace-labeled with 111In); additional weekly CS-1008 was scheduled as 4-wk cycles. Primary endpoints were to determine (1) the influence of CS-1008 dose on initial biodistribution, pharmacokinetic (PK) and tumor uptake of 111In-CS-1008 following single infusion; (2) changes in biodistribution, PK and tumor uptake following sequential doses. Secondary endpoints were to determine (1) anti-tumor response; (2) changes in tumor metabolism; (3) serum apoptosis biomarkers and serum tumor response markers. Results: Nineteen pts with a median age of 64 years and 2-6 prior CT lines were enrolled as follows: Co 1, 2 pts; Co 2, 4 pts; Co 3, 5 pts; Co 4, 3 pts; and Co 5, 5 pts. Twelve pts showed tumor uptake of 111In-CS-1008, 3 at each of the 1, 2, 4 and 6 mg/kg D1 dose levels. 111In-CS-1008 uptake in tumor was variable: some pts showed no uptake, in others uptake was observed in all measurable lesions. Liver metastases showed poor uptake of CS-1008. No significant differences were observed in tumor uptake between D1 and D36, and no effect of dose on tumor uptake was seen. DR5 expression in archived samples did not correlate with 111In-CS-1008 uptake, nor with clinical outcome. 111In-CS-1008 biodistribution showed gradual blood pool clearance and no discernible abnormal uptake in normal tissue. CS-1008 PK was not affected by dose or repeated drug administration. At restaging, there were 8 SD, 1 PR and 10 PD. The duration of PR was 3.7 months (mos). The mean duration of SD was 4 mos (range, 2.6-6.7 mos). Among the group of pts who showed CS-1008 uptake in tumor, 58% had clinical benefit (SD or PR), compared with 28% of pts in the group with no tumor uptake. The lesions that showed CS-1008 uptake were less likely to progress even in pts with overall PD at restaging. Conclusions: 111In-CS-1008 uptake in tumor predicts SD or PR. Tumor DR5 expression, assessed by 111In-CS-1008 imaging, reveals real-time heterogeneous DR5 expression, both on a per pt and on a lesion by lesion basis, and appears to be a promising predictive imaging biomarker of clinical benefit in pts with mCRC receiving CS-1008. Citation Format: Marika Ciprotti, Niall C. Tebbutt, Fook T. Lee, Sze T. Lee, Dave C. McKee, Graeme J. O'Keefe, Sylvia J. Gong, Geoffrey Chong, Hui K. Gan, Wendie Hopkins, Bridget Chappell, Nancy Y. Guo, Fiona E. Smyth, Archie N. Tse, Mendel Jansen, Manabu Matsumura, Rira Watanabe, Robert A. Beckman, Jon Greenberg, Andrew M. Scott. A phase I imaging and pharmacodynamic trial of CS-1008 in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1174. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1174