Search

PURPOSE Oral mucositis (OM) remains a common, debilitating toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. The goal of this phase IIb, multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of GC4419, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, with placebo to reduce the duration, incidence, and severity of severe OM (SOM). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 223 patients (from 44 institutions) with locally advanced oral cavity or oropharynx cancer planned to be treated with definitive or postoperative intensity-modulated RT (IMRT; 60 to 72 Gy [≥ 50 Gy to two or more oral sites]) plus cisplatin (weekly or every 3 weeks) were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg (n = 73) or 90 mg (n = 76) of GC4419 or to receive placebo (n = 74) by 60-minute intravenous administration before each IMRT fraction. WHO grade of OM was assessed biweekly during IMRT and then weekly for up to 8 weeks after IMRT. The primary endpoint was duration of SOM tested for each active dose level versus placebo (intent-to-treat population, two-sided α of .05). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, was used for adverse event grading. RESULTS Baseline patient and tumor characteristics as well as treatment delivery were balanced. With 90 mg GC4419 versus placebo, SOM duration was significantly reduced ( P = .024; median, 1.5 v 19 days). SOM incidence (43% v 65%; P = .009) and severity (grade 4 incidence, 16% v 30%; P = .045) also were improved. Intermediate improvements were seen with the 30-mg dose. Safety was comparable across arms, with no significant GC4419-specific toxicity nor increase of known toxicities of IMRT plus cisplatin. The 2-year follow-up for tumor outcomes is ongoing. CONCLUSION GC4419 at a dose of 90 mg produced a significant, clinically meaningful reduction of SOM duration, incidence, and severity with acceptable safety. A phase III trial (ROMAN; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03689712 ) has begun.

6078 Background: Severe oral mucositis (SOM) is a dose limiting toxicity during radiotherapy and cisplatin for head and neck cancers. The aim of this 4-arm randomized controlled pilot trial was to evaluate the efficacy of different schedules of a novel radioprotectant, RRx-001 versus standard-of-care (SOC), to reduce duration, time to onset and incidence of SOM in patients received cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer (OCC). Methods: Patients with locally advanced OCC treated with definitive or postoperative CRT were randomized to receive RRx-001 by 15-minute intravenous infusion in one of three different schedules versus none. The days and severity of mucositis were prospectively evaluated. Oral mucositis was assessed weekly during and after CRT as well as 28 days after completion. The pre-specified efficacy endpoints were duration of grade 3-4 SOM, resolution of SOM, time to onset of SOM and incidence of SOM. Results: A total of 53 patients were enrolled between June 2018 and July 2019 across 11 institutions. Forty-five (out of 53) patients received study drug and were efficacy evaluable. RRx-001 were well tolerated with no associated serious adverse events. All RRx-001 arms numerically outperformed SOC on the pre-specified efficacy measures, and the greatest effect estimate was observed on Arm 1 (RRx-001 pretreatment only + CRT). The following endpoints favored treatment with RRx-001. Median SOM duration by treatment was 22 and 40 days for Arm 1 and SOC respectively. Time to onset of SOM was by 38 days (Arm 1) vs. 26 days (SOC). On Arm 1, 83% of patients had SOM resolution vs 60% on SOC). Gastrostomy requirement was reduced by 45%. No patients on Arm 1 developed grade 4 mucositis vs 30% developed grade 4 mucositis on the SOC arm. Furthermore, the incidence of oropharyngeal dysphagia, which can substantially impair nutrition, was reduced by treatment with RRx-001, occurring at 50% vs 70% for Arm 1 vs SOC respectively. Treatment with RRx-001 resulted in highly significant decrease in the duration of SOM through 60 Gy with a median SOM of 1 day vs 17 days for Arm 1 vs SOC respectively (Wilcoxon rank-sum test p < 0.001). Median cumulative cisplatin dose was significantly greater for RRx-001 Arm 1 than SOC (557.4 mg vs. 438 mg, Wilcoxon p = 0.025). Conclusions: Compared with SOC, SOM among RRx-001-treated patients given 3 different treatment schedules was less severe, of shorter duration, demonstrated delayed time to onset and resolved earlier. Overall, the incidence, duration and severity of SOM and dysphagia was reduced. The safety profile of RRx-001 was similar to SOC. These results will inform the design of a Phase 3 pivotal study of RRx-001 in the prevention of SOM in at-risk cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03515538.

12106 Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a debilitating side effect of concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). EC-18 may effectively mitigate OM by minimizing the CRT-induced innate immune response. This Phase II, 2-stage trial evaluated safety, tolerability, and efficacy of EC-18 in reducing the duration, incidence, and trajectory of severe OM (SOM) in HNC patients. Methods: Patients (n = 105) with pathologically confirmed oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or nasopharynx squamous cell cancers who received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT; with ≥ 55 Gy on ≥ 2 oral sites) and weekly or tri-weekly cisplatin were studied. In Stage 1, 24 patients were randomized (n = 6 per arm) to receive 500, 1000, or 2000 mg of EC-18, or placebo. Following independent Data Safety Monitoring Board review, 81 patients in Stage 2 received EC-18 2000 mg (n = 41) or placebo (n = 40) throughout CRT. WHO OM grade was assessed twice weekly during IMRT and then once weekly for up to 6 weeks post-IMRT. The primary efficacy endpoint was duration of SOM during the active and short-term follow-up (STFU) periods in the compliant per-protocol population (PP). Much of Stage 2 was conducted during peak periods of the COVID-19 pandemic which measurably impacted patient compliance relative to test medication dosing and planned radiation. Consequently, to assess efficacy most accurately, the PP population was analyzed (with at least 4 weeks of study drug dosing, minimum cumulative radiation of 55 Gy, 80% study drug compliance in the first 28 days of dosing, and without using not-allowed-therapy). Results: Patient demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Adverse events (AEs) were comparable amongst cohorts without drug-related severe AEs. In the PP, the median duration of SOM from baseline through STFU was 0 day in the EC-18 group (n = 22) v 13.5 days in the placebo group (n = 20). SOM incidence through STFU (45.5% v 70%) and opioid use (time to onset: 32.3 v 26.0 days; and duration: 32.8 v 37.5 days) favored EC-18 v placebo. Results of the covariates analyses suggested that EC-18 favorably impacted SOM incidence in patients who experienced SOM treated with weekly low-dose cisplatin (n = 26; 37.5% v placebo 70.0%) and HPV+ tumors (n = 29; 35.3% v placebo 66.7%; Table). One-year long-term follow-up for tumor outcomes is ongoing. Conclusions: EC-18 safely mitigated the development and the time course of SOM in CRT-treated HNC patients. In addition, EC-18 may provide substantial benefits to subpopulations of HPV+ HNC patients treated with low dose cisplatin. Clinical trial information: NCT03200340. [Table: see text]

6075 Background: OM is a common, painful, and costly toxicity associated with cytotoxic regimens used to treat H&N cancers, which may result in radiotherapy treatment interruptions to negatively impact tumor control. There are currently no approved interventions to successfully prevent or delay OM onset among patients being treated with radiation therapy, with or without concomitant chemotherapy (CRT). Oxidative stress is a critical event in OM’s pathogenesis. Through its effect on Nrf2, ST-617 has marked anti-oxidative activity/properties. Supportive Therapeutics is developing ST-617, a dithioethione, for the attenuation of OM onset, duration and severity. The objective of this trial was to assess the safety, tolerability, PK, PD and efficacy of ST-617 in patients at high risk of severe OM (SOM). Methods: A dose escalation trial in which ST-617 administered as an oral suspension, 1-2 hours before the administration of daily RT fractions was performed at 9 study sites in South Africa and Australia. Eighteen patients with diagnoses of oral or oropharyngeal CA were enrolled (up to 6 pts/dose). Patients received concomitant cisplatin either weekly or tri-weekly. ST-617 was administered 3 days prior to CRT, and then continuing daily until the end of treatment. Safety outcomes, using CTCAE criteria (v 4.03) were used. Dose escalation occurred in the absence of toxicity. OM occurrence and severity were assessed by trained and validated evaluators using WHO, NCI-CTC and RTOG criteria; scores were centrally assigned. The primary efficacy endpoints included the incidence and duration of SOM (WHO grades 3 or 4) vs historical controls. PD tracking measured total ROS/RNS, GSH/GSSG, regulation in plasma and buccal epithelial cells. Results: 17 pts completed the 50, 100 and 150mg/day with no safety issues. No early dose limiting toxicity (DLT) or serious Adverse Event linked to ST-617 were observed. AEs observed were mainly nausea which is usually associated with CRT as expected. The 100 mg/day dose has been well tolerated with no grade 4 OM. No CRT dose interruptions or delays due to OM has been observed. Total ROS/RNS levels in plasma and buccal samples show significant decrease with increased ST-617 dosing from 50 to 100 mg/day. Conclusions: ST-617 administration was safe at all doses tested. The course and severity of patients treated with ST-617 compared favorably with historical controls. Mechanistic correlation between ROS/RNS levels was seen. A randomized, controlled, double blind trial is planned with the recommended dose of 100mg/day. Clinical trial information: 20180138.

12081 Background: SOM occurs in 70% of patients receiving CRT for HNC with consequent pain, treatment interruptions and increased costs of care. Supraphysiologic levels of oxidative stress are key SOM initiators. 001 activates nuclear factor erythroid related factor 2 (Nrf2) increasing expression of multiple antioxidant genes including superoxide dismutase glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase. This trial examined the effect of dose and schedule on safety and efficacy of 001. Primary efficacy endpoint was duration of SOM (WHO criteria assessed); secondary endpoints included time to onset, incidence grade 4 through 60Gy and 70Gy. Methods: Locally advanced HNC treated with definitive or postoperative CRT (cisplatin + RT) received one of 3 001 schedules: (ARM1) 2 doses/wk for 2 weeks (prior to) CRT. ARMS 2, 3: prior to + 2 doses or 6 doses with CRT respectively or standard of care (SOC). Results: 53 patients randomized, 45 evaluable. Benefit trends for endpoints were consistent across all 3 001 arms with greatest effect size in pre-treatment only, ARM1. Compared to SOC, 001 reduced duration of SOM by 45% (40 vs 22 days). Through 60Gy and 70Gy a reduction of 95% and 79% in duration SOM was also observed (17 vs 1 day, and 23 vs 5 days) respectively. No patients in ARM1 developed grade 4, (0% vs SOC 30%). Side effects were comparable to SOC. Conclusions: In this small, open label trial, 001 demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit profile supported by reductions in overall SOM duration including through 60Gy and 70Gy with no grade ARM1 was most effective suggesting short periods of Nrf2 activation before CRT oxidative stress generation may increase the threshold and buffering capacity of upregulated antioxidants. Larger, blinded trials, confirming the observed dose, schedule and treatment effects are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03515538 .

e15106 Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat a variety of cancers. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported. Oral manifestations of irAEs include stomatitis, oral ulcers, and xerostomia. However, the trajectory and frequency of oral irAEs remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence, trajectory and nature of oral irAEs and their association with primary cancer diagnosis and other irAEs. Methods: A retrospective electronic chart review using the Partners Research Patient Data was performed for all patients treated with ICIs at Partners Healthcare hospitals and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 12/2011 and 9/2019. Keywords specific to oral irAE such as oral mucositis, stomatitis or mouth sore were used. We collected data on demographics, cancer features, treatments, and characteristics of oral irAEs. Results: 822 of 4683 patients who received ICIs therapy were identified by keyword filtering. Lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and skin cancer (including melanoma) were the most common types of primary malignancies with a frequency of 35.5%, 12.4 % and 11.7%, respectively. Oral irAEs were identified in 106 patients with the median age of 69 (range: 29-92) years and the female to male ratio of 1:1. 57.5% (n = 61) presented with symptomatic oral mucosal lesions. 47.2% (n = 50) had xerostomia and 17.0% (n = 18) had dysgeusia. The median time from the date of ICIs initiation to the date of oral irAE onset was 105 days (range: 2-631 days) in patients presented with oral mucosal lesions, 103 days (2-860 days) in xerostomia patients, and 156 days (range: 5-836 days) in dysgeusia patients. Melanoma was the most common cancer seen in oral irAE patients (30.2%), followed by lung cancer (26.4%) and oral/oropharyngeal cancer (12.3%). 60, 42, and 12 patients received pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab, respectively. 86.8% of oral irAE patients received only one type of ICIs therapy. Concomitant cutaneous, intestinal, and rheumatological irAEs were commonly reported with a frequency of 19.4%, 15.3%, and 12.2%, respectively in those patients. Conclusions: Oral irAEs can present with both acute and chronic onset in patients with ICIs therapy but are not as common as oral AEs associated with conventional cytotoxic regimens. While data relative to capturing oral irAEs is still preliminary, the current provides insight into their nature and course. Prospective studies focused on assessing the impact of ICI on oral irAEs are likely to provide additional insight into the character, course and impact of these conditions.

TPS6596 Background: Approximately 70% of patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plus cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) develop SOM, defined as WHO Grade 3 or 4, which limits patients' ability to eat solids (Gr 3) or liquids (Gr 4, requiring enteral nutrition). An RT-induced burst of superoxide initiates oral mucositis (OM) development. GC4419, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, interrupts this process by converting superoxide to H2O2. It showed promising reduction of SOM in a published open-label Phase 1b/2a trial (IJROBP 1 Feb 2018). In a subsequent randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 223 patients receiving IMRT/cisplatin for HNC (ASCO 2018), 90 mg of GC4419 administered M-F prior to IMRT demonstrated statistically significant reduction in SOM duration (p=0.024, median 1.5 days @ 90 mg vs. 19 days placebo) and meaningful reductions @ 90 mg in SOM incidence (43% vs. 65%) and severity (incidence of Grade 4, 16% vs. 30%). The safety results were acceptable and consistent with the known toxicities of IMRT/cisplatin. Methods: 335 patients at multiple centers in the U.S. and Canada with locally-advanced, nonmetastatic head and neck cancer (oral cavity/oropharyngeal) receiving 70 Gy IMRT (>50 Gy to > 2 oral sites) plus cisplatin (40 mg/m2 qwk x 6-7, or 100 mg/m2 q3wk x 3) are being randomized (double-blinded) 3:2 to 90 mg of GC4419 or placebo, M-F before each RT fraction. Enrollment is stratified by cisplatin schedule and treatment setting (definitive vs. post-op). OM by the WHO scale will be assessed twice weekly during RT & weekly for 2 weeks post RT. The primary efficacy endpoint is incidence of SOM through the end of IMRT. Secondary efficacy endpoints include severity (incidence of Grade 4 OM through the end of IMRT), & days of SOM (days from first to last SOM for all patients, with patients never developing SOM having 0 days of SOM by definition). Days of SOM for the subset developing SOM will be analyzed descriptively. Patients will be followed for one year post IMRT for tumor progression/recurrence and for two years for survival. Clinical trial information: NCT03689712 .

TPS6096 Background: Approximately 70% of patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plus cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) develop SOM, defined as WHO Grade 3 or 4, which limits patients' ability to eat solids (Gr 3) or liquids (Gr 4, requiring enteral nutrition). An RT-induced burst of superoxide initiates oral mucositis (OM) development. GC4419, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, interrupts this process by converting superoxide to H2O2. It showed promising reduction of SOM in a published open-label Phase 1b/2a trial (IJROBP 1 Feb 2018). In a subsequent randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 223 patients receiving IMRT/cisplatin for HNC (ASCO 2018), 90 mg of GC4419 administered M-F prior to IMRT demonstrated statistically significant reduction in SOM duration (p=0.024, median 1.5 days @ 90 mg vs 19 days placebo) and meaningful reductions @ 90 mg in SOM incidence (43% vs 65%) and severity (incidence of Grade 4, 16% vs 30%). The safety profile was acceptable and consistent with the known toxicities of IMRT/cisplatin. Methods: 335 patients at multiple centers in the U.S. and Canada with locally-advanced, nonmetastatic head and neck cancer (oral cavity/oropharyngeal) receiving 70 Gy IMRT (>50 Gy to > 2 oral sites) plus cisplatin (40 mg/m2 qwk x 6-7, or 100 mg/m2 q3wk x 3) are being randomized (double-blinded) 3:2 to 90 mg of GC4419 or placebo, M-F before each RT fraction. Enrollment is stratified by cisplatin schedule and treatment setting (definitive vs post-op). OM by the WHO scale will be assessed twice weekly during RT & weekly for 2 weeks post RT. The primary efficacy endpoint is incidence of SOM through the end of IMRT. Secondary efficacy endpoints include severity (incidence of Grade 4 OM through the end of IMRT), & days of SOM (days from first to last SOM for all patients, with patients never developing SOM having 0 days of SOM by definition). Days of SOM for the subset developing SOM will be analyzed descriptively. Patients will be followed for one year post IMRT for tumor progression/recurrence and for two years for survival. Supported by Galera Therapeutics, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT03689712.

Overview: Mucositis is among the most debilitating side effects of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted anticancer therapy. Research continues to escalate regarding key issues such as etiopathology, incidence and severity across different mucosae, relationships between mucosal and nonmucosal toxicities, and risk factors. This approach is being translated into enhanced management strategies. Recent technology advances provide an important foundation for this continuum. For example, evolution of applied genomics is fostering development of new algorithms to rapidly screen genomewide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for patient-associated risk prediction. This modeling will permit individual tailoring of the most effective, least toxic treatment in the future. The evolution of novel cancer therapeutics is changing the mucositis toxicity profile. These agents can be associated with unique mechanisms of mucosal damage. Additional research is needed to optimally manage toxicity caused by agents such as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, without reducing antitumor effect. There has similarly been heightened attention across the health professions regarding clinical practice guidelines for mucositis management in the years following the first published guidelines in 2004. New opportunities exist to more effectively interface this collective guideline portfolio by capitalizing upon novel technologies such as an Internet-based Wiki platform. Substantive progress thus continues across many domains associated with mucosal injury in oncology patients. In addition to enhancing oncology patient care, these advances are being integrated into high-impact educational and scientific venues including the National Cancer Institute Physician Data Query (PDQ) portfolio as well as a new Gordon Research Conference on mucosal health and disease scheduled for June 2013.

6006Background: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plus cisplatin is established treatment for locally advanced OC/OP cancer, but appx. 70% of patients develop SOM, defined as WHO Grade 3 or 4...

10102 Background: Many BC patients treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) develop AIA; 20% have symptoms severe enough to effect treatment compliance. Results of candidate gene studies to identify AIA risk are limited in scope. In this case-controlled study, we evaluated the potential of a NAA to predict AIA using germline single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data obtained prior to treatment initiation. Methods: Systematic chart review of 700 AI-treated patients with stage I-III BC between 2003-2012 identified asymptomatic patients (n = 39) and those with clinically significant AIA resulting in AI termination or therapy switch (n = 123). Germline DNA was obtained from peripheral blood cells and SNP genotyping performed using the Affymetrix UK BioBank Axiom Array to yield 695,277 SNPs. The identity of the cluster of SNPs that most closely defined AIA risk was discovered using an NAA that sequentially combined statistical filtering and a machine learning algorithm. NCBI PhenGenI and Ensemble databases were used to define gene attribution of the 200 most discriminating SNPs. Phenotype, pathway, and ontologic analyses assessed functional and mechanistic validity. Results: Cases and controls were similar in demographic characteristics. A cluster of 70 SNPs, correlated to 57 genes (accounting for linkage disequilibrium), was identified. This SNP group predicted AIA occurrence with a maximum accuracy of 75.93%. Strong associations with arthralgia, breast cancer, and estrogen phenotypes were seen in 19/57 genes (33%) and were functionally and ontologically consistent. Conclusions: Using a NAA, we identified a 70 SNP cluster that predicted AIA risk with fair accuracy. Phenotype, functional, and pathway analysis of attributed genes was consistent with clinical phenotypes. This study is the first to link a specific SNP/gene cluster to AIA risk independent of candidate gene bias. An ongoing prospective companion study will be used to validate and to expand upon results.

10120Background: CRT-induced SO significantly contributes to OM initiation. GC4419 (MW=483) specifically mimics SOD’s dismutation of SO to H2 O2 , and reduced severe OM (SOM) in a hamster cheek pou...

e19049 Background: ARCHER 1042 (NCT01465802) was a randomized patient (pt) blinded trial that explored prophylactic interventions to minimize select dermatologic adverse events of interest (SDAEI) ...

10091 Background: There is currently no effective mechanistically-targeted intervention for radiation-induced OM. Clonidine, a a2 adrenergic agonist, has been shown to impact NF-kappaB with consequ...

143 Background: Conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may result in profound neutropenia placing patients at risk for infection. Since the mouth is a common site of origin for infection and bacteremia, elimination of pre-existing oral and dental disease prior to HCT favorably impacts infection risk and attendant morbidities. While pre-HCT dental screening is highly desirable, the logistics of assuring that all HCT patients are comprehensively evaluated and appropriately managed is challenging. Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center (DFBWCC) implemented a community-based dental evaluation program (CBDEP) for all patients scheduled to undergo HCT which has proved to be effective, cost-efficient and patient-friendly. The objective of this presentation is to describe that program. Methods: We describe the CBDEP and evaluate volume trends and clinical and cost outcomes. As part of the HCT work-up, the patient is provided with education materials, evaluation guidelines and forms to be completed by the community dentist (CD). The patient is responsible for making a timely appointment with the CD who obtains a full series of radiographs and completes a comprehensive examination and treatment plan. The completed documents and radiographs are returned to DFBWCC and reviewed by the oral medicine specialist. The CD is contacted immediately with any discordance in the plan. A letter confirming the final treatment plan is sent to the CD and entered into the electronic medical record. Upon admission for HCT, the patient is evaluated bedside to ensure all work is completed and there are no new symptoms. Results: From 2009-2012 an average of 523 patients per year participated in the CBDEP, with an increasing trend due to growing HCT volume with 440 patients evaluated in 2009 and 563 in 2012. Once returned, evaluations were reviewed within 1-10 days. The average cost for examination, radiographs, scaling and prophylaxis was $255. The average cost rose to $453 if additional treatment was required. Conclusions: The CBDEP provides an efficient and effective model for clearance prior to HCT. This directly involves the patient and the CD, is inexpensive and easy to implement, and may reduce complications during HCT.

9620 Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a painful complication of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck (H&N) cancer. OM can compromise nutrition, require opioid analgesics and hospitalization for pain control, and lead to treatment interruptions. Due to the role of inflammatory pathways in the pathogenesis of OM, this study investigated the effect of inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) on severity and morbidity of OM. Methods: In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial,40 H&N cancer patients were randomized to daily use of 200 mg celecoxib or matched placebo, for the duration of RT. Eligibility criteria included planned RT dose of ≥ 5000 cGy to 2+ areas of the mouth and no contraindication for celecoxib use. The planned sample size of 20 per arm provided 80% power to detect a 1 point difference in mean Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS) score (range 0-5) at 5000 cGy RT (primary endpoint), applying a two-tailed, two-sample t-test at the 5% level of significance. Clinical OM, normalcy of diet, pain scores and analgesic use were assessed 2-3 times a week by blinded investigators during the 6-7 week period of RT, using validated scales. Results: Twenty subjects were randomized to each arm, which were similar with respect to tumor location, radiation dose, and concomitant chemotherapy. In both arms, mucositis and pain scores increased over the course of RT. Intent-to-treat analyses demonstrated no significant difference in mean (SD) OMAS scores at 5000 cGy [celecoxib 1.32 (0.71), placebo 1.27 (0.86), p = 0.83, two sample t-test]. There was also no difference between the celecoxib and placebo arms respectively, in mean OMAS scores over the period of RT (SD) [0.98(0.77) & 0.97 (0.86), p = 0.84], mean worst pain scores [3.38 (3.07) & 3.31 (3.32), p = 0.83], mean normalcy of diet scores [5.43 (3.86) & 5.11(3.94), p = 0.65], or mean daily opioid medication use in IV morphine equivalents [19.08 (16.57) & 20.48 (19.07), p = 0.48], all by linear mixed model fixed effects regression analysis. There were no SAEs attributed to celecoxib use. Conclusions: Daily use of a selective COX-2 inhibitor, during the period of RT for H&N cancer, did not reduce the severity of clinical OM, pain, dietary compromise or use of opioid analgesics. Clinical trial information: NCT00698204.

9535 Background: Using proprietary Bayesian network (BN) algorithms, we discovered interacting single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-BNs predicting patient-risk for 6 chemotherapy (CT)-induced side effects (SEs): oral mucositis (OM), diarrhea (D), CT-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), fatigue, cognitive dysfunction (CD) and peripheral neuropathy (PN). To assess biologic validity, SNP-BNs mapped each SE to its gene loci, exploring biologic pathways for those genes. Roles of genes and pathways found in similar phenotypic diseases (e.g., Inflammatory Bowel Disease [IBD] for D, Alzheimer disease [AD] for CD, chronic fatigue syndrome [CFS] for F) were explored. Methods: Via an FDA-cleared DNA extraction kit, saliva was collected from 78 women with breast cancer (dose-dense AC+T) and 57 patients with colon cancer (FOLFOX +/- bevacizumab). We assessed 2.5M SNPs/patient (Illumina OmniQuad bead chip assays). SEs were measured via a validated tool (Patient Care Monitor). Analyzed SNP arrays and SEs discovered SNP-BNs. Final SNP-BNs per SE included gene name, symbol, and loci. Pathways and networks were analyzed for gene function and related genes, querying 6 databases (NLM, NextBio, Weizmann Institute, SPRING, Gene Ontology, AmiGO). Results: Mucosal injury-implicated networks and genes were identified, including oxidative stress, NF-κB, pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6, and TNF, MMPs and fibronectin breakdown (SPOCK3). D networks and genes overlapped with IBD (ERG, IER2, CASK). SNP-BNs for CINV overlapped in both CT regimens with genes for neurotransmitters (serotonin, dopamine, substance P) and nerve impulse transmission. B3GAT1, involved with opioid-induced CINV, was identified. F networks involving genes and pathways for cytokines and skeletal muscle overlapped to CFS. CD networks involve genes in AD. PN networks mapped genes involving myelination, demyelination, inflammation, and toxic neuropathy. Conclusions: SNP-BNs predicting CT-induced SEs mapped to genes associated with known biology of each SE, sharing central traits with other diseases, and are targets for drug discovery in cancer-related SEs and unmet needs, including AD.

9530 Background: OPC treatment is associated with significant long-term toxicity. Very little is known about the long-term symptom burden and orodental health in OPC survivors >2 yrs from treatment. Methods: Survivors treated for OPC with CRT/ST (involving definitive RT) at Dana Farber Cancer Institute between 2002-2011 and >2 yrs from treatment completion, were identified by chart review and asked to complete the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey version 2 (VHNSS v2), National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey for Oral Health Questionnaire, health care availability survey. Results: 200 survivors were contacted, 127 responded (RR: 64%). Median age at diagnosis was 54 yrs; 85% males; 85% stage IVA/B, 13% stage III; 56% CRT, 43% ST. HPV status: 47% (+), 10% (-), 43% unknown. Median time from treatment completion: 50 mths (24-135 mths). Residual moderate to severe toxicities reported in VHNSS v2: 71% dry mouth; 59% difficulty chewing/swallowing food; 53% feeling of food becoming stuck in the throat; 53% prolonged time to eat; 31% thick mucus, 6% had difficulty sleeping secondary to this; 16% trouble speaking, 27% trouble hearing;30% limitation of neck/shoulder movement; altered taste/smell - 45%/23%; sensitivity to spicy food and dryness-57%/62%; 30% decreased desire to eat, 11% had moderate weight loss. Orodental health assessment: 13% thermal sensitivity, 21% teeth cracking and chipping, 20% loose teeth, 33% had treatment for gum disease, 42% had lost bone around teeth. 98% survivors had health insurance; only 66% had dental insurance. No statistically significant difference was noted with respect to symptoms between CRT or ST. ST did not affect long-term toxicity compared to CRT alone. Conclusions: OPC is known to correlate with HPV positivity, early age at diagnosis and high rates of long-term survival after appropriate therapy. Our study documents that the OPC survivors have substantial residual long-term head and neck and orodental symptoms directly related to the treatment that significantly impacts their quality of life. A substantial number of patients lack dental health coverage, which likely further impacts symptom burden and QOL.

Background: Patients undergoing chemotherapy for colon cancer are at significant risk for developing moderate-to-severe side effects as a result of their treatment regimens. These side effects can be debilitating to the patient and are often associated with a number of negative health and economic consequences. There is currently no accurate method to identify which patients are at risk for chemotherapy-induced side effects. If such a prediction tool were available, it would provide opportunities for directed prophylactic interventions. This study adopted a novel approach to filling the unmet clinical need for an accurate risk prediction tool. It capitalized on the growing body of evidence that genetic factors (in particular, networks of interacting genes) play a role in determining the likelihood of a patient’s risk for developing side effects. Specifically, the study was designed to assess the feasibility of identifying SNP-BNs 1 that could accurately predict the risk for 6 common chemotherapy-induced side effects: chemotherapyinduced nausea and vomiting (CINV), diarrhea, oral mucositis (OM) 2 , cognitive dysfunction (CD), peripheral neuropathy (PN), and fatigue. Methods: Patients (n=57) with colon cancer who received at least 3 cycles of FOLFOX6 +/bevacizumab (along with standard supportive care strategies) were enrolled. After informed consent, saliva samples were collected, DNA was isolated, and SNPs were analyzed on Illumina Omni microarrays (2.5 x 10 6 SNPs). Side effects under consideration were observed using Patient Care Monitor © , a validated patient-reported symptom assessment instrument. BNs were developed for each of the 6 side effects and cross-validated using robust statistical analyses. Results: The percentage of patients who experienced moderate-to-severe side effects was notable despite supportive care measures. Side effects included the following: CINV (32%), diarrhea (16%), OM (26%), CD (21%), PN (26%), and fatigue (56%). SNP-BNs were defined for each of the 6 side effects and were found to predict risk with a high degree of accuracy (>90%) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (>0.920).

9119 Background: Oral ulcerative mucositis (OM) is a common, painful, dose-limiting toxicity of cancer therapy. The care for OM is largely palliative and there is an urgent need for new and effective therapies. Host defense proteins (HDPs) are amphiphilic components of the innate immune system that serve as a primary response to infection. Exclusive of their direct antimicrobial activity, HDPs have been shown to possess immune modulatory and anti-inflammatory activities. We are developing non-peptidic mimics of HDPs, capturing the structural and biological properties of HDPs within a framework of smaller fully synthetic oligomers. The lead compound, PMX30063, is in Phase 2 clinical trials for iv treatment of systemic staphylococcal infections. Recently, we observed that HDP mimics attenuate anti-inflammatory pathways and reasoned that these activities could be leveraged into a mucositis intervention. Methods: In an acute radiation hamster model, PMX30063 was applied as a topical rinse, 3 times daily at 1, 3 or 10 mg/ml over a 28 day treatment regimen ( n = 10), following a single radiation dose to the buccal cheek pouch (40 Gy). In a fractionated radiation model, radiation (7.5 Gy/dose) was administered on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9, targeting the left buccal pouch mucosa. PMX30063 was given topically 3 times daily at 3 mg/ml over a 35 day regimen beginning on day 0 (n = 10). OM was scored using an established blinded method. Results: In the acute model, PMX30063 reduced the number of animal days with ulceration from 43% in vehicle-treated hamsters to < 5% in all 3 PMX30063 dose groups (χ2 test; p2 test; p

9024 Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a significant toxicity of ICT in LAHNC. AG013, a mouth rinse composed of a recombinant Lactococcus lactis (sAGX0085) engineered to secrete human Trefoil Factor 1 (hTFF1) and deficient in the gene encoding thymidylate synthase, was investigated in patients receiving ICT (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil +/-docetaxel:PF+/-T). TFFs have wound-healing properties and are protective of mucosal tissues. Methods: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK profile and efficacy of AG013 in attenuating ICT-associated OM, 52 patients (pts) with newly diagnosed LAHNC receiving ICT (24TPF, 1PF) were screened in ICT cycle (Cy) 1 for symptomatic OM (SOM). 25 pts who developed SOM in Cy1 were enrolled into 3 successive groups of at least 7 pts each in the active phase and randomly assigned at the Baseline visit (d1 of ICT Cy2) in a 5:2 ratio to receive AG013 or placebo during ICT Cy2. Dose was escalated in successive groups from 1 x/day (qd) to 3 x/day (tid) and to 6 x/day, resulting in doses of 2 x 1011, 6 x 1011, and 1.2 x 1012 colony-forming units (CFU)/day respectively. Pts were assessed daily from Cy 2 d1 to d14 for OM using WHO criteria. Safety endpoints and PK (mucosal, salivary and blood samples) were assessed. Results: AG013-sAGX0085 could not be detected in blood. Recovered oral live bacterial levels were high immediately after dosing, decreased by 90 minutes post dose, and undetectable at study end. No differences in hTFF1 serum levels were seen. Pts in the placebo group had ulcerative OM (UOM) on nearly 60% of the days vs. 35-40% days in the AG013 group. 29 % pts who received AG013 had 0 or 1 day of UOM vs. at least 2 days of UOM in the placebo group. Pts who received AG013 on any dosing schedule had a lower % of days with OM, fewer unplanned office and emergency room visits compared to pts who received placebo. No differences were noted in mouth and throat soreness, opioid use, or gastrostomy tube placement. Conclusions: Topical administration of AG013 appears safe, well tolerated and effective in reducing the severity and course of OM in patients receiving ICT for HNC.

5591 Background: Gamma-D-glutamyl-L-tryptophan (SCV-07) is being studied for attenuation of oral mucositis (OM) in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiation therapy. In a pilot study S...