Search

The Gyrolab™ xP is a microfluidic platform for conducting ligand binding assays (LBAs) and is recognized for its utility in discovery bioanalysis. However, few reports have focused on the technology for regulated bioanalysis. This technology has the advantage of low reagent consumption, low sample volume, and automated ligand binding methods. To improve bioanalysis testing timelines and increase the speed at which biotherapeutics are delivered to patients, we evaluated the technology for its potential to deliver high-quality data at reduced testing timelines for regulated bioanalysis. Six LBA methods were validated to support bioanalysis for GLP toxicokinetic or clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Validation, sample analysis, and method transfer are described. In total, approximately 4000 samples have been tested for regulated bioanalysis to support 6 GLP toxicology studies and approximately 1000 samples to support 2 clinical studies. Gyrolab™ xP had high run pass rates (≥83%) and high incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) pass rates (>94%). The maximum total error observed across all QC levels for a given assay was <30% for all six LBAs. High instrument response precision (CV ≤5%) was observed across compact discs (CDs), and methods were validated to use a single standard curve across multiple CDs within a Gyrolab™ xP run. Reduced bioanalysis timelines were achieved compared to standard manual plate-based methods, and methods were successfully transferred across testing labs, paving the way for this platform for use in late-stage clinical development.

Most biotherapeutics can elicit immune responses in dosed recipients generating anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are a subpopulation of ADAs that can potentially impact patient safety and directly mediate loss of drug efficacy by blocking the biological activity of a therapeutic product. Therefore, NAb detection is an important aspect of immunogenicity assessment, requiring sensitive and reliable methods reflective of the therapeutic mechanism of action (MoA). Both cell-based and non cell-based assays are viable options for NAb assessment. However, the scientific approach for the selection of a suitable assay format (cell-based or non cell-based) for NAb assessment is not currently well defined. In this manuscript, the authors summarize the design and utility of cell-based and non cell-based NAb assays and recommend a NAb assay format selection approach that relies on a combination of three factors. These include (i) the therapeutic MoA, (ii) the evidence of desirable assay performance characteristics, and (iii) risk of immunogenicity. The utility of correlating NAb response with pharmacodynamic data is also discussed. The aim of this paper is to provide a consistent strategy that will guide the selection of scientifically justified assay formats capable of detecting clinically relevant NAbs for biotherapeutics with varying MoAs and diverse complexity.

The Global Bioanalysis Consortium (GBC) set up an international team to explore the impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments. The intent of this paper is to define the field and propose best practices when developing PK assays for biotherapeutics. We focus on the impact of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) on the performance of PK assay leading to the impact on the reported drug concentration and exposure. The manuscript describes strategies to assess whether the observed change in the drug concentration is due to the ADA impact on drug clearance rates or is a consequence of ADA interference in the bioanalytical method applied to measure drug concentration. This paper provides the bioanalytical scientist guidance for developing ADA-tolerant PK methods. It is essential that the data generated in the PK, ADA, pharmacodynamic and efficacy/toxicity evaluations are viewed together. Therefore, the extent for the investigation of the PK sensitivity to the presence of ADA should be driven by the project needs and risk based.