Search

Your search keyword '"Cintas, Celia"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Author "Cintas, Celia" Publisher arxiv
4 results on '"Cintas, Celia"'

1. FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare

Author

Lekadir, Karim, Feragen, Aasa, Fofanah, Abdul Joseph, Frangi, Alejandro F, Buyx, Alena, Emelie, Anais, Lara, Andrea, Porras, Antonio R, Chan, An-Wen, Navarro, Arcadi, Glocker, Ben, Botwe, Benard O, Khanal, Bishesh, Beger, Brigit, Wu, Carol C, Cintas, Celia, Langlotz, Curtis P, Rueckert, Daniel, Mzurikwao, Deogratias, Fotiadis, Dimitrios I, Zhussupov, Doszhan, Ferrante, Enzo, Meijering, Erik, Weicken, Eva, González, Fabio A, Asselbergs, Folkert W, Prior, Fred, Krestin, Gabriel P, Collins, Gary, Tegenaw, Geletaw S, Kaissis, Georgios, Misuraca, Gianluca, Tsakou, Gianna, Dwivedi, Girish, Kondylakis, Haridimos, Jayakody, Harsha, Woodruf, Henry C, Aerts, Hugo JWL, Walsh, Ian, Chouvarda, Ioanna, Buvat, Irène, Rekik, Islem, Duncan, James, Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree, Zahir, Jihad, Park, Jinah, Mongan, John, Gichoya, Judy W, Schnabel, Julia A, Kushibar, Kaisar, Riklund, Katrine, Mori, Kensaku, Marias, Kostas, Amugongo, Lameck M, Fromont, Lauren A, Maier-Hein, Lena, Alberich, Leonor Cerdá, Rittner, Leticia, Phiri, Lighton, Marrakchi-Kacem, Linda, Donoso-Bach, Lluís, Martí-Bonmatí, Luis, Cardoso, M Jorge, Bobowicz, Maciej, Shabani, Mahsa, Tsiknakis, Manolis, Zuluaga, Maria A, Bielikova, Maria, Fritzsche, Marie-Christine, Linguraru, Marius George, Wenzel, Markus, Bruijne, Marleen De, Tolsgaard, Martin G, Ghassemi, Marzyeh, Ashrafuzzaman, Md, Goisauf, Melanie, Yaqub, Mohammad, Ammar, Mohammed, Abadía, Mónica Cano, Mahmoud, Mukhtar M E, Elattar, Mustafa, Rieke, Nicola, Papanikolaou, Nikolaos, Lazrak, Noussair, Díaz, Oliver, Salvado, Olivier, Pujol, Oriol, Sall, Ousmane, Guevara, Pamela, Gordebeke, Peter, Lambin, Philippe, Brown, Pieta, Abolmaesumi, Purang, Dou, Qi, Lu, Qinghua, Osuala, Richard, Nakasi, Rose, Zhou, S Kevin, Napel, Sandy, Colantonio, Sara, Albarqouni, Shadi, Joshi, Smriti, Carter, Stacy, Klein, Stefan, Petersen, Steffen E, Aussó, Susanna, Awate, Suyash, Raviv, Tammy Riklin, Cook, Tessa, Mutsvangwa, Tinashe E M, Rogers, Wendy A, Niessen, Wiro J, Puig-Bosch, Xènia, Zeng, Yi, Mohammed, Yunusa G, Aquino, Yves Saint James, Salahuddin, Zohaib, Starmans, Martijn P A, Lekadir, Karim, Feragen, Aasa, Fofanah, Abdul Joseph, Frangi, Alejandro F, Buyx, Alena, Emelie, Anais, Lara, Andrea, Porras, Antonio R, Chan, An-Wen, Navarro, Arcadi, Glocker, Ben, Botwe, Benard O, Khanal, Bishesh, Beger, Brigit, Wu, Carol C, Cintas, Celia, Langlotz, Curtis P, Rueckert, Daniel, Mzurikwao, Deogratias, Fotiadis, Dimitrios I, Zhussupov, Doszhan, Ferrante, Enzo, Meijering, Erik, Weicken, Eva, González, Fabio A, Asselbergs, Folkert W, Prior, Fred, Krestin, Gabriel P, Collins, Gary, Tegenaw, Geletaw S, Kaissis, Georgios, Misuraca, Gianluca, Tsakou, Gianna, Dwivedi, Girish, Kondylakis, Haridimos, Jayakody, Harsha, Woodruf, Henry C, Aerts, Hugo JWL, Walsh, Ian, Chouvarda, Ioanna, Buvat, Irène, Rekik, Islem, Duncan, James, Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree, Zahir, Jihad, Park, Jinah, Mongan, John, Gichoya, Judy W, Schnabel, Julia A, Kushibar, Kaisar, Riklund, Katrine, Mori, Kensaku, Marias, Kostas, Amugongo, Lameck M, Fromont, Lauren A, Maier-Hein, Lena, Alberich, Leonor Cerdá, Rittner, Leticia, Phiri, Lighton, Marrakchi-Kacem, Linda, Donoso-Bach, Lluís, Martí-Bonmatí, Luis, Cardoso, M Jorge, Bobowicz, Maciej, Shabani, Mahsa, Tsiknakis, Manolis, Zuluaga, Maria A, Bielikova, Maria, Fritzsche, Marie-Christine, Linguraru, Marius George, Wenzel, Markus, Bruijne, Marleen De, Tolsgaard, Martin G, Ghassemi, Marzyeh, Ashrafuzzaman, Md, Goisauf, Melanie, Yaqub, Mohammad, Ammar, Mohammed, Abadía, Mónica Cano, Mahmoud, Mukhtar M E, Elattar, Mustafa, Rieke, Nicola, Papanikolaou, Nikolaos, Lazrak, Noussair, Díaz, Oliver, Salvado, Olivier, Pujol, Oriol, Sall, Ousmane, Guevara, Pamela, Gordebeke, Peter, Lambin, Philippe, Brown, Pieta, Abolmaesumi, Purang, Dou, Qi, Lu, Qinghua, Osuala, Richard, Nakasi, Rose, Zhou, S Kevin, Napel, Sandy, Colantonio, Sara, Albarqouni, Shadi, Joshi, Smriti, Carter, Stacy, Klein, Stefan, Petersen, Steffen E, Aussó, Susanna, Awate, Suyash, Raviv, Tammy Riklin, Cook, Tessa, Mutsvangwa, Tinashe E M, Rogers, Wendy A, Niessen, Wiro J, Puig-Bosch, Xènia, Zeng, Yi, Mohammed, Yunusa G, Aquino, Yves Saint James, Salahuddin, Zohaib, and Starmans, Martijn P A

Abstract

Despite major advances in artificial intelligence (AI) for medicine and healthcare, the deployment and adoption of AI technologies remain limited in real-world clinical practice. In recent years, concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI. To increase real world adoption, it is essential that medical AI tools are trusted and accepted by patients, clinicians, health organisations and authorities. This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare. The FUTURE-AI consortium was founded in 2021 and currently comprises 118 inter-disciplinary experts from 51 countries representing all continents, including AI scientists, clinicians, ethicists, and social scientists. Over a two-year period, the consortium defined guiding principles and best practices for trustworthy AI through an iterative process comprising an in-depth literature review, a modified Delphi survey, and online consensus meetings. The FUTURE-AI framework was established based on 6 guiding principles for trustworthy AI in healthcare, i.e. Fairness, Universality, Traceability, Usability, Robustness and Explainability. Through consensus, a set of 28 best practices were defined, addressing technical, clinical, legal and socio-ethical dimensions. The recommendations cover the entire lifecycle of medical AI, from design, development and validation to regulation, deployment, and monitoring. FUTURE-AI is a risk-informed, assumption-free guideline which provides a structured approach for constructing medical AI tools that will be trusted, deployed and adopted in real-world practice. Researchers are encouraged to take the recommendations into account in proof-of-concept stages to facilitate future translation towards clinical practice of medical AI.

Published
2023

2. Domain-agnostic and Multi-level Evaluation of Generative Models

Author

Tadesse, Girmaw Abebe, Born, Jannis, Cintas, Celia, Ogallo, William, Zubarev, Dmitry, Manica, Matteo, and Weldemariam, Komminist

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Abstract

While the capabilities of generative models heavily improved in different domains (images, text, graphs, molecules, etc.), their evaluation metrics largely remain based on simplified quantities or manual inspection with limited practicality. To this end, we propose a framework for Multi-level Performance Evaluation of Generative mOdels (MPEGO), which could be employed across different domains. MPEGO aims to quantify generation performance hierarchically, starting from a sub-feature-based low-level evaluation to a global features-based high-level evaluation. MPEGO offers great customizability as the employed features are entirely user-driven and can thus be highly domain/problem-specific while being arbitrarily complex (e.g., outcomes of experimental procedures). We validate MPEGO using multiple generative models across several datasets from the material discovery domain. An ablation study is conducted to study the plausibility of intermediate steps in MPEGO. Results demonstrate that MPEGO provides a flexible, user-driven, and multi-level evaluation framework, with practical insights on the generation quality. The framework, source code, and experiments will be available at https://github.com/GT4SD/mpego.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Analyzing Bias in Sensitive Personal Information Used to Train Financial Models

Author

Bryant, Reginald, Cintas, Celia, Wambugu, Isaac, Kinai, Andrew, and Weldemariam, Komminist

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Computer Science - Databases, Databases (cs.DB), Cryptography and Security (cs.CR), Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Abstract

Bias in data can have unintended consequences that propagate to the design, development, and deployment of machine learning models. In the financial services sector, this can result in discrimination from certain financial instruments and services. At the same time, data privacy is of paramount importance, and recent data breaches have seen reputational damage for large institutions. Presented in this paper is a trusted model-lifecycle management platform that attempts to ensure consumer data protection, anonymization, and fairness. Specifically, we examine how datasets can be reproduced using deep learning techniques to effectively retain important statistical features in datasets whilst simultaneously protecting data privacy and enabling safe and secure sharing of sensitive personal information beyond the current state-of-practice., Comment: 5 pages, 4 figures, IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP 2019)

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Estimating Skin Tone and Effects on Classification Performance in Dermatology Datasets

Author

Kinyanjui, Newton M., Odonga, Timothy, Cintas, Celia, Codella, Noel C. F., Panda, Rameswar, Sattigeri, Prasanna, and Varshney, Kush R.

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computers and Society, integumentary system, Statistics - Machine Learning, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computers and Society (cs.CY), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Abstract

Recent advances in computer vision and deep learning have led to breakthroughs in the development of automated skin image analysis. In particular, skin cancer classification models have achieved performance higher than trained expert dermatologists. However, no attempt has been made to evaluate the consistency in performance of machine learning models across populations with varying skin tones. In this paper, we present an approach to estimate skin tone in benchmark skin disease datasets, and investigate whether model performance is dependent on this measure. Specifically, we use individual typology angle (ITA) to approximate skin tone in dermatology datasets. We look at the distribution of ITA values to better understand skin color representation in two benchmark datasets: 1) the ISIC 2018 Challenge dataset, a collection of dermoscopic images of skin lesions for the detection of skin cancer, and 2) the SD-198 dataset, a collection of clinical images capturing a wide variety of skin diseases. To estimate ITA, we first develop segmentation models to isolate non-diseased areas of skin. We find that the majority of the data in the the two datasets have ITA values between 34.5{\deg} and 48{\deg}, which are associated with lighter skin, and is consistent with under-representation of darker skinned populations in these datasets. We also find no measurable correlation between performance of machine learning model and ITA values, though more comprehensive data is needed for further validation., Comment: NeurIPS 2019 Workshop on Fair ML for Health

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results