Search

Purpose: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in cancer patients. Evidence has suggested that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) might improve survival in patients with cancer by preventing both VTE and the progression of metastases. No trial in a single cancer type has been powered to demonstrate a clinically significant survival difference. The aim of this trial was to investigate this question in patients with lung cancer., Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial to evaluate the addition of a primary prophylactic dose of LMWH for 24 weeks to standard treatment in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer of any stage and histology. The primary outcome was 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes included metastasis-free survival, VTE-free survival, toxicity, and quality of life., Results: For this trial, 2,202 patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment arms over 4 years. The trial did not reach its intended number of events for the primary analysis (2,047 deaths), and data were analyzed after 2,013 deaths after discussion with the independent data monitoring committee. There was no evidence of a difference in overall or metastasis-free survival between the two arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.10; P = .814; and HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.08; P = .864, respectively). There was a reduction in the risk of VTE from 9.7% to 5.5% (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.79; P = .001) in the LMWH arm and no difference in major bleeding events but evidence of an increase in the composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in the LMWH arm., Conclusion: LMWH did not improve overall survival in the patients with lung cancer in this trial. A significant reduction in VTE is associated with an increase in clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Strategies to target those at greatest risk of VTE are warranted., (© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Purpose: This study compared denosumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand antibody, with zoledronic acid (ZA) for delaying or preventing skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases (excluding breast and prostate) or myeloma., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind, double-dummy design to receive monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg (n = 886) or intravenous ZA 4 mg (dose adjusted for renal impairment; n = 890). Daily supplemental calcium and vitamin D were strongly recommended. The primary end point was time to first on-study SRE (pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression)., Results: Denosumab was noninferior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98; P = .0007). Although directionally favorable, denosumab was not statistically superior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (P = .03 unadjusted; P = .06 adjusted for multiplicity) or time to first-and-subsequent (multiple) SRE (rate ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; P = .14). Overall survival and disease progression were similar between groups. Hypocalcemia occurred more frequently with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred at similarly low rates in both groups. Acute-phase reactions after the first dose occurred more frequently with ZA, as did renal adverse events and elevations in serum creatinine based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events grading., Conclusion: Denosumab was noninferior (trending to superiority) to ZA in preventing or delaying first on-study SRE in patients with advanced cancer metastatic to bone or myeloma. Denosumab represents a potential novel treatment option with the convenience of subcutaneous administration and no requirement for renal monitoring or dose adjustment.

Purpose: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is exquisitely chemosensitive, but few patients are cured by conventional chemoradiotherapy. Recent studies suggest that increased cytotoxic dose-intensity might improve survival. In this randomized phase II study, we tested the feasibility of dose intensification using sequential reinfusion of hematopoietic progenitors in whole blood., Patients and Methods: SCLC patients with a favorable prognosis were treated with six cycles of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE), at 4-week (standard treatment) or 2-week (intensified treatment) intervals. Intensified treatment was supported by daily subcutaneous filgrastim injections and reinfusion of 750 mL of autologous blood collected immediately before each cycle., Results: Fifty consecutive patients were randomized to standard (n = 25) or intensified (n = 25) ICE. A total of 94% completed at least three treatment cycles, and 70% completed six cycles; 96% of treatments were given at full dose. The planned dose-intensity was 1.0 for standard and 2.0 for intensified ICE. The median received dose-intensity for cycles 1 through 3 was 0.99 (range, 0.33 to 1.02) for the standard treatment arm and 1.80 (range, 0.99 to 1.97) for the intensified treatment arm (P <.001). Over all six cycles, the median received dose-intensity was 0.95 (range, 0.17 to 1.03) for the standard treatment arm and 1.60 (range, 0.60 to 2.01) for the intensified treatment arm (P <.001). Febrile neutropenia was more common on the standard treatment arm (84% v 56%), resulting in more days of intravenous antibiotics (median, 10 v 3 days; P =.035). Transfusion requirements were similar in the two groups., Conclusion: Sequential reinfusion of hematopoietic progenitors in whole blood can safely support substantial increases in dose-intensity of ICE chemotherapy for SCLC.

Purpose: This was the first randomized study to investigate the efficacy of peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization using stem-cell factor (SCF) in combination with filgrastim (G-CSF) following chemotherapy compared with filgrastim alone following chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Forty-eight patients with ovarian cancer were treated with cyclophosphamide and randomized to receive filgrastim 5 microg/kg alone or filgrastim 5 microg/kg plus SCF. The dose of SCF was cohort-dependent (5, 10, 15, and 20 microg/kg), with 12 patients in each cohort, nine of whom received SCF plus filgrastim and the remaining three patients who received filgrastim alone. On recovery from the WBC nadir, patients underwent a single apheresis., Results: SCF in combination with filgrastim following chemotherapy enhanced the mobilization of progenitor cells compared with that produced by filgrastim alone following chemotherapy. This enhancement was dose-dependent for colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM), burst-forming unit-erythrocyte (BFU-E), and CD34+ cells in both the peripheral blood and apheresis product. In the apheresis product, threefold to fivefold increases in median CD34+ and progenitor cell yields were obtained in patients treated with SCF 20 microg/kg plus filgrastim compared with yields obtained in patients treated with filgrastim alone. Peripheral blood values of CFU-GM, BFU-E, and CD34+ cells per milliliter remained above defined threshold levels longer with higher doses of SCF. The higher doses of SCF offer a greater window of opportunity in which to perform the apheresis to achieve high yields., Conclusion: SCF (15 or 20 microg/kg) in combination with filgrastim following chemotherapy is an effective way of increasing progenitor cell yields compared with filgrastim alone following chemotherapy.

Purpose: To compare standard and intensive treatment strategies for patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) of poor prognosis, defined by the international prognostic index., Patients and Methods: Thirty-four patients received standard chemotherapy with 11 weeks of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, prednisolone, and methotrexate (VAPEC-B), and 33 received intensive treatment with 7 weeks of VAPEC-B, three cycles of ifosfamide/cytarabine, then high-dose busulfan/cyclophosphamide followed by autologous blood progenitor-cell (BPC) transplantation., Results: Twelve of 33 patients in the intensive group and 26 of 34 patients in the standard group have died. The median follow-up time for the surviving patients is 31 months and 68 months, respectively. At 2 years, the actuarial estimates of event-free survival (EFS) were 61% versus 35% (P = .01) and of overall survival, 64% versus 35% (P = .01). A significant reduction in the event rate (progression or death) was maintained after adjustment for age and the number of risk factors. The estimated risk of experiencing an event was 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.84) in the intensive group compared with the standard group., Conclusion: Patients with poor prognostic features who received high-dose therapy and BPC rescue had a superior EFS. The survival differences observed in this study justify a formal comparison in a randomized study.

Purpose: The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to increase cytotoxic dose-intensity was assessed in a randomized trial in better-prognosis small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Both control and G-CSF arms were subject to the same dose-intensification strategy., Patients and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed SCLC and either no or one adverse prognostic factor were randomized to receive vincristine, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (VICE) alone or with recombinant human (rHu)G-CSF (lenograstim) 5 micrograms/kg/d between cycles. Six chemotherapy cycles were given, with prophylactic cranial irradiation after cycle 1 and thoracic irradiation after cycle 3. There was no fixed dose interval. In both arms, patients were eligible for re-treatment when the WBC count was > or = 3 x 10(9)/L and platelet count was > or = 100 x 10(9)/L. No dose reductions were permitted. Dose-intensity was expressed relative to standard every-4-weeks VICE., Results: Sixty-five consecutive patients in one institution were randomized to control (n = 31) or G-CSF (n = 34). WBC and neutrophil counts were consistently higher in G-CSF patients than in the control group, but there were no significant differences in the incidence of febrile neutropenia, antibiotic or transfusion requirements, or days in hospital. In both treatment arms, the median dose-intensity was greater than one for each cycle (control group, P = .0009; G-CSF group, P = .0001). The G-CSF group received a significantly higher dose-intensity than the control group, with the greatest difference in the first three cycles (1.34 v 1.17, P = .001). There were more chemotherapy-related deaths in the G-CSF group than in the control group (six v one), but this group had a better 2-year survival rate (32% with G-CSF, 95% confidence interval [CI], 16 to 48; 15% with controls, 95% CI, 2 to 27)., Conclusion: The dose-intensity of VICE chemotherapy was increased in both groups. Patients randomized to receive G-CSF achieved a significantly higher dose-intensity than controls. Despite early toxicity, they had a better 2-year survival rate.

Purpose: To support multicyclic, dose-intensive chemotherapy, we assessed the effects of reinfusing hematopoietic progenitors collected at each cycle in leukapheresis product or whole blood., Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with six cycles of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 300 micrograms/d subcutaneously (SC) on days 4 to 15. Hematopoietic progenitors collected during each cycle were reinfused on day 3 of the next cycle. Cohort 1 (n = 6) was treated every 3 weeks, with leukapheresis after 2 weeks and cryopreservation of the leukapheresis product. Chemotherapy was given if the WBC count was > or = 3 x 10(9)/L and platelet count > or = 100 x 10(9)/L. Cohort 2 (n = 7) was treated every 2 weeks, with leukapheresis on day 1 of the next cycle and storage of the leukapheresis product at 4 degrees C. Cohort 3 (n = 12) was treated every 2 weeks, with 500 to 750 mL of blood drawn by venesection on day 1 of the next cycle and stored at 4 degrees C. In cohorts 2 and 3, chemotherapy was given if the WBC count was > or = 3 x 10(9)/L and platelet count > or = 30 x 10(9)/L. Blood and leukapheresis products were assayed for hematopoietic progenitors., Results: ICE chemotherapy with G-CSF was effective in mobilizing blood progenitors (median, 120-fold). Long-term cultures showed no evidence of stem-cell depletion. The cytotoxic dose-intensity of standard every-4-weeks ICE is 100%. In the first three cycles, it was 134% (median) in cohort 1 and 200% in cohorts 2 and 3 (P < .0001). Toxicity and supportive care requirements were not increased., Conclusion: The dose-intensity of ICE chemotherapy can be doubled by reinfusing hematopoietic progenitors collected by leukapheresis or venesection and stored at 4 degrees C.