Search

Your search keyword '"Feuer, Eric J"' showing total 9 results
Start Over Author "Feuer, Eric J" Publisher american college of physicians
9 results on '"Feuer, Eric J"'

1. Risk Model–Based Lung Cancer Screening

Author

Toumazis, Iakovos, primary, Cao, Pianpian, additional, de Nijs, Koen, additional, Bastani, Mehrad, additional, Munshi, Vidit, additional, Hemmati, Mehdi, additional, ten Haaf, Kevin, additional, Jeon, Jihyoun, additional, Tammemägi, Martin, additional, Gazelle, G. Scott, additional, Feuer, Eric J., additional, Kong, Chung Yin, additional, Meza, Rafael, additional, de Koning, Harry J., additional, Plevritis, Sylvia K., additional, and Han, Summer S., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms

Author

Mandelblatt, Jeanne S., Cronin, Kathleen A., Bailey, Stephanie, Berry, Donald A., de Koning, Harry J., Draisma, Gerrit, Huang, Hui, Lee, Sandra J., Munsell, Mark, Plevritis, Sylvia K., Ravdin, Peter, Schechter, Clyde B., Sigal, Bronislava, Stoto, Michael A., Stout, Natasha K., van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T., Venier, John, Zelen, Marvin, and Feuer, Eric J.

Subjects
Breast cancer -- Diagnosis, Breast cancer -- Prevention, Mammography -- Usage, Cancer -- Diagnosis, Cancer -- Methods, Health
Abstract

Background: Despite trials of mammography and widespread use, optimal screening policy is controversial. Objective: To evaluate U.S. breast cancer screening strategies. Design: 6 models using common data elements. Data Sources: National data on age-specific incidence, competing mortality, mamography characteristics, and treatment effects. Target Population: A contemporary population cohort. Time Horizon: Lifetime. Perspective: Societal. Interventions: 20 screening strategies with varying initiation and cessation ages applied annually or biennially. Outcome Measures: Number of mammograms, reduction in deaths from breast cancer or life-years gained (vs. no screening), false-positive results, unnecessary biopsies, and overdiagnosis. Results of Base-Case Analysis: The 6 models produced consistent rankings of screening strategies. Screening biennially maintained an average of 81% (range across strategies and models, 67% to 99%) of the benefit of annual screening with almost half the number of false-positive results. Screening biennially from ages 50 to 69 years achieved a median 16.5% (range, 15% to 23%) reduction in breast cancer deaths versus no screening. Initiating biennial screening at age 40 years (vs. 50 years) reduced mortality by an additional 3% (range, 1% to 6%), consumed more resources, and yielded more false-positive results. Biennial screening after age 69 years yielded some additional mortality reduction in all models, but overdiagnosis increased most substantially at older ages. Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Varying test sensitivity or treatment patterns did not change conclusions. Limitation: Results do not include morbidity from false-positive results, patient knowledge of earlier diagnosis, or unnecessary treatment. Conclusion: Biennial screening achieves most of the benefit of annual screening with less harm. Decisions about the best strategy depend on program and individual objectives and the weight placed on benefits, harms, and resource considerations. Primary Funding Source: National Cancer Institute.

Published
2009

4. Breast cancer screening among women from 65 to 74 years of age in 1987-88 and 1991

Author

Coleman, Elizabeth Ann and Feuer, Eric J.

Subjects
Breast cancer -- Diagnosis, Mammography -- Usage, Health
Abstract

Mammography among older women aged 65 to 74 increased significantly from 1987-88 to 1991, but clinical breast examination decreased over the same period. While older women have twice the breast cancer mortality rate of younger women and although studies suggest breast cancer screening is more effective in older women, they are still less likely to undergo mammography and clinical breast examination than younger women. A study comparing surveys of mammography and clinical breast examination use among older women in five different areas of the US found mammography use increased from 19% to 33% in 1987-88 to 35% to 59% in 1988. However, clinical breast examination use decreased from 95% to 85% among women who had had a mammogram. To be most effective, breast cancer screening should include mammography, clinical breast examination and a third method not surveyed, breast self examination.

Published
1992

5. Reconciling the Effects of Screening on Prostate Cancer Mortality in the ERSPC and PLCO Trials

Author

Tsodikov, Alex, primary, Gulati, Roman, additional, Heijnsdijk, Eveline A.M., additional, Pinsky, Paul F., additional, Moss, Sue M., additional, Qiu, Sheng, additional, de Carvalho, Tiago M., additional, Hugosson, Jonas, additional, Berg, Christine D., additional, Auvinen, Anssi, additional, Andriole, Gerald L., additional, Roobol, Monique J., additional, Crawford, E. David, additional, Nelen, Vera, additional, Kwiatkowski, Maciej, additional, Zappa, Marco, additional, Luján, Marcos, additional, Villers, Arnauld, additional, Feuer, Eric J., additional, de Koning, Harry J., additional, Mariotto, Angela B., additional, and Etzioni, Ruth, additional

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Models in the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Author

Habbema, J. Dik F., primary, Wilt, Timothy J., additional, Etzioni, Ruth, additional, Nelson, Heidi D., additional, Schechter, Clyde B., additional, Lawrence, William F., additional, Melnikow, Joy, additional, Kuntz, Karen M., additional, Owens, Douglas K., additional, and Feuer, Eric J., additional

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Personalizing Age of Cancer Screening Cessation Based on Comorbid Conditions: Model Estimates of Harms and Benefits

Author

Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris, primary, Gulati, Roman, additional, Mariotto, Angela B., additional, Schechter, Clyde B., additional, de Carvalho, Tiago M., additional, Knudsen, Amy B., additional, van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T., additional, Heijnsdijk, Eveline A.M., additional, Pabiniak, Chester, additional, van Ballegooijen, Marjolein, additional, Rutter, Carolyn M., additional, Kuntz, Karen M., additional, Feuer, Eric J., additional, Etzioni, Ruth, additional, de Koning, Harry J., additional, Zauber, Ann G., additional, and Mandelblatt, Jeanne S., additional

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Benefits and Harms of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Strategies: A Comparative Modeling Study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Author

de Koning, Harry J., primary, Meza, Rafael, additional, Plevritis, Sylvia K., additional, ten Haaf, Kevin, additional, Munshi, Vidit N., additional, Jeon, Jihyoun, additional, Erdogan, Saadet Ayca, additional, Kong, Chung Yin, additional, Han, Summer S., additional, van Rosmalen, Joost, additional, Choi, Sung Eun, additional, Pinsky, Paul F., additional, de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington, additional, Berg, Christine D., additional, Black, William C., additional, Tammemägi, Martin C., additional, Hazelton, William D., additional, Feuer, Eric J., additional, and McMahon, Pamela M., additional

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Breast Cancer screening among Women from 65 to 74 Years of Age in 1987-88 and 1991.

Author

Copleman, Elizabeth Ann and Feuer, Eric J.

Subjects
*BREAST cancer diagnosis, *MAMMOGRAMS, *MEDICARE
Abstract

Presents a study that compared breast cancer screening rates from the 1991 survey with data from 1987 to 1988 for women aged 65 to 74. Effects of Medicare benefit on mammography use; Demography of the study populations; Changes in the use of clinical breast examination; Reasons for never having a mammogram.

Published
1992
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results