Search

Statistical views of reading highlight the link between proficient literacy and the assimilation of various regularities embedded in writing systems, including those in the mapping between print and meaning. Still, orthographic-semantic (O-S) regularities remain relatively understudied, with open questions regarding 3 issues: (a) how O-S regularities should be quantified, (b) how they impact the behavior of proficient readers, and (c) whether individual differences in sensitivity to these regularities predict reading skills. The goal of the current article is to address these questions. We start by reviewing previous studies estimating print-meaning regularities, where orthography-to-semantics consistency (OSC) is defined as the mean semantic similarity between a word and its orthographic neighbors. While we adopt this general strategy, we identify a potential confound in previous operational definitions. We therefore offer a modified measure, which we use to examine group-level OSC effects in available data sets of single word recognition and reading for comprehension. Our findings validate the existence of OSC effects but reveal variation across tasks, with OSC effects emerging more strongly in tasks involving a direct mapping of print to meaning. Next, we present a reanalysis of word naming data from 399 second through fifth graders, where we examine individual differences in reliance on O-S regularities and their relation to participants' reading skills. We show that early readers whose naming accuracy is more influenced by OSC (i.e., those who rely more on O-S) have better passage comprehension abilities. We conclude by discussing the role of O-S regularities in proficient reading and literacy acquisition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is now considerable evidence regarding the types of interventions that are effective at remediating reading disabilities on average. It is generally unclear, however, what predicts the magnitude of individual-level change following a given intervention. We examine new predictors of intervention gains that are theoretically grounded in computational models of reading and focus on individual differences in the functional organization of the reading system. Specifically, we estimate the extent to which children with reading disabilities (n = 118 3rd–4th graders) rely on two sources of information during an oral word reading task—print–speech correspondences and semantic imageability—before and after a phonologically-weighted intervention. We show that children who relied more on print–speech regularities and less on imageability preintervention had better intervention gains. In parallel, children who over the course of the intervention exhibited greater increases in their reliance on print–speech correspondences and greater decreases in their reliance on imageability, had better intervention outcomes. Importantly, these two factors were differentially related to specific reading task outcomes, with greater reliance on print–speech correspondences associated with pseudoword naming, while (lesser) reliance on imageability related to word reading and comprehension. We discuss the implications of these findings for theoretical models of reading acquisition and educational practice. Educational Impact and Implications Statement: Why do some children with reading disabilities show substantial gains when provided with an intervention program, whereas others show little to no improvement? Here we argue that such differences in improvement can be tied to the way in which different children read (reflecting the functional organization of their reading system). We measure how different children are impacted by two sources of information of words they read—print–speech correspondences (orthographic–phonological) and semantic imageability—before and after a phonologically-weighted intervention for children with reading disabilities. Results show that children who before the intervention relied more on orthographic–phonological knowledge, and less on semantic imageability, had greater reading skill gains over the intervention. Skill gains were also associated with changes children made in their use of these two sources of information over the intervention. These findings may help in detecting the children who may benefit more or less from a given intervention and advance us toward identifying an optimal intervention program for each individual based on the state of their reading system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Criticizes a study by Joordens and Besner on ambiguity in lexical decision tasks. Masson's model of semantic printing; Unreliability of the ambiguity advantage; Response measures and semantic access; Effect of algorithmic and architectural factors on network performance; Speed with which readers perform lexical decisions as affected by number of meanings a given word has.

Set for variability (SfV) is an oral language task that requires an individual to disambiguate the mismatch between the decoded form of an irregular word and its actual lexical pronunciation. For example, in the task, the word wasp is pronounced to rhyme with clasp (i.e. /wæsp/), and the individual must recognize the actual pronunciation of the word to be /wɒsp/. SfV has been shown to be a significant predictor of both item-specific and general word reading variance above and beyond that associated with phonemic awareness skill, letter-sound knowledge, and vocabulary skill. However, very little is known about the child characteristics and word features that affect SfV item performance. In this study, we explored whether word features and child characteristics that involve phonology only are adequate to explain item-level variance in SfV performance or whether including predictors that involve the connection between phonology and orthography explains additional variance. To accomplish this, we administered the SfV task (N = 75 items) to a sample of grade 2–5 children (N = 489), along with a battery of reading, reading related, and language measures. Results suggest that variance in SfV performance is uniquely accounted for by measures tapping phonological skill along with those capturing knowledge of phonology to orthography associations, but more so in children with better decoding skill. Additionally, word reading skill was found to moderate the influence of other predictors suggesting that how the task is approached may be impacted by word reading and decoding ability. Educational Impact and Implications Statement: Set for variability (SfV) is a powerful predictor of word recognition skill in developing readers. The measure taps children's ability to go from the decoded form of a word (e.g., /wʌz/for was) to the correct form (e.g., /wɒz/ for was), which is considered an important second step in word decoding. In the current study, we worked to determine what factors lead to variability in children's ability to perform the task. We found that performance on the SfV task was highly correlated with children's phonemic awareness skill and also related to their reading and decoding skill. This suggests that children with advanced reading and decoding skill may be using both phonological and spelling skills to go from the decoded form of a word to the correct pronunciation. The findings suggest that further studies evaluating the causal influence of SfV on reading development are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]