Search

Purpose To report the long-term results of the Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 91-11 study evaluating the contribution of chemotherapy added to radiation therapy (RT) for larynx preservation. Patients and Methods Patients with stage III or IV glottic or supraglottic squamous cell cancer were randomly assigned to induction cisplatin/fluorouracil (PF) followed by RT (control arm), concomitant cisplatin/RT, or RT alone. The composite end point of laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was the primary end point. Results Five hundred twenty patients were analyzed. Median follow-up for surviving patients is 10.8 years. Both chemotherapy regimens significantly improved LFS compared with RT alone (induction chemotherapy v RT alone: hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.95; P = .02; concomitant chemotherapy v RT alone: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; P = .03). Overall survival did not differ significantly, although there was a possibility of worse outcome with concomitant relative to induction chemotherapy (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.61; P = .08). Concomitant cisplatin/RT significantly improved the larynx preservation rate over induction PF followed by RT (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.89; P = .0050) and over RT alone (P < .001), whereas induction PF followed by RT was not better than treatment with RT alone (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.82; P = .35). No difference in late effects was detected, but deaths not attributed to larynx cancer or treatment were higher with concomitant chemotherapy (30.8% v 20.8% with induction chemotherapy and 16.9% with RT alone). Conclusion These 10-year results show that induction PF followed by RT and concomitant cisplatin/RT show similar efficacy for the composite end point of LFS. Locoregional control and larynx preservation were significantly improved with concomitant cisplatin/RT compared with the induction arm or RT alone. New strategies that improve organ preservation and function with less morbidity are needed.

Purpose This study evaluated whether males without partners were disadvantaged for survival in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) head and neck cancer clinical trials. Methods Patients treated on three RTOG trials were studied. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine if sex and the interaction between sex and marital/partner status were independent prognostic variables for overall survival controlling for Karnofsky performance status, tumor stage, nodal stage, primary site, and protocol treatment. Results A total of 1,901 patients (1,509 men) were entered onto the three RTOG trials, with 1,822 (1,438 men) analyzable patients. Prognostic variables independent of disease-related variables for survival in multivariate analyses restricted to men were age, marital/partner status, and income. Conclusion The apparent disadvantage of unpartnered men is striking, even after controlling for disease and other demographic variables. Possible explanations could easily be tested in observational studies, leading to evaluation of simple interventions to improve their outcome.

Purpose: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Protocol 92–02 was a randomized trial testing long-term (LT) adjuvant androgen deprivation (AD) after initial AD with external-beam radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PC; T2c-4) and with prostate-specific antigen level less than 150 ng/mL. Patients and Methods: Patients received a total of 4 months of goserelin and flutamide, 2 months before and 2 months during RT. A radiation dose of 65 to 70 Gy was given to the prostate and a dose of 44 to 50 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes. Patients were randomly assigned to receive no additional therapy (short-term [ST]AD-RT) or 24 months of goserelin (LTAD-RT); 1,554 patients were entered onto the study. Results: The LTAD-RT arm showed significant improvement in all efficacy end points except overall survival (OS; 80.0% v 78.5% at 5 years, P = .73), compared with the STAD-RT arm. In a subset of patients not part of the original study design, with tumors assigned Gleason scores of 8 to 10 by the contributing institutions, the LTAD-RT arm had significantly better OS (81.0% v 70.7%, P = .044). There was a small but significant increase in the frequency of late radiation grades 3, 4, and 5 gastrointestinal toxicity ascribed to the LTAD-RT arm (2.6% v 1.2% at 5 years, P = .037), the cause of which is not clear. Conclusion: The RTOG 92–02 trial supports the addition of LT adjuvant AD to STAD with RT for T2c-4 PC. In the exploratory subset analysis of patients with Gleason scores 8 to 10, LT adjuvant AD resulted in a survival advantage.

PURPOSE Definitive chemoradiation (CR) has replaced radical surgery as the preferred treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. To determine the importance of mitomycin (MMC) in the standard CR regimen and to assess the role of salvage CR in patients who have residual tumor following CR, a phase III randomized trial was undertaken by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between August 1988 and December 1991, 310 patients were randomized to receive either radiotherapy (RT) and fluorouracil (5-FU) or radiotherapy, 5-FU, and MMC. Of 291 assessable patients, 145 received 45 to 50.4 Gy of pelvic RT plus 5-FU at 1,000 mg/m2/d for 4 days, and 146 received RT, 5-FU, and MMC (10 mg/m2 per dose for two doses). Patients with residual tumor on posttreatment biopsy were treated with a salvage regimen that consisted of additional pelvic RT (9 Gy), 5-FU, and cisplatin (100 mg/m2). RESULTS Posttreatment biopsies were positive in 15% of patients in the 5-FU arm versus 7.7% in the MMC arm (P = .135). At 4 years, colostomy rates were lower (9% v 22%; P = .002), colostomy-free survival higher (71% v 59%; P = .014), and disease-free survival higher (73% v 51%; P = .0003) in the MMC arm. A significant difference in overall survival has not been observed at 4 years. Toxicity was greater in the MMC arm (23% v 7% grade 4 and 5 toxicity; P < or = .001). Of 24 assessable patients who underwent salvage CR, 12 (50%) were rendered disease-free. CONCLUSION Despite greater toxicity, the use of MMC in a definitive CR regimen for anal cancer is justified, particularly in patients with large primary tumors. Salvage CR should be attempted in patients with residual disease following definitive CR before resorting to radical surgery.

A phase Ilate/II trial of hyperfractionated (HFX) radiation therapy for non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCCL) was conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) between 1983 and 1987. Fractions of 1.2 Gy were administered twice daily with greater than or equal to 4 hours between fractions. Patients were randomized to receive minimum total doses of 60.0, 64.8, and 69.6 Gy. After acceptable risks of acute and late effects were found, 74.4 Gy and 79.2 Gy arms were added, and the lowest total dose arms were closed. No significant differences in the risks of acute or late effects in normal tissues were found among the 848 patients analyzed in the five arms; risks of severe or life-threatening pneumonitis were 2.6% for 60.0 to 64.8 Gy, 5.7% for 69.6 to 74.4 Gy, and 8.1% for 79.2 Gy. Among 350 patients who had the same criteria as Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocol 84-33 (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging [AJCCS], 1984, stage III; Karnofsky performance status [KPS] 70 to 100; less than 6% weight loss), there was a dose response for survival: survival with 69.6 Gy (median, 13.0 months; 2 years, 29%) was significantly (P = .02) better than the lower total doses. There were no differences in survival among the three highest total-dose arms. Comparisons with results in similar patients treated with 60 Gy in 30 fractions of 2.0 Gy 5 days per week for 6 weeks suggest benefit from HFX radiation therapy with 69.6 Gy. Improvement in survival with HFX radiation therapy at 69.6 Gy total dose without increase in normal tissue effects, justifies phase III comparison with standard fractionation alone and combined with systemic chemotherapy in this common presentation of NSCCL.

10533 Background: Despite the known efficacy of imatinib mesylate (IM) in metastatic GIST, both primary and secondary drug resistance remain a clinical problem. Therefore, future management of GIST may benefit from further molecular characterization associated with IM treatment. Methods: A recently completed prospective phase II trial of neoadjuvant/adjuvant IM treatment for advanced primary and recurrent operable GISTs included gene expression profiling using oligonucleotide microarrays on tumor samples obtained before and after neoadjuvant IM therapy for 8 to 12 weeks. Fifty-two analyzable patients were classified according to changes in tumor size after IM based on CT scan measurements. A response was defined as >25% tumor reduction. Gene profiling data were then evaluated with SAM analysis (FDR = 10%) to identify differentially expressed genes (in pre-treatment GIST samples). In addition, a custom siRNA library was designed targeting these genes and a mid-throughput siRNA synthetic lethal screening approach was used to evaluate the ability of each to sensitize GIST cells to IM. Results: Thirty-eight genes were expressed at significantly lower levels in the pre-treatment samples of tumors that rapidly responded to IM. Eighteen of these genes encoded KRAB domain containing zinc finger (KRAB-ZNF) transcriptional repressors. Importantly, ten KRAB-ZNF genes mapped to a single locus on chromosome 19p, and a subset of these predicted likely response to IM-based therapy in a naïve panel of GISTs. Further evaluation revealed that modifying in vitroexpression of genes via RNAi approaches within this predictive response signature enhanced the sensitivity of GIST cells to IM. Conclusions: Using clinical samples from a prospective neoadjuvant/adjuvant phase II trial we have identified a genetic signature which includes KRAB-ZNF 91 subfamily members that may be both predictive of and functionally associated with likely rapid response to short-term IM treatment and which may provide a prognostic biomarker identifying patients who will benefit from it. [Table: see text]

6035 Background: The gold standard endpoint in randomized trials of HNSCC is OS. Our objective was to study if event-free survival (EFS) or loco-regional control (LRC) could be good surrogate endpoints to estimate the effect of radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) on OS. This would permit to decrease the duration and cost of the development of new treatments for HNSCC. Methods: EFS is the time from randomization to first event (loco-regional, distant recurrence or death), LRC the time from randomization to first loco-regional event. Individual patient data from two meta-analyses (MARCH; Bourhis, Lancet 2006, MACH-NC; Bourhis, ASCO 2004) were used. At the individual level, the rank correlation coefficient ρ between the surrogate endpoint (EFS or LRC) and OS was estimated from the bivariate distribution of these endpoints. At the trial level, the correlation coefficient R between treatment effects (estimated by log hazard ratios) on the surrogate endpoint and OS was estimated from a linear regression. EFS and LRC would be acceptable surrogates only if the correlation coefficients ρ and R were close to 1. Results: At the individual level, EFS was more strongly correlated with OS than LRC. For RT, treatment effects on both LRC and EFS were strongly correlated with those on OS. For CT, the correlation coefficients between treatment effects on EFS and OS were larger than those between LRC and OS. Conclusions: The preliminary analysis indicates that EFS can be used as a surrogate for OS to evaluate the treatment effect in randomized trials of patients with HNSCC. LRC is a possible alternative in RT alone trials. Unrestricted grants from ARC, LNCC, PHRC, Sanofi-Aventis. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

5517 Background: The 2-year results of Intergroup RTOG 91–11 were published in 2003 (NEJM 349:2091–8,2003). We now present the 5-year results (after median follow-up for surviving patients of 6.9 years) of 515 eligible pts with resectable stage III or IV (excluding T1 and high volume T4), cancer of the glottic or supraglottic larynx. Methods: Patients were randomized to induction cisplatin/5-FU (CF) with responders then receiving RT (I+RT) (n = 173); or concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 q 21 days × 3) and RT (CRT) (n = 171); or RT alone (R) (n = 171). Laryngectomy was performed for < partial response to induction CF, for persistent/recurrent disease or for laryngeal dysfunction. Results: At 5 years, laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (44.6%, p = 0.011) or CRT (46.6%, p = 0.011) compared to R (33.9%). There was no difference in LFS between I+RT and CRT (p = 0.98). Laryngeal preservation (LP) was significantly better with CRT (83.6%) compared to I+RT (70.5%, p = 0.0029) or R (65.7%, p = 0.00017). Local-regional control (LRC) was significantly better with CRT (68.8%) compared to I+RT (54.9%, p = 0.0018) or R (51%, p = 0.0005). I+RT compared to R for LP and LRC showed no significant difference (p = 0.37 and 0.62, respectively). The distant metastatic rate was low (I+RT 14.3%, CRT 13.2%, R 22.3%) with a trend (p ∼0.06) for benefit from chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (38.6%, p = 0.016) or CRT (39%, p = 0.0058) compared to R (27.3%). Overall survival rates were similar for the first 5 years (I+RT 59.2%, CRT 54.6%, R 53.5%); thereafter I+RT had a non-significant lower death rate. Compared to CRT, significantly more pts in the R group died of their cancer (34% vs 58.3%, p = 0.0007); the rate for I+RT was 43.8%. Conclusion: These 5-year results differ from the 2-year analysis by a significant improvement in LFS now seen for both I+RT and CRT treatments compared to R. For the endpoints of LP and LRC, CRT is still the superior treatment with no advantage seen to the addition of induction CF to R. There is no significant difference in overall survival. [Table: see text]

6026 Background: There is currently no method for concisely summarizing and comparing aggregate adverse event (AE) data among treatment options. We propose a new concept (“toxicity burden”) and new...

5527 Background: We conducted a comparison of overall survival (OS) and local-regional tumor control (LC) outcomes in patients with stage IV-T4 disease originating from the oral cavity, oropharynx or hypopharynx among 4 RTOG H/N trials using RT +/- chemotherapy. Methods: The four compared RTOG trials and their treatment regimens were as follows: 1. RTOG 8117–standard fractionated (SFX) RT [66 –73.8 Gy] & 3 cycles of concurrent IV P (100 mg/m2); 2. RTOG 9003 –SFX RT (70 Gy in 7 weeks) alone [Arm 1], & accelerated fractionated (fx) RT with concomitant boost (AFX-C) [72 Gy in 42 fxs over 6 weeks] [Arm 4]; 3. RTOG 9703–concurrent SFX RT (70 Gy/7 weeks in arms 1 and 3, and q other week over 13 weeks in arm 2] with IV daily P (10 mg/m2) / 5-FU (400 mg/m2 d/ CI last 2 wks of RT) [Arm 1], q other week of IV 5-FU (800 mg/m2/d x 5 days) / Hydroxyurea (1 gm po bid x 6 days) [Arm 2], or weekly IV P (20 mg/m2) / Taxol (30 mg/m2) [Arm 3]; & 4. RTOG 9615 –intra-arterial (IA) weekly P (100 mg/m2) x 4 weeks with SFX RT (7...

6043 Background: The specific aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of socio-demographic factors on local-regional (LR) control and survival of patients treated on RTOG head and neck cancer clinical trials. Methods:Patients treated on RTOG 9003, RTOG 9111 and RTOG 9703 were utilized. The model was stratified by protocol and a step-up procedure using a 0.05 significance level was initially used to build the model. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine if any tumor or socio-demographic variables (age, gender, race, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), T-stage, N-stage, marital status, number of persons in household, education level, household income prior to cancer diagnosis, and tobacco use) are independent prognostic variables for LR control and/or survival. Results:A total of 1901 patients were entered onto the 3 RTOG trials of which 1822 were analyzable. Fifty-nine percent of the analyzable patients were from 9003, 28% from 9111 and 13% from 9703. In multivariate analyses T a...

A total of 589 patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma were randomized to receive daily oral melphalan, pulse-dose intravenous (IV) melphalan, carmustine (BCNU), or lomustine (CCNU). All patients received an initial tapering course of prednisone (Pred). During week 22 (day 154), patients were randomized to receive or not to receive additional therapy with vincristine (VCR) (1 mg/m2) and prednisone (0.6 mg/kg/d for seven days) at 8-week intervals. The influence of VCR/Pred was determined in 302 patients who remained on study beyond 22 weeks after initial therapy. VCR/Pred converted a significant percentage of nonresponders to responders in patients treated with melphalan (55% v 19%, P = .002), but not in patients treated with a nitrosourea (48% v 23%, P = .06). Survival beyond week 22 was significantly longer following the addition of VCR/Pred in patients receiving melphalan (median, 35.3 months v 27.0 months; P = .003) but not in patients receiving BCNU or CCNU (median, 28.1 months v 26.2 months; P = .91). These differences were seen both for oral and IV melphalan. A trend for beneficial effect of VCR/Pred was definitely seen in the good-risk patients (P = .03) but only suggestive for poor-risk patients (P = .12). Following adjustment for VCR/Pred effects, there were no differences in the survival of patients receiving any of the four initial treatments.