Search

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are regulated by complex molecular mechanisms, both in physiologic and pathologic conditions, and their signaling can be intricate. Many factors influence their signaling behavior, including the type of ligand that activates the GPCR, the presence of interacting partners, the kinetics involved, or their location. The two CXC-type chemokine receptors, CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3), both members of the GPCR superfamily, are important and established therapeutic targets in relation to cancer, human immunodeficiency virus infection, and inflammatory diseases. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how the signaling of these receptors works to be able to specifically target them. In this review, we discuss how the signaling pathways activated by CXCR4 and ACKR3 can vary in different situations. G protein signaling of CXCR4 depends on the cellular context, and discrepancies exist depending on the cell lines used. ACKR3, as an atypical chemokine receptor, is generally reported to not activate G proteins but can broaden its signaling spectrum upon heteromerization with other receptors, such as CXCR4, endothelial growth factor receptor, or the α 1 -adrenergic receptor ( α 1 -AR). Also, CXCR4 forms heteromers with CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 2, CCR5, the Na + /H + exchanger regulatory factor 1, CXCR3, α 1 -AR, and the opioid receptors, which results in differential signaling from that of the monomeric subunits. In addition, CXCR4 is present on membrane rafts but can go into the nucleus during cancer progression, probably acquiring different signaling properties. In this review, we also provide an overview of the currently known critical amino acids involved in CXCR4 and ACKR3 signaling., (Copyright © 2019 by The Author(s).)

Chemoproteomic approaches to identify ligand-receptor interactions have gained popularity. However, identifying transmembrane receptors remains challenging. A new trifunctional probe to aid the nonbiased identification of such receptors was developed and synthesized using a convenient seven-step synthesis. This probe contained three functional groups: 1) an N -hydroxysuccinimide ester for ligand-coupling through free amines, 2) a diazirine moiety to capture the receptor of interest upon irradiation with UV light, and 3) a biotin group which allowed affinity purification of the final adduct using streptavidin. The interaction between the G protein-coupled tachykinin neurokinin 1 (NK 1 ) receptor, expressed in an inducible manner, and the peptidic ligand substance P was used as a test system. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis confirmed successful coupling of the probe to substance P, while inositol monophosphate accumulation assays demonstrated that coupling of the probe did not interfere substantially with the substance P-NK 1 receptor interaction. Confocal microscopy and western blotting provided evidence of the formation of a covalent bond between the probe and the NK 1 receptor upon UV activation. As proof of concept, the probe was used in full ligand-based receptor-capture experiments to identify the substance P-binding receptor via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, resulting in the successful identification of only the NK 1 receptor. This provides proof of concept toward general utilization of this probe to define interactions between ligands and previously unidentified plasma-membrane receptors., (Copyright © 2019 by The Author(s).)

High-affinity and selective antagonists that are able to block the actions of both endogenous and synthetic agonists of G protein-coupled receptors are integral to analysis of receptor function and to support suggestions of therapeutic potential. Although there is great interest in the potential of free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFA4) as a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of type II diabetes, the broad distribution pattern of this receptor suggests it may play a range of roles beyond glucose homeostasis in different cells and tissues. To date, a single molecule, 4-methyl- N -9 H -xanthen-9-yl-benzenesulfonamide (AH-7614), has been described as an FFA4 antagonist; however, its mechanism of antagonism remains unknown. We synthesized AH-7614 and a chemical derivative and demonstrated these to be negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) of FFA4. Although these NAMs did inhibit FFA4 signaling induced by a range of endogenous and synthetic agonists, clear agonist probe dependence in the nature of allosteric modulation was apparent. Although AH-7614 did not antagonize the second long-chain free fatty acid receptor, free fatty acid receptor 1, the simple chemical structure of AH-7614 containing features found in many anticancer drugs suggests that a novel close chemical analog of AH-7614 devoid of FFA4 activity, 4-methyl- N -(9 H -xanthen-9-yl)benzamide (TUG-1387), will also provide a useful control compound for future studies assessing FFA4 function. Using TUG-1387 alongside AH-7614, we show that endogenous activation of FFA4 expressed by murine C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal stem cells is required for induced differentiation of these cells toward a more mature, adipocyte-like phenotype., (Copyright © 2017 by The Author(s).)

It is established that long-chain free fatty acids includingω-3 fatty acids mediate an array of biologic responses through members of the free fatty acid (FFA) receptor family, which includes FFA4. However, the signaling mechanisms and modes of regulation of this receptor class remain unclear. Here, we employed mass spectrometry to determine that phosphorylation of mouse (m)FFAR4 occurs at five serine and threonine residues clustered in two separable regions of the C-terminal tail, designated cluster 1 (Thr(347), Thr(349), and Ser(350)) and cluster 2 (Ser(357)and Ser(361)). Mutation of these phosphoacceptor sites to alanine completely prevented phosphorylation of mFFA4 but did not limit receptor coupling to extracellular signal regulated protein kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) activation. Rather, an inhibitor of Gq/11proteins completely prevented receptor signaling to ERK1/2. By contrast, the recruitment of arrestin 3, receptor internalization, and activation of Akt were regulated by mFFA4 phosphorylation. The analysis of mFFA4 phosphorylation-dependent signaling was extended further by selective mutations of the phosphoacceptor sites. Mutations within cluster 2 did not affect agonist activation of Akt but instead significantly compromised receptor internalization and arrestin 3 recruitment. Distinctly, mutation of the phosphoacceptor sites within cluster 1 had no effect on receptor internalization and had a less extensive effect on arrestin 3 recruitment but significantly uncoupled the receptor from Akt activation. These unique observations define differential effects on signaling mediated by phosphorylation at distinct locations. This hallmark feature supports the possibility that the signaling outcome of mFFA4 activation can be determined by the pattern of phosphorylation (phosphorylation barcode) at the C terminus of the receptor., (Copyright © 2016 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Despite some blockbuster G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) drugs, only a small fraction (∼ 15%) of the more than 390 nonodorant GPCRs have been successfully targeted by the pharmaceutical industry. One way that this issue might be addressed is via translation of recent deorphanization programs that have opened the prospect of extending the reach of new medicine design to novel receptor types with potential therapeutic value. Prominent among these receptors are those that respond to short-chain free fatty acids of carbon chain length 2-6. These receptors, FFA2 (GPR43) and FFA3 (GPR41), are each predominantly activated by the short-chain fatty acids acetate, propionate, and butyrate, ligands that originate largely as fermentation by-products of anaerobic bacteria in the gut. However, the presence of FFA2 and FFA3 on pancreatic β-cells, FFA3 on neurons, and FFA2 on leukocytes and adipocytes means that the biologic role of these receptors likely extends beyond the widely accepted role of regulating peptide hormone release from enteroendocrine cells in the gut. Here, we review the physiologic roles of FFA2 and FFA3, the recent development and use of receptor-selective pharmacological tool compounds and genetic models available to study these receptors, and present evidence of the potential therapeutic value of targeting this emerging receptor pair., (Copyright © 2016 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

In this Perspective, former and current editors of Molecular Pharmacology, together with the guest editors for this 50th Anniversary Issue, provide a historical overview of the journal since its founding in 1965. The substantial impact that Molecular Pharmacology has had on the field of pharmacology as well as on biomedical science is discussed, as is the broad scope of the journal. The authors conclude that, true to the original goals for the journal, Molecular Pharmacology today remains an outstanding venue for work that provides a mechanistic understanding of drugs, molecular probes, and their biologic targets., (Copyright © 2015 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

G protein-coupled receptors, including the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, can form homo-oligomers. However, the basis of these interactions and the overall organizational structure of such oligomers are poorly understood. Combinations of site-directed mutagenesis and homogenous time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies that assessed interactions between receptor protomers at the surface of transfected cells indicated important contributions of regions of transmembrane domains I, IV, V, VI, and VII as well as intracellular helix VIII to the overall organization. Molecular modeling studies based on both these results and an X-ray structure of the inactive state of the M3 receptor bound by the antagonist/inverse agonist tiotropium were then employed. The results could be accommodated fully by models in which a proportion of the cell surface M3 receptor population is a tetramer with rhombic, but not linear, orientation. This is consistent with previous studies based on spectrally resolved, multiphoton fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Modeling studies furthermore suggest an important role for molecules of cholesterol at the dimer + dimer interface of the tetramer, which is consistent with the presence of cholesterol at key locations in many G protein-coupled receptor crystal structures. Mutants that displayed disrupted quaternary organization were often poorly expressed and showed immature N-glycosylation. Sustained treatment of cells expressing such mutants with the muscarinic receptor inverse agonist atropine increased cellular levels and restored both cell surface delivery and quaternary organization to many of the mutants. These observations suggest that organization as a tetramer may occur before plasma membrane delivery and may be a key step in cellular quality control assessment., (Copyright © 2015 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Analysis of the roles of the short chain fatty acid receptor, free fatty acid 3 receptor (FFA3), has been severely limited by the low potency of its endogenous ligands, the crossover of function of these on the closely related free fatty acid 2 receptor, and a dearth of FFA3-selective synthetic ligands. From a series of hexahydroquinolone-3-carboxamides, we demonstrate that 4-(furan-2-yl)-2-methyl-5-oxo-N-(o-tolyl)-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxamide is a selective and moderately potent positive allosteric modular (PAM)-agonist of the FFA3 receptor. Modest chemical variations within this series resulted in compounds completely lacking activity, acting as FFA3 PAMs, or appearing to act as FFA3-negative allosteric modulators. However, the pharmacology of this series was further complicated in that certain analogs displaying overall antagonism of FFA3 function actually appeared to generate their effects via a combined positive allosteric binding cooperativity and negative allosteric effect on orthosteric ligand maximal signaling response. These studies show that various PAM-agonist and allosteric modulators of FFA3 can be identified and characterized. However, within the current chemical series, considerable care must be taken to define the pharmacological characteristics of specific compounds before useful predictions of their activity and their use in defining specific roles of FFA3 in either in vitro and in vivo settings can be made., (Copyright © 2014 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Most evidence indicates that, as for family C G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), family A GPCRs form homo- and heteromers. Homodimers seem to be a predominant species, with potential dynamic formation of higher-order oligomers, particularly tetramers. Although monomeric GPCRs can activate G proteins, the pentameric structure constituted by one GPCR homodimer and one heterotrimeric G protein may provide a main functional unit, and oligomeric entities can be viewed as multiples of dimers. It still needs to be resolved if GPCR heteromers are preferentially heterodimers or if they are mostly constituted by heteromers of homodimers. Allosteric mechanisms determine a multiplicity of possible unique pharmacological properties of GPCR homomers and heteromers. Some general mechanisms seem to apply, particularly at the level of ligand-binding properties. In the frame of the dimer-cooperativity model, the two-state dimer model provides the most practical method to analyze ligand-GPCR interactions when considering receptor homomers. In addition to ligand-binding properties, unique properties for each GPCR oligomer emerge in relation to different intrinsic efficacy of ligands for different signaling pathways (functional selectivity). This gives a rationale for the use of GPCR oligomers, and particularly heteromers, as novel targets for drug development. Herein, we review the functional and pharmacological properties of GPCR oligomers and provide some guidelines for the application of discrete direct screening and high-throughput screening approaches to the discovery of receptor-heteromer selective compounds.

Lack of high potency agonists has restricted analysis of the G protein-coupled receptor GPR35. Moreover, marked variation in potency and/or affinity of current ligands between human and rodent orthologs of GPR35 has limited their productive use in rodent models of physiology. Based on the reported modest potency of the antiasthma and antiallergic ligands cromolyn disodium and nedocromil sodium, we identified the related compounds lodoxamide and bufrolin as high potency agonists of human GPR35. Unlike previously identified high potency agonists that are highly selective for human GPR35, both lodoxamide and bufrolin displayed equivalent potency at rat GPR35. Further synthetic antiallergic ligands, either sharing features of the standard surrogate agonist zaprinast, or with lodoxamide and bufrolin, were also shown to display agonism at either human or rat GPR35. Because both lodoxamide and bufrolin are symmetric di-acids, their potential mode of binding was explored via mutagenesis based on swapping between the rat and human ortholog nonconserved arginine residues within proximity of a key conserved arginine at position 3.36. Computational modeling and ligand docking predicted the contributions of different arginine residues, other than at 3.36, in human GPR35 for these two ligands and were consistent with selective loss of potency of either bufrolin or lodoxamide at distinct arginine mutants. The computational models also suggested that bufrolin and lodoxamide would display reduced potency at a low-frequency human GPR35 single nucleotide polymorphism. This prediction was confirmed experimentally.

TUG-891 [3-(4-((4-fluoro-4'-methyl-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-yl)methoxy)phenyl)propanoic acid] was recently described as a potent and selective agonist for the long chain free fatty acid (LCFA) receptor 4 (FFA4; previously G protein-coupled receptor 120, or GPR120). Herein, we have used TUG-891 to further define the function of FFA4 and used this compound in proof of principle studies to indicate the therapeutic potential of this receptor. TUG-891 displayed similar signaling properties to the LCFA α-linolenic acid at human FFA4 across various assay end points, including stimulation of Ca²⁺ mobilization, β-arrestin-1 and β-arrestin-2 recruitment, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation. Activation of human FFA4 by TUG-891 also resulted in rapid phosphorylation and internalization of the receptor. While these latter events were associated with desensitization of the FFA4 signaling response, removal of TUG-891 allowed both rapid recycling of FFA4 back to the cell surface and resensitization of the FFA4 Ca²⁺ signaling response. TUG-891 was also a potent agonist of mouse FFA4, but it showed only limited selectivity over mouse FFA1, complicating its use in vivo in this species. Pharmacologic dissection of responses to TUG-891 in model murine cell systems indicated that activation of FFA4 was able to mimic many potentially beneficial therapeutic properties previously reported for LCFAs, including stimulating glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from enteroendocrine cells, enhancing glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, and inhibiting release of proinflammatory mediators from RAW264.7 macrophages, which suggests promise for FFA4 as a therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Together, these results demonstrate both potential but also significant challenges that still need to be overcome to therapeutically target FFA4.

Over the past decade, ideas and experimental support for the hypothesis that G protein-coupled receptors may exist as dimeric or oligomeric complexes moved initially from heresy to orthodoxy, to the current situation in which the capacity of such receptors to interact is generally accepted but the prevalence, maintenance, and relevance of such interactions to both pharmacology and function remain unclear. A vast body of data obtained following transfection of cultured cells is still to be translated to native systems and, even where this has been attempted, results often remain controversial and contradictory. This review will consider approaches that are currently being applied and why these might be challenging to interpret, and will suggest means to overcome these limitations.

Drugs targeting the orphan receptor GPR35 have potential therapeutic application in a number of disease areas, including inflammation, metabolic disorders, nociception, and cardiovascular disease. Currently available surrogate GPR35 agonists identified from pharmacologically relevant compound libraries have limited utility due to the likelihood of off-target effects in vitro and in vivo and the variable potency that such ligands exhibit across species. We sought to identify and characterize novel GPR35 agonists to facilitate studies aimed at defining the physiologic role of GPR35. PathHunter β-arrestin recruitment technology was validated as a human GPR35 screening assay, and a high-throughput screen of 100,000 diverse low molecular weight compounds was conducted. Confirmed GPR35 agonists from five distinct chemotypes were selected for detailed characterization using both β-arrestin recruitment and G protein-dependent assays and each of the human, mouse, and rat GPR35 orthologs. These studies identified 4-{(Z)-[(2Z)-2-(2-fluorobenzylidene)-4-oxo-1,3-thiazolidin-5-ylidene]methyl}benzoic acid (compound 1) as the highest potency full agonist of human GPR35 yet described. As with certain other GPR35 agonists, compound 1 was markedly selective for human GPR35, but displayed elements of signal bias between β-arrestin-2 and G protein-dependent assays. Compound 1 also displayed competitive behavior when assessed against the human GPR35 antagonist, ML-145 (2-hydroxy-4-[4-(5Z)-5-[(E)-2-methyl-3-phenylprop-2-enylidene]-4-oxo-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-3-yl]butanoylamino]benzoic acid). Of the other chemotypes studied, compounds 2 and 3 were selective for the human receptor, but compounds 4 and 5 demonstrated similar activity at human, rat, and mouse GPR35 orthologs. Further characterization of these compounds and related analogs is likely to facilitate a better understanding of GPR35 in health and disease.

Variation in pharmacology and function of ligands at species orthologs can be a confounding feature in understanding the biology and role of poorly characterized receptors. Substantial selectivity in potency of a number of GPR35 agonists has previously been demonstrated between human and rat orthologs of this G protein-coupled receptor. Via a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay of induced interactions between GPR35 and β-arrestin-2, addition of the mouse ortholog to such studies indicated that, as for the rat ortholog, murine GPR35 displayed very low potency for pamoate, whereas potency for the reference GPR35 agonist zaprinast was intermediate between the rat and human orthologs. This pattern was replicated in receptor internalization and G protein activation assays. The effectiveness and mode of action of two recently reported GPR35 antagonists, methyl-5-[(tert-butylcarbamothioylhydrazinylidene)methyl]-1-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyrazole-4-carboxylate (CID-2745687) and 2-hydroxy-4-[4-(5Z)-5-[(E)-2-methyl-3-phenylprop-2-enylidene]-4-oxo-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-3-yl]butanoylamino)benzoic acid (ML-145), were investigated. Both CID-2745687 and ML-145 competitively inhibited the effects at human GPR35 of cromolyn disodium and zaprinast, two agonists that share an overlapping binding site. By contrast, although ML-145 also competitively antagonized the effects of pamoate, CID-2745687 acted in a noncompetitive fashion. Neither ML-145 nor CID-2745687 was able to effectively antagonize the agonist effects of either zaprinast or cromolyn disodium at either rodent ortholog of GPR35. These studies demonstrate that marked species selectivity of ligands at GPR35 is not restricted to agonists and considerable care is required to select appropriate ligands to explore the function of GPR35 in nonhuman cells and tissues.

Molecular evolution and chemical genetics have been applied to generate functional pairings of mutated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and nonendogenous ligands. These mutant receptors, referred to as receptors activated solely by synthetic ligands (RASSLs) or designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs), have huge potential to define physiological roles of GPCRs and to validate receptors in animal models as therapeutic targets to treat human disease. However, appreciation of ligand bias and functional selectivity of different ligands at the same receptor suggests that RASSLs may signal differently than wild-type receptors activated by endogenous agonists. We assessed this by generating forms of wild-type human M(3) muscarinic receptor and a RASSL variant that responds selectively to clozapine N-oxide. Although the RASSL receptor had reduced affinity for muscarinic antagonists, including atropine, stimulation with clozapine N-oxide produced effects very similar to those generated by acetylcholine at the wild-type M(3)-receptor. Such effects included the relative movement of the third intracellular loop and C-terminal tail of intramolecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer sensors and the ability of the wild type and evolved mutant to regulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation. Each form interacted similarly with β-arrestin 2 and was internalized from the cell surface in response to the appropriate ligand. Furthermore, the pattern of phosphorylation of specific serine residues within the evolved receptor in response to clozapine N-oxide was very similar to that produced by acetylcholine at the wild type. Such results provide confidence that, at least for the M(3) muscarinic receptor, results obtained after transgenic expression of this RASSL are likely to mirror the actions of acetylcholine at the wild type receptor.

Allosteric agonists are powerful tools for exploring the pharmacology of closely related G protein-coupled receptors that have nonselective endogenous ligands, such as the short chain fatty acids at free fatty acid receptors 2 and 3 (FFA2/GPR43 and FFA3/GPR41, respectively). We explored the molecular mechanisms mediating the activity of 4-chloro-α-(1-methylethyl)-N-2-thiazolylbenzeneacetamide (4-CMTB), a recently described phenylacetamide allosteric agonist and allosteric modulator of endogenous ligand function at human FFA2, by combining our previous knowledge of the orthosteric binding site with targeted examination of 4-CMTB structure-activity relationships and mutagenesis and chimeric receptor generation. Here we show that 4-CMTB is a selective agonist for FFA2 that binds to a site distinct from the orthosteric site of the receptor. Ligand structure-activity relationship studies indicated that the N-thiazolyl amide is likely to provide hydrogen bond donor/acceptor interactions with the receptor. Substitution at Leu(173) or the exchange of the entire extracellular loop 2 of FFA2 with that of FFA3 was sufficient to reduce or ablate, respectively, allosteric communication between the endogenous and allosteric agonists. Thus, we conclude that extracellular loop 2 of human FFA2 is required for transduction of cooperative signaling between the orthosteric and an as-yet-undefined allosteric binding site of the FFA2 receptor that is occupied by 4-CMTB.

For many years seven transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were thought to exist and function exclusively as monomeric units. However, evidence both from native cells and heterologous expression systems has demonstrated that GPCRs can both traffic and signal within higher-order complexes. As for other protein-protein interactions, conformational changes in one polypeptide, including those resulting from binding of pharmacological ligands, have the capacity to alter the conformation and therefore the response of the interacting protein(s), a process known as allosterism. For GPCRs, allosterism across homo- or heteromers, whether dimers or higher-order oligomers, represents an additional topographical landscape that must now be considered pharmacologically. Such effects may offer the opportunity for novel therapeutic approaches. Allosterism at GPCR heteromers is particularly exciting in that it offers additional scope to provide receptor subtype selectivity and tissue specificity as well as fine-tuning of receptor signal strength. Herein, we introduce the concept of allosterism at both GPCR homomers and heteromers and discuss the various questions that must be addressed before significant advances can be made in drug discovery at these GPCR complexes.

Some growth hormone secretagogues act as agonists at the ghrelin receptor and have been described as "ago-allosteric" ligands because of an ability to also modulate the maximum efficacy and potency of ghrelin (Holst et al., 2005). In membranes prepared from cells coexpressing the human ghrelin receptor and the G protein Galpha(o1), N-[1(R)-1, 2-dihydro-1-ethanesulfonylspiro-3H-indole-3,4'-piperidin)-1'-yl]carbonyl-2-(phenylmethoxy)-ethyl-2-amino-2-methylpropanamide (MK-677), growth hormone-releasing peptide 6 (GHRP-6), and the 2(R)-hydroxypropyl derivative of 3-amino-3-methyl-N-(2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2-oxo-1-([2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) (1,1'-biphenyl)-4-yl]methyl)-1H-1-benzazepin-3(R)-yl)-butanamide (L-692,585) each functioned as direct agonists, and each displayed higher efficacy than ghrelin. The effect of multiple, fixed concentrations of each of these ligands on the function and concentration-dependence of ghrelin and the effect of multiple, fixed concentrations of ghrelin on the action of MK-677, GHRP-6, and L-692,585 was analyzed globally according to a modified version of an operational model of allosterism that accounts for allosteric modulation of affinity, efficacy, and allosteric agonism. Each of the data sets was best fit by a model of simple competition between a partial and a full agonist. Both positive and negative allosteric modulators are anticipated to alter the kinetics of binding of an orthosteric agonist. However, none of the proposed ago-allosteric regulators tested had any effect on the dissociation kinetics of (125)I-[His]-ghrelin, and GHRP-6 and MK-677 were able to fully displace (125)I-[His]-ghrelin from the receptor. At least in the system tested, each of the ligands acted in a simple competitive fashion with ghrelin as demonstrated by analysis according to a model whereby ghrelin is a partial agonist with respect to each of the synthetic agonists tested.

The serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) 2A receptor is a cell surface class A G protein-coupled receptor that regulates a multitude of physiological functions of the body and is a target for antipsychotic drugs. Here we found by means of fluorescence resonance energy transfer and immunoprecipitation studies that the 5-HT(2A)-receptor homodimerized in live cells, which we linked with its antagonist-dependent fingerprint in both binding and receptor signaling. Some antagonists, like the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and risperidone, differentiate themselves from others, like the typical antipsychotic haloperidol, antagonizing these 5-HT(2A) receptor-mediated functions in a pathway-specific manner, explained here by a new model of multiple active interconvertible conformations at dimeric receptors.

Identification of G protein-coupled receptors that are activated by free fatty acids has led to considerable interest in their pharmacology and function because of the wide range of normal physiology and disease states in which fatty acids have been implicated. Free fatty acid receptor (FFA) 1 is activated by medium- to long-chain fatty acids and is expressed in the insulin-producing beta-cells of the pancreas. Activation of FFA1 has been proposed to mediate fatty acid augmentation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion although it is unclear whether the known long-term detrimental effects of beta-cell exposure to high levels of fatty acids are also mediated through this receptor. The related receptors FFA2 and FFA3 are both activated by short-chain fatty acids although they have key differences in the signaling pathways they activate and tissue expression pattern. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of the pharmacology and physiological role of these fatty acid receptors.

Analysis of the distribution of mRNA encoding the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) 5-HT(2A) receptor and the mu opioid peptide receptor in rat brain demonstrated their coexpression in neurons in several distinct regions. These regions included the periaqueductal gray, an area that plays an important role in morphine-induced analgesia but also in the development of tolerance to morphine. To explore potential cross-regulation between these G protein-coupled receptors, the human mu opioid peptide receptor was expressed stably and constitutively in Flp-In T-REx human embryonic kidney 293 cells that harbored the human 5-HT(2A) receptor at the inducible Flp-In locus. In the absence of the 5-HT(2A) receptor, pretreatment with the enkephalin agonist [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin but not with the alkaloid agonist morphine produced desensitization, internalization, and down-regulation of the mu opioid peptide receptor. Induction of 5-HT(2A) receptor expression in these cells resulted in up-regulation of mu opioid peptide receptor levels that was blocked by both a 5-HT(2A) receptor inverse agonist and selective inhibition of signaling via Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) G proteins. After induction of the 5-HT(2A) receptor, coaddition of 5-HT with morphine now also resulted in desensitization, receptor internalization, and down-regulation of the mu opioid peptide receptor. It has been argued that enhancement of mu opioid peptide receptor internalization in response to morphine would limit the development of tolerance without limiting analgesia. These data suggest that selective activation of the 5-HT(2A) receptor in concert with treatment with morphine might achieve this aim.

The human dopamine D(2L) receptor couples promiscuously to multiple members of the Galpha(i/o) subfamily. Despite the high homology of the D(2L) and D(3) receptors, the G protein coupling specificity of the human D(3) receptor is less clearly characterized. The primary aim of this study, then, was the parallel characterization of the G protein coupling specificity of the D(2L) and D(3) receptors. By using both receptor-G protein fusion proteins and stable cell lines in which pertussis toxin-resistant mutants of individual Galpha(i)-family G proteins were expressed in an inducible fashion, we demonstrated highly selective coupling of the D(3) receptor to Galpha(o1). Furthermore, by using the fusion proteins to ensure identical stoichiometry of receptor to G protein for each pairing, a range of ligands displayed higher potency and, for partial agonists, higher efficacy at the D(3) receptor when coupled to Galpha(o1) compared with the D(2L) receptor. The second aim of this study was to investigate the molecular basis of the above differential G protein coupling specificity. The importance of a 12-amino acid sequence from the C-terminal end of the third intracellular loop of the D(2L) receptor in providing promiscuity in G protein coupling was demonstrated using a chimeric D(3)/D(2) receptor in which the equivalent region of the D(3) receptor was exchanged for this sequence. This chimera displayed D(3)-like affinity for [(3)H]spiperone and potency for agonists but gained D(2)-like ability to couple to each of Galpha(i1-3) as well as Galpha(o1).

A range of ligands displayed agonism at the long isoform of the human dopamine D(2) receptor, whether using receptor-G protein fusions or membranes of cells in which pertussis toxin-resistant mutants of individual Galpha(i)-family G proteins could be expressed in an inducible fashion. Varying degrees of efficacy were observed for individual ligands as monitored by their capacity to load [(35)S]GTPgammaS onto each of Galpha(i1),Galpha(i2),Galpha(i3), and Galpha(o1). By contrast, (S)-(-)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-propylpiperidine was a partial agonist when Galpha(o1) was the target G protein but an antagonist/inverse agonist at Galpha(i1),Galpha(i2), and Galpha(i3). In ligand binding assays, dopamine identified both high- and low-affinity states at each of the dopamine D(2) receptor-G protein fusion proteins, and the high-affinity state was eliminated by guanine nucleotide. (S)-(-)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-propylpiperidine bound to an apparent single state of the constructs in which the D(2) receptor was fused to Galpha(i1),Galpha(i2), or Galpha(i3). However, it bound to distinct high- and low-affinity states of the D(2) receptor-Galpha(o1) fusion, with the high-affinity state being eliminated by guanine nucleotide. Likewise, although dopamine identified guanine nucleotide-sensitive high-affinity states of the D(2) receptor when expression of pertussis toxin-resistant forms of each of Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2), Galpha(i3), and Galpha(o1) was induced, (S)-(-)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-propylpiperidine identified a high-affinity site only in the presence of Galpha(o1). p-Tyramine displayed a protean ligand profile similar to that of (S)-(-)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-propylpiperidine but with lower potency. These results demonstrate (S)-(-)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-propylpiperidine to be a protean agonist at the D(2) receptor and may explain in vivo actions of this ligand.

Approaches to identify G protein-coupled receptor oligomers rather than dimers have been lacking. Using concatamers of fluorescent proteins, we established conditions to monitor sequential three-color fluorescence resonance energy transfer (3-FRET) and used these to detect oligomeric complexes of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor in single living cells. Mutation of putative key hydrophobic residues in transmembrane domains I and IV resulted in substantial reduction of sequential 3-FRET and was associated with lack of protein maturation, prevention of plasma membrane delivery, and elimination of signaling function. Although these mutations prevented cell surface delivery, bimolecular fluorescence complementation studies indicated that they did not ablate protein-protein interactions and confirmed endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi retention of the transmembrane domain I plus transmembrane domain IV mutated receptor. The transmembrane domain I plus transmembrane domain IV mutated receptor was a "dominant-negative" in blocking cell surface delivery of the wild-type receptor. Mutations only in transmembrane domain I did not result in a reduction in 3-FRET, whereas restricting mutation to transmembrane domain IV did result in reduced 3-FRET. Mutations in either transmembrane domain I or transmembrane domain IV, however, were sufficient to eliminate cell surface delivery. Terminal N-glycosylation is insufficient to determine cell surface delivery because both transmembrane domain I and transmembrane domain IV mutants matured as effectively as the wild-type receptor. These data indicate that the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor is able to form oligomeric rather than only simple dimeric complexes and that disruption of effective oligomerization by introducing mutations into transmembrane domain IV has profound consequences for cell surface delivery and function.

In cells lacking expression of Ca(2+)-mobilizing G proteins, coexpression of human GPR40 and Galpha(q) allowed medium- and long-chain fatty acids to elevate intracellular [Ca(2+)]. This was also observed when human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells were transfected with a GPR40-Galpha(q) fusion protein. The kinetic of elevation of intracellular [Ca(2+)] slowed with increasing fatty acid chain length, suggesting different ligand on-rates, whereas the addition of fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin reduced signals, presumably by binding the fatty acids. To allow effective ligand equilibration, GPR40-Galpha(q) was used in guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding assays. After expression of GPR40-Galpha(q) in HEK293 cells and membrane preparation basal binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaSinGalpha(q) immunoprecipitates was high and not elevated substantially by fatty acids. However, treatment of membranes with fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin reduced the basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in a concentration-dependent manner and allowed the responsiveness and pharmacology at GPR40 of each of the fatty acids thiazolidinediones and a novel small-molecule agonist to be uncovered. Membranes of rat INS-1E cells that express GPR40 endogenously provided similar observations. The high apparent constitutive activity of GPR40-Galpha(q) was also reversed by a small-molecule GPR40 antagonist, and basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was prevented by the selective Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) inhibitor YM-254890. The current studies provide novel insights into the pharmacology of GPR40 and indicate that G protein-coupled receptors which respond to fatty acids, and potentially to other lipid ligands, can be occupied by endogenous agonists before assay and that this may mask the pharmacology of the receptor and may be mistaken for high levels of constitutive activity.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have long been considered to be monomeric membrane proteins. Although numerous recent studies have indicated that GPCRs can form multimeric complexes, the functional and pharmacological consequences of this phenomenon have remained elusive. With the discovery that the functional GABA(B) receptor is an obligate heterodimer and with the use of energy transfer technologies, it is now accepted that GPCRs can form heteromultimers. In some cases, specific properties of such heteromers not shared by their respective homomers have been reported. Although in most cases these properties have only been observed in heterologous expression systems, there are a few reports describing data consistent with such heteromultimeric GPCR complexes also existing in native tissues. The present article illustrates well-documented examples of such native multimeric complexes, lists a number of recommendations for recognition and acceptance of such multimeric receptors, and gives recommendations for their nomenclature.

Fusion proteins between a receptor and a pertussis toxin-insensitive G(i)alpha subunit were used to gain insight into the molecular interactions that take place upon mu and delta opioid receptor heterodimerization. When mu opioid receptor-G(i1)alpha fusions were coexpressed with nonfused delta opioid receptors in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, or vice versa, receptor heterodimers were detected by coimmunoprecipitation. In pertussis toxin-treated cells, receptor coexpression decreased the amount of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) incorporated in the fused G alpha protein after the addition of agonists specific for the receptor-G(i1)alpha fusion. In addition, activation of the G alpha protein occurred in heterodimers upon addition of an agonist specific for the nonfused receptor. It remained unaffected by an inverse agonist specific for the receptor-G(i1)alpha fusion. These data suggest that signaling through the receptor-G(i1)alpha fusion protein is impaired in heterodimers and support a mechanism in which activation of the G alpha subunit is promoted by a direct interaction with the nonfused receptor. Alternatively, receptor coexpression did not modify the ligand binding properties for the high-affinity state of the receptor-G(i1)alpha fusion nor the EC50 values for agonist-induced [35S]GTPgammaS incorporation in the G(i1)alpha subunit. In addition, no binding competition was observed between delta and mu ligands. Together, the data point to mu-delta opioid receptor heterodimers formed by contact interactions between monomers that retain their structural integrity.

When expressed via an inducible promoter in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, the rat Mas-related gene D (rMrgD) receptor responded to beta-alanine but not L-alanine by elevating intracellular [Ca(2+)], stimulating phosphorylation of the mitogenactivated protein kinases known as extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1 and ERK2 and translocating from the plasma membrane to punctate intracellular vesicles. By contrast, the related rat Mas-related gene E (rMrgE) receptor did not respond to beta-alanine. Coexpression of rMrgD with rMrgE, which occurs in peripheral nociceptive neurons, allowed coimmunoprecipitation of the two receptors and resulted in the detection of cell surface rMrgD-rMrgE heterodimers via timeresolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer. These interactions increased the potency of beta-alanine to phosphorylate ERK1 and ERK2 as well as maintaining the capacity of beta-alanine to elevate intracellular [Ca(2+)], which was reduced in magnitude and slowed in response with increasing times of expression of rMrgD in isolation. Associated with these effects, the presence of rMrgE restricted beta-alanine-induced internalization of rMrgD. This is the first report of heterodimeric interactions between members of the Mas-related gene (Mrg) receptor family and indicates that interactions between rMrgD and rMrgE modulate the function of rMrgD. Because the Mrg receptors are potential therapeutic targets in pain, these results suggest that efforts to understand the function and regulation of individual Mrg family receptors may require coexpression of relevant pairs.

Mammalian regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are highly conserved within the RGS domain. Of amino acids that are universal, a serine residue at the C terminus of this domain has been described as the binding site in RGS7 for 14-3-3 proteins. However, studies with the related RGS3 indicate that the site of interaction is not within the RGS domain. We confirm that the interaction of RGS3 with 14-3-3tau and 14-3-3zeta requires Ser264 and not the RGS domain and show both that mutation of the conserved RGS domain serine, Ser496 in RGS3, to either alanine or aspartate does not prevent binding of 14-3-3 proteins and that 14-3-3 proteins do not inhibit GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity against receptor-activated Galpha(o1). However, mutation of Ser496 does directly impair the action of RGS3 as a GAP against receptor-activated Galpha(o1). We mutated the equivalent serine residue in the family B/R4 RGS proteins RGS1 and RGS16. Using two distinct assay formats, conversion to aspartate virtually abolished GAP activity, whereas conversion to alanine decreased potency 20-fold. Neither alteration modulated interactions with 14-3-3tau or 14-3-3zeta, but the 14-3-3 proteins did not modulate the GAP activity of the wild-type or mutant RGS proteins. Although interactions between 14-3-3 proteins and many RGS proteins can be observed, this does not involve this conserved serine and does not inherently modify GAP function.

Complementation of function after coexpression of pairs of nonfunctional G protein-coupled receptors that contain distinct inactivating mutations supports the hypothesis that such receptors exist as dimers. Chimeras between members of the metabotropic glutamate receptor-like family have been particularly useful because the N-terminal ligand binding and heptahelical transmembrane elements can be considered distinct domains. To examine the utility of a related approach for opioid receptors, fusion proteins were generated in which a pertussis toxin-resistant (Cys351Ile) variant of the G protein Gi1alpha was linked to the C-terminal tails of the delta opioid peptide (DOP), kappa opioid peptide, and mu opioid peptide receptors. Each was functional as measured by agonist stimulation of guanosine 5'-([gamma-35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding in Gialpha immunoprecipitates from membranes of pertussis toxin-treated HEK293 cells. Agonist function was eliminated either by fusion of the receptors to Gi1alphaGly202Ala,Cys351Ile or mutation of a pair of conserved Val residues in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor. Coexpression, but not simple mixing, of the two inactive fusion proteins reconstituted agonist-loading of [35S]GTPgammaS for each receptor. At equimolar amounts, reconstitution of DOP receptor function was more extensive than kappa or mu opioid receptor. Reconstitution of DOP function required two intact receptors and was not achieved by provision of extra Gi1alphaCys351Ile membrane anchored by linkage to DOP transmembrane domain 1. Inactive forms of all G protein alpha subunits can be produced by mutations equivalent to Gi1alphaGly202Ala. Because the amino acids modified in the opioid receptors are highly conserved in most rhodopsin-like receptors, this approach should be widely applicable to study the existence and molecular basis of receptor dimerization.

Chemotaxis is a cellular response that directs cell migration toward a chemical gradient and is fundamental to a variety of cellular processes. The receptors for most known chemokines belong to the seven transmembrane-spanning superfamily and signal through members of the G(alphai) family. Beta-arrestins, in addition to regulating desensitization, have emerged as potential mediators of G-protein-independent signaling pathways and have been implicated in several chemotactic pathways. Here, we report a system wherein chemotaxis is stimulated in a beta-arrestin 2-dependent and apparently G-protein-independent manner. Human embryonic kidney 293 cells with stable expression of the angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor type 1A (AT(1A)R) undergo chemotaxis in response to Ang II. An Ang II peptide analog S(1)I(4)I(8) Ang II that is unable to activate G-protein-mediated responses induces chemotaxis in these cells that is unaffected by pertussis toxin-mediated suppression of G(alphai). Suppression of beta-arrestin 2 expression using small interfering RNA (siRNA) essentially eliminated AT(1A)R-mediated chemotaxis induced by either Ang II or the S(1)I(4)I(8) Ang II peptide but had no effect on epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced chemotaxis. It also abolished chemotaxis induced by lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which was completely sensitive to pertussis toxin. In contrast, reduction of G(alphaq/11) through siRNA and inhibition of protein kinase C, extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2, or phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase did not diminish AT(1A)R-mediated chemotaxis. Inhibiting p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase decreased AT(1A)R-mediated chemotaxis and eliminated EGF-mediated chemotaxis, suggesting that p38 plays a role in chemotaxis that is not specific to the AT(1A)R in this system. These data suggest that beta-arrestin 2 can mediate chemotaxis through mechanisms which may be G-protein-independent (Ang II receptors) or -dependent (LPA receptors).

Numerous studies have attested to the importance of the extreme C terminus of G protein alpha subunits in determining their selectivity of receptor recognition. We have previously reported that a highly conserved glycine residue within linker I is important for constraining the fidelity of receptor recognition by Galpha(q) proteins. Herein, we explored whether both modules (linker I and extreme C terminus) interact cooperatively in switching G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-to-effector specificity and created as models mutant Galpha(q) proteins in which glycine was replaced with various amino acids and the C-terminal five Galpha(q) residues with the corresponding Galpha(i) or Galpha(s) sequence. Coupling properties of the mutated Galpha(q) proteins were determined after coexpression with a panel of 13 G(i)-and G(s) -selective receptors and compared with those of Galpha proteins modified in only one module. Galpha proteins modified in both modules are significantly more efficacious in channeling non-G(q) -selective receptors to G(q)-mediated signaling events compare with those containing each module alone. Additive effects of both modules were observed even if individual modules lacked an effect on GPCR-to-effector specificity. Dually modified Galpha proteins were also superior in conferring high-affinity agonist sites onto a coexpressed GPCR in the absence, but not in the presence, of guanine nucleotides. Together, our data suggest that receptor-G protein coupling selectivity involves cooperative interactions between the extreme C terminus and linker I of Galpha proteins and that distinct determinants of selectivity exist for individual receptors.

The antagonist ligand BODIPY-FL-prazosin (QAPB) fluoresces when bound to bovine alpha(1a)-adrenoceptors (ARs). Data indicate that the receptor-ligand complex is spontaneously internalized by beta-arrestin-dependent endocytosis. Internalization of the ligand did not occur in beta-arrestin-deficient cells; was blocked or reversed by another alpha(1) ligand, phentolamine, indicating it to reflect binding to the orthosteric recognition site; and was prevented by blocking clathrin-mediated endocytosis. The ligand showed rapid, diffuse, low-intensity, surface binding, superseded by punctate intracellular binding that developed to equilibrium in 50 to 60 min and was reversible on ligand removal, indicating a dynamic equilibrium. In cells expressing a human alpha(1a)-AR-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) 2 fusion protein, BODIPY-R-558/568-prazosin (RQAPB) colocalized with the fusion, indicating that the ligand gained access to all compartments containing the receptor, and, conversely, that the receptor has affinity for the ligand at all of these sites. The distribution of QAPB binding sites was similar for receptors with or without EGFP2, validating the fusion protein as an indicator of receptor location. The ligand partially colocalized with beta-arrestin in recycling and late endosomes, indicating receptor transit without destruction. Organelles containing receptors showed considerable movement consistent with a transportation function. This was absent in beta-arrestin-deficient cells, indicating that both constitutive receptor internalization and subsequent intracellular transportation are beta-arrestin-dependent. Calculations of relative receptor number indicate that at steady state, less than 30% of receptors reside on the cell surface and that recycling is rapid. We conclude that alpha(1a)-ARs recycle rapidly by an agonist-independent, constitutive, beta-arrestin-dependent process and that this can transport "alpha-blockers" into cells carrying these receptors.

Combinations of coimmunoprecipitation, single-cell fluorescence resonance energy transfer, and cell-surface time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer demonstrated protein-protein interactions and quaternary structure for the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor. Self-association of transmembrane domain 1 and its interaction with the full-length receptor indicated a symmetrical interface provided by this domain. Lack of effect of mutation of the glycophorin-A dimerization-like region within this helix demonstrated that this did not provide the molecular mechanism. Multiple interactions were observed between the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and fragments derived from its sequence. Fragments comprising transmembrane domains 3 and 4 and transmembrane domains 5 and 6, but not transmembrane domain 7, were also able to interact with the full-length receptor. Transmembrane domain 7 failed to interact significantly with any element of the receptor and was not transported to the cell surface after coexpression with the full-length receptor. Symmetrical interactions were also noted between fragments incorporating transmembrane domain 4, but this segment of the receptor failed to interact with transmembrane domains 1 and 2 or transmembrane domains 5 and 6. Time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies were also consistent with contributions of transmembrane domains 1 and/or 2 and transmembrane domains 3 and/or 4 to protein-protein interactions within the quaternary structure of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor, and with a contribution of transmembrane domains 5 and/or 6. These data are consistent with a complex oligomeric quaternary structure of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor in which major, symmetrical interactions may define intradimeric contacts with other contributions, providing interdimer contacts to generate oligomeric complexes akin to those observed for murine rhodopsin. A model derived from this was developed.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of receptors involved in transmembrane signaling. Although these receptors were generally believed to be monomeric entities, accumulating evidence supports the presence of GPCRs in multimeric forms. Here, using immunoprecipitation as well as time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer to assess protein-protein interactions in living cells, we unambiguously demonstrate the occurrence of dimerization of the human histamine H(1) receptor. We also show the presence of domain-swapped H(1) receptor dimers in which there is the reciprocal exchange of transmembrane domain TM domains 6 and 7 between the receptors present in the dimer. Mutation of aspartate(107) in transmembrane (TM) 3 or phenylalanine(432) in TM6 to alanine results in two radioligand-binding-deficient mutant H(1) receptors. Coexpression of H(1)D(107) A and H(1)F(432)A, however, results in a reconstituted radioligand binding site that exhibits a pharmacological profile that corresponds to the wild-type H(1) receptor. Interestingly, the H(1) receptor radioligands [(3)H]mepyramine and [(3)H]-(-)-trans-1-phenyl-3-N,N-dimethylamino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene show differential saturation binding values (B(max)) for wild-type H(1) receptors but not for the radioligand binding site that is formed upon coexpression of H(1) D(107)A and H(1) F(432)A receptors, suggesting the presence of different H(1) receptor populations.

Several domains of G protein alpha subunits are implicated in the control of receptor-G protein coupling specificity. Among these are the extreme N-and C-termini, the alpha4/beta6-loops, and the loop linking the N-terminal alpha-helix to the beta1-strand of the ras-like domain. In this study, we illustrate that single-point mutations of a highly conserved glycine residue within the linker I region of the Galpha(q) subunit confers upon the mutant Galpha(q) the ability to be activated by Galpha(i)- and Galpha(s) -coupled receptors, as evidenced by guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding and inositol phosphate turnover assays. The mutations did not affect expression of Galpha(q) proteins nor their ability to stimulate phospholipase Cbeta. It is noteworthy that both mutant and wild-type Galpha(q) proteins are indistinguishable in their ability to reconstitute a functional Gq-PLCbeta-calcium signaling pathway when cotransfected with the Galpha(q)-coupled neurokinin 1 or muscarinic M3 receptor into mouse embryonic fibroblasts derived from Galpha(q/11) knockout mice. On a three-dimensional model of the receptor-G protein complex, the highly conserved linker I region connecting the helical and the GTPase domain of the Galpha protein is inaccessible to the intracellular surface of the receptors. Our data indicate that receptor-G protein coupling specificity is not exclusively governed by direct receptor-G protein interaction and that it even bypasses the requirement of the extreme C terminus of Galpha, a well accepted receptor recognition domain, suggesting a novel allosteric mechanism for G protein-coupled receptor-G protein selectivity.

Using combinations of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer and the functional complementation of pairs of inactive receptor-G protein fusion proteins, the human alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptor was shown to form homodimeric/oligomeric complexes when expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. Saturation bioluminescence resonance energy transfer studies indicated the alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptor homodimer interactions to be high affinity and some 75 times greater than interactions between the alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptor and the delta opioid peptide receptor. Only a fraction of the alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptors was at the plasma membrane of HEK293 cells at steady state. However, dimers of alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptors were also present in intracellular membranes, and the dimer status of those delivered to the cell surface was unaffected by the presence of agonist. Splice variation can generate at least three forms of the human alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptor with differences limited to the C-terminal tail. Each of the alpha(1A-1), alpha(1A-2a), and alpha(1A-3a)-adrenoceptor splice variants formed homodimers/oligomers, and all combinations of these splice variants were able to generate heterodimeric/oligomeric interactions. Despite the coexpression of these splice variants in human tissues that possess the pharmacologically defined alpha(1L)-adrenoceptor binding site, coexpression of any pair in HEK293 cells failed to generate ligand binding characteristic of the alpha(1L)-adrenoceptor.

It is now generally accepted that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can exist as dimers or as part of larger oligomeric complexes. Increasing evidence suggests that a dimer is the minimal functional structure, but considerable variation exists between reports of the effects of agonist ligands on quaternary structure. Many studies have intimated the existence of heterodimeric GPCR pairings. Key questions that remain to be addressed effectively include the prevalence and relevance of these in native tissues and the implications of heterodimerization for pharmacology and, potentially, for drug design.

Over the last decade, the ability to detect agonist-independent signal transduction by G protein-coupled receptors has in turn resulted in the detection and study of ligands able to block this activity. Such ligands are generically described as inverse agonists. Considerable attention has recently been devoted to the presence and roles of endogenous antagonist/inverse agonists and the concept that inverse agonists may have specific therapeutic benefits compared with neutral antagonists.

The rat muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype 3 was modified by swapping the third intracellular loop with the corresponding region of a constitutively active mutant human beta2-adrenergic receptor and attaching Renilla reniformis luciferase to its C terminus. The chimeric fusion receptor displayed constitutive Gq- and Gs-coupled activity as demonstrated in nuclear factor of activated T cell and cAMP response element reporter gene assays. The chimeric receptor displayed a pharmacological binding profile comparable with that of the wild-type receptor for agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists but showed a large decrease in expression in both human embryonic kidney 293 and COS-7 cells. Long-term treatment of cells expressing the chimeric receptor with agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists resulted in a concentration-dependent up-regulation in the steady-state levels that was not observed for the wild-type receptor. The EC50 of neutral antagonists and inverse agonists was significantly correlated to their binding affinities at the wild-type receptor, whereas agonists demonstrated greater EC50 values for the chimeric receptor. To validate the approach as a means of discovering novel receptor modulators, a cell-based, high-throughput screening assay was developed and used to screen a small molecule compound collection against the chimeric fusion receptor. Several novel hits were identified and confirmed by ligand binding assay and functional assays using the wild-type rat muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype 3.

The stable interaction of a G-protein coupled receptor and a particular partner G-protein was made possible by creating tandems between the alpha(2A) adrenergic receptor (alpha(2A)-R) and pertussis toxin-resistant mutants of different G alpha subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins. Both alpha(2A)-R-G alpha(o) and alpha(2A)-R-G alpha(i) proved able to reconstitute agonist-induced voltage-dependent inhibition of N-type calcium channels (Ca(V)2.2) similar to the wild-type alpha(2A)-R when expressed in COS-7 cells. The interaction of G(q) with the G(i/o) signaling pathways was studied by expressing either G alpha(q) or a chimeric construct based on G alpha(q) containing the last five amino acids of G alpha(z), which is activated by alpha(2A)-R. It was found that G alpha(qz5) activated by the wild-type alpha(2A)-R inhibited Ca(V)2.2 currents in a voltage-independent fashion. Furthermore, G alpha(qz5) counteracted the voltage-dependent inhibition resulting from alpha(2A)-R-G alpha(o) activation. We subsequently investigated the basis for the behavior of G alpha(qz5). Our evidence suggests that this occurs as a result of a downstream effect of activation of G alpha(qz5) because it was blocked by C-terminal construct of phospholipase C beta 1. Furthermore it is likely to occur in part via protein kinase C (PKC) activation, because the PKC activator phorbol dibutyrate mimicked the effects of G alpha(qz5) in alpha(2A)-R-G alpha(o)-transfected cells. Conversely, cells expressing both alpha(2A)-R-G alpha(o) and G alpha(qz5) exhibited a partial restoration of voltage-dependent inhibition in the presence of the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I (GF 109203X). The potential sites of phosphorylation are discussed.

Constitutive activity of wild-type and mutant forms of human beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors was measured by guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding assays using fusion proteins between these receptors and G(s)alpha. Constitutive activity of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor is enhanced by mutation of Leu(322). The ability of ligands to suppress receptor instability and produce up-regulation is often associated with constitutively active mutants. Leu(322)Lysbeta(1)-adrenoceptor, but not wild type, was up-regulated by exposure to the beta(1)-adrenoceptor selective blocker betaxolol. More extensive sequence alterations of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor were generated to mimic the initially described constitutively active mutant (CAM) of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor that is up-regulated strongly by betaxolol. Substitution of amino acids 316 to 324 of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor with the equivalent alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor sequence did not result in up-regulation by betaxolol. However, these forms of both beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors displayed substantial and equivalent constitutive activity. The addition of the Leu(322)Lys mutation into the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor substituted beta(1)-adrenoceptor to produce the CAMKbeta(1)-adrenoceptor allowed substantially greater levels of up-regulation by betaxolol without enhancement of constitutive [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. Arg(156)Alabeta(1)-adrenoceptor was up-regulated strongly by betaxolol but displayed lower constitutive activity than did other mutants. Binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to all the fusion proteins was increased substantially by isoprenaline. Despite the ability of betaxolol to cause up-regulation of many mutants, only for the CAMbeta(2)-adrenoceptor-G(s)alpha and CAMKbeta(1)-adrenoceptor-G(s)alpha fusion proteins was the basal binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS decreased by betaxolol. Clear resolution between receptor constitutive activity and ligand suppression of receptor instability can be obtained for mutant beta-adrenoceptors, and potential inverse agonists do not function equally at phenotypically apparently equivalent CAM receptors.

Immunoprecipitation of a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and Galpha(11) following a [(35)S]GTPgammaS [guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate] binding assay resulted in incorporation of low levels of nucleotide. The agonist phenylephrine increased incorporation some 30-fold. Agonist-induced binding represented 1.0 mol of [(35)S]GTPgammaS/mol of fusion protein. This was to the G protein linked to the receptor rather than endogenous Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) as a fusion protein containing the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and a form of Galpha(11) (G(208)A) unable to exchange guanine nucleotides effectively, bound [(35)S]GTPgammaS very poorly. Fusion proteins between A(293)E, D(142)A, and 3CAM mutants of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and Galpha(11) bound substantially greater levels of [(35)S]GTPgammaS in the absence of agonist than the fusion incorporating the wild-type receptor. Constitutive binding of the nucleotide induced by these mutants was only 20% of the level achieved by phenylephrine. These mutant receptors thus do not provide an accurate mimic of the agonist-occupied state. Phentolamine reduced the binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS and acted as a partial inverse agonist for each of the constitutively active mutants. [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galpha(11) was elevated by phenylephrine in both wild-type and constitutively active mutant forms of the fusion proteins, but agonist potency and binding affinity were 50 times higher for the fusions containing the mutated receptors. These studies provide the first direct demonstration of the capacity of constitutively active mutants of a receptor to stimulate guanine nucleotide exchange on the alpha subunit of a G(q) family G protein and defines a strategy potentially suitable for any receptor that couples to these G proteins.

Fusion proteins between the human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A) receptor and either wild type or certain pertussis toxin-resistant forms of G(o1)alpha and G(i1)alpha display constitutive GTPase activity that can be inhibited by the inverse agonist spiperone. Addition of recombinant regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) 1 or RGS16 to membranes expressing these fusion proteins resulted in elevation of this constitutive GTPase activity without significantly altering the binding affinity of antagonist/inverse agonist ligands. For a 5-HT(1A) receptor-(Cys(351)Ile)G(o1)alpha fusion protein the increase in basal GTPase activity was greater than 4-fold. Enzyme kinetic analysis demonstrated that the effect of RGS1 was as a GTPase-activating protein for the fusion construct. In the presence of the RGS proteins, both agonists and inverse agonists produced much more robust regulation of high-affinity GTPase activity than in their absence. This allowed detection of the partial agonist nature of WAY100635, which has been described previously as a neutral antagonist at the 5-HT(1A) receptor. Of a range of ligands studied, only haloperidol functioned as a neutral ligand in the presence of RGS1. These studies show that addition of a recombinant RGS protein provides a simple and novel means to elevate the fraction of basal membrane GTPase activity contributed by the constitutive activity of a receptor. By so doing, it also greatly enhances the ability to detect and analyze the effects of inverse agonists and to discriminate between neutral ligands and those with low levels of positive intrinsic efficacy.

Compared with cloned, human (h)D(2) receptors (pK(i) = 6.9), the antiparkinsonian agent piribedil showed comparable affinity for halpha(2A)- (7.1) and halpha(2C)- (7.2) adrenoceptors (ARs), whereas its affinity for halpha(2B)-ARs was less marked (6.5). At halpha(2A)- and halpha(2C)-ARs, piribedil antagonized induction of [(35)S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding by norepinephrine (NE) with pK(b) values of 6.5 and 6.9, respectively. Furthermore, Schild analysis of the actions of piribedil at halpha(2A)-ARs indicated competitive antagonism, yielding a pA(2) of 6.5. At a porcine alpha(2A)-AR-Gi1alpha-Cys351C (wild-type) fusion protein, piribedil competitively abolished (pA(2) = 6.5) GTPase activity induced by epinephrine. However, at a alpha(2A)-AR-Gi1alpha-Cys351I (mutant) fusion protein of amplified sensitivity, although still acting as a competitive antagonist (pA(2) = 6.2) of epinephrine, piribedil itself manifested weak partial agonist properties. Similarly, piribedil weakly induced mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation via wild-type halpha(2A)-ARs, although attenuating its phosphorylation by NE. As demonstrated by functional [(35)S]GTPgammaS autoradiography in rats, piribedil antagonized activation by NE of alpha(2)-ARs in cortex, amygdala, and septum. Antagonist properties were also expressed in a dose-dependent enhancement of the firing rate of adrenergic neurons in locus ceruleus (0.125-4.0 mg/kg i.v.). Furthermore, piribedil (2.5-4.0 mg/kg s.c.) accelerated hippocampal NE synthesis, elevated dialysis levels of NE in hippocampus and frontal cortex, and blocked hypnotic-sedative properties of the alpha(2)-AR agonist xylazine. Finally, piribedil showed only modest affinity for rat alpha(1)-ARs (5.9) and weakly antagonized NE-induced activation of phospholipase C via halpha(1A)-ARs (pK(b) = 5.6). In conclusion, piribedil displays essentially antagonist properties at cloned, human and cerebral, rat alpha(2)-ARs. Blockade of alpha(2)-ARs may, thus, contribute to its clinical antiparkinsonian profile.

Coexpression of the rat thyrotropin releasing hormone receptor-1 with beta-arrestin 1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) in human embryonic kidney 293 cells results in agonist-dependent translocation of the arrestin to the plasma membrane followed by its cointernalization with the receptor. Truncations of the receptor C-terminal tail from 93 to 50 amino acids did not alter this. Truncations to fewer than 47 amino acids prevented such interactions and inhibited but did not fully eliminate agonist-induced internalization of the receptor. Deletion and site-directed mutants of the C-terminal tail indicated that separate elimination of a potential casein kinase II phosphorylation site or clathrin/clathrin adapter motifs was insufficient to prevent either internalization of the receptor or its cointernalization with beta-arrestin 1-GFP. Alteration of sites of acylation reduced internalization and prevented interactions with beta-arrestin 1-GFP. Combinations of these mutants resulted in lack of interaction with beta-arrestin 1-GFP and a 10-fold reduction in internalization of the receptor. Despite this, the receptor construct that lacked the three protein sequence motifs was fully functional. These studies map sites that contribute the interactions of the thyrotropin releasing hormone receptor-1 C-terminal tail required for effective contacts with beta-arrestin 1-GFP and indicate key roles for these interactions in agonist-induced internalization of the receptor.

S18616 ((S)-spiro[(1-oxa-2-amino-3-azacyclopent-2-ene)-4, 2'-(8'-chloro-1',2',3',4'-tetrahydronaphthalene)]) displayed high affinity at native rat alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (AR)s (pK(i), 9.8), native human (h)alpha(2A)-ARs (9.6), and cloned halpha(2A)- (9.5), halpha(2B)- (9.2), and halpha(2C)- (9.0) ARs. It showed 40-fold lower affinity for halpha(1A)-ARs (8.4) and >/=100-fold lower affinity for rat alpha(1)-ARs (7.1), halpha(1B)-ARs (7.7), halpha(1D)-ARs (7.6), imidazoline(1) (7.4), and imidazoline(2) (7.4) sites and >100-fold lower affinity for all other (>50) sites. At halpha(2A)-ARs, in guanosine-5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding studies, S18616 was a potent (partial) agonist: log effective concentration (pEC(50)), 9.3/maximal effect, 51%. This observation was corroborated employing a halpha(2A)-Gi1alpha fusion protein/GTPase assay (9.0/40%) in which the actions of S18616 were blocked by pertussis toxin. Employing guanosine-5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate binding assays, S18616 was also a partial agonist at halpha(2C)-ARs (8.2/63%) but a full agonist (8.4/124%) at halpha(2B)-ARs. At halpha(2A)-, halpha(2B)-, and halpha(2C)-ARs, the selective alpha(2)-AR antagonist, atipamezole, abolished the actions of S18616: pK(b) values of 9.1, 9. 1, and 9.4, respectively. As determined by depletion of membrane-bound [(3)H]phosphatidyl inositols, S18616 behaved as a (less potent) agonist (7.8/79%) at halpha(1A)-ARs, an action abolished by prazosin (pK(b), 8.9). Reflecting alpha(2)-AR agonist properties, S18616 potently (>/=1 microg/kg, s.c.) and dose dependently elicited hypothermia and antinociception (nine diverse models) in rodents. These actions were dose dependently inhibited by chemically diverse alpha(2)- versus alpha(1)-AR antagonists, atipamezole, idazoxan, RX821,002, and BRL44418 (a preferential alpha(2A)-AR ligand). In contrast, the actions of S18616 were unaffected by the alpha(1)-AR antagonists, ARC239 and prazosin (which preferentially block alpha(2B/2C)- versus alpha(2A)-ARs). Although the affinity of dexmedetomidine at alpha(2)-ARs was lower than S18616; it displayed a similar receptor and functional profile. Clonidine displayed lower efficacy than S18616, was substantially less potent, and had marked affinity for imidazoline(1) sites and alpha(1)-ARs. In conclusion, S18616 is a novel, selective, and highly potent agonist at alpha(2)-ARs.

Constitutively active forms of the hamster alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor can be produced from the point mutations Asp(142)Ala or Ala(293)Glu or exchange of a small segment of the third intracellular loop with the equivalent region of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged forms of each of these mutants and of the wild type alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor were expressed stably in HEK293 cells. The wild type alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor-GFP was expressed both at the plasma membrane and with a distinctly perinuclear punctate pattern. Sustained treatment with a range of antagonist/inverse agonist ligands failed to modulate the cellular distribution or levels of expression of this construct. The form of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor containing the beta(2)-adrenoceptor sequence substitution was predominantly located in punctate intracellular vesicles and sustained challenge with the same series of antagonists/inverse agonists produced a 5-fold up-regulation of protein levels with elevation of both plasma membrane and intracellular receptor. Quantification of these effects could be produced by spectrofluorometric analysis of cells grown in a 96-well microtiter plate. In contrast, both the Asp(142)Ala and Ala(293)Glu forms of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor-GFP were located predominantly at the plasma membrane. Levels of these two point mutants were not increased by any of the antagonist/inverse agonist ligands tested, although the sequence substitution mutation encompasses codon 293. Resolution of constitutive activity and ligand-induced up-regulation was further exemplified by a mutant lacking eight serine residues in the C-terminal tail that displayed little constitutive activity but was up-regulated by sustained ligand challenge. These results demonstrate the nonequivalence of mutations in their regulation by antagonist/inverse agonist ligands.

Fusion proteins were generated by attachment of green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the C-terminal tail of either the wild-type human beta(2)-adrenoceptor or a form with enhanced constitutive activity. Sustained treatment of HEK293 cells stably expressing the constitutively active mutant (CAM) beta(2)-adrenoceptor-GFP with the inverse agonist betaxolol resulted in a marked up-regulation of the fusion protein that could be monitored by both fluorescence and immunoblotting of membrane fractions. This was not observed for the wild-type beta(2)-adrenoceptor-GFP. Addition of the agonist isoprenaline to CAM beta(2)-adrenoceptor-GFP expressing cells previously treated with betaxolol resulted in rapid internalization of the receptor into punctate intracellular vesicles in a manner similar to wild-type beta(2)-adrenoceptor-GFP. A range of "beta-blockers" replicated the up-regulation of the CAM beta(2)-adrenoceptor-GFP, although pharmacological specificity was maintained, as it was not produced by alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoceptor-selective antagonists/inverse agonists. Parallel intact cell binding studies with [(3)H]dihydroalprenolol confirmed up-regulation of the CAM beta(2)-adrenoceptor-GFP by betaxolol but failed to predict the optically monitored up-regulation produced by high concentrations of alprenolol. The cellular distribution of the up-regulated CAM beta(2)-adrenoceptor-GFP was not identical after sustained treatment of the cells with different beta-blockers. Inverse agonists, able to reduce basal intracellular cAMP levels, such as betaxolol and ICI118551, resulted in both increased plasma membrane receptor and increased diffuse intracellular staining. In contrast, treatment with labetolol and alprenolol resulted in a significant fraction of the intracellular receptor displaying a punctate distribution pattern. These ligands displayed substantial agonism to stimulate intracellular cAMP levels via the CAM beta(2)-adrenoceptor-GFP.