Search

Bis-heteroleptic cyclometalated iridium complexes of the form Ir(La)2(acac), where La is a substituted 2-phenylpyridine derivative and acac is an acetylacetonato ligand, are a useful class of luminescent organometallic complexes for a range of applications. Related tris-heteroleptic complexes of the form Ir(La)(Lb)(acac) offer the potential advantage of greater functionality through the use of two different cyclometalated ligands but are, in general, more difficult to obtain. We report the synthesis of divergent bis- and tris-heteroleptic triisopropylsilylethynyl-substituted intermediate complexes that can be diversified using a "chemistry-on-the-complex" approach. We demonstrate the methodology through one-pot deprotection and Sonogashira cross-coupling of the intermediate complexes with para-R-aryliodides (R = H, SMe, and CN). The photophysical and electrochemical behaviors of the resultant bis- and tris-heteroleptic complexes are compared, and it is shown that the tris-heteroleptic complexes exhibit subtly different emission and redox properties to the bis-heteroleptic complexes, such as further red-shifted emission maxima and lower extinction coefficients, which can be attributed to the reduced symmetry. It is demonstrated, supported by DFT and time-dependent DFT calculations, that the charge-transfer character of the emission can be altered via variation of the terminal substituent; the introduction of an electron-withdrawing cyano group in the terminal position leads to a significant red shift, while the introduction of an SMe group can substantially increase the emission quantum yield. Most notably, this convenient synthetic approach reduces the need to perform the often challenging isolation of tris-heteroleptic complexes to a single divergent intermediate, which will simplify access to families of complexes of the form Ir(La)(Lb)(acac).

Pyridine-2-carboxylate (pic) has been employed extensively as a blue-shifting ancillary ligand in the production of cyclometalated iridium complexes used in OLEDs, but surprisingly, further elaboration of this ligand has largely been unexplored. In this work we demonstrate a simple and versatile route for modifying picolinate ligands coordinated to iridium. Reacting a μ-chloro iridium(C∧N) dimer (where C∧N is a phenylpyridine-based ligand) with 4-bromopicolinic acid (HpicBr) yields the corresponding iridium(C∧N)2(picBr) complexes, which were readily modified by a Suzuki–Miyaura reaction to give the corresponding aryl-substituted picolinate complexes. The luminescent behavior of these complexes shows that by restricting the torsional angle between the substituent and pic the emission can be shifted by up to 77 nm.

A simple and versatile route for modifying picolinate ligands coordinated to iridium is described. Reacting a μ-chloro iridium(C∧N) dimer (where C∧N is a phenylpyridine-based ligand) with bromopicolinic acid (HpicBr) yields the corresponding iridium(C∧N)2(picBr) complexes (1–4 and 11), which were readily modified by a Sonogashira reaction to give eight alkyne-substituted picolinate complexes (5–10, 12, and 13). The luminescent behavior of these complexes shows that the position of substitution about the picolinate ring has an effect on both photophysical behavior as well as the reactivity.

The single molecule conductances of a series of bis-2,2':6',2″-terpyridine complexes featuring Ru(II), Fe(II), and Co(II) metal ions and trimethylsilylethynyl (Me3SiC≡C-) or thiomethyl (MeS-) surface contact groups have been determined. In the absence of electrochemical gating, these complexes behave as tunneling barriers, with conductance properties determined more by the strength of the electrode-molecule contact and the structure of the "linker" than the nature of the metal-ion or redox properties of the complex.

The ligands 4'-(4-(methylthio)phenyl)-2,2':6',2″-terpyridine (L(1)), 4'-((4-(methylthio)phenyl)ethynyl)- 2,2':6',2″-terpyridine (L(2)), and bis(tridentate) bridging ligand 2,3,5,6-tetra(pyridine-2-yl)pyrazine (tpp) were used to prepare the complexes [Ru(L(1))2][PF6]2 ([1][PF6]2, [Ru(L(2))2][PF6]2 ([2][PF6]2), [{(L(1))Ru}(μ-tpp){Ru(L(1))}][PF6]4 ([3][PF6]4), and [{(L(2))Ru}(μ-tpp){Ru(L(2))}][PF6]4 ([4][PF6]4). Crystallographically determined structures give S···S distances of up to 32.0 Å in [4](4+). On the basis of electrochemical estimates, the highest occupied molecular orbitals of these complexes fall between -5.55 and -5.85 eV, close to the work function of clean gold (5.1-5.3 eV). The decay of conductance with molecular length across this series of molecules is approximately exponential, giving rise to a decay constant (pseudo β-value) of 1.5 nm(-1), falling between decay factors for oligoynes and oligophenylenes. The results are consistent with a tunnelling mechanism for the single-molecule conductance behavior.

Two new cyclotriphosphazene ligands with pendant 2,2':6',2″-terpyridine (Terpy) moieties, namely, (pentaphenoxy){4-[2,6-bis(2-pyridyl)]pyridoxy}cyclotriphosphazene (L(1)), (pentaphenoxy){4-[2,6-terpyridin-4-yl]phenoxy}cyclotriphosphazene (L(2)), and their respective polymeric analogues, L(1P) and L(2P), were synthesized. These ligands were used to form iron(II) complexes with an Fe(II)Terpy(2) core. Variable-temperature resonance Raman, UV-visible, and Mössbauer spectroscopies with magnetic measurements aided by density functional theory calculations were used to understand the physical characteristics of the complexes. By a comparison of measurements, the polymers were shown to behave in the same way as the cyclotriphosphazene analogues. The results showed that spin crossover (SCO) can be induced to start at high temperatures by extending the spacer length of the ligand to that in L(2) and L(2P); this combination provides a route to forming a malleable SCO material.

Copper(II) chloride and bromide react with the pyridyloxy-substituted cyclotetraphosphazene ligands, octakis(2-pyridyloxy)cyclotetraphosphazene (L(1)), and octakis(4-methyl-2-pyridyloxy)cyclotetraphosphazene (L(2)), to form the dimetallic complexes, [L(CuX2)2] (L = L(1), X = Br; L = L(2), X = Cl or Br), and [{L(1)(CuCl2)2}n]. Single crystal X-ray crystallography shows the complex [{L(1)(CuCl2)2}n] to be a coordination polymer propagated by interligand "Cu(mu-Cl)2Cu" bridges whereas [L(2)(CuCl2)2] forms discrete dimetallic cyclotetraphosphazene-based moieties. The variable temperature magnetic susceptibility data for [{L(1)(CuCl2)2}n] are consistent with a weak antiferromagnetic exchange interaction between the copper(II) centers occurring via the bridging chloride ions. [L(2)(CuCl2)2] and [L(CuBr2)2] (L = L(1) and L(2)) exhibit normal Curie-like susceptibilities. The abstraction of a chloride ion, using [Ag(MeCN)4](PF6), from each copper site in [L(2)(CuCl2)2], affords the new complex, [L(2)(CuCl)2](PF6)2, in which the two copper(II) ions are separated by "N-P=N-P=N" phosphazene bridges. Electron spin resonance and variable temperature magnetic measurements indicate the occurrence of weak antiferromagnetic coupling between the unpaired electrons on the copper(II) centers. Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations on the [L(2)(CuCl)2](2+) dication and the related cyclotriphosphazene complex, [L(4)(CuCl2)2] (L(4) = hexakis(4-methyl-2-pyridyloxy)cyclotriphosphazene), have identified "electron-density-bridge" molecular orbitals which involve Cu 3d orbitals overlapping with the non-bonding N-based molecular orbitals on the phosphazene rings as the pathway for this interaction.