Search

Importance: Single sensory impairment is associated with reduced functional resilience and increased mortality, though the effects of multiple sensory deficits are not known., Objective: To investigate longitudinal associations of the type, severity, and number of sensory impairments with physical function trajectories and mortality in older adults., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort study, the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) study, incorporated data from April 1997 to July 2013, featuring a 16-year follow-up with annual examinations and questionnaires. The cohort comprised 3075 men and women, aged 70 to 79 years at baseline, residing in Memphis, Tennessee, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. All participants with complete sensory testing and covariate data at analytical baseline (year 5, 2002) were included. The data were analyzed September 1, 2022., Exposures: Visual, olfactory, auditory, and touch sensory functions were assessed between 2000 and 2002., Main Outcomes: The main outcomes included physical functioning trajectories and mortality risk. Physical function was assessed longitudinally using the Health ABC physical performance battery (HABCPPB)., Results: A total of 1825 individuals (mean [SD] age, 77.4 [3.2] years; 957 [52%] female) were included in this study. Multivariable analysis of HABCPPB decline indicated that having 1 sensory impairment (β estimate, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.02 to -0.001]); 2 sensory impairments (β estimate, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.02 to -0.01]); 3 sensory impairments (β estimate, -0.03 [95% CI, -0.04 to -0.02]); or 4 sensory impairments (β estimate, -0.04 [95% CI, -0.05,-0.03]) was significantly associated with a steeper HABCPPB score decline in a dose-dependent manner. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models indicated that having 1 sensory impairment (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.01-1.81]), 2 sensory impairments (HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.19-2.11]), 3 sensory impairments (HR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.33-2.42]), or 4 sensory impairments (HR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.39-2.79]) was significantly associated with increased mortality risk in a similarly dose-dependent manner., Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort study, the degree and number of multiple sensory impairments were associated with worse physical functioning and increased mortality risk. These findings represent an opportunity for further investigation into the value of screening, prevention, and treatment of sensory impairments to reduce morbidity and mortality in older adults.

Importance: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is increasingly recognized as a robust marker of frailty and mortality. Despite broad recognition of frailty as a critical component of head and neck cancer (HNC) care, there is no standardized frailty assessment., Objective: To assess the prevalence of OD and its association with frailty and postoperative outcomes in HNC., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective cohort study with enrollment between February 17, 2021, to September 29, 2021, at a tertiary academic medical center, 85 eligible adult patients with primary, treatment-naive HNC of mucosal or cutaneous origin were included. Patients with a history of COVID-19, neurocognitive, or primary smell/taste disorders were excluded., Exposures: Prospective olfactory assessments (self-reported, visual analog scale [VAS] and psychophysical, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test [UPSIT]) with concurrent frailty assessment (Risk Analysis Index [RAI]) were used. Olfactory-specific quality of life (QOL) was examined with brief Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS)., Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): The primary outcome was the prevalence of OD as assessed by VAS (0-10, no to normal smell) and UPSIT (0-40, higher scores reflect better olfaction) and its association with frailty (RAI, 0-81, higher scores indicate greater frailty). For surgical patients, secondary outcomes were associations between OD and postoperative length of stay (LOS), 30-day postoperative outcomes, and QOD-NS (0-21, higher scores indicate worse QOL)., Results: Among 51 patients with HNC (mean [SD] age, 63 [10] years; 39 [77%] male participants; 41 [80%] White participants), 24 (47%) were frail, and 4 (8%) were very frail. Despite median (IQR) self-reported olfaction by VAS of 9 (8-10), 30 (59%) patients demonstrated measured OD with psychophysical testing. No meaningful association was found between self-reported and psychophysical testing (Hodges-Lehmann, <0.001; 95% CI, -2 to 1); a total of 46 (90%) patients did not report decreased olfaction-specific QOL. Median UPSIT scores were lower in frail patients (Hodges-Lehmann, 6; 95% CI, 2-12). Multivariate modeling demonstrated severe microsmia/anosmia was associated with 1.75 (95% CI, 1.09-2.80) times odds of being frail/very frail and approximately 3 days increased LOS (β, 2.96; 95% CI, 0.29-5.62)., Conclusions and Relevance: Although patients with HNC are unaware of olfactory changes, OD is common and may serve as a bellwether of frailty. In this prospective cohort study, a dose-dependent association was demonstrated between increasing degrees of OD and frailty, and the potential utility of olfaction was highlighted as a touchstone in the assessment of HNC frailty.

Importance: Traumatic brain injury has been associated with short-term olfactory dysfunction, but the association of number of prior head injuries and head injury severity with both subjective and objective long-term olfactory function is less clear., Objective: To investigate the associations of prior head injury, number of prior head injuries, and head injury severity with subjective and psychophysical (objective) olfactory function in older adults and to examine concordance between subjective and objective olfactory function among individuals with and without head injury., Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included 5951 participants who attended Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study visit 5 (2011 through 2013). Data analysis was performed between November 2021 and May 2022., Exposures: Head injury was defined by self-report and International Classification of Diseases codes., Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported subjective olfactory dysfunction was assessed by the question, "Do you suffer from smell loss or a significantly decreased sense of smell?" Objective olfactory performance was assessed using the 12-item Sniffin' Sticks odor identification test., Results: Overall, the 5951 participants were a mean (SD) age of 75.6 (5.2) years, 3501 (58.8%) were female, 1356 (22.8%) were of Black race, and 1666 (28.0%) had a history of head injury. Participants with prior head injury were more likely than individuals without prior head injury to report subjective olfactory dysfunction (24% vs 20%; difference, 4%; 95% CI, 1% to 6%) and have objective anosmia (15% vs 13%; difference, 2%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 4%) but had lower concordance between subjective and objective assessment (72% vs 77%; difference, -5%; 95% CI, -8% to -3%). In logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographics and medical comorbidities including cognitive status, participants with a history of prior head injury, particularly individuals with 2 or more prior head injuries and more severe head injuries, were more likely to self-report subjective olfactory dysfunction and were more likely to be found to have objective anosmia compared with participants with no history of head injury., Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study provide evidence supporting the association between head injury and olfactory dysfunction, particularly among individuals who experienced multiple prior head injuries and among individuals with more severe head injury. The findings also suggest that individuals with prior head injury were more likely to both under-self-report and over-self-report deficits compared with objective olfactory testing; therefore, it may be important to consider objective olfactory testing in this patient population.