Search

Objective: In spite of the evidence that both symptom reduction and functional improvement are important for supporting recovery from trauma, psychotherapy process research has largely focused on mechanisms of symptom reduction. A better understanding of how change occurs in treatments that emphasize functional improvement rather than trauma processing is critical for optimizing effective, patient-centered care., Method: This study involved secondary analysis of data collected in three multisite trials of a 10-module web-based version of Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation, a skills-focused transdiagnostic intervention. The sample included 314 trauma-exposed veterans (38% male; 64% non-Hispanic White) who screened positive for elevated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and/or depression. Latent change score modeling examined prospective relationships between changes from pre-to-mid and mid-to-post treatment in four potential mechanisms (emotion regulation, interpersonal problems, posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, and depression symptoms) and the association of these changes with overall functional improvement (at posttreatment and follow-up)., Results: Emotion regulation change during the first half of treatment predicted interpersonal and symptom improvements during the second half of treatment, but not vice versa. Changes in each potential mechanism were uniquely associated with functional improvement and together statistically accounted for 78% additional variance in functional improvement beyond what was associated with baseline functioning and covariates., Conclusions: Results support emotion regulation as an early mechanism of transdiagnostic therapeutic change in web-based version of Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation and highlight the relevance of all four potential mechanisms to functional improvement. The study contributes to an understanding of how change occurs in skills-focused interventions for trauma-exposed individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Objective: In a recent trial, moral reconation therapy (MRT)-a cognitive-behavioral intervention for criminal recidivism-was not more effective than usual care (UC) for veterans in behavioral health treatment. To determine for whom treatments of recidivism are most effective, we tested if recency of criminal history or psychopathic traits moderated MRT's effects on outcomes., Method: In a multisite trial, 341 veterans (95.3% male; 57.8% White/Non-Hispanic) with a criminal history who were admitted to behavioral health treatment programs were randomly assigned to UC or UC + MRT and followed at 6- and 12-months. Incarceration (yes/no) or criminal conviction (yes/no) in the year prior to enrollment and psychopathic traits at baseline (median split) were prespecified as moderators of treatment effects on primary (criminal thinking, criminal associations) and secondary outcomes (legal, employment, and family/social problems; substance use problems and days of use)., Results: Among veterans incarcerated in the year prior to enrollment, MRT (vs. UC) was associated with greater reductions in criminal associations (6 months) and days drinking or using drugs (12 months). Among those convicted in the year prior to enrollment, MRT (vs. UC) was associated with greater reductions in employment problems (12 months) and days drinking or using drugs at each follow-up. For those high in psychopathic traits, MRT (vs. UC) was associated with greater reductions in days drinking or using drugs at each follow-up., Conclusions: For veterans in behavioral health treatment with recent criminal histories and high in psychopathic traits, MRT may be effective for reducing risk for criminal recidivism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).