Search

PURPOSE: Matching patients to clinical trials is cumbersome and costly. Attempts have been made to automate the matching process; however, most have used a trial-centric approach, which focuses on a single trial. In this study, we developed a patient-centric matching tool that matches patient-specific demographic and clinical information with free-text clinical trial inclusion and exclusion criteria extracted using natural language processing to return a list of relevant clinical trials ordered by the patient's likelihood of eligibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records from pediatric leukemia clinical trials were downloaded from ClinicalTrials.gov. Regular expressions were used to discretize and extract individual trial criteria. A multilabel support vector machine (SVM) was trained to classify sentence embeddings of criteria into relevant clinical categories. Labeled criteria were parsed using regular expressions to extract numbers, comparators, and relationships. In the validation phase, a patient-trial match score was generated for each trial and returned in the form of a ranked list for each patient. RESULTS: In total, 5,251 discretized criteria were extracted from 216 protocols. The most frequent criterion was previous chemotherapy/biologics (17%). The multilabel SVM demonstrated a pooled accuracy of 75%. The text processing pipeline was able to automatically extract 68% of eligibility criteria rules, as compared with 80% in a manual version of the tool. Automated matching was accomplished in approximately 4 seconds, as compared with several hours using manual derivation. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this project represents the first open-source attempt to generate a patient-centric clinical trial matching tool. The tool demonstrated acceptable performance when compared with a manual version, and it has potential to save time and money when matching patients to trials. AI improves patient-centric clinical trials matching. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: There is a need for an improved understanding of clinical and biologic risk factors in pediatric cancer to improve patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) represents the application of computational inference from advanced statistical methods that can be applied to increasing amount of data available for study in pediatric oncology. The goal of this systematic review was to systematically characterize the state of ML in pediatric oncology and highlight advances and opportunities in the field. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the Embase, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases for applications of ML in pediatric oncology. Query results from all three databases were aggregated and duplicate studies were removed. RESULTS: A total of 42 unique articles that examined the applications of ML in pediatric oncology met inclusion criteria for review. We identified 20 studies of CNS tumors, 13 of solid tumors, and nine of leukemia. ML tasks included classification, prediction of treatment response, and dose optimization with a variety of methods being used including neural network, k-nearest neighbor, random forest, naive Bayes, and support vector machines. Strengths of the identified studies included matching or outperforming physician comparators via automated analysis and predicting therapeutic response. Common limitations included significant heterogeneity in reporting standards, clinical applicability, small sample sizes, and missing external validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: We identified areas where ML can enhance clinical care in ways that may not otherwise be achievable. Although ML promises enormous potential in improving diagnostics, decision making, and monitoring for children with cancer, the field remains in early stages and future work will be aided by standards and guidelines to ensure rigorous methodologic design and maximizing clinical utility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scans are a radionucleotide imaging modality that undergo Curie scoring to semiquantitatively assess neuroblastoma burden, which can be used as a marker of therapy response. We hypothesized that a convolutional neural network (CNN) could be developed that uses diagnostic MIBG scans to predict response to induction chemotherapy. METHODS: We analyzed MIBG scans housed in the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Data Commons from patients enrolled in the Children's Oncology Group high-risk neuroblastoma study ANBL12P1. The primary outcome was response to upfront chemotherapy, defined as a Curie score ≤ 2 after four cycles of induction chemotherapy. We derived and validated a CNN using two-dimensional whole-body MIBG scans from diagnosis and evaluated model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We also developed a clinical classification model to predict response on the basis of age, stage, and MYCN amplification. RESULTS: Among 103 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma included in the final cohort, 67 (65%) were responders. Performance in predicting response to upfront chemotherapy was equivalent using the CNN and the clinical model. Class-activation heatmaps verified that the CNN used areas of disease within the MIBG scans to make predictions. Furthermore, integrating predictions using a geometric mean approach improved detection of responders to upfront chemotherapy (geometric mean AUC 0.73 v CNN AUC 0.63, P <.05; v clinical model AUC 0.65, P <.05). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate feasibility in using machine learning of diagnostic MIBG scans to predict response to induction chemotherapy for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. We highlight improvements when clinical risk factors are also integrated, laying the foundation for using a multimodal approach to guiding treatment decisions for patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. In this study of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma, we demonstrate feasibility in using machine learning of diagnostic MIBG scans to predict response to induction chemotherapy. @ComerChildrens [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]