Search

Chemokine-directed leukocyte migration is crucial for effective immune and inflammatory responses. Conventional chemokine receptors (cCKRs) directly control cell movement; atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs) regulate coexpressed cCKRs; and both cCKRs and ACKRs internalize chemokines to limit their abundance in vivo, a process referred to as scavenging. A leukocyte's migratory and chemokine-scavenging potential is determined by which cCKRs and ACKRs it expresses, and by the ligand specificity, signaling properties, and chemokine internalization capacity of these receptors. Most chemokines can bind at least one cCKR and one ACKR. CCL2 can bind to CCR2 (a cCKR) and two ACKRs (ACKR1 and ACKR2). In this study, by using fluorescent CCL2 uptake to label cells bearing functional CCL2 receptors, we have defined the expression profile, scavenging activity, and ligand specificity of CCL2 receptors on mouse leukocytes. We show that qualitative and quantitative differences in the expression of CCR2 and ACKR2 endow individual leukocyte subsets with distinctive CCL2 receptor profiles and CCL2-scavenging capacities. We reveal that some cells, including plasmacytoid dendritic cells, can express both CCR2 and ACKR2; that Ly6Chigh monocytes have particularly strong CCL2-scavenging potential in vitro and in vivo; and that CCR2 is a much more effective CCL2 scavenger than ACKR2. We confirm the unique, overlapping, ligand specificities of CCR2 and ACKR2 and, unexpectedly, find that cell context influences the interaction of CCL7 and CCL12 with CCR2. Fluorescent chemokine uptake assays were instrumental in providing these novel insights into CCL2 receptor biology, and the sensitivity, specificity, and versatility of these assays are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Salmonella infection is a globally important cause of gastroenteritis and systemic disease and is a useful tool to study immune responses in the intestine. Although mechanisms leading to immune responses against Salmonella have been extensively studied, questions remain about how bacteria travel from the intestinal mucosa to the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), a key site for Ag presentation. In this study, we used a mouse model of infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (STM) to identify changes in intestinal immune cells induced during early infection. We then used fluorescently labeled STM to identify interactions with immune cells from the site of infection through migration in lymph to the MLN. We show that viable STM can be carried in the lymph by any subset of migrating dendritic cells but not by macrophages. Moreover, approximately half of the STM in lymph are not associated with cells at all and travel autonomously. Within the MLN, STM associates with dendritic cells and B cells but predominantly with MLN-resident macrophages. In conclusion, we describe the routes used by STM to spread systemically in the period immediately postinfection. This deeper understanding of the infection process could open new avenues for controlling it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dendritic cells (DCs) are crucial to intestinal immune regulation because of their roles in inducing protective immunity against pathogens while maintaining tolerance to commensal bacteria. Nonetheless, relatively little is known about intestinal DC responsiveness to innate immune stimuli via TLRs. We have previously shown that DCs migrating from the rat intestine in lymph (iLDCs) are hyporesponsive to LPS stimulation, thus possibly preventing harmful immune responses being induced to commensal flora. In this study, to understand how iLDC function is regulated by innate immune stimuli, we have characterized the expression and function of TLRs in iLDCs isolated from the thoracic duct lymph of mesenteric lymphadenectomized rats and compared these with DCs grown from bone marrow in the presence of Flt3 ligand. We show that iLDCs express mRNAs for all TLRs, but express significantly less TLR4 mRNA than bone marrow-derived DCs. Functionally, iLDCs could be activated by TLR agonists representing intestinal pathogen-associated molecular patterns, with the important exception of the TLR4 agonist LPS. Furthermore, we show that DCs in the intestinal wall interact directly with noninvasive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis spores), leading to an increase in the output of activated iLDCs into lymph, and that DCs containing spores are activated selectively. These data highlight a functional difference between TLR4 and other TLRs. As iLDCs can respond to TLR stimulation in vitro, there must be other mechanisms that prevent their activation by commensal bacteria under steady-state conditions.

Dendritic cells (DCs) migrating via lymph are the primary influence regulating naive T cell differentiation, be it active immunity or tolerance. How DCs achieve this regulation in vivo is poorly understood. Intestinal DCs are in direct contact with harmless or pathogenic luminal contents, but may also be influenced by signals from epithelial cells, macrophages, or other resident or immigrant cells. To understand the role of TLR7 and TLR8 in regulating intestinal DC function, we fed a TLR7/8 ligand (resiquimod (R-848)) to rats and mice and examined DC in pseudoafferent lymph (rat) and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs). Oral R-848 induced a 20- to 30-fold increase in DC output from the intestine within 10 h due to a virtually total release of lamina propria DCs. This resulted in an accumulation of DCs in the MLNs that in mice was completely TNF-alpha dependent. Surprisingly, intestinal lymph DCs (iL-DCs) released by R-848 did not up-regulate CD86, but did up-regulate CD25. In contrast, MLN-DCs from R-848-stimulated rats and mice expressed high levels of CD86. This DC activation in MLNs was dependent on type 1 IFNs. The major source of these rapidly released cytokines is plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) and not classical DCs, because depletion of pDCs significantly reduces the R-848-stimulated increase in serum cytokine levels as well as the accumulation and activation of DCs in MLNs. These experiments show that TLR-mediated regulation of iL-DC functions in vivo is complex and does not depend only on direct iL-DC stimulation, but can be regulated by pDCs.