Search

Over the past decades outcomes of clinical hematopoietic stem cell transplants have established a clear relationship between the sources of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) infused and their differential homing and engraftment properties. For a long time, bone marrow (BM) harvest has been the preferred source of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) for hematopoietic reconstitution following myeloablative conditioning regimen. At present, mobilized peripheral blood (PB) is commonly used for hematopoietic cells transplantation in both adults and children, particularly in the autologous setting, and it has progressively replaced BM as the source of HSCs.HSCs are maintained in their niche by binding to cellular determinants through adhesion molecules and diverse strategies are currently used to promote their egress from BM to PB. Traditionally, the growth factor granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) represents the gold standard agent to mobilize HSPCs for transplantation. Nevertheless, other compounds have been recently tested. One of the most successful mobilizing agents is Plerixafor (AMD3100, Mozobil™), a bicyclam molecule that selectively and reversibly antagonizes the binding of stromal cell derived factor-1 (SDF-1), located on the surface of BM stromal cells and osteoclasts, to chemokine CXC-receptor-4 (CXCR4), located on the surface of HSPCs, with the subsequent mobilization in the blood. The use of this drug is currently approved by FDA and EMA in combination with G-CSF, in patients affected by lymphoma or multiple myeloma whose cells mobilize poorly with G-CSF alone. Clinical trials demonstrated that Plerixafor alone safely and rapidly mobilizes HSCs also in healthy donors, beta-thalassemia patients and pediatric patients affected by malignancies. Previous characterization studies on non-human primates and human samples of Plerixafor mobilized cells in comparison to cells mobilized by G-CSF alone or in combination with Plerixafor showed a different expression profile, cell composition and engrafting potential in a xenotransplant model. From these studies remains unsolved whether Plerixafor, G-CSF, or their combination mobilizes different primitive HSC populations, defined both by multimarker immunophenotype and in vivo functional analysis. In the present study we investigated by controlled comparative analysis the functional and molecular hallmarks of human HSCs collected from BM, G-CSF and/or Plerixafor mobilized peripheral blood. We show that Plerixafor alone mobilizes preferentially long-term hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs), defined as CD34+CD38/lowCD90+CD45RA-CD49f+ cells and primitive populations of HSCs. These cells possess higher ability to home to hematopoietic niches and engraft in NOD/SCID/IL2rγnull (NSG) mice, resulting in enriched scid-repopulating cell frequency, in comparison to other sources. The higher content of CXCR4+ and CD49f+ cells correlates with this feature. Furthermore, global gene expression profiling highlights the superior in vivo reconstitution activity of Plerixafor mobilized cells. The "stemness" signature of cells dislodged from their niche by the drug is attenuated by the combined use with G-CSF, which emphasizes the gene expression profile induced by G-CSF treatment. These data indicate that a qualitative advantage accounts for the superior performance of Plerixafor mobilized cells. These findings provide the rationale for using a suboptimal dose of more primitive HSCs when target cell number for transplantation is limited, or when G-CSF mobilization is too risky like in sickle cell anemia patients. Moreover, CD34+ cells mobilized by Plerixafor alone or with the combination of G-CSF are efficiently transduced by a lentiviral vector encoding for human ß-globin gene (GLOBE LV) and are able to engraft and differentiate in vivo, supporting their use for gene therapy applications. Disclosures Ciceri: MolMed SpA: Consultancy.

Abstract 586 Gene therapy of inherited blood diseases requires harvest of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from patients and autologous transplantation of genetically modified cells. In order to achieve correction of the disease, high number of HSCs and previous conditioning of the host bone marrow (BM) are necessary. In the clinical application of gene therapy for thalassemic patients the choice of the HSC source is a crucial issue. On one side, the minimal target dose poses a challenge for the use of steady state BM since reinfusion of high numbers of beta globin gene modified CD34+ cells is probably necessary to gain sufficient correction of the genetic defect in order to achieve transfusion independency; on the other side, the disease related features and complications of thalassemic patients (i.e. splenomegaly and thrombophilia) dictate caution in the use of G-CSF as mobilizing agent. In April 2011 a clinical protocol exploring the use of Plerixafor (AMD3100) as single agent was started (“Plerixafor mobilized stem cells as source for gene therapy of beta-thalassemia”, acronym AMD-THAL, EudraCT2011-000973-30). Aims of the trial were to explore the ability of Plerixafor in inducing safe and effective stem cells mobilization in adult patients affected by beta-thalassemia, to characterize stem/progenitor cells mobilized from the BM and peripheral blood of treated subjects and to achieve gene transfer efficiency of mobilized CD34+ cells at a level comparable to that obtained using steady state BM. Four patients (01, 02, 03 and 04) were enrolled and already mobilized to date (August 2012). All patients are affected by transfusion dependent beta-thalassemia and aged 28 (01), 41 (02), 39 (03), 33 (04). Two are splenectomized (02 and 03); all subjects are regularly iron chelated with adequate organ function. Administration of Plerixafor subcutaneously as single agent and at the single dose of 0.24 mg/kg resulted in mobilization of CD34+ cells/mcl with a peak of 78 cells at 9 hrs (01), 70 cells at 7 hrs (02) and 69 cells at 8 hrs (03); suboptimal mobilization was observed in patient 04 (peak 18 at 8 hrs). Patient 03 received a second dose at 0.40 mg/kg 24 hrs after the first dose and underwent a second leucoapheretic procedure. Harvest by leukoapharesis resulted in procurement of the following CD34+ cells/kg: 1.84 × 106 (01) and 4.43 × 106 (02) with a unique leukoapheretic procedure, and 3.57 × 106 (03) with two leukoapheresis. No apheresis was performed for patient 04 because the minimum target of 20 CD34+ cells/mcl in peripheral blood was not reached. CD34+ cells selection through Clinimacs Miltenyi resulted in the following yield: 1.2 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg, 65% recovery (01), 2.66 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg, 60% recovery (02), 1.78 × 106 CD34+ cells/Kg, 50% recovery (03). No severe adverse event occurred. Recorded side effects were: grade 3 hypotension related to the apheretic procedure (01), mild grade 1 facial disestesia (02 and 04) and hyperleukocytosis (02: WBC from 13.6 to 42.6 × 103/mcl). In addition, steady state and Plerixafor primed BM aspirates were performed to analyze any modification in CD34+ concentration in the BM following Plerixafor administration. In fact, Plerixafor administration resulted in enrichment of CD34+ cells concentration in the BM. Purified CD34+ cells from leukoapheresis of the 4 treated patients were analyzed for their biological and functional properties, subpopulations composition and expression profile. In vivo reconstitution potential and lymphomyeloid differentiation of CD34+ cells were tested following transplantation in NSG mice. Experiments are ongoing but preliminary results indicate that cells mobilized by Plerixafor have a primitive phenotype with a high reconstitution potential and are efficiently transduced with a lentiviral based vector, named GLOBE, encoding for the human beta-globin (Roselli et al., 2010), thus being a suitable source of target cells for gene therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 4438 BACKGROUND: Graft Failure (GF) occurs in 5–27% of patients (pts) after allogeneic hamatopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality related to infections and hemorrhagic events. Graft function may be poor as result of graft rejection, primary disease relapse or Poor Graft Function (PGF). The incomplete recovery of blood counts is defined primary PGF and the decreasing blood counts after successful engraftment secondary PGF. Several factors may determine GF: disease risk and status, conditioning regimen, HSC source, HLA compatibility, T cell content, immunosuppression, GvHD, viral infections, drugs. GCSF and Rhu-EPO are readily available and effective in PGF but with no effects on platelets. Second transplantation from the same donor, with or without conditioning therapy, can boost the haematopoietic recovery in pts with GF. Unfortunately, both a second peripheral CD34+ mononuclear cells (MNC) mobilization and a marrow harvest in the operating room may be contraindicated early after the first donation as not safe for donors. Intrabone SCT can overcome the risk of graft failure even with a low number of CD34+ MNC, as it has been demonstrated in cord blood transplant. Here we investigate in three adult pts with GF a bone-to-bone boost (BBB) with a small marrow harvest from respective donors, unfit for a second conventional donation. AIM: to evaluate the feasibility of the BBB technique in 3 pts with graft failure. METHODS: pts were 2 males (57, 53 y) with PGF with a diagnosis of AML and CMML, respectively, and a female (44 y) with graft rejection and AML relapse. In the first two patients prolonged pancytopenia and hypoplastic marrow were documented, with diagnosis of primary PGF and secondary PGF, respectively, donor chimerism ranging from 80–100% (STR and HLA), without evidence of leukemia. In the third patient, after prolonged pancytopenia an AML relapse was documented with 89% blasts on bone marrow aspirate. In PGF patients no conditioning regimen was administered before the boost at day 30 and 72 after SCT, respectively. In the patient with AML relapse Melphalan 200 mg/mq was given 48 h before the infusion, at day 35 after SCT. The 3 donors were related, haploidentical. For the BBB procedure small quantities of bone marrow (< 200ml) were collected from the posterior iliac crest bilaterally of the donors, at the bedside, during deep sedation and analgesya. Shortly after the unmanipulated marrow harvested was infused in superior-posterior iliac crest mono- or bilaterally, depending on the volume, during deep sedation and analgesya. In pt 1 Mononucleated cell (MNC) dose was 0.9 × 10^8/Kg for a volume of 166 ml. In pt 2 MNC dose was 0.4 × 10^8/Kg for a volume of 88 ml. In pt 3 MNC dose was 0.3 × 10^8/Kg for a volume of 140 ml. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In this cases the BBB technique proved feasible and safe for both the donor and the patient. Patient 1 received a second PBSC boost, without conditioning, 3 months after the BBB, and he's now alive, in CR, 13 months after the first transplant. Patient 2 died 3 months after the first transplant for pneumonia and sepsis. Patient 3 is alive, in CR, 4 months after the first HSCT. This practice can give the chance of HSC boost to patients with GF without the need of a GCSF mobilization for donors, with a minimal invasive operation. This can give the option to overcome and resolve infectious and hemorrhagic complications, bridging patients to further therapies and procedures. The intra-bone SCT may be a facilitating tool for microenvironment reconstitution, seeding and subsequent differentiation and may as well have a tolerogenic effect, through the mesenchymal stromal cells infused with the harvest. Further studies are necessary to assess the efficacy of this procedure. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.