Search

We analyze the error compensations that are responsible for the relatively good performance of the popular B3LYP/6-31G* model chemistry for molecular thermochemistry. We present the B3LYP-gCP-D3/6-31G* scheme, which corrects for missing London dispersion and basis set superposition error (BSSE) in a physically sound manner. Benchmark results for the general main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions set (GMTKN30) are presented. A detailed look is cast on organic reactions of several arenes with C60, Diels--Alder reactions, and barriers to [4 + 3] cycloadditions. We demonstrate the practical advantages of the new B3LYP-gCP-D3/6-31G* scheme and show its higher robustness over standard B3LYP/6-31G*. B3LYP-gCP-D3/6*31G* is meant to fully substitute standard B3LYP/6-31G* calculations in the same black-box sense at essentially no increase in computational cost. The energy corrections are made available by a Web service (http://www.thch.uni-bonn.de/tc/gcpd3) and by freely available software. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phosphate···π, also called anion···π, contacts occur between nucleobases and anionic phosphate oxygens (OP2) in r(GNRA) and r(UNNN) U-turn motifs (N = A,G,C,U; R = A,G). These contacts were investigated using state-of-the-art quantum-chemical methods (QM) to characterize their physicochemical properties and to serve as a reference to evaluate AMBER force field (AFF) performance. We found that phosphate···π interaction energies calculated with the AFF for dimethyl phosphate···nucleobase model systems are less stabilizing in comparison with double-hybrid DFT and that minimum contact distances are larger for all nucleobases. These distance stretches are also observed in large-scale AFF vs QM/MM computations and classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on several r(gcGNRAgc) tetraloop hairpins when compared to experimental data extracted from X-ray/cryo-EM structures (res. ≤ 2.5 Å) using the WebFR3D bioinformatic tool. MD simulations further revealed shifted OP2/nucleobase positions. We propose that discrepancies between the QM and AFF result from a combination of missing polarization in the AFF combined with too large AFF Lennard-Jones (LJ) radii of nucleobase carbon atoms in addition to an exaggerated short-range repulsion of the r -12 LJ repulsive term. We compared these results with earlier data gathered on lone pair···π contacts in CpG Z-steps occurring in r(UNCG) tetraloops. In both instances, charge transfer calculations do not support any significant n → π* donation effects. We also investigated thiophosphate···π contacts that showed reduced stabilizing interaction energies when compared to phosphate···π contacts. Thus, we challenge suggestions that the experimentally observed enhanced thermodynamic stability of phosphorothioated r(GNRA) tetraloops can be explained by larger London dispersion.

The lone-pair···π (lp···π) (deoxy)ribose···nucleobase stacking is a recurring interaction in Z-DNA and RNAs that is characterized by sub-van der Waals lp···π contacts (<3.0 Å). It is a part of the structural signature of CpG Z-step motifs in Z-DNA and r(UNCG) tetraloops that are known to behave poorly in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Although the exact origin of the MD simulation issues remains unclear, a significant part of the problem might be due to an imbalanced description of nonbonded interactions, including the characteristic lp···π stacking. To gain insights into the links between lp···π stacking and MD, we present an in-depth comparison between accurate large-basis-set double-hybrid Kohn-Sham density functional theory calculations DSD-BLYP-D3/ma-def2-QZVPP (DHDF-D3) and data obtained with the nonbonded potential of the AMBER force field (AFF) for NpN Z-steps (N = G, A, C, and U). Among other differences, we found that the AFF overestimates the DHDF-D3 lp···π distances by ∼0.1-0.2 Å, while the deviation between the DHDF-D3 and AFF descriptions sharply increases in the short-range region of the interaction. Based on atom-in-molecule polarizabilities and symmetry-adapted perturbation theory analysis, we inferred that the DHDF-D3 versus AFF differences partly originate in identical nucleobase carbon atom Lennard-Jones (LJ) parameters despite the presence/absence of connected electron-withdrawing groups that lead to different effective volumes or vdW radii. Thus, to precisely model the very short CpG lp···π contact distances, we recommend revision of the nucleobase atom LJ parameters. Additionally, we suggest that the large discrepancy between DHDF-D3 and AFF short-range repulsive part of the interaction energy potential may significantly contribute to the poor performances of MD simulations of nucleic acid systems containing Z-steps. Understanding where, and if possible why, the point-charge-type effective potentials reach their limits is vital for developing next-generation FFs and for addressing specific issues in contemporary MD simulations.

Phosphorothioates (PTs) are important chemical modifications of the RNA backbone where a single nonbridging oxygen of the phosphate is replaced with a sulfur atom. PT can stabilize RNAs by protecting them from hydrolysis and is commonly used as a tool to explore their function. It is, however, unclear what basic physical effects PT has on RNA stability and electronic structure. Here, we present molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, quantum mechanical (QM) calculations, and NMR spectroscopy measurements, exploring the effects of PT modifications in the structural context of the neomycin-sensing riboswitch (NSR). The NSR is the smallest biologically functional riboswitch with a well-defined structure stabilized by a U-turn motif. Three of the signature interactions of the U-turn: an H-bond, an anion-π interaction, and a potassium binding site; are formed by RNA phosphates, making the NSR an ideal model for studying how PT affects RNA structure and dynamics. By comparing with high-level QM calculations, we reveal the distinct physical properties of the individual interactions facilitated by the PT. The sulfur substitution, besides weakening the direct H-bond interaction, reduces the directionality of H-bonding while increasing its dispersion and induction components. It also reduces the induction and increases the dispersion component of the anion-π stacking. The sulfur force-field parameters commonly employed in the literature do not reflect these distinctions, leading to the unsatisfactory description of PT in simulations of the NSR. We show that it is not possible to accurately describe the PT interactions using one universal set of van der Waals sulfur parameters and provide suggestions for improving the force-field performance.

Although atomistic explicit-solvent Molecular Dynamics (MD) is a popular tool to study protein-RNA recognition, satisfactory MD description of protein-RNA complexes is not always achieved. Unfortunately, it is often difficult to separate MD simulation instabilities primarily caused by the simple point-charge molecular mechanics (MM) force fields from problems related to the notorious uncertainties in the starting structures. Herein, we report a series of large-scale QM/MM calculations on the U1A protein-RNA complex. This experimentally well-characterized system has an intricate protein-RNA interface, which is very unstable in MD simulations. The QM/MM calculations identify several H-bonds poorly described by the MM method and thus indicate the sources of instabilities of the U1A interface in MD simulations. The results suggest that advanced QM/MM computations could be used to indirectly rationalize problems seen in MM-based MD simulations of protein-RNA complexes. As the most accurate QM method, we employ the computationally demanding meta-GGA density functional TPSS-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP level of theory. Because considerably faster methods would be needed to extend sampling and to study even larger protein-RNA interfaces, a set of low-cost QM/MM methods is compared to the TPSS-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP data. The PBEh-3c and B97-3c density functional composite methods appear to be suitable for protein-RNA interfaces. In contrast, HF-3c and the tight-binding Hamiltonians DFTB3-D3 and GFN-xTB perform unsatisfactorily and do not provide any advantage over the MM description. These conclusions are supported also by similar analysis of a simple HutP protein-RNA interface, which is well-described by MD with the exception of just one H-bond. Some other methodological aspects of QM/MM calculations on protein-RNA interfaces are discussed.

The HutP protein from B. subtilis regulates histidine metabolism by interacting with an antiterminator mRNA hairpin in response to the binding of l-histidine and Mg 2+ . We studied the functional ligand-bound HutP hexamer complexed with two mRNAs using all-atom microsecond-scale explicit-solvent MD simulations performed with the Amber force fields. The experimentally observed protein-RNA interface exhibited good structural stability in the simulations with the exception of some fluctuations in an unusual adenine-threonine interaction involving two closely spaced H-bonds. We further investigated this interaction by comparing QM/MM and MM optimizations, using the QM region comprising almost 350 atoms described at the DFT-D3 level. The QM/MM method clearly improved the adenine-threonine interaction compared to MM, especially when the X-H bond lengths were frozen during the MM optimization to mimic the use of SHAKE in the MD simulations. Thus, both the MM approximation and the use of SHAKE can compromise the description of H-bonds at protein-RNA interfaces. The simulations also revealed a notable Mg 2+ -parameter dependence in the behavior of the ligand-binding pocket (LBP). With the SPC/E water model, the 12-6 Åqvist and Li&Merz parameters provided an entirely stable LBP structure, but the 12-6 Allnér and 12-6-4 Li&Merz parametrizations resulted in a progressive loss of direct nitrogen-Mg 2+ LBP coordination. The Allnér and Li&Merz 12-6 parametrizations were also tested with the TIP3P water model; the LBP was destabilized in both cases. This illustrates the difficulty of consistently describing different Mg 2+ interactions using nonpolarizable force fields. Overall, the simulations support the hypothesis that HutP protein becomes fully structured upon ligand binding. Subsequent RNA binding does not affect the protein structure, in keeping with the mechanism inferred from experimental structures.

Modern dispersion-corrected DFT methods have made it possible to perform reliable QM studies on complete nucleic acid (NA) building blocks having hundreds of atoms. Such calculations, although still limited to investigations of potential energy surfaces, enhance the portfolio of computational methods applicable to NAs and offer considerably more accurate intrinsic descriptions of NAs than standard MM. However, in practice such calculations are hampered by the use of implicit solvent environments and truncation of the systems. Conventional QM optimizations are spoiled by spurious intramolecular interactions and severe structural deformations. Here we compare two approaches designed to suppress such artifacts: partially restrained continuum solvent QM and explicit solvent QM/MM optimizations. We report geometry relaxations of a set of diverse double-quartet guanine quadruplex (GQ) DNA stems. Both methods provide neat structures without major artifacts. However, each one also has distinct weaknesses. In restrained optimizations, all errors in the target geometries (i.e., low-resolution X-ray and NMR structures) are transferred to the optimized geometries. In QM/MM, the initial solvent configuration causes some heterogeneity in the geometries. Nevertheless, both approaches represent a decisive step forward compared to conventional optimizations. We refine earlier computations that revealed sizable differences in the relative energies of GQ stems computed with AMBER MM and QM. We also explore the dependence of the QM/MM results on the applied computational protocol.

We have created a benchmark set of quantum chemical structure-energy data denoted as UpU46, which consists of 46 uracil dinucleotides (UpU), representing all known 46 RNA backbone conformational families. Penalty-function-based restrained optimizations with COSMO TPSS-D3/def2-TZVP ensure a balance between keeping the target conformation and geometry relaxation. The backbone geometries are close to the clustering-means of their respective RNA bioinformatics family classification. High-level wave function methods (DLPNO-CCSD(T) as reference) and a wide-range of dispersion-corrected or inclusive DFT methods (DFT-D3, VV10, LC-BOP-LRD, M06-2X, M11, and more) are used to evaluate the conformational energies. The results are compared to the Amber RNA bsc0χOL3 force field. Most dispersion-corrected DFT methods surpass the Amber force field significantly in accuracy and yield mean absolute deviations (MADs) for relative conformational energies of ∼0.4-0.6 kcal/mol. Double-hybrid density functionals represent the most accurate class of density functionals. Low-cost quantum chemical methods such as PM6-D3H+, HF-3c, DFTB3-D3, as well as small basis set calculations corrected for basis set superposition errors (BSSEs) by the gCP procedure are also tested. Unfortunately, the presently available low-cost methods are struggling to describe the UpU conformational energies with satisfactory accuracy. The UpU46 benchmark is an ideal test for benchmarking and development of fast methods to describe nucleic acids, including force fields.

A set of conformations obtained from explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the Sarcin-Ricin internal loop (SRL) RNA motif is investigated using quantum mechanical (QM, TPSS-D3/def2-TZVP DFT-D3) and molecular mechanics (MM, AMBER parm99bsc0+χol3 force field) methods. Solvent effects are approximated using implicit solvent methods (COSMO for DFT-D3; GB and PB for MM). Large-scale DFT-D3 optimizations of the full 11-nucleotide motif are compared to MM results and reveal a higher flexibility of DFT-D3 over the MM in the optimization procedure. Conformational energies of the SRL motif expose significant differences in the DFT-D3 and MM energy descriptions that explain difficulties in MD simulations of the SRL motif. The TPSS-D3 data are in excellent agreement with results obtained by the hybrid functionals PW6B95-D3 and M06-2X. Computationally more efficient methods such as PM6-D3H and HF-3c show promising but partly inconsistent results. It is demonstrated that large-scale DFT-D3 computations on complete nucleic acids building blocks are a viable tool to complement the picture obtained from MD simulations and can be used as benchmarks for faster computational methods. Methodological challenges of large-scale QM computations on nucleic acids such as missing solvent-solute interactions and the truncation of the studied systems are discussed.

Molecular mechanical (MM) force fields are commonly employed for biomolecular simulations. Despite their success, the nonpolarizable nature of contemporary additive force fields limits their performance, especially in long simulations and when strong polarization effects are present. Guanine quadruplex D(R)NA molecules have been successfully studied by MM simulations in the past. However, the G-stems are stabilized by a chain of monovalent cations that create sizable polarization effects. Indeed, simulation studies revealed several problems that have been tentatively attributed to the lack of polarization. Here, we provide a detailed comparison between quantum chemical (QM) DFT-D3 and MM potential energy surfaces of ion binding to G-stems and assess differences that may affect MM simulations. We suggest that MM describes binding of a single ion to the G-stem rather well. However, polarization effects become very significant when a second ion is present. We suggest that the MM approximation substantially limits accuracy of description of energy and dynamics of multiple ions inside the G-stems and binding of ions at the stem-loop junctions. The difference between QM and MM descriptions is also explored using symmetry-adapted perturbation theory and quantum theory of atoms in molecules analyses, which reveal a delicate balance of electrostatic and induction effects.