Search

e16754 Background: Myosteatosis (adipose deposits in muscle) can be detected on cross-sectional imaging through variations in Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD). Patients with myosteatosis tend to have lower overall survival, increased chemotherapy toxicity, and shorter progression-free intervals across cancer types. We investigated whether changes in myosteatosis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy can predict postoperative morbidity risk in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study from 2014-2019 of patients with biopsy-proven PDAC who completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy and R0/1 resection (R1: margin < 1mm or microscopically positive). We obtained preoperative patient (age at diagnosis, baseline body mass index (BMI), sex, race, comorbidities) and treatment data (neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen and duration, time from completion of systemic therapy to surgery, type of operation). Primary outcomes were postoperative complications and 90-day readmission. Average SMD was measured using imaging analysis software at the L3 level on axial abdominal CT scans at the time of diagnosis and at completion of neoadjuvant therapy (SliceOmatic TomoVision QC, Can). We defined SMDΔ as the decrease in SMD during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics and Student’s t-test were performed with STATA. Results: We identified 44 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, achieved a R0/1 resection, and had available CT scans for body composition evaluation. The postoperative complication rate was 43% (n = 19) and 90-day readmission rate was 30% (n = 13). Lower SMD at diagnosis was associated with increased postoperative delirium (p < 0.01) and 90-day readmission (p = 0.02). Greater SMDΔ was associated with increased ICU utilization (p < 0.01) and tube feeding upon discharge (p = 0.03). There was no significant association between preoperative BMI or albumin and our primary outcomes. Conclusions: Preoperative SMD and SMDΔ, rather than albumin or BMI, can predict postoperative morbidity in PDAC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study provides the framework for future studies to develop and validate a tool to predict postoperative morbidity risk in these patients.

TPS784 Background: Patients(pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) have a median survival of less than one year even with use of multiagent chemotherapy programs. Pancreatic tumors are composed of multiple cell types and a dense extracellular matrix that may support cancer cell proliferation and impede chemotherapy delivery. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF’s) in the tumor microenvironment secrete pro-inflammatory factors and components of the extracellular matrix. In PC laboratory models, engagement of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) by VDR agonists shifts CAFs toward a more quiescent phenotype with reduced tumor growth and improved chemotherapy penetration (Sherman. Cell, 2014). Paricalcitol is a synthetic VDR agonist used in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to chronic kidney disease. A prior pilot study evaluated IV paricalcitol with gemcitabine (G) and nab-paclitaxel (A) before surgical resection in patients with resectable PC (NCT02030860). Methods: Pts with previously-untreated metastatic PC will be enrolled in a two-stage study consisting of a safety run-in and a randomized phase 2 study (NCT03520790). In the run-in stage, 36 pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to G (1000 mg/m2) and A (125 mg/m2) given 3 weeks on and 1 week off plus: (a) paricalcitol 25mcg IV thrice weekly, (b) paricalcitol 16mcg oral daily, or (c) placebo oral daily. Grade 3/4 hypercalcemia or genitourinary stones will be considered dose limiting toxicities.Pts will undergo paired pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsies to examine pharmacodynamic (PD) markers by bulk and single cell RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluoresence.Assuming safety and supportive PD assessments, the phase 2 study will randomize an additional 76 pts to two treatment arms with GA plus: (a) paricalcitol or (b) placebo.Paricalcitol formulation (IV or oral) will be determined based on data from the run-in stage.The primary endpoint of the phase 2 study is overall survival, with a total of 100 pts needed to identify a hazard ratio of 0.6 with 80% power and one-sided alpha of 0.10.Secondary endpoints include safety, response rate, and progression free survival.Trial funding provided by SU2C, CRUK,Lustgarten Foundation, and AACR. Clinical trial information: NCT03520790.

211 Background: COMPASS is a prospective study with the primary aim to identify predictive mutational and transcriptional features in advanced PDAC for improved patient stratification and treatment selection. Methods: Patients with advanced PDAC were prospectively recruited prior to first-line combination chemotherapy for whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing (RNASeq). Fresh tumor tissue was acquired by image guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of locally advanced primary or metastatic tumors. Laser capture microdissection was performed for all cases to ensure high-resolution genomic analyses. Primary endpoint was feasibility to report WGS results prior to first disease assessment CT scan at 8 weeks. The main secondary endpoint was discovery of patient subsets with predictive mutational and transcriptional signatures. Results: Of 63 patients who underwent a tumor biopsy between December 2015 and June 2017, WGS and RNASeq were successful in 62 (98%) and 60 (95%), respectively. Genomic results were reported at a median of 35 days (range 19-52 days) from biopsy, meeting the primary feasibility endpoint. Three patients with an ‘unstable’ genomic subtype, including two with a novel ‘duplicator’ phenotype, responded well to m-FOLFIRINOX. Of two cases with the same germline BRCA2 mutation, only the chemotherapy responder had loss of heterozygosity and genomic hallmarks of double stranded break repair deficiency. Approximately 25% of tumors displayed the basal-like RNA expression signature and these were chemotherapy resistant, with tumor shrinkage mainly observed in those with the classical RNA subtype (P = 0.003). Thirty percent of patients had potentially actionable genetic alterations. Conclusions: Prospective comprehensive genomic profiling of advanced PDAC is feasible and our early data indicate that chemotherapy response differs among patients with different genomic/transcriptomic subtypes providing the impetus for further studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02750657.

277 Background: PDAC is a lethal disease with poor survival even when detected at an early stage. Recurrence rates after surgical resection remain high. Recently, two distinct molecular subtypes of PDAC (basal-like and classical) have been identified with basal-like tumors demonstrating inferior outcomes. We hypothesize that differences in tumor immunogenicity may contribute to this aggressive biology and predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: RNA sequencing was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples of 60 resected PDAC patients. We evaluated previously published immune gene expression signatures comprised of 1400 genes and used a single sample classifier to determine molecular subtypes. Results: Table 1 summarizes patient characteristics in our cohort. There were 35 classical and 25 basal-like tumors. PFS was significantly shorter in patients with basal-like compared to classical subtypes (9 vs 15 mo, p = 0.006). In a multivariable model with molecular subtype, lymph node and margin status, subtype was the only independent predictor of PFS (p=0.028). Unsupervised clustering identified two distinct immune groups that were associated with molecular subtypes (p=0.038) with higher expression of immune genes in basal-like tumors. Basal-like tumors were significantly associated with an immunosuppressive signature (p

4021 Background: Desmoplastic tumor stroma (TS) characterizes the primary tumor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, but its role in tumor progression and metastasis is less clear. The objective of...

175 Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cells shed into circulation from tumors. They are increasingly recognized to be important biomarkers of disease burden in patients with solid tumors. Studies in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have been limited due in part to low sensitivity of existing assays with extremely low numbers detected (0-15 per 7.5-15ml of blood). The development of newer microfluidic platforms has resulted in the ability to detect substantially greater numbers of CTCs. Methods: 15 patients with PDAC were enrolled in an IRB-approved study. Blood was collected in EDTA tubes and processed within 3 hours. CTCs were selected from 2-3ml of whole blood using monoclonal antibodies against epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and enumerated using a novel microfluidic platform. CTCs were confirmed by DAPI, CK8/18/19 and CD45 staining. Results: Patients with metastatic disease (n=12) had a mean of 29.7, median of 22 (3.5-107) CTCs per 1ml of blood. Patients with localized disease (n=3) had a mean of 3.8, median of 2.9 (2.3-6.2) CTCs per 1ml of blood. 0.5-1 CTCs per 1ml were detected in normal controls (n=2). The number of CTCs was significantly different between localized, metastatic and normal patients (p=0.01). 1 patient, initially thought to have localized disease by standard imaging but found to be metastatic at time of operation, had a mean of 45.9 CTCs per 1ml of blood compared to a mean of 3.8 CTCs per 1ml in patients who underwent a curative resection (p=0.009). Conclusions: Studies of CTCs in PDAC have been very limited. Our ability to detect large numbers of CTCs with good dynamic range suggests that further investigation into CTCs as a prognostic marker in PDAC is warranted. This is the first study that we are aware of to find CTCs in patients with localized disease. The presence of CTCs in patients with localized PDAC is surprising and may be associated with findings of unexpected metastatic disease at surgery. Further follow-up will be needed to determine if the presence of CTCs in these patients is a harbinger of shorter progression-free survival and overall survival after curative operations.

e14505 Background: The increased risk of thrombosis in patients with cancer has been well established. However, the triggers in these patients have yet to be fully defined. Under pathological conditions, the potent procoagulant protein Tissue Factor (TF) is found in the circulation and may trigger thrombosis. Methods: We evaluated the level of TF expression in 4 different human pancreatic cancer cell lines. We also measured TF microparticle (MP) release from these tumors in vivo by flow cytometry and TF activity assay. We then used these lines in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer to evaluate the sources of TF that activate coagulation and contribute to thrombosis using a saphenous vein model. Results: We found that mice bearing orthotopic pancreatic tumors which express higher levels of TF (HPAC and HPAF) show increased activation of coagulation (measured by thrombin-antithrombin complex) as compared to mice bearing TF negative tumors (MIA-PaCa-2 and PANC-1). This activation of coagulation could be reduced by treatment with a human TF antibody. Further, mice bearing tumors derived from TF high cell line HPAC demonstrated an activation of coagulation despite a lack of circulating TF-positive MPs. Mice bearing TF expressing pancreatic tumors also demonstrated increased thrombosis by a saphenous vein model. Treatment of tumor-free mice with TF MPs did not result in an activation of coagulation or increased thrombosis unless mice were given 40-100 fold higher levels of TF bearing MPs than are found in the circulation of tumor bearing mice. Conclusions: The data suggest that TF on the tumor itself is involved in the activation of coagulation whereas circulating TF-positive MPs is likely to contribute to thrombosis. Elevated levels of TF-positive MPs may be used as a biomarker to identify cancer patients at risk for thrombosis.

444 Background: It is well known that KRAS mutations limit the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However the role of KRAS mutations in patients who undergo a curative liver resection for mCRC is less clear. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the relationship between KRAS mutation status and survival in this patient population. Methods: We examined an IRB approved tissue repository and retrospective database of 129 patients from 1998-2010 who underwent curative liver resection for mCRC. Tumors were sequenced for KRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 mutations using pyrosequencing. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression method. Results: The median follow-up for our cohort was 20.4mo (0.4-112). Mean age was 61.4±12.3. Prior to surgical resection 55 (43%) patients received chemotherapy. 35 (27%) tumors were KRAS mutant (mt), 83 (64%) were wild-type (wt), and 11 (9%) were not characterized. Median OS for KRAS wt patients was 40.3mo vs. 27.1mo for KRAS mt patients (p=0.046). Median DFS for KRAS wt was 13.6mo vs. 7.7mo for KRAS mt patients (p=0.037). 8 patients received cetuximab post–operatively. Cetuximab status was unknown in 50 patients. When we excluded those treated with cetuximab, the median OS was 40mo for KRAS wt vs. 25mo for KRAS mt patients (p=0.007). There were no differences in OS or DFS in patients who received cetuximab (p=0.7). In a multivariable model with pre-operative chemotherapy (p=0.2), extent of resection (p=0.053), and cetuximab therapy (p=0.7), the presence of KRAS mutation was independently associated with poor prognosis (HR=2.7 [1.3-5.5]). Conclusions: In patients undergoing curative liver resection for mCRC, KRAS mutation status is independently predictive of a worse outcome regardless of cetuximab therapy. KRAS status may be associated with more aggressive tumor biology. Our data supports the critical need to define KRAS mutation status and to develop therapies against KRAS and its downstream effectors.