1. Sirolimus-Eluting vs Uncoated Stents for Prevention of Restenosis in Small Coronary Arteries
- Author
-
Diego Ardissino, Claudio Cavallini, Ezio Bramucci, Ciro Indolfi, Antonio Marzocchi, Antonio Manari, Giulia Angeloni, Giuseppe Carosio, Erminio Bonizzoni, Stefania Colusso, Monica Repetto, Piera Angelica Merlini, and for the SES-SMART Investigators
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Coronary Artery Disease ,Revascularization ,Coronary Restenosis ,Lesion ,Drug Delivery Systems ,Restenosis ,Angioplasty ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Single-Blind Method ,Prospective Studies ,Myocardial infarction ,Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ,Aged ,Sirolimus ,business.industry ,Stent ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Radiography ,Coronary arteries ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Circulatory system ,Cardiology ,Female ,Stents ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Immunosuppressive Agents - Abstract
ContextPercutaneous coronary revascularization of small vessels is associated with a high restenosis rate. Sirolimus-eluting stents reduce restenosis in simple and previously untreated lesions of large coronary arteries, but their outcomes in small vessels have not been adequately investigated.ObjectiveTo determine whether sirolimus-eluting stents are associated with a reduced 8-month rate of angiographic restenosis in comparison with an uncoated stent.Design, Setting, and PatientsThis was a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, prospective trial performed with 257 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization for ischemic heart disease, and who had a previously untreated atherosclerotic lesion located in a small segment with a diameter of 2.75 mm or less, in 20 Italian centers between August 2002 and December 2003.InterventionPatients were randomly assigned to receive a sirolimus-eluting stent (129 patients) or an uncoated stent having an identical architecture and radiographic appearance (128 patients).Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary end point was the 8-month binary in-segment restenosis rate; secondary end points included procedural success and the 8-month rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.ResultsThe mean (SD) reference diameter of the treated segment was 2.2 (0.28) mm; the lesion length, 11.84 (6.15) mm. After 8 months, the binary in-segment restenosis rate was 53.1% (60/113) in the patients receiving an uncoated stent and 9.8% (12/123) in those receiving a sirolimus-eluting stent (relative risk [RR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.32; P
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF