1. Stellar masses from the CANDELS survey: the GOODS-South and UDS fields
- Author
-
Paola Santini, Dale D. Kocevski, Anton M. Koekemoer, Stijn Wuyts, Tomas Dahlen, Andrea Grazian, M. E. Dickinson, Bahram Mobasher, Benjamin J. Weiner, Michael C. Cooper, Ricardo Amorín, Guillermo Barro, Peter Kurczynski, Adriano Fontana, K. Boutsia, Nimish P. Hathi, Sang-Gak Lee, E. Merlin, Steve Finkelstein, Tommy Wiklind, Yicheng Guo, Li-Ting Hsu, Alice Mortlock, Marco Castellano, Audrey Galametz, C. J. Conselice, D. Paris, Jeffrey A. Newman, Henry C. Ferguson, Bomee Lee, Janine Pforr, Raymond C. Simons, L. Pentericci, Mauro Giavalisco, Mara Salvato, Steven P. Willner, Norman A. Grogin, Omar Almaini, INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma (OAR), Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Space Telescope Science Institute (STSci), Institute of cosmology and gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE), Excellence Cluster Universe, excellence cluster centre, Onsala Space Observatory, Chalmers University of Technology [Göteborg], Steward observatory, University of Arizona, Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, Department of Astronomy [Amherst], University of Massachusetts [Amherst] (UMass Amherst), University of Massachusetts System (UMASS)-University of Massachusetts System (UMASS), INGENIERIE (INGENIERIE), Institut de recherches sur la catalyse et l'environnement de Lyon (IRCELYON), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC), Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA), and Smithsonian Institution-Harvard University [Cambridge]
- Subjects
Physics ,COSMIC cancer database ,Stellar mass ,Star formation ,FOS: Physical sciences ,Astronomy and Astrophysics ,Astrophysics ,Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics ,stellar content [galaxies] ,Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies ,Galaxy ,Spectral line ,Redshift ,Photometry (optics) ,surveys ,Space and Planetary Science ,Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA) ,fundamental parameters [galaxies] ,Astrophysics::Solar and Stellar Astrophysics ,Stellar isochrone ,Astrophysics::Earth and Planetary Astrophysics ,[PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph] ,catalogs ,high-redshift [galaxies] ,Astrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics - Abstract
We present the public release of the stellar mass catalogs for the GOODS-S and UDS fields obtained using some of the deepest near-IR images available, achieved as part of the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey (CANDELS) project. We combine the effort from ten different teams, who computed the stellar masses using the same photometry and the same redshifts. Each team adopted their preferred fitting code, assumptions, priors, and parameter grid. The combination of results using the same underlying stellar isochrones reduces the systematics associated with the fitting code and other choices. Thanks to the availability of different estimates, we can test the effect of some specific parameters and assumptions on the stellar mass estimate. The choice of the stellar isochrone library turns out to have the largest effect on the galaxy stellar mass estimates, resulting in the largest distributions around the median value (with a semi interquartile range larger than 0.1 dex). On the other hand, for most galaxies, the stellar mass estimates are relatively insensitive to the different parameterizations of the star formation history. The inclusion of nebular emission in the model spectra does not have a significant impact for the majority of galaxies (less than a factor of 2 for ~80% of the sample). Nevertheless, the stellar mass for the subsample of young galaxies (age < 100 Myr), especially in particular redshift ranges (e.g., 2.2 < z < 2.4, 3.2 < z < 3.6, and 5.5 < z < 6.5), can be seriously overestimated (by up to a factor of 10 for < 20 Myr sources) if nebular contribution is ignored., Accepted for publication by ApJ. Replaced to match the final version (two tables and one figure added in the appendix)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF