Search

In this study, the behavior of soft clay improved with a conductive jute geotextile-encased stone column was investigated, considering the effects of electrokinetic coupling. The study findings suggest that electrokinetic-coupled encased stone columns (e-ESCs) improve the dewatering efficiency, consolidation settlement rate, and shear strength of the soft clay compared to nonelectrokinetic encased columns. After the inclusion of e-ESCs, the time required to remove 50% of the total discharge was decreased by 92% compared to encased stone columns (ESCs). A significant decrease in the volumetric shrinkage and surface cracks was observed for e-ESC-improved soft clay. Further, due to anode corrosion during the process, brass electrodes experienced a 4.25% loss in weight at the end. The consumed power per unit weight of treated soil (Wh/kg) at the end of the test period was 24.03, 19.70, 20.10, and 23.38 Wh/kg for the e-ESC with mild steel, copper, brass, and aluminum anodes, respectively. The findings showed that the choice of anode material affects the characteristics of soft clay, such as undrained shear strength, pore water discharge, flow pattern, and moisture content. Further, a noteworthy modification in the physicochemical properties of clay was observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper pertains to the development of a mechanical model to predict the behavior of a geosynthetic-reinforced granular fill over soft soil improved with stone columns. The saturated soft soil has been idealized by Kelvin–Voight model to represent its consolidation behavior. The stone columns are idealized by stiffer springs. Pasternak shear layer and rough elastic membrane represent the granular fill and geosynthetic reinforcement layer, respectively. The nonlinear behavior of the granular fill and the soft soil is considered. Effect of consolidation of the soft soil due to inclusion of the stone columns has also been included in the model. Plane strain conditions are considered for the loading and reinforced foundation soil system. An iterative finite difference scheme is applied for obtaining the solution, and results are presented in nondimensional form. Comparison between the results from the present study and the analytical solution using theory of elasticity shows reasonable agreement. The advantage of using geosynthetic reinforcement is highlighted. Results indicate that inclusion of the geosynthetic layer effectively reduces the settlement. Nonlinearity in the behavior of the soft soil and the granular fill is reduced due to the use of geosynthetic reinforcement layer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]