Search

102 Background: Intra-prostatic boost to dominant nodule is an attractive method for biological dose augmentation. Aim of study was to assess clinical feasibility of radiation boost to mp-MRI visible tumour using external beam radiotherapy. We report a planned analysis of toxicity and efficacy in the first two dose cohorts in this study. Methods: DELINEATE (ISRCTN04483921) was a single centre prospective phase 2 multi-cohort study including standard (Cohort A (A): 74Gy/37F) and moderately hypofractionated (Cohort B (B): 60Gy/20F) prostate image-guided IMRT regimens. Patients treated in A and B received integrated boost of 82Gy and 67Gy to mp-MRI-visible lesions. 55 patients were recruited to A and 158 patients recruited to B; the first 50 sequentially treated patients in B were included in analysis. Duration of androgen deprivation therapy was at clinician discretion. Primary endpoint was RTOG late toxicity at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included acute and late toxicity timepoints and biochemical relapse (BCR) free survival, using Phoenix definition. Treatment related toxicity was measured by RTOG, CTCAE v4 scales, IPSS and EPIC-26. Results: Between July 2011 and January 2015, 105 patients were treated within A&B. Median follow up for A was 74.5 months and 52 months for B. Median age was 71 years (range 57-80). In A and B, there were 27% and 40% of patients respectively classified with NCCN high risk disease. Cumulative RTOG toxicity in Table. 6 patients had BCR (5 patients: A and 1 patient: B). Within A, 1 patient had pelvic nodal progression and 1 local progression; patient in B had local progression. Conclusions: Delivery of intra-prostatic boost to dominant nodule is feasible with acceptable toxicity and good efficacy. Intra-prostatic boost is now part of the randomised phase 3 PIVOTALboost trial (ISRCTN80146950). Clinical trial information: 04483921. [Table: see text]

5043 Background: Active surveillance (AS) for untreated prostate cancer requires accurate selection of patients unlikely to need treatment in their lifetime. Most studies have selected patients on ...

22 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) screening is controversial and a better assessment of individualized PC risk is needed. Several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) conferring a cumulative risk of PC have been identified. We have explored the potential role of genetic markers for targeted screening in a population with increased risk of PC due to family history (FH). Methods: PROFILE was developed as a pilot study to determine the feasibility of targeted PC screening using prostatic biopsy (PB) and its association with specific genetic profiles in men with FH. We also evaluated the role of PSA and Diffusion Weighted MRI (DW-MRI) as screening tools. One hundred sixteen men age 40 to 69 with FH of PC were enrolled between October 2009 and December 2012. Cumulative SNP risk scores were calculated by summing 59 risk alleles for each locus using the weighted effect (log-additive model). DW-MRI was performed in 50 patients. Participants were asked to undergo a 10 core PB regardless of baseline PSA. Results: Median age 53 (40 to 69) and median PSA was 1.15. One hundred and two men accepted to undergo a PB as primary PC screening. Twenty-three tumours were found (22.5% of biopsies) as well as seven men diagnosed with atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) (6.8%) and eight men with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-PIN) (7.8%). In total 37.1% received an abnormal result. Out of the diagnosed PC 41% were intermediate or high risk and requiring treatment, which compares with 24% in general population screening. The predictive performance of DW-MRI, PSA, genetic model and genetic model plus PSA measured by AUC were: 0.85, 0.73, 0.57 and 0.74, respectively. The genetic model performed best in men with a normal PSA of

5054 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) screening is controversial and better approaches are needed, including a better assessment of individualized PC risk. Several studies have identified a number of common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that confer a cumulative risk of PC. We have explored the potential role of genetic markers in identifying men who should be selectively targeted for screening in a population with increased risk of PC due to family history (FH) of the disease. Methods: PROFILE has been developed as a pilot study. The primary aim is to determine the feasibility of targeted PC screening using prostatic biopsy (PB) and its association with specific genetic profiles in men with FH. Secondary aims are to evaluate the role of PSA and Diffusion Weighted MRI (DW-MRI) as screening tools in this population. From December 2010 men aged 40-69 with FH of PC were invited into the study until 100 men were enrolled. Blood samples were provided for PSA and DNA extraction. The cumulative SNP risk scores for each patient were calculated by summing 59 risk alleles for each locus using the weighted effect as estimated in previous studies (log-additive model). DW-MRI was performed in 50 patients. All participants were asked to undergo a 10 core PB regardless of baseline PSA. Those who declined PB have been excluded from this analysis. Data on side effects and cancer worry were also collected. Results: 35% of invited men entered the study. Median age was 53 yrs (40-69) and median PSA was 1.15. Ninety men accepted to undergo a PB as primary PC screening. Twenty-two tumours were found and 45% of them were clinically significant [Median age 64yrs (47-69), median PSA 5.4 (0.91-9.3)]. The predictive performance of DW-MRI, PSA, genetic model and genetic model plus PSA measured by AUC were: 0.85, 0.73, 0.57 and 0.74, respectively. The genetic model performed better in men with PSA

3523 Background: ARQ 197 (ARQ) is a selective non-ATP competitive inhibitor of c-Met, a receptor tyrosine kinase implicated in tumor cell proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis. Preclinical data and declines in circulating endothelial cell (CEC) levels in patients (pts) receiving ARQ suggest antiangiogenic potential of c-Met inhibition. Methods: ARQ was administered orally twice daily (bid) to pts with advanced solid tumors. Pre and post-therapy tumor biopsies were mandated for c-Met and FAK immunohistochemical studies during dose escalation (n = 16). CEC enumeration was evaluated. 12 pts are being investigated in the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) expansion cohort with DCE and Diffusion Weighted (DW) MRI. Results: 29 pts (14 F/15 M; mean 54.4 yrs) received ARQ at doses of 100 (n = 3), 200 (n = 6), 300 (n = 16), and 400 (n = 4) mg bid. 3 pts experienced dose limiting toxicities of CTCAEv3 grade (G)3 fatigue (200 mg bid); G3 hand-foot syndrome, G3 mucositis and G3 febrile neutropenia (400 mg bid). This established the ARQ MTD/recommended phase II dose (RP2D) at 300 mg bid. Other toxicities were G1–2, such as fatigue (n = 5); diarrhea, nausea and vomiting (n = 3). Mean AUC0–12h and Cmax increased linearly through the MTD. Statistically significant post-ARQ inhibition of high baseline phosphorylated c-Met and FAK expression in tumor tissue was seen in all dose cohorts confirming target inhibition. Disease stabilization (SD) was seen in 11 pts for up to 23 weeks with tumor regressions up to 12.4%. 13 of 20 pts had post-ARQ CEC declines of up to 100%. In the DCE-MRI cohort to date, preliminary analyses of ktrans histograms from pelvic lesions were consistent with antiangiogenic effects, with a ktrans median reduction of 20.1% on day 7 of ARQ (intrapatient baseline variability: 2.8%). This effect was still present (ktrans median decline: 8.3%) on day 56 of ARQ. Conclusions: ARQ is well tolerated with MTD/RP2D of 300mg bid, linear PK and evidence of phosphorylated c-Met and FAK inhibition. CEC and preliminary DCE-MRI data support the antiangiogenic effects of c-Met inhibition with ARQ. Correlation with other DCE parameters and DW changes will be presented. [Table: see text]