Search

PURPOSE To determine the antitumor activity and toxicity of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-one patients with advanced measurable or assessable NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 who had not received prior chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours with premedication. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of nine cycles. Most patients had prior radiotherapy (57%), extrathoracic metastatic disease (65%), and measurable disease (75%). Twenty-two percent had previously untreated stage III disease. RESULTS The objective response rate was five of 51 (10%; 95% confidence interval, 3% to 21%). No subgroup with a higher response rate could be identified. There were no complete responses (CRs) and all responses lasted less than 5 months. Treatment was well tolerated with brief World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV neutropenia in only 16% of patients. Grade III/IV myalgia/athralgia occurred in 22% of patients. No significant hypersensitivity reactions occurred. CONCLUSION The antitumor activity of this dose and schedule appears inferior to that reported in previously published phase II trials in NSCLC that used higher doses of paclitaxel infused over 24 hours, although confidence intervals for response overlap. Determining the optimal dose and schedule for using paclitaxel in NSCLC requires further investigation, and these results should caution against using shorter infusions outside appropriate clinical trials.

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of a combination of fluorouracil (5-FU) with recombinant human interferon alfa-2a (Roferon-A; Hoffman La-Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland) versus the combination of 5-FU with leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 496 previously untreated colorectal cancer patients were randomized to receive either Roferon-A (9 MIU) subcutaneously three times per week, with 5-FU (750 mg/m2/d) by continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion (CIV) on days 1 to 5, then, after a 9-day hiatus, as a weekly i.v. bolus at the same dose (IFN/5-FU); or LV (200 mg/m2/d) by i.v. infusion plus 5-FU (370 mg/m2/d) by i.v. bolus on days 1 to 5, repeated every 4 weeks (LV/5-FU). RESULTS There were no significant differences between IFN/5-FU and LV/5-FU in the overall response rate (21% v 18%), duration of response (7.3 v 6.2 months), or survival time (median, 11.0 v 11.3 months). Toxicity profiles differed; constitutional symptoms and myelosuppression were more frequent and more severe with IFN/5-FU, and gastrointestinal symptoms with LV/5-FU. More patients interrupted treatment for adverse events (AEs) with IFN/5-FU than with LV/5-FU. Five treatment-related deaths occurred with each regimen. CONCLUSION The combination IFN/5-FU produced response rates, response durations, and survival times similar to those with LV/5-FU. Biochemical modulation of 5-FU by either IFN or LV appears to result in equivalent efficacy; however, fewer patients were able to tolerate the specified IFN/5-FU combination used in this study.

Purpose: In an effort to maintain the excellent long-term results achieved with combination chemotherapy for good-prognosis germ cell carcinoma, but to reduce the toxicities encountered, a randomized trial was conducted comparing cisplatin and vinblastine with or without bleomycin. Patients and Methods: Two hundred eighteen assessable patients with a good prognosis were randomized to receive induction chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 intravenously (IV) day 1 and vinblastine 6 mg/m 2 IV days 1 and 2 every 3 weeks (PV) with or without bleomycin 30 mg intramuscularly (IM) weekly (PVB) for a maximum of 12 weeks

Forty-four patients with documented meningeal carcinomatosis (small-cell lung carcinoma [SCLC], 29%; breast carcinoma, 25%) were treated in a prospective randomized trial with intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) 15 mg or MTX plus cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) 50 mg/m2. Most patients received intrathecal hydrocortisone (HC) each treatment to minimize arachnoiditis. Overall response was 55%. Seven patients achieved complete response. Response to MTX was superior to combined MTX/Ara-C, but not significantly so (61% v 45%; P greater than .10). Response was more frequent if drugs were administered via Ommaya reservoir than by lumbar puncture (65% v 48%; P greater than .10). Concurrent radiotherapy to the CNS was associated with significantly better response (73% v 35%; P less than .05). Small-cell lung carcinoma patients showed the best response (69%). Overall median survival for the whole group was 8 weeks, but responders fared better than nonresponders (median survival, 18 v 7 weeks; P less than .05). Nausea and vomiting were the most common toxicities encountered (45%), but rarely proved limiting. An unusual, previously undocumented reaction to intrathecal HC was noted. MTX is moderately effective in nonleukemic meningeal carcinomatosis, but the addition of Ara-C does not appear to improve results. Pretreatment factors did not predict outcome in this trial.