Search

An evaluation of precipitation and evapotranspiration simulated by mesoscale models is carried out within the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA) program. Six models performed simulations of a mesoscale convective system (MCS) observed to cross part of West Africa in August 2005. Initial and boundary conditions are found to significantly control the locations of rainfall at synoptic scales as simulated with either mesoscale or global models. When initialized and forced at their boundaries by the same analysis, all models forecast a westward-moving rainfall structure, as observed by satellite products. However, rainfall is also forecast at other locations where none was observed, and the nighttime northward propagation of rainfall is not well reproduced. There is a wide spread in the rainfall rates across simulations, but also among satellite products. The range of simulated meridional fluctuations of evapotranspiration (E) appears reasonable, but E displays an overly strong zonal symmetry. Offline land surface modeling and surface energy budget considerations show that errors in the simulated E are not simply related to errors in the surface evaporative fraction, and involve the significant impact of cloud cover on the incoming surface shortwave flux. The use of higher horizontal resolution (a few km) enhances the variability of precipitation, evapotranspiration, and precipitable water (PW) at the mesoscale. It also leads to a weakening of the daytime precipitation, less evapotranspiration, and smaller PW amounts. The simulated MCS propagates farther northward and somewhat faster within an overall drier atmosphere. These changes are associated with a strengthening of the links between PW and precipitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two monthly gridded precipitation datasets of the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP; the multisatellite product) and the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) Variability Analysis of Surface Climate Observations (VASClimO; rain gauge data) are compared for a 22-yr period, from January 1979 to December 2000, over land areas (i.e., latitudes 4°–20°N and longitudes 18°W–15°E). The two datasets are consistent with respect to the spatial distribution of the annual and seasonal rainfall climatology over the domain and along latitudinal bands. However, the satellite generally overestimates rainfall. The inability of the GPCC data to capture the bimodal rainfall pattern along the Guinea coast (i.e., south of latitude 8°N) is an artifact of the interpolation of the rain gauge data. For interannual variability, the gridded multisatellite and gridded gauge datasets agree on the sign of the anomaly 15 out of the 22 yr (68% of the time) for region 1 (between longitude 5° and 18°W and north of latitude 8°N) and 18 out of the 22 yr (82% of the time) for region 2 (between longitude 5°W and 15°E and north of latitude 8°N). The datasets agreed on the sign of the anomaly 14 out of the 22 yr (64% of the time) over the Guinea Coast. The magnitudes of the anomaly are very different in all years. Most of the years during which the two datasets did not agree on the sign of the anomaly were years with El Niño events. The ratio of the seasonal root-mean-square differences to the seasonal mean rainfall range between 0.24 and 2.60. The Kendall’s tau statistic indicated statistically significant trends in both datasets, separately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]