Search

Most measures of psychotherapy outcome focus on symptomatic change. However, clients often report other changes through therapy, such as increased self-acceptance. This study reports on the development and validation of the Complementary Measure of Psychotherapy Outcome (COMPO) that assesses different areas of psychological functioning deemed important by clients and therapists. Items were written based on a literature review of client-reported change and feedback from experienced therapists. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the initial 42-item COMPO administered to 264 psychotherapy clients. Iterative item reduction resulted in the final 12-item, four-factor solution, with factors named self-acceptance, self-knowledge, relationship quality, and consideration of others. This factor structure, along with a bifactor model that contains a general factor and the four domain-specific factors, was replicated on a sample of 571 adults in the community. The 12-item COMPO exhibits convergent validity with measures of self-esteem, insight, social support, and empathy; demonstrates 2-week test-retest reliability; and predicts life satisfaction. The 12-item COMPO was further administered to 28 clients in short-term psychodynamic therapy for depression. Except for consideration of others, COMPO subscales and total scale scores improved from pre- to posttherapy. Posttherapy COMPO scores were also higher among clients who experienced clinically significant change compared to those who did not. The COMPO was negatively associated with depressive symptoms and impairments in functioning across the three samples. The brevity of the COMPO makes it a convenient tool to supplement symptom-based measures for a more comprehensive assessment of outcome in psychotherapy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Previous studies have shown that individuals with personality disorder (PD) suffer from significant interpersonal distress. Some PDs, such as avoidant personality disorder (AvPD), have been characterized with a clear homogeneous interpersonal profile. Other PDs, such as obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD), have shown significant heterogeneity rather than a distinct profile. Our study aimed to compare these two PDs and determine their interpersonal profiles. Analyses included 43 patients with OCPD and 64 with AvPD recruited in 2 clinical trials. They completed the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems at baseline (Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 1990). Structural summary and circular statistic methods were used to examine group interpersonal profile. Cluster analysis was used to identify subtypes within the OCPD and AvPD samples. The AvPD sample demonstrated a homogeneous interpersonal profile placed in the socially avoidant octant of the circumplex. In contrast, the OCPD group exhibited a heterogeneous interpersonal profile, with two subtypes on opposite sides of the circumplex: (a) "aggressive" (i.e., vindictive-domineering) and (b) "pleasing" (i.e., submissive-exploitable). Both clusters demonstrated homogeneous, prototypical, and distinct interpersonal profiles. Our findings show that individuals with either OCPD or AvPD exhibit significant interpersonal distress. Although AvPD may be inherently an interpersonal PD, OCPD cannot classified into one homogenous profile, but rather two distinct interpersonal subgroups. The heterogeneity may be explained by the presence of interpersonal subtypes. Detection of subtypes can inform future research on treatment targets as well as personalized interventions, tailored to patients' specific interpersonal difficulties. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).