Search

Nitric oxide (NO), being produced by active neurones and also being a cerebral vasodilator, may couple brain activity and blood flow in sleep, particularly during active sleep (AS), which is characterized by widespread neural activation and markedly elevated cerebral blood flow (CBF) compared with quiet wakefulness (QW) and quiet sleep (QS). This study examined CBF and cerebral vascular resistance (CVR) in lambs (n = 6) during spontaneous sleep-wake cycles before and after infusion of [N.sup.[Omega]]-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA), an inhibitor of NO synthase. L-NNA infusion produced increases in CVR and decreases in CBF during all sleep-wake stages, with the greatest changes occurring in AS ([Delta]CVR, 88 [+ or -] 19%; [Delta]CBF -24 [+ or -] 8%). The characteristic CVR and CBF differences among AS, QS, and QW disappeared within 1-3 h of L-NNA infusion, but had reappeared by 24 h despite persisting cerebral vasoconstriction. These experiments show that NO promotes cerebral vasodilatation during sleep as well as wakefulness, particularly during AS. Additionally, NO is the major, although not sole, determinant of the CBF differences that exist between sleep-wake states. [N.sup.[Omega]]-nitro-L-arginine, cerebral blood flow; cerebral vascular resistance; lamb

Many small mammals, such as the laboratory mouse, utilize the hypometabolic state of torpor in response to caloric restriction. The signals that relay the lack of fuel to initiate a bout of torpor are not known. Because the mouse will only enter a torpid state when calorically challenged, it may be that one of the inputs for initiation into a bout of torpor is the lack of the primary fuel (glucose) used to power brain metabolism in the mouse. Using glucose telemetry in mice, we tested the hypotheses that 1) circulating glucose (GLC), core body temperature (T b ), and activity are significantly interrelated; and 2) that the level of GLC at the onset of torpor differs from both GLC during arousal from torpor and during feeding when there is no torpor. To test these hypotheses, six C57Bl/6J mice were implanted with glucose telemeters and exposed to different feeding conditions (ad libitum, fasting, limited food intake, and refeeding) to create different levels of GLC and T b . We found a strong positive and linear correlation between GLC and T b during ad libitum feeding. Furthermore, mice that were calorically restricted entered torpor bouts readily. GLC was low during torpor entry but did not drop precipitously as T b did at the onset of a torpor bout. GLC significantly increased during arousal from torpor, indicating the presence of endogenous glucose production. While low GLC itself was not predictive of a bout of torpor, hyperactivity and low GLC preceded the onset of torpor, suggesting that this may be involved in triggering torpor.

The central neural mechanisms underlying differences in cardiovascular variability between wakefulness, non-rapid-eye-movement sleep (NREMS), and rapid-eye-movement sleep (REMS) remain poorly understood. These mechanisms may involve hypocretin (HCRT)/orexin signaling. HCRT signaling is linked to wake-sleep states, involved in central autonomic control, and impaired in narcoleptic patients. Thus, we investigated whether HCRT signaling plays a role in controlling cardiovascular variability during spontaneous behavior in HCRT-deficient mice. HCRT-ataxin3 transgenic mice lacking HCRT neurons (TG), knockout mice lacking HCRT peptides (KO), and wild-type controls (WT) were instrumented with electrodes for sleep recordings and a telemetric blood pressure transducer. Fluctuations of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart period (HP) during undisturbed wake-sleep behavior were analyzed with the sequence technique, cross-correlation functions, and coherent averaging of SBP surges. During NREMS, all mice had lower SBP variability, greater baroreflex contribution to HP control at low frequencies, and greater amplitude of the central autonomic and baroreflex changes in HP associated with SBP surges than during wakefulness. During REMS, all mice had higher SBP variability and depressed central autonomic and baroreflex HP controls relative to NREMS. HP variability during REMS was higher than during NREMS in WT only. TG and KO also had lower amplitude of the cardiac baroreflex response to SBP surges during REMS than WT. These results indicate that chronic lack of HCRT signaling may cause subtle alterations in the control of HP during spontaneous behavior. Conversely, the integrity of HCRT signaling is not necessary for the occurrence of physiological sleep-dependent changes in SBP variability.

We investigated whether in human subjects, the pattern of coupling between the spontaneous fluctuations of heart period (HP) and those of systolic blood pressure (SBP) differs among wake-sleep states. Polysomnographic recordings and finger blood pressure measurements were performed for 48 h in 15 nonobese adults without sleep-disordered breathing. The cross-correlation function (CCF) between the fluctuations of HP and SBP at frequencies <0.15 Hz was computed during quiet wakefulness (QW), light (stages 1 and 2) and deep (stages 3 and 4) nonrapid-eye-movement sleep (NREMS), and rapid-eye-movement sleep (REMS). A positive correlation between HP and the previous SBP values, which is the expected result of baroreflex feedback control, was observed in the sleep states but not in QW. In deep NREMS, the maximum CCF value was significantly higher than in any other state, suggesting the greatest baroreflex contribution to the coupling between HP and SBP. A negative correlation between HP and the subsequent SBP values was also observed in each state, consistent with the mechanical feed-forward action of HP on SBP and with central autonomic commands. The contribution of these mechanisms to the coupling between HP and SBP, estimated from the minimum CCF value, was significantly lower in deep NREMS than either in light NREMS or QW. These results indicate that the pattern of coupling between HP and SBP at low frequencies differs among wake-sleep states in human subjects, with deep NREMS entailing the highest feedback contribution of the baroreflex and a low effectiveness of feed-forward mechanisms.

We investigated whether the relative contribution of the baroreflex and central commands to the control of heart period differs between spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto normotensive rats (WKY) during physiological behavior. Rats were instrumented with an arterial catheter and with electrodes for discriminating wakefulness, nonrapid eye movement sleep (NREMS), and rapid eye movement sleep (REMS). The cross-correlation function (CCF) between spontaneous fluctuations of heart period and mean arterial pressure was computed at frequencies <0.2 Hz. The baroreflex determines a positive correlation between heart period and previous pressure values. This pattern was observed in the CCF during quiet wakefulness (QW) and NREMS, and in QW, it was accompanied by a pronounced negative correlation between heart period and subsequent pressure values. The relative baroreflex contribution to the control of heart period, estimated from the positive peak value of the CCF, was lower in SHR than in WKY during QW but not during NREMS. During REMS, the CCF showed a negative correlation between heart period and both previous and subsequent pressure values, reflecting the prevalence of central autonomic commands. The relative contribution of central commands to the control of heart period, estimated from the negative peak value of the CCF, was lower in SHR than in WKY during REMS. These results suggest that during QW and REMS, the control of heart period exerted by the baroreflex and central commands, respectively, is less effective in SHR than in WKY. This difference is not apparent in a behavioral state of autonomic stability such as NREMS.