Search

The response to antimicrobial therapy in patients with pneumonia was assessed by using a previously developed pneumonia scoring system. Patients from two different clinical trials were evaluated. The first group (n = 22) was treated with cefmenoxime. For these patients, doses were adjusted to achieve an area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) above the MIC of 140 microg x h/ml and pneumonia response scores were evaluated retrospectively. The second group (n = 21) were treated with either ciprofloxacin (CIP) or ceftazidime (TAZ) in a randomized clinical trial. Here, doses were adjusted to achieve AUC from 0 to 24 h/MIC values that were > 250 SIT(-1) x h (estimate of the area under the curve of inverse serum inhibitory titer versus time) and pneumonia response scoring was concurrent. In both studies eradication of the pathogen was determined by serial endotracheal cultures and clinical parameters were scored daily. A decrease in total score was indicative of an improving clinical condition. The percent change in clinical daily score was determined for each day of treatment. The rate of clinical response was determined by linear regression of the percent change in daily clinical score versus time during the course of antimicrobial therapy. Factors predictive of time to eradication were explored by interval analysis. Logistic regression was used to determine the earliest time point in therapy at which treatment scores predicted outcome. Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis, and significance was accepted at P < 0.05. There were no differences in baseline scores at day one for the patients treated with different antibiotics (P = 0.58). For patients with pathogen eradication, a significant difference between the two studies in time to eradication was found: 4.8 days for cefmenoxime-treated patients and 1.4 days for CIP- or TAZ-treated patients (P < 0.001). For patients experiencing bacterial eradication, the rates of clinical change for cefmenoxime and CIP or TAZ treatment were similar (P = 0.77). For patients with organisms that were not eradicated, the rates of change were similar (P = 0.14). There was a significant difference in the rate of change for patients experiencing eradication compared with that for patients in which the organism persisted (P << 0.01). Both treatment group and rate were found to be predictive of days to eradication. There was a significant difference in the percent change in clinical score on day 3 of therapy for patients with bacteria that were eradicated versus those with persistent organisms (P < 0.01). The percent change was more predictive of outcome with each subsequent day. Patients who demonstrated a > or = 10% reduction in clinical score after 72 h of treatment had an 88% probability of bacterial eradication. The clinical scoring system is a useful tool for modeling the response of pneumonia to antimicrobial therapy. The ability to predict outcome relatively early in therapy, by using a scoring system of clinical parameters which can be routinely monitored, will aid in assessing the response to antimicrobial therapy in clinical as well as in research settings.

It is not known whether a prophylactic antibiotic administered prior to surgery reaches adequate levels in the peritoneum, where peritonitis may take place. This study determined levels of cefmenoxime in sera and peritoneal tissues of patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Fifteen patients who underwent elective gastrointestinal surgery received an intravenous drip infusion of cefmenoxime (2 g) over 1 h prior to surgery. In patients who underwent gastrectomy, the level of cefmenoxime in serum was 130.8 +/- 6.9 micrograms/ml at laparatomy and decreased to 5.0 +/- 0.7 micrograms/ml at 4 h. Levels in parietal peritoneal and omental tissues at laparotomy were 35.3 +/- 5.2 and 19.2 +/- 3.5 micrograms, respectively, and decreased time dependently. In patients who underwent cholecystectomy, the level of cefmenoxime in serum was 137.9 +/- 7.3 micrograms/ml at laparotomy and decreased to 5.0 +/- 1.2 micrograms/ml at 4 h. Levels in parietal peritoneal and omental tissues were 31.0 +/- 8.4 and 13.7 +/- 3.3 micrograms/g, respectively, and decreased time dependently. The level of cefmenoxime in serum correlated with the levels of cefmenoxime in parietal peritoneum (r = 0.64, P less than 0.01) and in omentum (r = 0.47, P less than 0.02). In patients with appendicitis who received a bolus injection of 2 g of cefmenoxime, the level of drug in inflammatory omental tissue correlated with the level in serum. The levels in peritoneal tissue during surgery lasting up to 2 h were significantly greater than in MIC of cefmenoxime against almost all bacteria reported. A preoperative single dose of 2 g of cefmenoxime probably is effective as a prophylactic for intraoperative contamination.

We investigated the synergistic effects of romurtide (MDP-Lys [L18]) and cefmenoxime (CMX) in the treatment of experimental Klebsiella pneumonia in mice. Mice were infected with 1 x 10(4) CFU of Klebsiella pneumoniae by inhalation of aerosol bacterial suspension. About 90% of untreated animals died within a week; however, the mortality rate of animals treated with CMX alone at a dose of 40 mg/kg/day was 60% at 7 days after the infection. When one or two doses of L18 were administered before or after the infection concomitantly with CMX, a remarkable improvement in the survival rate was observed. There was no significant improvement in the survival rate of animals treated with L18 alone before or after infection. Histopathological sections of the lungs of mice treated with CMX and L18 showed slower progression of infection than those of mice treated with CMX alone. Significant differences were also found in quantitative cultures of viable bacteria in the lungs 1 to 4 days after the infection. Although viable bacterial counts in the lungs of the control and CMX-treated groups showed a rapid increase 24 to 48 h after the infection, they remained lower than the initial counts (x 10(4)) in the lungs of mice treated with combination regimens. From these results, it can be concluded that L18 is a useful biological response modifier in the treatment of acute pulmonary bacterial infections.

Two beta-lactam antibiotics, cefazolin and cefmenoxime, were administered for 7 days to mice with pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae by using dosage regimens that would simulate multiple dosing in usual clinical treatments at dosing intervals of 8 or 12 h. Viable numbers of the bacteria in the lungs were measured at 12- or 24-h intervals. The mathematical model established in a previous single-dose study was applied in this study to explain the time courses of the changes in bacterial count over 7 days. However, because the error in viable count measurements was larger than that in the previous study, the time course of the changes in mean viable count was not regular and the viable count reduction rate changed during multiple dosing, and therefore it was difficult to explain the time course by repeated application of the mathematical model described previously. This study suggests that the changes in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters during multiple dosing need to be considered.

Two beta-lactam antibiotics, cefazolin and cefmenoxime, were administered in an experimental model of murine pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae in a way which enabled us to approximate the serum antibiotic concentration time course in humans. Bacterial counts during the experiments were subjected to nonlinear least-squares analyses by using a mathematical model that explained the bacterial killing by the antibiotic concentration time course and other factors associated with antimicrobial potency and bacterial growth. Cefazolin gave a killing curve that changed synchronously with the drug levels in serum; in contrast, cefmenoxime gave a curve that was prolonged as compared with the change in the drug levels in serum. Multiple correlation coefficients were about 0.9, and the model worked well for bacterial count data. Parameters relating to antimicrobial potency of the drugs, bacterial growth rate, and drug distribution into the tissue were estimated numerically.

In previous papers (Y. Ikeda and T. Nishino, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32:1073-1077, 1988; Y. Ikeda, T. Nishino, and T. Tanino, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:865-869, 1987), we reported that many of the 7-aminothiazolyl cephalosporins, such as cefmenoxime, showed paradoxically reduced activity against Proteus vulgaris at higher concentrations, whereas these paradoxical effects were not observed for other types of cephalosporins, such as cefbuperazone and cefoperazone. In this study, we compare the therapeutic effect of cefmenoxime with that of cefbuperazone and explore the in vivo paradoxical effect of cefmenoxime by using an experimental infection model in mice. In an intraperitoneal infection with P. vulgaris 11, the survival rate with cefmenoxime was increased to 43% at 3.13 mg/kg but was lower at higher doses. On the other hand, cefbuperazone did not show such a paradoxical therapeutic effect. In mice infected with P. vulgaris 11, cefmenoxime levels in both serum and peritoneal washings were rapidly reduced and beta-lactamase activities in the peritoneal cavity were increased at higher cefmenoxime doses. These findings suggested that high levels of cefmenoxime at the infection site induced increased production of beta-lactamase, which then rapidly inactivated the antibiotic. We conclude that the paradoxical therapeutic effect of cefmenoxime against P. vulgaris occurs by the same mechanisms as the in vitro effect and that the high beta-lactamase inducibility and low beta-lactamase stability may account for the paradoxical therapeutic effect of cefmenoxime against P. vulgaris.