Search

Objective: To test the null hypothesis that premolar autotransplantation is not successful for orthodontic patients. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 28 premolar transplants from 24 orthodontic patients were associated with orthodontic treatment. At a routine 3-month appointment, patients underwent a dental radiograph and a chair-side observation for periodontal problems. Three sets of dental radiographs were taken by one dental assistant using a custom holder at: preoperation (T0), 2 year postoperation (T1), and retention (T2) (4- to 14-year follow-up observation) stages. All transplants were conducted in a one-phase operation by one operator (Dr Inoue). Recipient sites were: ten for missing maxillary canines, nine for maxillary centrals and laterals, eight for lower second premolar, and five for other missing premolar sites. All recipients maintained the retained primary tooth with a socket. Results: The success ratio of all 28 transplants was 100%, although four transplants shorter than a 4-year period of observation were omitted. Two transplant patients, one with a medical history of histiocytosis and the other with a history of osteomyelitis of the maxilla without a recipient socket, were also excluded from this study. Eleven of 22 premolar transplants had a root canal treatment (RCT), four of which had RCT within 2 years after the operation. Conclusions: The null hypothesis was rejected. The success ratio of premolar transplants was 100%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines cephalometric differences and sex differences in the long-term outcome of chin cup treatments of Class III subjects with two facial patterns. Seventeen nondolichofacial and 16 dolichofacial Class Ill male patients and 16 nondolichofacial and 16 dolichofacial female patients were treated by either bicuspid extraction or nonextraction. Rapid palatal expansion without maxillary protraction was performed on 11 male cases and 15 female cases. The borderline between the two groups was drawn either at 39° mandibular plane angle or 132° (male subjects) or 130° (female subjects) gonial angle. Dolichofacial subjects were treated with either an occipital or a high-pull chin cup force during the first two years, followed by high-pull force during night-time wear for the subsequent three years. All treated cases showed excellent results in the retention records with acceptable posterior occlusion as well as excellent skeletal and soft-tissue profiles. In addition, patient compliance was excellent. The treatment outcomes of the two groups showed significant improvement of the skeletal Class III malocclusion. This study indicated that the treatment period and wear time of the chin cup appliance in nondolichofacial (mostly mesiofacial pattern) patients could be shorter than those of dolichofacial patients. Although all subjects showed significant improvement in the Class III malocclusion, the treatment outcome in the two groups maintained the original characteristic skeletal morphology at retention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]