Search

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been considered as the treatment of choice for patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (HR-CLL; ie, refractory to purine analogs, short response [<24 months] to che-moimmunotherapy, and/or presence of del[17p]/TP53mutations). Currently, treatment algorithms for HR-CLL are being challenged by the introduction of novel classes of drugs. Among them, BCR signal inhibitors (BCRi) and B-cell lymphoma 2 antagonists (BCL2a) appear particularly promising. As a result of the growing body of favorable outcome data reported for BCRi/BCL2a, uncertainty is emerging on how to advise patients with HR-CLL about indication for and timing of HSCT. This article provides an overview of currently available evidence and theoretical considerations to guide this difficult decision process. Until the risks and benefits of different treatment strategies are settled, all patients with HR-CLL should be considered for treatment with BCRi/BCL2a. For patients who respond to these agents, there are 2 treatment possibilities: (1) performing an HSCT or (2) continuing treatment with the novel drug. Individual disease-specific and transplant-related risk factors, along with patient's preferences, should be taken into account when recommending one of these treatments over the other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The CLL3 trial was designed to study intensive treatment including autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) as part of first-line therapy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Here, we present the long-term outcome of the trial with particular focus on the impact of genomic risk factors, and we provide a retrospective comparison with patients from the fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) arm of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) CLL8 trial. After a median observation time of 8.7 years (0.3- 12.3 years), median progression-free survival (PFS), time to retreatment, and overall survival (OS) of 169 évaluable patients, including 38 patients who did not proceed to autoSCT, was 5.7, 7.3, and 11.3 years, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly reduced in the presence of 17p- and of an unfavorable immunoglobulin heavy variable chain mutational status, but not of 11q-. Five-year nonrelapse mortality was 6.5%. When 110 CLL3 patients were compared with 126 matched patients from the FCR arm of the CLL8 trial, 4-year time to retreatment (75% vs 77%) and OS (86% vs 90%) was similar despite a significant benefit for autoSCT in terms of PFS. In summary, early treatment intensification including autoSCT can provide very effective disease control in poor-risk CLL, although its clinical benefit in the FCR era remains uncertain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) have a poor prognosis with conventional chemotherapy. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients with BPDCN who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT). A total of 39 patients (allo-SCT, n = 34; auto-SCT, n - 5) were identified in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. The 34 allo-SCT patients had a median age of 41 years (range, 10-70) and received transplantations from sibling (n = 11) or unrelated donors (n = 23) between 2003 and 2009. MAC was used in 74% of patients. Nineteen allo-SCT patients (56%) received transplantations in first complete remission. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse, disease-free survival, and overall survival was 32%, 33%, and 41%, respectively. By univariate comparison, being in first remission at allo-SCT favorably influenced survival, whereas age, donor source, and chronic GVHD had no significant impact. We conclude that high-dose therapy followed by allo-SCT from related or unrelated donors can provide durable remission even in elderly patients with BPDCN. However, it remains to be shown if graft-versus-malignancy effects can contribute significantly to BPDCN control after allo-SCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and can be readily controlled by systemic high-dose steroids in many patients. However, patients whose GVHD is refractory to this therapy have a poor prognosis. Refractory patients have ongoing end-organ damage despite effective immunosuppression with second-line regimens, suggesting pathomechanisms independent from the initiating T-cell attack. To explore whether endothelial damage might contribute to GVHD refractoriness and to study the role of angiopoietin-2 (ANG2) in this process, we have compared kinetics of T-cell activation markers and markers of endothelial dysfunction in the serum of patients with sensitive (n = 23) and refractory GVHD (n = 25). Longitudinal measurements of soluble FAS ligand along with other immune markers demonstrate that refractory patients are not exposed to an overwhelming or unresponsive T-cell attack. However, in contrast to sensitive GVHD, refractory GVHD was associated with rising thrombomodulin levels and high ANG2/ vascular endothelial-derived growth factor ratios. Patients with refractory GVHD showed significantly increased ANG2 levels already before SCT. These results suggest that endothelial cell vulnerability and dysfunction, rather than refractory T-cell activity, drives treatment refractoriness of GVHD and opens new avenues for prediction and control of this devastating condition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]