Search

Background: Numerous RHD variant genes affect the expression of D on the red blood cell surface. In Suriname, 4.3% of pregnant women were D-, ranging from virtually zero to 7% among ethnic groups. Characterization of RHD variants, which are associated with a variable potential to induce anti-D, is of practical clinical importance especially in case of limited access to preventive measures. Here we report on the occurrence of RHD variant genes in Surinamese serologically D- pregnant women and their D- newborns from different ethnic groups., Study Design and Methods: The RheSuN study is a cross-sectional cohort study in D- pregnant women and their newborns, who visited hospitals in Paramaribo, Suriname, during routine pregnancy care. The presence of RHD variants was investigated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction targeting RHD Exons 5 and 7 and RH-multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification., Results: Seven RHD variant genes were detected in 35 of 84 women and four RHD variant genes in 15 of 36 newborns. The RHD*03 N.01 and RHD*08 N.01 variants represented 87% of a total of 62 variant genes. Variants were comparably frequent among ethnicities. In four cases genotyping would have changed anti-D prophylaxis policy: one woman with a RHD*01EL.01 variant, not associated with anti-D formation and three D- newborns with RHD*09.01 and RHD*09.03.01 variants, potentially capable of inducing anti-D., Conclusion: RHD variants at risk for anti-D are common among serologic D- individuals from African descent in Suriname. While genotyping D- women has limited added value, it may be considered in newborns from D- women., (© 2019 AABB.)

Background: In low-resource countries, screening for D antibodies to detect pregnancies at risk for hemolytic disease of the newborn is not routine practice. Retrospective data showed that 5.5% of Surinamese newborns of D-negative women had a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT), indicating the presence of maternal antibodies against fetal antigens. Here, the frequency and clinical relevance of DAT positivity is evaluated., Study Design and Methods: Between April 2015 and June 2016, an observational, multicenter cohort study was undertaken among Surinamese newborns born to D-negative women. In newborns, the DAT was performed, and clinical outcomes between DAT-negative and DAT-positive newborns were compared., Results: Of the 232 evaluable newborns, 19 (8.2%) had a positive DAT, of which 11 of 15 antibody-tested newborns had D antibodies. DAT-positive newborns had lower hemoglobin levels (p = 0.02) and a trend toward higher bilirubin concentrations (p = 0.09) in the first days of life compared with DAT-negative newborns. DAT-positive newborns were admitted more frequently (p = 0.02), needed phototherapy treatment almost four times as often as DAT-negative newborns (26% vs. 7%; p = 0.008), and therapy took 2 days longer (p = 0.01). Exchange transfusions were performed in two newborns with D antibodies, both complicated with sepsis. The hospital stay was 2.5 days longer for DAT-positive newborns (p = 0.007). Overall, the prevalence of hemolytic disease of the newborn requiring treatment was 2.2% among the whole cohort of newborns., Conclusion: We found a high prevalence of DAT positivity with substantial need for hyperbilirubinemia treatment in newborns in Suriname. These results stress the necessity for better management procedures in D-negative women., (© 2017 AABB.)

Background: Maternal antibodies against the D antigen are the most common cause of severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). In high-income countries, the risk of D immunization has been reduced by routine antenatal and postpartum administration of RhIG from 13% to less than 0.5%. In less-resourced countries, such as Suriname, red blood cell (RBC) antibody screening during pregnancy and prophylactic RhIG administration are not routine. Accurate data on D immunization risk is not available. In the RheSuN (Rhesus Surinamese Neonates) study, the prevalence and the hemolytic potential of maternal D antibodies were investigated., Study Design and Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study in four major hospitals in Paramaribo, Suriname, covering 90% of approximately 10,000 births yearly in Suriname. Included were D- pregnant women of various ethnicities seeking routine prenatal care and/or their newborns., Results: D antibodies were detected in 19 of 214 D- pregnancies (8.9%; 95% confidence interval, 5.1%-12.7%), in 2.0% of primigravid and 11.7% of multigravid women. The direct antiglobulin test was positive in 11 of 13 tested D+ newborns. Determination of D antibody titers and antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay revealed three newborns at high risk for HDFN (ADCC > 50%)., Conclusion: D immunization risk in Suriname women is comparable to the pre-anti-D prophylaxis era in high-income countries. Recommended is free-of-charge routine RBC antibody screening and prophylactic RhIG administration for women at risk for D antibody formation as part of standard of ante- and postnatal care., (© 2017 AABB.)