Search

Context.— Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has historically been considered to be an aggressive subtype of prostate cancer. Objective.— To investigate if PDA is independently associated with worse biochemical recurrence (BCR)–free survival after radical prostatectomy. Design.— A review of 1584 radical prostatectomies was performed to grade, stage, and assess margin status in each tumor nodule. Radical prostatectomies with localized PDA (ie, those lacking metastasis) in the tumor nodule with the highest grade and stage and worst margin status were matched with prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma according to grade, stage, and margin status. The effect of PDA on BCR was assessed by multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results.— Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma was present in 171 cases. We excluded 24 cases because of lymph node metastasis (n = 13), PDA not in the highest-grade tumor nodule (n = 9), and positive surgical margin in a lower-grade tumor nodule (n = 2). The remaining 147 cases included 26 Grade Group (GG) 2, 44 GG3, 6 GG4, and 71 GG5 cancers. Seventy-six cases had extraprostatic extension, 33 had seminal vesicle invasion, and 65 had positive margins. Follow-up was available for 113 PDA and 109 prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma cases. Prostate-specific antigen density (odds ratio, 3.7; P = .001), cancer grade (odds ratio, 3.3–4.3; P = .02), positive surgical margin (odds ratio, 1.7; P = .02), and tumor volume (odds ratio, 1.3; P = .02) were associated with BCR in multivariable analysis. Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma, its percentage, intraductal carcinoma, and cribriform Gleason pattern 4 were not significant independent predictors of BCR. Conclusions.— Advanced locoregional stage, higher tumor grade, and positive surgical margin status rather than the mere presence of PDA are more predictive of worse BCR-free survival outcomes following radical prostatectomy in men with a component of PDA.

Context.— Pseudocarcinomatous urothelial hyperplasia (PCUH) architecturally and cytologically mimics cancer. The urine cytology features of PCUH have not been described. Objective.— To describe PCUH features in urine cytology. Design.— We reviewed urine cytology cases with concurrent PCUH tissue specimens from 5 academic institutions and classified them by using The Paris System criteria. Results.— Thirty-nine patients included 31 men and 8 women with a mean age of 67 years (range, 39–87 years). All patients had prior pelvic irradiation, and most presented with hematuria (n = 27). The specimens included voided urine (n = 16); bladder washing (n = 11); and urine, not otherwise specified (n = 12). The specimen preparation included cytospin (n = 29) and ThinPrep (n = 10). Original interpretations were negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (n = 28), atypical urothelial cells (AUCs; n = 10), and high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC; n = 1). Twenty-five urine specimens (64%) had findings of PCUH. These specimens were moderately cellular and composed of sheets, cohesive groups, or isolated urothelial cells. Nucleoli were present in 23 cases. The nuclear membrane was smooth to irregular (n = 9), smooth (n = 8), and irregular (n = 8). The chromatin was glassy (n = 8), vesicular (n = 7), hyperchromatic (n = 7), and vesicular to finely granular (n = 3). The cytoplasm varied from dense squamoid, to finely vacuolated, to vacuolated. Nucleomegaly was observed in all 25 specimens, and nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio greater than 0.5 was seen in 11 of 25 cases (44%). The background contained acute inflammation (n = 14), was clean (n = 9), and contained red blood cells (n = 2). All cases originally interpreted as AUCs and HGUC had PCUH features. Conclusions.— PCUH urine features can overlap with AUCs, HGUC, and other nonurothelial malignancies. In our cohort, 44% (11 of 25) of urine specimens with PCUH changes were initially misclassified. Recognition of cytologic features of PCUH is important to avoid overcalling reactive changes.

Since 1966, when Donald Gleason, MD, first proposed grading prostate cancer based on its histologic architecture, there have been numerous changes in clinical and pathologic practices relating to prostate cancer. Patterns 1 and 2, comprising more than 30% of cases in the original publications by Gleason, are no longer reported on biopsy and are rarely diagnosed on radical prostatectomy. Many of these cases may even have been mimickers of prostate cancer that were described later with the use of contemporary immunohistochemistry. The original Gleason system predated many newly described variants of prostate cancer and our current concept of intraductal carcinoma. Gleason also did not describe how to report prostate cancer on biopsy with multiple cores of cancer or on radical prostatectomy with separate tumor nodules. To address these issues, the International Society of Urological Pathology first made revisions to the grading system in 2005, and subsequently in 2014. Additionally, a new grading system composed of Grade Groups 1 to 5 that was first developed in 2013 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and subsequently validated in a large multi-institutional and multimodal study was presented at the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology meeting and accepted both by participating pathologists as well as urologists, oncologists, and radiation therapists. In the present study, we describe updates to the grading of prostate cancer along with the new grading system.