Search

This paper discusses how small-strain stiffness and some aspects of the yield surface affect the finite-element predictions of excavation responses, including wall and ground deformations. By using the in-house-developed constitutive model SC1SS, it is possible to isolate and quantify impacts brought about by selected aspects of the soil behavior. This soil model has been validated to reasonably model Taipei silty clay and deep excavations in such soil. This study shows that ignoring small-strain stiffness can overestimate deformations by as much as 80%, leading to conservative and costly design. Inclined yield surface and Lode-angle dependency (on deviatoric planes) have lesser effects on the prediction results. In addition, the mechanisms behind these impacts are investigated through numerical triaxial tests.

The maintenance planning of deteriorating bridges is to find a balance between obtained performance and incurred cost. Because the planning horizon spans tens of years, a certain amount of uncertai...

This paper describes a numerical study of drained pressuremeter tests in sand using a one-dimensional finite-element method in conjunction with an advanced soil model MIT-S1, and input parameters corresponding to Toyoura sand. This soil model is capable of describing realistically the transitions in peak shear strength parameters of cohesionless soils that occur due to changes in void ratio and confining pressure. The predicted peak shear strengths can be normalized, at least approximately, by introducing a state parameter that references the initial (preshear) void ratio to the value occurring at large strain critical state conditions at the same mean effective stress. The numerical analyses idealize the pressuremeter test as the expansion of a cylindrical cavity and ignore disturbance effects caused by probe insertion. This idealization is relevant to self-boring pressuremeter tests. Results confirm that there is a linear correlation between the in situ (i.e., preshear) state parameter of the soil and the gradient of the log pressure-cavity strain expansion, as first suggested by Yu in 1994 using a much simpler soil model. Indeed, the linear coefficients derived for Toyoura sand differ only slightly from those obtained previously by Yu for six other sands.