Search

e18811 Background: The economic burden of multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to increase with more advanced lines of therapy (LOTs). Given the rapidly evolving treatment landscape of MM, this study aimed to describe the current real-world healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs among patients with MM across LOTs. Methods: A commercial insurance claims database was used to identify patients with ≥2 MM diagnoses who initiated a LOT containing an antineoplastic agent for MM between 1/2016 and 2/2021, had continuous insurance coverage ≥6 months before and ≥60 days after first line (1L) initiation, and never received stem cell transplant. LOTs were defined based on agents used within a 60-day period. End of LOT was defined when patients switched treatment, or after a treatment gap of 90 days. HRU and costs (in 2021 USD) were reported for the duration of each LOT (from initiation of LOT to initiation of a subsequent LOT or end of coverage). Results: 1492 patients initiated 1L, 681 initiated 2L, 359 initiated 3L and 188 initiated 4L. Mean age at 1L initiation was 66.6 years. Mean duration of LOT (10.7, 9.4, 8.1 and 10.2 months in 1L, 2L, 3L and 4L, respectively) was longer in 1L than in subsequent LOTs. All-cause monthly outpatient (OP) and inpatient (IP) visits were stable across LOTs (5.0-5.6 OP visits; 0.21-0.32 IP visits). However, mean monthly all-cause costs were lowest in 1L (15.9% - 34.9% lower) as compared to subsequent LOTs ($23.6K in 1L, $29.7K in 2L, $27.3K in 3L and $31.8K in 4L; Table). Conclusions: In this study, the duration of LOT was the longest among 1L patients. Total all-cause healthcare costs were the lowest in 1L than in more advanced LOTs. This suggests that selection of 1L best treatment regimen upfront that prolongs time to disease progression could reduce the overall economic burden of MM.[Table: see text]

e18737 Background: Daratumumab (DARA), a CD38 monoclonal antibody, has been approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) among previously-treated patients since 2015, and among newly-diagnosed patients since 2018. This study aimed to describe real-world treatment response among patients initiating DARA across different lines of therapy since 2018. Methods: A retrospective chart review of adult patients with MM initiating DARA (monotherapy or as part of a combination regimen) between 1/2018 and 5/2020 was conducted at two clinical sites in the US (Levine Cancer Institute & Weill Cornell Medical College). De-identified patient-level data were abstracted in an electronic case report form. Treatment patterns, overall response rate (ORR) and proportion of patients with very good partial response (VGPR) or better were reported using descriptive statistics and stratified by line of therapy (first line [1L], second line [2L] or third line or later [3L+]). Results: A total of 202 patient charts were extracted. Patients were, on average, 65.3 years old at MM diagnosis and 68.1 years old at DARA initiation; 109 (54.0%) were male; 104 (51.5%) were White and 65 (32.2%) were Black or African American; 64 (31.7%) received a stem cell transplant (SCT) prior to the line of DARA initiation. Twenty-one (10.4%), 53 (26.2%) and 128 (63.4%) patients initiated DARA in 1L, 2L and 3L+, respectively. Median follow-up time was 6.2 months for 1L patients and 13.8 months for 2L+ patients. The most common 1L regimen was DARA with bortezomib, lenalidomide ± dexamethasone (DVRd; n=10, 47.6%) followed by DARA with lenalidomide ± dexamethasone (DRd; n=8, 38.1%). The most common 2L regimen was DRd (n=15, 28.3%) followed by DARA with pomalidomide ± dexamethasone (DPd, n=13, 24.5%) and DARA with bortezomib ± dexamethasone (DVd, n=13, 24.5%). The most common regimen in 3L+ was DPd (n=62, 48.4%). Among patients initiating DARA in 1L, 2L or 3L+ the ORR was 100.0%, 81.6% and 76.0%, and the proportion of patients achieving VGPR or better was 73.3%, 65.8% and 51.0%, respectively (Table 1). Median time to treatment response ranged between 2.6 and 2.8 months post-initiation. Conclusions: In this study, patients initiated on DARA had high ORR and rates of VGPR or better, including an ORR of 100% among 1L DARA users. These findings suggest that DARA-based regimens are an effective treatment option across all lines of therapy, with highest response rate in 1L. [Table: see text]

44 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is associated with a high clinical and economic burden. Advanced oral (AO) therapies have become the standard of care for patients with advanced PC, but real-world data on treatment patterns and their impact on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) are lacking. This study aims to describe treatment adherence, factors associated with adherence, and its impact on HRU in patients with PC initiated on AOs. Methods: Adults with a PC diagnosis initiated on apalutamide, enzalutamide, or abiraterone acetate were identified using Symphony Health Solutions Patient Transactional Databases (10/01/2014-09/30/2019). Patients were included if they had ≥6 months of continuous clinical activity before and after AO initiation (index date) and no other cancer diagnoses. Adherence was defined using the proportion of days covered (PDC) by AOs during the 6-month period following the index date. Patients with a PDC≥80% were considered adherent. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate baseline characteristics associated with AO adherence. All-cause and PC-related HRU was assessed from 6 to 18 months post-index and compared between adherent and non-adherent patients using multivariable Poisson regression. Results: A total of 27,322 patients initiated on an AO were identified. Most patients were aged ≥65 years (81%), were white (60%), had Medicare coverage (48%), and had metastatic PC (56%). At 6 months, 57% of patients were adherent to AOs. Patients aged 55-64 and 65-74 years had greater odds of being adherent versus those aged ≥75 years (24% and 22%, respectively), while Black patients had 17% lower odds of being adherent relative to white patients (all p

e19138 Background: mCSPC is clinically complex. Although consensus on treatments are evolving, ADT remains the backbone of therapy. This study assessed the proportion of mCSPC patients treated with ADT only or remaining untreated and their HRU during the mCSPC period in the US. Methods: The Optum Clinformatics Extended DataMart was used to identify men with ≥2 claims for prostate cancer (PC), ≥1 claim for metastasis, ≥1 castration sensitivity (CS) indicator (CS diagnosis code [dx]; castration and no prostate-specific antigen [PSA] rise; or hormone/castration naive for ≥18 months [mo] before index [date of 1st metastasis dx on or after 1st PC dx and between 2015-2018]). Patients were excluded if they had a pre-index castration-resistance (CR) indicator (CR dx; castration within ≥90 days pre-index or with PSA rise; or a claim for a drug solely recommended for metastatic CRPC). mCSPC period (F/U) was defined as time from index until CR (i.e., any post-index CR indicator or initiation of abiraterone acetate or docetaxel ≥12 mo after post-index ADT initiation or ≥12 mo post-index for those with no ADT) or end of data. The proportion of patients receiving ADT only or no mCSPC treatment during F/U was reported. Per-patient-per-year (PPPY) all-cause HRU were evaluated during baseline (12 mo pre-index) and F/U. Descriptive statistics were used: n (%) for binary and mean [SD] for continuous variables. Results: A total of 2,825 mCSPC patients were identified (age: 75 [9] years). Of these, 2,181 (77%) received ADT only or no treatment in a F/U of 10.9 [9.0] mo. Among them, there were more patients with ≥1 inpatient (IP) stay or ≥1 emergency room (ER) visit (F/U vs. baseline; IP: 50% vs. 20%; ER: 57% vs. 44%), and patients had more IP stays and ER visits (IP: 2.0 [4.0] vs. 0.3 [0.7] stays; ER: 3.2 [7.1] vs. 1.1 [2.2] visits) and more IP days (27 [61] vs. 3 [11] days) PPPY in F/U vs. baseline. Trends were similar among patients receiving ADT only (N=1,252 [44%]; F/U of 12.6 [9.0] mo; Table). Conclusions: The majority of mCSPC patients were treated with ADT only or remained untreated and incurred substantial HRU. These findings suggest that improvements in therapy and prompt treatment initiation in men with mCSPC are needed to improve outcomes. [Table: see text]

e19354 Background: Ibrutinib (Ibr) is an established standard of care in CLL/SLL patients across lines, regardless of age, comorbidities and risk status. With the introduction of venetoclax (Ven) in the treatment landscape, there is a need to understand the real-world treatment sequencing of targeted oral agents, and the implication of sequencing on HRU/costs. This retrospective study evaluated HRU/costs associated with Ven treatment in various sequencing scenarios, including prior use of Ibr. Methods: Optum Clinformatics Extended DataMart De-Identified Databases (4/11/2015-6/30/2019) were used to identify adults with CLL/SLL treated with Ven (excluding investigational combination therapies). The index date was the start of the first Ven-based line of therapy (index LOT) and the baseline period was the 12-month period pre-index. Mean all-cause HRU/costs per patient per month (PPPM) were calculated during the index LOT and the Ven ramp-up period (first 30 days post-index). Results: Among a total of 11,861 CLL/SLL patients receiving ≥1 LOT, 121 patients (1.0%) were treated with Ven, including 25 patients (64.0% single agent) using Ven in first line (1L cohort), 30 (90.0% single agent) in second line (2L cohort), and 66 (83.3% single agent) in third line or later (3L+ cohort). Mean age was 71.6 years; 33.1% were female; mean baseline Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 4.7; median follow up from the start of 1L was 25.3 months; median duration of index LOT was 4.2 months. The majority of 2L+ Ven patients were previously treated with Ibr (2L: 56.7%, 3L+: 74.2%). Patients in all 3 cohorts had frequent outpatient (OP) visits PPPM during their index LOT (1L: 4.58; 2L: 4.75; 3L+: 5.71). Total costs PPPM during the index LOT were highest in the 1L cohort (1L: $21,762; 2L: $17,697; 3L+: $20,900), driven by higher OP costs (1L $9,402; 2L: $5,633; 3L+: $7,701). Increased total costs PPPM were observed during Ven ramp-up (1L: $31,707; 2L: $21,036; 3L+: $25,362). Compared to the overall 2L cohort, those treated with Ibr in 1L had lower total costs PPPM (index LOT: $15,350; V ramp-up: $15,882). Conclusions: In this descriptive study, the highest costs PPPM were observed for Ven treatment in the 1L. Prior treatment with Ibr was common among 2L and 3L+ CLL/SLL patients treated with Ven. Among 2L Ven patients, those previously treated with Ibr in 1L had $2,347 and $5,154 lower costs PPPM during 2L and Ven ramp-up, respectively, suggesting that previous Ibr treatment may help reduce costs in subsequent V treatment.

e19408 Background: Ibrutinib is a targeted oral therapy indicated for MCL patients who received ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT) (conditional approval on 11/13/2013 in the US). This study compared healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of R/R MCL patients treated with ibrutinib ± rituximab (I±R) or CIT in a US-managed care population. Methods: Optum Clinformatics Extended DataMart De-Identified Databases (05/13/2013-6/30/2019) were used to identify adults with MCL receiving I±R or CIT (index date) following ≥1 prior LOT. Patients’ baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Monthly HRU and costs (plan paid amount) were evaluated during the first Oncology Care Model (OCM) episode (i.e., first 6 months) post-index and during the observed index I±R or CIT LOT (index LOT); and compared using rate ratios (RRs) and mean monthly cost differences (MMCDs), respectively. Results: A total of 146 I±R and 158 CIT patients were identified. Given the small sample size and to ensure outliers were not driving the results, 2 patients with total healthcare costs ≤0.5th and ≥99.5th percentile were excluded from each cohort. After IPTW, 149 and 151 patients were included in the weighted I±R and CIT cohorts, respectively (mean length of index LOT: 12.0 vs 11.0 months). During the first OCM episode and during the index LOT, the I±R cohort had significantly fewer monthly days with outpatient services compared to the CIT cohort (OCM: RR= 0.63, P

e19131 Background: Given recent advances in treatment options for mCSPC, this study assessed US real-world treatment patterns of mCSPC patients over time. Methods: The Optum Clinformatics Extended DataMart was used to identify men with ≥2 claims for PC, ≥1 claim for metastasis, ≥1 castration sensitivity (CS) indicator (CS diagnosis code [dx]; castration and no prostate-specific antigen [PSA] rise; or hormone/castration naive for ≥18 months [mo] before metastasis). Index (idx) date was the 1st metastasis dx date on or after 1st PC dx and from 2015-2018. Patients were excluded if they had a pre-idx castration-resistance (CR) indicator (CR dx; castration within ≥90 days pre-idx or with PSA rise; or a claim for a drug solely recommended for metastatic CRPC). mCSPC period (F/U) was defined as time from idx until CR (i.e., any post-idx CR indicator or initiation of abiraterone acetate [ABI] or docetaxel [DOC] ≥12 mo after post-idx androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] initiation or ≥12 mo post-idx for those with no ADT) or end of data. mCSPC treatment patterns in F/U were assessed overall and in patients with idx years (yrs) in 2015-2016 and in 2017-2018, separately. Descriptive statistics were used: n (%) for binary and mean [SD] for continuous variables. Results: In the 2,825 mCSPC patients identified (age: 75 [9] yrs; F/U: 10.9 [9.0] mo), 43% were in the 2015/16 cohort (age: 75 [9] yrs; F/U: 15.8 [10.2] mo); and 57% were in the 2017/18 cohort (age: 75 [9] yrs; F/U: 7.2 [4.7] mo). The most common first-line (1L) mCSPC therapy was ADT only (Table), but patients in the 2017/18 cohort had fewer ADT only as 1L (43% vs. 52%) and more 1L ABI (10% vs. 4%) compared to the 2015/16 cohort. About 4% (2015/16: 5%; 2017/18: 3%) of patients received second-line (2L) mCSPC therapies, with ABI (74%) and DOC (25%) as the main 2L therapies observed. In patients receiving 2L mCSPC therapies, the 2017/18 cohort had more 2L ABI (81% vs. 68%) and fewer 2L DOC (19% vs. 30%) compared to the 2015/16 cohort. Conclusions: A large proportion of men with mCSPC were untreated/deferred treatment or were treated with ADT only, highlighting unmet needs in this patient group. As additional therapies for mCSPC become available, this trend is expected to improve, as supported by more recent treatment patterns. [Table: see text]

e19037 Background: Treatment failure (TF) is associated with significant cost burden in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in the US. This study assessed treatment patterns and healthcare cost burden of first-line (FL) TF in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a subtype of NHL, overall, and for the top 5 FL regimens. Methods: A retrospective study of a large national claims database identified adult patients with CLL who initiated an antineoplastic agent (AA) after their first CLL diagnosis (index date) from 01/2011- 07/2016. Patients included had ≥12 and ≥6 months of observation pre- and post-index, respectively, and were treatment-naïve with no solid or selected blood malignancies in the pre-index period. FL therapy included AA administered within the first 30 days post-index. TF occurred at the earliest of: initiation of a new AA, resumption of initial treatment following a gap of ≥3 months, radiotherapy, stem cell transplant, or hospice care. The total cost difference between patients with and without FL TF was estimated using ordinary least squares regressions adjusted for baseline characteristics. Non-parametric bootstrap was used to estimate confidence intervals (CI) and p-values. Results: Among the 2,226 patients included (mean age: 68 years; female: 41%), 46% experienced FL TF. Overall, the average adjusted total cost difference between patients with and without FL TF was $3,011 per patient per month (PPPM) (95% CI: 2,400, 3,583; P < 0.001). Among the 5 most common FL regimens, fludarabine / cyclophosphamide / rituximab (FCR) regimen was associated with the highest PPPM cost of TF (N = 281; $4,758; 95% CI: 2,652, 7,346), followed by other cyclophosphamide-based regimens (N = 142; $4,579; 95% CI: 2,474, 6,311), chlorambucil-based regimens (N = 223; $3,761; 95% CI: 2,029, 5,602), bendamustine / rituximab (BR) regimen (N = 592; $3,163; 95% CI: 2,206, 4,148), and other rituximab-based regimens (N = 474; $3,030; 95% CI: 2,164, 3,956) (P < 0.001 for all). Conclusions: The most common FL regimens used in patients with CLL were associated with 46% treatment failure. Clinicians should consider the cost of treatment failure when selecting the initial therapy in these patients.

e16528 Background: Treatment options for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have been expanding. AA+P is one therapy that prolongs OS in men with mCRPC. However, it remains challenging to predict the prognosis of men shortly after starting therapy. We identified patterns of PSA change over time (trajectories) for men in the COU-AA-301 trial and examined the association between PSA trajectory and OS. Methods: Data from both treatment arms of the COU-AA-301 trial were used, restricting to men with ≥6 months of follow-up. Log PSA at the first 2 visits post-randomization (84 and 168 days) was used in a modelling procedure to stratify men into 3 groups, each comprised of men with a differing PSA trajectory. Univariate Cox regression assessed the association between trajectory group and OS. Among AA+P patients, predictors of a better trajectory group were identified using multivariate multinomial logistic regression. Results: A total of 913 men (634 AA+P; 279 placebo) were included in the analysis. Group 1 had the lowest mean PSA at both visits post-randomization while Group 3 had the highest. The percent of men in each group and associations with OS are shown in the table. AA+P treated men were more likely to be in a favorable group. Versus Group 1, risk of death was 2.8 and 4.9 times higher in Group 2 and 3, respectively. Exploratory modelling among AA+P patients identified that older age and higher baseline log PSA were among the most important predictors of being assigned to a worse PSA trajectory group (Group 2 or 3 vs 1). Conclusions: In a post-hoc analysis of COU-AA-301 trial data, 3 PSA trajectories over the first 6-months post-randomization were identified and correlated with OS. AA+P treated men were more likely to have a favorable PSA trajectory. The findings suggest that AA+P may be associated with PSA changes post-initiation that may in turn predict survival, although further study is needed. [Table: see text]

e18529 Background: Management of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is challenging due to a higher comorbidity burden, poorer performance status and less favorable biology. This study assessed treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in the US in patients diagnosed with AML aged ≥65 years who did not receive intensive chemotherapy. Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with ≥2 diagnoses for AML were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan Analytics Databases (01/01/2011-07/31/2016). Patients had ≥1 bone marrow diagnosis procedure (BX; first AML diagnosis following BX defined as the index date), ≥12 months of continuous eligibility pre-index, no treatment with intensive chemotherapy at any time, no diagnosis for AML relapse or remission or stem cell transplant before BX, and

e16529 Background: A post-hoc analysis of COU-AA-302 trial data showed that brief pain inventory (BPI), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and bone metastases were predictors for overall survival in men with mCRPC treated with AA+P. This study aimed to identify baseline predictors of other clinical outcomes. Methods: COU-AA-302 trial data were used to develop predictive models for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) deterioration, and opiate use. Associations between baseline factors and outcomes were first assessed using multivariable Cox models among AA+P patients (Step 1). In Step 2, interaction testing was conducted between treatment (AA+P vs. placebo) and each potential predictor (P < 0.2) identified in Step 1. Final Cox models included predictors and any significant interactions (p < 0.05). Results: A total of 1,034 men (525 AA+P; 509 placebo) were included in the analysis. Baseline BPI, PSA, LDH, and ALP were predictors of PSA progression and opiate use regardless of AA+P or placebo with higher values indicating higher risks (all P < 0.05). Younger age, shorter time from luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone to randomization, higher Gleason score, and lower PSA at diagnosis were also associated with higher risks of opiate use: (all P < 0.05). For ECOG PS deterioration, higher baseline BPI, PSA, LDH, and Gleason score, older age, and lower baseline ECOG were associated with higher risks regardless of AA+P or placebo (all P < 0.05). Baseline ALP and site of metastasis also predicted ECOG PS deterioration but the effect varied by treatment (lower risk in AA+P versus placebo; both interactions’ P < 0.05). Conclusions: Predictors of PSA progression, ECOG PS deterioration, and opiate use were identified in AA+P and placebo-treated men with mCRPC. No predictors were associated with worse outcomes for AA+P versus placebo, while the negative impact of certain predictors on ECOG PS was favorably modified by AA+P. Further study is needed on the relationship between AA+P and prognostic factors.

e16071 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) combined with prednisone and enzalutamide (ENZ) are novel oral therapies offering survival benefit to mCRPC patients. This study evaluates concomitant co...

e16067 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (ENZ) are novel oral therapies offering survival benefit to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Developmen...

228 Background: Little information exists regarding the sequences in which new mCRPC therapies with evidence of survival benefits are used. This study aims at describing the sequence of mCRPC medication use as observed in 3 healthcare datasets. Methods: Healthcare claims datasets (Dataset #1 and #2) and a community oncology electronic medical record (Dataset #3) were used to identify PC patients with ≥ 1 claim for a study drug (abiraterone acetate--AA, cabazitaxel--CAB, docetaxel – DOC, enzalutamide – ENZ, and sipuleucel T – SIP) occurring after 9/1/2012. The index date was the 1st study drug claim. Patients were excluded if a study drug claim occurred prior to 9/1/2012. Descriptive statistics summarized the proportion of patients receiving one vs. two or more lines of therapy. The prevalence of 1st line therapy and of 1st to 2nd-line sequences was analyzed. Results: Analysis of 3 unique datasets with > 5,900 PC patients revealed most patients received a single line of therapy. AA and DOC were the most common 1st line agents. The five most-prevalent 1st- to 2nd-line sequences identified in each database are shown in the table below. The most commonly observed 1st- to 2nd-line sequences were AA-ENZ, AA-DOC, and DOC-AA. Conclusions: Real world treatment selection for 5 mCRPC medications was consistent across 3 datasets. The majority of PC patients had a prescription/claim for a single agent. AA and DOC were the most commonly selected 1st line treatments. A 2nd-line agent was observed in 14-33% of patients. Similar patterns of 1st-2nd line sequences were observed between datasets. Further research is warranted with longer follow-up and consideration of other treatment interventions. [Table: see text]

8554 Background: Intravenous (IV) BTZ was approved in the US for the treatment of relapsed MCL in 2006 based on the phase 2 PINNACLE study (Fisher, JCO 2006). In 2012, SQ BTZ was approved based on ...

265 Background: Two oral agents have recently been approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): abiraterone acetate (AA) combined with prednisone (P) for treatment of patients with mCRPC and enzalutamide (ENZ) for patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel. Although corticosteroid (CS) co-administration is not required in ENZ prescribing information, 48% of ENZ-treated patients receive CS according to a large phase III clinical trial. To date, real world CS utilization patterns in AA- and ENZ-treated patients has not been reported. Methods: ProMetis Lx administrative claims data covering multiple health plans were used to identify patients with ≥1 PC diagnosis (ICD-9 185, V10.46) during ≥6 months of claims activity before the first AA or ENZ claim (index date). The proportion of patients receiving CS (identified by NDC codes) during AA or ENZ treatment (observation period-defined as first to end of last AA or ENZ prescription) was reported using descriptive statistics. Additionally, dosing and medication possession ratio (MPR) were calculated for the subset of patients receiving P. Results: A total of 3,228 AA-treated and 675 ENZ-treated PC patients were identified. Baseline comorbidities patterns were similar between treatment groups for hypertension (AA 55%, ENZ 56%), diabetes (25% both groups), and cardiovascular disease (28% both groups). The mean (SD) observation period for AA-treated patients was 142 (133) days and for ENZ-treated patients was 74 (46) days. CS use, P dose and P MPR are described in the following table. Conclusions: CS use was common in PC patients prior to and during treatment with AA and ENZ. While this data set may underreport CS use, patterns of CS use are consistent with clinical trial data. Further research based on data with longer follow-up and additional observational datasets is warranted. [Table: see text]

267 Background: Oral medications have become more widely available for treatment of various cancers, and adherence to dosing/ refill patterns, or medication possession, are important considerations for treatment. Abiraterone acetate (AA), prodrug of aberaterone, is a novel oral androgen biosynthesis inhibitor approved for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. This study reports adherence to AA dosing and administration recommendations by prostate cancer (PC) patients as observed in two separate data sources. Methods: PC patients with ≥1 AA prescription fill were identified in two retrospective pharmacy claim data sources: (1) Truven Commercial Claims and Encounters; and (2) Symphony ProMetis. Patients with no evidence of recent chemotherapy (NRC) or with evidence of recent chemotherapy (RC) were identified in the 6 months prior to AA initiation. The average AA daily dose per prescription per patient was reported. To evaluate adherence, the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), a measure of consistency calculated as the sum of the AA days of supply divided by the total number of days between first and end of last AA fill, was assessed for patients with ≥2 AA fills. Data were summarized by descriptive statistics. Results: In both datasets the mean medication consistency/MPR was greater than 90% and the mean daily dose was within 1% of the recommended daily dose (1,000 mg). Medication consistency and AA daily dose per patient appeared similar between patients with recent chemotherapy and patients without recent chemotherapy (Table). Conclusions: Results from two observational studies representing > 3,700 PC patients reported high levels of AA adherence to AA dosing and administration consistent with prescribing information. Such data support providers’ understanding of the consistency to which AA treated PC patients adhere to AA medication use. [Table: see text]

204 Background: In metastatic prostate cancer (MPC) patients, treatment options include hormonal therapies, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. This study quantifies the real-world healthcare resource utilization of MPC patients. Methods: Health insurance claims from 40 self-insured companies across the US (Employer [E]; 01/1999-02/2009), and from the Medicare 5% ([M]; 1999-2008) databases were analyzed. Patients with a metastasis diagnosis (ICD-9: 196-199) following 2 prostate cancer diagnoses (ICD-9: 185, V10.46) within 365 days were identified. Patients with other malignant diagnoses at baseline, defined as 365 days prior to metastasis diagnosis (index date), were excluded. Patients were evaluated for baseline medical history and for chemotherapy, hormonal agents, radiation, and corticosteroids utilization during both baseline and observation periods. Hospitalization rates and prostate cancer-related procedures post index date were also reported. Results: The study population comprised 11,725 patients (E: 3,227; M: 8,498). Mean age (SD) was 72.8 (10.2) in Employer and 78.1 (7.7) in Medicare. Mean observation period (SD) was 803 (753) days in Employer and 9.2 (8.2) quarters in Medicare. During the baseline period, chemotherapy, hormonal agents, radiation therapy, and corticosteroids were administered to 5%, 52%, 9%, and 21% of Employer, and 2%, 45%, 8%, and 12% of Medicare patients respectively, whereas these interventions increased to 22%, 55%, 39%, and 46% for Employer, and to 21%, 50%, 33%, and 29% for Medicare during the observation period. A total of 66% Employer and 79% Medicare patients were hospitalized post index date. Most patients (E: 92%; M: 98%) had prostate cancer-related procedures, including prostate specific-antigen testing (E: 39%; M: 80%), computerized axial tomography scan (E: 72%; M: 81%), prostate biopsy (E: 47%; M: 54%), X-ray (E: 11%; M: 64%), bone scan (E: 56%; M: 60%), and magnetic resonance imaging scan (E: 35%; M: 37%). Conclusions: This observational study describes real-world utilization patterns in patients with advanced prostate cancer. [Table: see text]

e17524 Background: With recent changes in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) labeling and coverage limitations by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, it is important to examine the evolution of EPO and DARB real-world utilization in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in a hospital outpatient setting. Methods: Electronic outpatient records (2006–2007) from >500 hospitals in the Premier Perspective Comparative Hospital Database were analyzed. Subjects were ≥18 years, had ≥1 cancer diagnosis, received chemo during newly initiated ESA therapy, and ≥2 doses during the treatment episode (classified by quarter of ESA initiation). Mean cumulative dose and dose ratio of EPO:DARB were calculated. 2% of patients with extreme doses were excluded. Results: 7,259 outpatient treatment episodes were identified (EPO 3,568;DARB 3,691). EPO patients were slightly younger (years; EPO 62.7;DARB 64.0, p [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

9624 Background: Pegfilgrastim is a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) used to prevent or treat febrile neutropenia associated with myelosuppressive anticancer therapies. According to the prescribing information, pegfilgrastim should not be administered within 14 days before or 24 hours after cytotoxic chemotherapy because of the potential for myeloid toxicity. This study examined use patterns of pegfilgrastim in real-life practice. Methods: Analysis of health insurance claims data in 2000- 2007 from > 35 large health plans across the US was conducted. Patients who had a cancer diagnosis and chemotherapy within 120 days of their first pegfilgrastim injection were identified. The proportion of pegfilgrastim injections that were followed by administration of chemotherapy within 11 and 9 days was calculated. Analysis was also stratified by cancer type [Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), lung, breast]. Results: A total of 13,526 cancer patients received 57,118 pegfilgrastim injections. NHL, lung, and breast cohorts comprised 2,722, 2,772, and 4,955 patients, respectively. Mean age (SD) was 55.0 (11.6) and women represented 65.9% of study population. Among all cancer types, 19.2% of pegfilgrastim injections had a chemotherapy claim within the following 11 days. This pattern of use was the highest in NHL (18.9%), followed by lung (17.1%), and breast (16.2%). Similar results were observed in the 9-day sensitivity analysis (see Table ). Conclusions: Based on the retrospective analysis of this administrative claims database, the use of pegfilgrastim within 11 days of an administration of chemotherapy was observed in 15–20% of cases which is inconsistent with the recommended guidelines. Pegfilgrastim use in these situations may have the potential to increase sensitivity of rapidly dividing myeloid cells to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Further research is being conducted to assess the related clinical and economic impact of this pattern of usage. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]