Search

Objective: We compared the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with that of triple-phase 16-, 40-, and 64-MDCT in the preoperative detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Subjects and Methods: Sixty-two consecutively registered patients (54 men, eight women; age range, 31-67 years) with 83 HCCs underwent triple-phase (arterial, portal venous, equilibrium) CT at 16-, 40-, or 64-MDCT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MRI. The diagnosis of HCC was established after surgical resection. Three observers independently and randomly reviewed the MR and CT images on a tumor-by-tumor basis. The diagnostic accuracy of these techniques in the detection of HCC was assessed with alternative free response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values, and sensitivity according to tumor size were evaluated., Results: For each observer, the areas under the ROC curve were 0.971, 0.959, and 0.967 for MRI and 0.947, 0.950, and 0.943 for CT. The differences were not statistically significant between the two techniques for each observer (p > 0.05). The differences in sensitivity and positive and negative predictive values between the two techniques for each observer were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Among 10 HCCs 1 cm in diameter or smaller, each of the observers detected seven tumors with MRI. With CT, one observer detected five, one observer detected four, and one observer detected three HCCs with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and triple-phase MDCT have similar diagnostic performance in the preoperative detection of HCC, but MRI may be better than MDCT in the detection of HCC 1 cm in diameter or smaller.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare phased-array 3-T MRI and endorectal sonography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer., Materials and Methods: During an 8-month period, 24 patients with rectal cancer underwent both 3-T MRI performed with phased-array coils and 7.5- to 10-MHz endorectal sonography in the 3 weeks before surgical resection. Three radiologists independently reviewed the MR and endorectal sonographic images. The histopathologic findings in resected specimens were used to evaluate the sensitivities and specificities of these techniques for invasion of the muscularis propria and perirectal tissue and for lymph node involvement. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the diagnostic accuracies of the techniques., Results: For muscularis propria invasion, the mean sensitivities of both MRI and endorectal sonography were 100%, and the mean specificities were 66.7% and 61.1%, respectively. The differences in the mean sensitivities and specificities were not statistically significant (p > 0.05 in each case). For perirectal tissue invasion, MRI and endorectal sonography had comparable sensitivities and specificities (91.1% vs 100%, 92.6% vs 81.5%; p > 0.05 in each case). They also had similar sensitivities and specificities for lymph node involvement (63.6% vs 57.6%, 92.3% vs 82.1%; p > 0.05 in each case). ROC curves for muscularis propria invasion and lymph node involvement showed no differences in diagnostic accuracy. The mean area under the ROC curve for endorectal sonography (A(Z) = 0.996) for perirectal tissue invasion, however, showed higher accuracy than that of MRI (A(Z) = 0.938, p = 0.028)., Conclusion: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 3-T MRI were similar to those of endorectal sonography for muscularis propria invasion and lymph node involvement, but for perirectal tissue invasion, 3-T MRI was less accurate than endorectal sonography.