Search

Because of its high specificity, trypsin is the enzyme of choice in shotgun proteomics. Nonetheless, several publications do report the identification of semitryptic and nontryptic peptides. Many of these peptides are thought to be signaling peptides or to have formed during sample preparation. It is known that only a small fraction of tandem mass spectra from a trypsin-digested protein mixture can be confidently matched to tryptic peptides. If other possibilities such as post-translational modifications and single-amino acid polymorphisms are ignored, this suggests that many unidentified spectra originate from semitryptic and nontryptic peptides. To include them in database searches, however, may not improve overall peptide identification because of the possible sensitivity reduction from search space expansion. To circumvent this issue for E-value-based search methods, we have designed a scheme that categorizes qualified peptides (i.e., peptides whose differences in molecular weight from the parent ion are within a specified error tolerance) into three tiers: tryptic, semitryptic, and nontryptic. This classification allows peptides that belong to different tiers to have different Bonferroni correction factors. Our results show that this scheme can significantly improve retrieval performance compared to those of search strategies that assign equal Bonferroni correction factors to all qualified peptides.

In this paper, we present Molecular Isotopic Distribution Analysis (MIDAs), a new software tool designed to compute molecular isotopic distributions with adjustable accuracies. MIDAs offers two algorithms, one polynomial-based and one Fourier-transform-based, both of which compute molecular isotopic distributions accurately and efficiently. The polynomial-based algorithm contains few novel aspects, whereas the Fourier-transform-based algorithm consists mainly of improvements to other existing Fourier-transform-based algorithms. We have benchmarked the performance of the two algorithms implemented in MIDAs with that of eight software packages (BRAIN, Emass, Mercury, Mercury5, NeutronCluster, Qmass, JFC, IC) using a consensus set of benchmark molecules. Under the proposed evaluation criteria, MIDAs's algorithms, JFC, and Emass compute with comparable accuracy the coarse-grained (low-resolution) isotopic distributions and are more accurate than the other software packages. For fine-grained isotopic distributions, we compared IC, MIDAs's polynomial algorithm, and MIDAs's Fourier transform algorithm. Among the three, IC and MIDAs's polynomial algorithm compute isotopic distributions that better resemble their corresponding exact fine-grained (high-resolution) isotopic distributions. MIDAs can be accessed freely through a user-friendly web-interface at .[Figure not available: see fulltext.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]