Search

Purpose: In classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL), the impact of tumor cell Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status on clinical outcome is controversial., Patients and Methods: We assessed failure-free survival (FFS) and relative survival (RS) in 412 patients with cHL and age-defined subgroups in a population-based study in the northern Netherlands. Tumor cell EBV status was positive in 34%, and the median follow-up time was 7.1 years. Patients' median age at diagnosis was 35 years (range, 7 to 91 years), and 63% had Ann Arbor stage I or II, 24% had stage III, and 12% had stage IV disease., Results: EBV status influenced 5-year FFS and RS only in patients from the age group 50 to 74 years. Five-year FFS was 60% in patients with EBV-positive versus 85% in EBV-negative tumors (P = .01). Five-year RS was 69% in patients with EBV-positive versus 82% in EBV-negative tumors (P = .03). After adjusting for histology, HLA class II expression by tumor cells, stage, presence of extranodal localizations and treatment, and the effect of positive EBV tumor status remained significant in FFS multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.28 to 7.53; P = .01)., Conclusion: This study indicates that treatment failure in older adult patients with cHL is associated with positive tumor cell EBV status.

Purpose: The neoplastic Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL) are derived from B cells. The frequency of HLA class II downregulation and its effect on prognosis are unknown., Patients and Methods: Immunohistochemistry results for HLA class II were evaluated in 292 primary cHL patients in a population-based approach. Patients were diagnosed between 1989 and 2000 in the northern part of the Netherlands. Median age at diagnosis was 38 years (range, 8 to 88 years); 63% had Ann Arbor stage I or II, 24% stage III, and 13% stage IV disease. Median follow-up was 7.1 years. For 168 patients, HLA genotype data were available., Results: Lack of HLA class II cell-surface expression on HRS cells was observed in 41.4% and was more common in patients with extranodal disease, patients with Epstein-Barr virus-negative disease, and patients with HLA class I-negative HRS cells. Alleles of three microsatellite markers in the HLA class II region were associated with presence or absence of protein expression. In univariate analyses, lack of HLA class II expression coincided with adverse outcome (5-years failure free survival [FFS], 67% v 85%; P = .001; 5-years age and sex matched relative survival (RS), 80% v 90%; P = .027). This effect remained in multivariate analyses for FFS with a hazard ratio of 2.40 (95% CI, 1.45 to 3.98) and RS with a relative excess risk of death of 2.55 (95% CI, 1.22 to 5.31)., Conclusion: Lack of membranous HLA class II expression by HRS cells in diagnostic lymph node specimens is an independent adverse prognostic factor in cHL.

Purpose: Outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with a germinal center B-cell (GCB) expression profile is superior to that of non-GCB DLBCL. This conclusion is mainly derived from patients with mixed international prognostic index (IPI) risk profiles treated with CHOP-like therapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). We wondered whether the prognostic impact of the expression profile would hold out in a homogeneous cohort of poor-risk DLBCL patients treated with high-dose sequential therapy (HDT) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) as first-line therapy., Patients and Methods: DLBCL from 66 newly diagnosed poor-risk patients, treated in two sequential prospective Dutch Hemato-Oncology Association (HOVON) trials, were studied retrospectively for expression of CD10, bcl6, MUM1/IRF4, bcl2, Ki67, and CD21+ follicular dendritic cells (FDC) by immunohistochemistry, and for the breakpoints of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Lymphomas with any follicular component were excluded., Results: A GCB immunophenotype profile was found in 58% and non-GCB immunophenotype profile in 42% of the tumors. Clinical characteristics of both groups were similar. Complete response (CR) rate was higher in patients with CD10+ tumors (58% v 30%; P = .03). A GCB immunophenotype profile, its constituting markers CD10 more than 30% and MUM1 less than 70%, and bcl2 less than 10% were each associated with a better overall survival (OS). FDC networks, equally present in GCB and non-GCB tumors, had superior CR (73% v 31%; P = .01), but disease-free survival rates were lower and there was no difference in OS rates. None of the breakpoints had a prognostic impact on outcome., Conclusion: Also in patients with poor-risk DLBCL treated with HDT and ASCT, the GCB immunophenotype and bcl2 expression retained a major impact on survival.

Purpose: Timing, appropriate amount, and composition of treatment before high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with poor-risk, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are still unknown. We conducted two consecutive multicenter phase II trials with up-front, high-dose, sequential chemotherapy and ASCT in poor-risk, aggressive NHL. Both trials had identical inclusion criteria and only differed in amount and duration of induction treatment before ASCT., Patients and Methods: Between 1994 and 2001, 147 newly diagnosed, poor-risk, aggressive NHL patients, age < or = 65 years with stage III to IV and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) more than 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN), entered the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON) -27 and HOVON-40 trials. Treatment in HOVON-27 consisted of two up-front, high-dose induction courses followed by carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan plus ASCT in responding patients. In HOVON-40, the same treatment was preceded by three intensified courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP)., Results: Patient characteristics in both trials were comparable: 80% had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 77% had stage IV disease, and median LDH levels were 3.1x ULN. Complete remission (CR) in both trials was 45% to 51%. Before ASCT, CR was 14% in HOVON-27 versus 28% in HOVON-40 (P = .03). Treatment failure was similar (27%). Four-year survival estimates in HOVON-27 compared with HOVON-40 were overall survival, 21% v 50% (P = .007); event-free survival, 15% v 49% (P = .0001); and disease-free survival, 34% v 74% (P = .008). This different outcome favoring HOVON-40 remained highly significant when correcting for competing risk factors in multivariate analysis., Conclusion: In patients with poor-risk, aggressive NHL, addition of intensified CHOP before up-front, high-dose, sequential therapy and ASCT significantly improved the duration of response and survival.