1. Characterizing lab instructors’ self-reported learning goals to inform development of an experimental modeling skills assessment
- Author
-
Laura Ríos, Benjamin Pollard, Heather Lewandowski, Jacob T. Stanley, and Dimitri R. Dounas-Frazer
- Subjects
Science instruction ,LC8-6691 ,Physics ,QC1-999 ,4. Education ,05 social sciences ,Physics - Physics Education ,Measure (physics) ,FOS: Physical sciences ,050301 education ,General Physics and Astronomy ,Context (language use) ,Science teachers ,Special aspects of education ,01 natural sciences ,Education ,Development (topology) ,Physics Education (physics.ed-ph) ,0103 physical sciences ,ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION ,Mathematics education ,010306 general physics ,0503 education - Abstract
The ability to develop, use, and refine models of experimental systems is a nationally recognized learning outcome for undergraduate physics lab courses. However, no assessments of students' model-based reasoning exist for upper-division labs. This study is the first step toward development of modeling assessments for optics and electronics labs. In order to identify test objectives that are likely relevant across many institutional contexts, we interviewed 35 lab instructors about the ways they incorporate modeling in their course learning goals and activities. The study design was informed by the Modeling Framework for Experimental Physics. This framework conceptualizes modeling as consisting of multiple subtasks: making measurements, constructing system models, comparing data to predictions, proposing causes for discrepancies, and enacting revisions to models or apparatus. We found that each modeling subtask was identified by multiple instructors as an important learning outcome for their course. Based on these results, we argue that test objectives should include probing students' competence with most modeling subtasks, and test items should be designed to elicit students' justifications for choosing particular modeling pathways. In addition to discussing these and other implications for assessment, we also identify future areas of research related to the role of modeling in optics and electronics labs., Comment: 24 pages, 2 figures, 5 tables; submitted to Phys. Rev. PER
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF