1. Radial Growth and Physiological Response of Coniferous Trees to Arctic Amplification
- Author
-
Trofim C. Maximov, Yojiro Matsuura, Shunsuke Tei, Hisashi Sato, Hitoshi Yonenobu, Atsuko Sugimoto, Akira Osawa, Junichi Fujinuma, and Maochang Liang
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Atmospheric Science ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Ecology ,δ13C ,Paleontology ,Soil Science ,Climate change ,Primary production ,Forestry ,Aquatic Science ,Dynamic global vegetation model ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Boreal ,Isotopes of carbon ,Climatology ,Polar amplification ,Environmental science ,Precipitation ,Physical geography ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Water Science and Technology - Abstract
We describe the physiological responses of boreal conifers to climate change for the past 112 years using ring width and carbon isotope ratios (δ13C) chronologies at six forest sites in northern Eurasia and Canada. Responses differed among regions, depending on their climatic and/or geographic characteristics. Tree radial growth decreased over the past 52 years in central eastern Siberia with the higher rate of summer temperature increase than other regions, as indicated by the negative correlation between radial growth and summer temperature, but increased in northern Europe and Canada. Changes in tree-ring δ13C indicated that recent climatic conditions have induced stronger drought stress for trees from central eastern Siberia than for those from other regions. The observed tree growth trends were compared to those simulated using a dynamic global vegetation model. Although the modeled annual net primary production (NPP) for trees generally exhibited similar decadal variation to radial growth, simulations did not show a recent decrease in tree growth, even in central eastern Siberia. This was probably due to an overestimation of the sensitivity of modeled tree NPP to precipitation. Our results suggest that the tree NPP forecasted under the expected future increases in temperature and average precipitation might be overestimated, especially in severely dry regions such as central eastern Siberia.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF