Search

Importance: As vaccinations against COVID-19 continue, potential ocular adverse events should be reported in detail to increase awareness among the medical community, although typically, a causal relationship cannot be established definitively., Objective: To describe ocular adverse events that occur soon after receiving an inactivated COVID-19 vaccination (Sinopharm)., Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series took place from September 2020 to January 2021 at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, a tertiary referral center. Patients who reported ocular adverse events and presented within 15 days from the first of 2 doses of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine were analyzed., Main Outcomes and Measures: Each patient underwent Snellen best-corrected visual acuity that was then converted to logMAR, applanation tonometry, and biomicroscopic examination with indirect ophthalmoscopy. Color fundus photography was obtained with a conventional 9-field fundus photography camera or with a widefield fundus photography system. Optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomographic angiography images were obtained. Sex, race, age, and clinical data were self-reported., Results: Nine eyes of 7 patients (3 male individuals) presenting with ocular complaints following COVID-19 vaccine were included in the study. The mean (SD) age was 41.4 (9.3) years (range, 30-55 years); the mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.23 logMAR (range, 0-1 logMAR; approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/32). The mean time of ocular adverse event manifestations was 5.2 days (range, 1-10 days). One patient was diagnosed with episcleritis, 2 with anterior scleritis, 2 with acute macular neuroretinopathy, 1 with paracentral acute middle maculopathy, and 1 with subretinal fluid., Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series study of 7 patients, the timing of transient and ocular complications 5.2 days after vaccination with an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine supported an association with the ocular findings, but a causal relationship cannot be established from this study design.

Importance: This case series highlights the risk of uveitis in patients treated with vemurafenib for unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma., Objective: To assess the occurrence and severity of uveitis as an adverse effect of vemurafenib therapy., Design, Setting, and Patients: In this observational small case series, data were collected successively from May 1, 2012, through February 31, 2013, from patients with clinical signs of ocular inflammation treated with vemurafenib at the Department of Ophthalmology, Cochin-Hôtel-Dieu Hospital., Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients' demographics, vemurafenib dosages, and the intervals between the onset of treatment and the first ocular symptoms were recorded. The characteristics of ocular inflammatory manifestations were analyzed. The effect of the discontinuation of vemurafenib therapy on ocular manifestations was assessed, as well as the effect of rechallenging when vemurafenib was reintroduced., Results: Seven patients (mean [SD] age, 74.7 [4.0] years) had uveitis. The vemurafenib dose was 960 mg twice per day in 6 patients and a half dose in 1 patient. The mean (SD) time until the appearance of ocular signs was 5.6 (2.3) months (range, 19 days to 7 months), and inflammation ranged from mild or low-grade anterior uveitis to severe explosive panuveitis complicated by retinal detachment. Signs of ocular inflammation were always bilateral. Optical coherence tomography revealed a macular edema in only 1 of the 7 patients. Clinical improvement occurred when vemurafenib therapy was stopped in 5 of 7 patients. The rechallenge at treatment reintroduction was positive in 2 of 7 patients., Conclusions and Relevance: This small case series highlights that uveitis can be a noteworthy adverse effect of vemurafenib therapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. However, these cases of uveitis were usually restricted to the anterior segment and manageable with local corticosteroid therapy, which justified the continuation of vemurafenib therapy because the benefits regarding the patients' survival were greater than the risk to their vision.