1. Effect of Screening for Coronary Artery Disease Using CT Angiography on Mortality and Cardiac Events in High-Risk Patients With Diabetes
- Author
-
Joseph B. Muhlestein, Joao A.C. Lima, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Donald L Lappe, Boaz D. Rosen, Viet T Le, Heidi T May, Steven R. Towner, Andrea L. Vavere, David A. Bluemke, Tami L Bair, and Stacey Knight
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,education.field_of_study ,Unstable angina ,business.industry ,Population ,Hazard ratio ,General Medicine ,Type 2 diabetes ,medicine.disease ,Angina ,Coronary artery disease ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,chemistry ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Cardiology ,Myocardial infarction ,Glycated hemoglobin ,education ,business - Abstract
Importance Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus, yet CAD often is asymptomatic prior to myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary death. Objective To assess whether routine screening for CAD by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes deemed to be at high cardiac risk followed by CCTA-directed therapy would reduce the risk of death and nonfatal coronary outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants The FACTOR-64 study was a randomized clinical trial in which 900 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes of at least 3 to 5 years’ duration and without symptoms of CAD were recruited from 45 clinics and practices of a single health system (Intermountain Healthcare, Utah), enrolled at a single-site coordinating center, and randomly assigned to CAD screening with CCTA (n = 452) or to standard national guidelines–based optimal diabetes care (n = 448) (targets: glycated hemoglobin level 50 mg/dL [women] or >40 mg/dL [men], triglycerides level Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization; the secondary outcome was ischemic major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of CAD death, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina). Results At a mean follow-up time of 4.0 (SD, 1.7) years, the primary outcome event rates were not significantly different between the CCTA and the control groups (6.2% [28 events] vs 7.6% [34 events]; hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.49-1.32]; P = .38). The incidence of the composite secondary end point of ischemic major adverse cardiovascular events also did not differ between groups (4.4% [20 events] vs 3.8% [17 events]; hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.60-2.19]; P = .68). Conclusions and Relevance Among asymptomatic patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, use of CCTA to screen for CAD did not reduce the composite rate of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization at 4 years. These findings do not support CCTA screening in this population. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00488033
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF