1. What Does It Mean to Be Ranked a 'High' or 'Low' Value-Added Teacher? Observing Differences in Instructional Quality Across Districts
- Author
-
Johanna Barmore, Erica Litke, and David Blazar
- Subjects
Value (ethics) ,Teaching method ,media_common.quotation_subject ,05 social sciences ,Comparability ,050301 education ,Academic achievement ,Education ,Student achievement ,0502 economics and business ,Mathematics education ,Quality (business) ,Video technology ,050207 economics ,Mathematics instruction ,Psychology ,0503 education ,media_common - Abstract
Education agencies are evaluating teachers using student achievement data. However, very little is known about the comparability of test-based or “value-added” metrics across districts and the extent to which they capture variability in classroom practices. Drawing on data from four urban districts, we found that teachers were categorized differently when compared within versus across districts. In addition, analyses of scores from two observation instruments, as well as qualitative viewing of lesson videos, identified stark differences in instructional practices across districts among teachers who received similar within-district value-added rankings. These patterns were not explained by observable background characteristics of teachers, suggesting that factors beyond labor market sorting likely played a key role.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF