Search

This study was conducted to test laser speckle perfusion imaging (LSPI) for imaging microcirculation and monitoring microcirculatory changes of port wine stains (PWS) during vascular targeted photodynamic therapy (V-PDT). Before and 5 min after V-PDT, PWS lesions and the corresponding contralateral healthy skins of 24 PWS patients were scanned, whereas seven PWS patients were scanned throughout V-PDT. V-PDT was conducted immediately after intravenous injection of photocarcinorin (4-5 mg kg(-1)). A 532 nm laser was used for irradiation (power density: 80-100 mW cm(-2), exposure time: 20-50 min). Before V-PDT, all 24 PWS patients demonstrated a significant difference in perfusion between the PWS lesion and the contralateral healthy control skin (1132 ± 724 and 619 ± 478 PU, respectively, P < 0.01). Five minutes after V-PDT, the mean perfusion value of the 24 PWS lesions was 1246 ± 754 PU. There was no significant difference compared to the perfusion before V-PDT (P > 0.05). During V-PDT, the perfusion of seven PWS patients increased rapidly after initiation of V-PDT, reached a maximum within 10 min, lasted for several minutes, and slowly returned to a relatively lower level at the end of V-PDT. On the basis of these results, LSPI is capable of imaging PWS microvasculature and monitoring microvascular reactivity to V-PDT., (© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Photochemistry and Photobiology © 2012 The American Society of Photobiology.)

Hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (HMME) is a novel and promising second-generation porphyrin-related photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy (PDT). To study the effects of HMME PDT on choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in rats, the PDT was performed 20 min after HMME bolus injection, which was investigated prior to the PDT by fluorescence microscopy with laser-induced CNV, and delivered at an irradiance of 400, 600 and 1000 mW cm(-2) corresponding to a fluence of 36, 54, 90 J cm(-2) in PDT plan I (15 mg kg(-1) HMME). In PDT plan II (30 mg kg(-1) HMME), the laser had a constant irradiance of 600 mW cm(-2), which was delivered for 60, 90 or 150 s, to also achieve total energy doses of 36, 54 or 90 J cm(-2). CNV closure rates assessed by fluorescein angiography and histologic damage to treated areas of choroid and retina varied as a function of the dose of HMME and of the activating light energy fluence. Endothelial cell labeled by platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 presented treated CNV lesions that were significantly reduced in size (P < 0.01). It can be concluded that PDT using HMME can effectively occlude CNV. HMME is a potentially useful photosensitizer for the reduction in CNV size of irradiated areas.

The effect of Photofrin encapsulated in a liposome delivery vehicle for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of the 9L gliosarcoma and normal rat brain was tested. We hypothesized that the liposome vehicle enhances therapeutic efficacy, possibly by increasing tumor tissue concentration of Photofrin. Male Fisher rats bearing a 9L gliosarcoma were treated 16 days after intracerebral tumor implantation with either Photofrin in dextrose (n = 5) or Photofrin in liposome (n = 6). Nontumor-bearing animals were treated with Photofrin delivered either in dextrose (n = 4) or liposome (n = 4) vehicle. Tissue concentrations of Photofrin delivered either in dextrose (n = 4) or liposome (n = 4) vehicle were measured in tumor, brain adjacent to tumor and in normal brain tissue. Photofrin was administered (intraperitoneally) at a dose of 12.5 mg/kg and PDT (17 J/cm2 of 632 nm light at 100 mW/cm2) was performed 24 h after Photofrin administration. Brains were removed 24 h after PDT and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for analysis of cellular damage. The PDT using Photofrin in the liposome vehicle caused significantly more damage to the tumor (P < 0.001) than did PDT with Photofrin in dextrose. The PDT of tumor with Photofrin delivered in liposomes caused a 22% volume of cellular necrosis, while PDT of tumor with Photofrin delivered in dextrose caused only scattered cellular damage. Photofrin concentration in tumors was significantly higher (P = 0.021) using liposome (33.8 +/- 18.9 micrograms/g) compared to dextrose delivery (5.5 +/- 1.5 micrograms/g). Normal brain was affected similarly in both groups, with only scattered cellular necrosis. Our data suggest that the liposome vehicle enhances the therapeutic efficacy of PDT treatment of 9L tumors.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a potential treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, little data is available regarding the relative distribution of sensitizer to tumor and intra-abdominal organs, optimal route of sensitizer administration, and maximal tolerated light dose. Tumor and normal tissue sensitizer levels were measured by tissue extraction 3, 24, 48 and 72 h after 10 mg/kg of Photofrin II was given intraperitoneally (IP) or intravenously (IV) in a mouse peritoneal tumor model, and the maximal tolerated PDT light dose determined. Equivalent tumor sensitizer levels were obtained regardless of the route of sensitizer administration. Route of administration, however, did affect the kinetics of tumor sensitizer elimination, with the half-time for elimination (T1/2) 113.6 h for IP drug and 60.6 h for IV drug. Route of administration also affected sensitizer levels in several intra-abdominal organs, resulting in somewhat higher tumor to liver and kidney levels at 24 and 72 h after IP sensitizer administration. Despite these tissue distribution differences, route of sensitizer administration did not significantly affect PDT toxicity or mortality when mice were treated with 630 nm light. The maximum tolerated light dose was 1.04 J/cm2. These parameters will prove helpful in designing large scale animal trials assessing the efficacy and safety of intra-abdominal PDT.